pauraque: Belle reads to sheep (belle reading)
This sequel to The Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi picks up the story with kinda-ex-pirate Amina and her crew on a quest to track down a dangerous magical artifact for the peris (air spirits) with whom Amina struck a bargain in the first book. This time it's a spindle that can alter the threads of fate, said to be in the hands of a witch on an island in the Persian Gulf shrouded by supernatural seas, where ships run aground no matter how skilled the sailors are, and nobody ever comes back.

I loved the first book in this series so I was eagerly awaiting the sequel, and it didn't disappoint. It's another seafaring adventure, this time with a slightly darker tone. It's less episodic than the first book, mostly dealing with this island and the mystery of the witch, her origins, and the suspiciously idyllic society she's created around her with the descendants of shipwrecked sailors who are all so very happy here... but can't actually leave. It's also less of an ensemble piece, with most of Amina's crew sidelined for much of the story. Instead it focuses more tightly on Amina's complicated friendship with the prickly alchemist Dalila, who's only pretending to be seduced into the witch's inner circle so she can steal the spindle... right? There's also more development of Amina's relationship with her semi-estranged husband, who is not only a self-involved jerk and annoyingly hot, but also a literal chaos demon.

With all of these relationships, I really like how the bonds of magic intertwine with bonds of emotion. It's not just, oh, this magical effect is a metaphor for how the character is tempted into something that's not good for them. It's that magic is happening and mundane interpersonal and emotional stuff is also happening, and it feels really cohesive and convincing to me.

I did think there was a bit of a structural hiccup towards the end where the reader learns the truth of what's going on too early, making it feel like it takes too long for Amina to figure it out. But that's a minor issue in a book I otherwise totally enjoyed. I had to tear through it at breakneck speed because I couldn't renew it from the library (someone else was waiting) and that was not a hardship for me at all!
pauraque: bird flying over the trans flag (trans pride)
In this steampunk alt-history novel, a group of Fabian Socialists and African-American missionaries become founders of a new nation in central Africa in the late 19th century. With a boost from talented inventors and new technologies (some plausible but a bit early, like airships, and some fanciful, like clockwork cyborg limbs) they're able to challenge oppressive Belgian rule in the region. This alters the course of history in a sprawling, decades-long narrative of international intrigue, featuring a huge cast of characters in a complex web of love and hate.

So, you know when a TV show gets canceled but they still have a few episodes left, or maybe they get a movie, and the writers do a speed-run of all the remaining unresolved plot threads, basically hitting the highlights, and you have to mentally fill in all the other stuff that would have happened if they'd been able to take their time? That's what reading this book is like. Shawl had enough ideas here to fill a series of six or seven books if they'd taken it at a leisurely pace, but instead it's all packed into 400 pages.

I'm not sure I'm exactly complaining, though? I don't think I'm quite the right audience for the material as presented (way too much romance and breakup drama, not enough speculative tech, disappointingly little followup on one character's intriguing steam engine kink) so if there were six or seven books, I doubt I would have read them all. A relatively quick overview of how it all plays out was enough to satisfy me. But on the other hand, if I'd been deeply invested and wanted to sink my teeth into every detail of the plot and the interpersonal stuff, I probably would have been disappointed, so I guess I'm not sure who the ideal reader for this is.

I have read a few of Shawl's short stories, and I'm starting to get the impression that they are not a writer who likes to go into intricate detail about things. I do think they have it all in their head, but it reads to me like they're more invested in writing the exciting, intense highlights than the in-between explainy parts. Which, honestly, I can relate to—I can find that stuff a slog to write, too! But even if it is in your head, it's not in the reader's head until you put it there.

There actually is a sequel, which at a peek sounds like it steers away from steampunk and leans more fantasy, which isn't necessarily what I would have expected (thought there are some magical elements here too). Either way, my interest level is probably closer to "read a detailed synopsis" than "actually read the book."
pauraque: butterfly trailing a rainbow through the sky from the Reading Rainbow TV show opening (butterfly in the sky)
I am back! I haven't really had a chance to catch up here yet, but here's my vacation read, for starters.

This stand-alone fantasy novel has a classic plot: A young soldier-prince hurries back from the front to inherit rulership from his dying father, only to find when he arrives at the capital that his uncle has usurped the throne. What makes the book stand out are the vivid characters and immersive worldbuilding—features that did not surprise me, having read and loved Leckie's science fiction for much the same reasons.

