In second-century Roman Britain, a young centurion named Marcus is discharged from the military due to an injury. Unsure of what to do with his life now that his career as a soldier is abruptly over, he makes an unexpected connection with an enslaved British gladiator named Esca. The two men, both of whose lives have not gone the way they wanted or expected, quickly bond, and decide to undertake a dangerous journey beyond Hadrian's Wall to search for answers about what really happened to Marcus's father, who disappeared there along with his entire Legion years before.
This is marketed as a children's novel, which I guess in the 1950s just meant that the violence is not graphic and there's no mention of sexuality. The characters are adults with adult concerns, motivations, and relationships. The prose is straightforward but not simplistic, and is quite vivid and evocative in places. Sutcliff has the gift of choosing particular sensory details to make the atmosphere of a place and time come alive, and she knows how to let her historical research serve the story rather than take it over.
The thing about this book is that it has the structure of an adventure story, but it is really a love story between Marcus and Esca. You don't need to read into it, it's just written that way. When their eyes first meet, suddenly it's like nobody else is there. Marcus can't stop thinking about Esca and feels compelled to buy him from his enslaver. Esca has a chance to escape, but instead sticks around because he has a feeling—a hope!—that it was Marcus who bought him. Marcus gives Esca his freedom, but Esca stays with him because they get each other in a way that transcends their differences in culture and position. They love each other at first sight, and in the course of this adventure in which everything else about their world falls away and they only have each other to rely on for survival, that love deepens, and that's what the book is about.
I guess it doesn't have to be romantic love. If anything, Marcus reads as aro-ace to me, even when he's interacting with his alleged female love interest, whom he seems to genuinely like as a person but does not appear to be attracted to in any other way. I suppose the intended reading is that Marcus and Esca are sort of platonic soul mates, but make that queerplatonic soul mates and you get a lot closer to how it actually reads. The ending only underlines this more strongly, and really makes you wonder if it's even possible that Sutcliff never considered that it would read this way.
But I don't think any of this diminishes what a good read the book is, no matter how you interpret the central relationship. My only real complaint is that Marcus has a pet wolf (given to him by Esca, of course) but the wolf isn't in the book as much as I wanted him to be. I do understand the literary symbolism of the wolf. I just wanted more wolf!
This is marketed as a children's novel, which I guess in the 1950s just meant that the violence is not graphic and there's no mention of sexuality. The characters are adults with adult concerns, motivations, and relationships. The prose is straightforward but not simplistic, and is quite vivid and evocative in places. Sutcliff has the gift of choosing particular sensory details to make the atmosphere of a place and time come alive, and she knows how to let her historical research serve the story rather than take it over.
The thing about this book is that it has the structure of an adventure story, but it is really a love story between Marcus and Esca. You don't need to read into it, it's just written that way. When their eyes first meet, suddenly it's like nobody else is there. Marcus can't stop thinking about Esca and feels compelled to buy him from his enslaver. Esca has a chance to escape, but instead sticks around because he has a feeling—a hope!—that it was Marcus who bought him. Marcus gives Esca his freedom, but Esca stays with him because they get each other in a way that transcends their differences in culture and position. They love each other at first sight, and in the course of this adventure in which everything else about their world falls away and they only have each other to rely on for survival, that love deepens, and that's what the book is about.
I guess it doesn't have to be romantic love. If anything, Marcus reads as aro-ace to me, even when he's interacting with his alleged female love interest, whom he seems to genuinely like as a person but does not appear to be attracted to in any other way. I suppose the intended reading is that Marcus and Esca are sort of platonic soul mates, but make that queerplatonic soul mates and you get a lot closer to how it actually reads. The ending
spoiler
(in which Marcus and Esca move in together with Marcus's love interest and the three of them live happily ever after in, presumably, a poly triad of some sort)But I don't think any of this diminishes what a good read the book is, no matter how you interpret the central relationship. My only real complaint is that Marcus has a pet wolf (given to him by Esca, of course) but the wolf isn't in the book as much as I wanted him to be. I do understand the literary symbolism of the wolf. I just wanted more wolf!
no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 03:41 pm (UTC)really makes you wonder if it's even possible that Sutcliff never considered that it read this way.
I would give SO much to take a peek inside Sutcliff's head. I also wonder about whether she was completely oblivious to how very queer her books are. Though my main question is, as
Also agreed that there should have been more of the wolf!
no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 04:22 pm (UTC)A good question! I think the almost total lack of awareness of women and their lives did not bother me as much as it might have in another book, because it seemed congruent with Marcus's POV as a guy whose cultural milieu and personal concerns are very male-focused, and who is only just starting to ask questions about how things might look different to people who are not like him. In-universe, I would like to think that Marcus's realizations about how the British perspective is different from the Roman might eventually lead to also thinking about how women's perspective is different from men's. But Doylistically, yeah, I dunno!
no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 04:50 pm (UTC)Although I have to ask--why did she make Cottia a love interest instead of just leaving her relationship platonic? Was it to off-set the queerness of the Marcus/Esca relationship?
no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 04:47 pm (UTC)(And it helps that Cottia is actually a good character herself, and isn't treated as an obstacle in any way. Poly triad FTW!)
no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2023 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 Mar 2023 06:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 Mar 2023 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 Mar 2023 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Mar 2023 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Mar 2023 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Mar 2023 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 Mar 2023 12:35 pm (UTC)I do have a question -- what was the literary symbolism of the wolf?
no subject
Date: 25 Mar 2023 01:43 pm (UTC)It seemed to me that Marcus's relationship with the wolf paralleled his relationship with Esca. Cub is a wild animal, and in Marcus's culture Esca is considered a barbarian who comes from an uncivilized world, but they're still able to bond. This seemed most clear in the chapter where Marcus gives Cub a chance to return to the wild, hoping he'll come back but wanting to give him a free choice. It's not long after that Marcus gives Esca his freedom, similarly hoping Esca will stay with him but realizing that he doesn't want it to be by force.
no subject
Date: 25 Mar 2023 06:52 pm (UTC)The movie falls on its face in the last act, but I still love it.
It was so deeply weird, then, to go to the book where they are instantly best friends forever despite one of them owning the other at the start of the relationship.
no subject
Date: 25 Mar 2023 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Mar 2023 05:39 pm (UTC)The movie was good.... they minimized the role of the female characters and really focused on the two men and their journey.
no subject
Date: 26 Mar 2023 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 30 Mar 2023 07:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 30 Mar 2023 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 Apr 2023 12:26 am (UTC)The question of Cottia is a strange one indeed. When I first read The Eagle of the Ninth, in fact, I actually didn't even parse her as being the designated love interest, because of the way Marcus's interest in her was so little signalled as being attraction. I do love her as a character though, and am fascinated by any of the possible configurations of relationship that might happen between the three characters after canon!
no subject
Date: 20 Apr 2023 02:16 pm (UTC)I was aware of there being an upsurge in fannish activity after the movie, which I think is when I got the book. Then it sat on my shelf for a decade or so. /o\ I am really trying to be better about reading books I own.