In the world of the book there are beings called gods, but their powers are subject to the laws of nature. They have to be careful what they try to will into existence, because if it requires too much energy or creates a paradox it can hurt or kill them, and if they don't understand the underlying principles of how something works they may not be able to do it at all. The gods have their own goals and internal politics, which humans often don't understand. I really liked how the consequences were worked out, with a mix of human beliefs about the gods—some accurate, some overcomplicated or oversimplified, and some fanciful wishful thinking. Even when it is actually possible to speak to the gods, some people will still only hear what they want to hear.

On the human side of the story, the themes struck me as thoroughly Shakespearean. The prince versus the conniving uncle, certainly, and more generally the impact of fatal character flaws and the focus on emotionally intimate relationships shaped by tricky power dynamics. The focal human character is not the prince Mawat, but his loyal retainer Eolo, a farmer's son turned soldier whose steadiness and observational skills are a balance to Mawat, who is smart but often lets his temper overrule his logic. When Mawat is being irrational, other characters beg Eolo to step in because Mawat will listen to him—except he doesn't always, and there is only so much Eolo can do within the bounds of hierarchy.

Eolo is also a trans man, which is a lens through which we learn a lot about how this world deals with people who fall outside social norms. I loved how this was handled. Different places have different attitudes toward queer people, and it's not a one-to-one mapping to real life views or a didactic take where the more queer-friendly folk are perfect "good guys". (None of the book's cultures are all good or all bad. They all have systemic problems and both admirable and ill-intentioned people in them.) Eolo's experiences and self-perceptions are grounded in the world he lives in. He's not an out-of-place transplant from our own world or an excuse to lecture to the reader. On the contrary, the book assumes the reader is savvy enough to pick up on nuanced points about gender and trans experiences without having them spelled out, and it's so refreshing.

The narrative is from the perspective of a god who uses second person to refer to Eolo as it observes his actions. This could be a barrier for some readers who are put off by long stretches of second person, but I found it very appropriate and not a distraction.

I would love it if Leckie wrote more novels in this world. I think she has some stories set in it, but I haven't gotten around to reading her short story collection yet.
pauraque: butterfly trailing a rainbow through the sky from the Reading Rainbow TV show opening (butterfly in the sky)
In 17th century West Africa, an immortal woman named Anyanwu encounters another immortal for the first time, a man named Doro. But while Anyanwu is a healer who uses her powers to help others, Doro is a brutal manipulator who has been gathering people with paranormal powers and attempting to breed a race of superhumans under his iron fist. Anyanwu is the only other immortal he has ever found, and he intends to use her as "breeding stock" to make more. The novel follows centuries of their power struggle after Doro takes Anyanwu to the New World, as she strives to protect those under Doro's control and he strives to bend her to his will.

This is the chronologically earliest novel in Butler's Patternist series, though it was the fourth to be published. I was assured by leading experts (i.e. book club friends) that this is a perfectly good entry point to the series, so I started here and do not actually know yet what happens next!

It's the kind of book where it's hard to sit down and think of what to write about it, because it has so many layers that are worth thinking about and talking about, and they're all woven together so tightly and effectively that I'm not sure where to start pulling threads to unravel everything the book does. Butler had a gift for writing stories that resonate deeply with real situations without being simplistic, didactic one-to-one mappings. The speculative narrative and the real world historical setting illuminate each other in complex ways, and all the while Butler never loses sight of the characters as people with their own specific hurts, flaws, and needs. She makes it look so easy.

spoilery thoughtsThe obvious comparison is to her stand-alone novel Kindred, published just the previous year, which had a contemporary Black American woman time-traveling to the era of slavery. Anyanwu also travels from a life of freedom to the New World under slavery. Against this backdrop, Doro acts as a master over "his people" in the eugenics program—and he definitely uses the phrase to indicate ownership, not kinship. His program isn't legal slavery, but it is inextricably entwined with it; sometimes Doro buys enslaved people who have the powers he's looking for, and if they wanted to leave, how could they? Even if Doro didn't catch them, they'd only be fleeing into a land where they'd be assumed to be runaway slaves. Anyanwu's powers are a match for Doro's, so saving herself is an option, but he controls the lives of everyone she knows and cares about. What this book shares most strongly with Kindred is a devastating portrayal of how people can be trapped into compliance with systems of oppression.

The book's religious themes are also complex. Anyanwu does not pray to gods, as she feels she has all the power she needs within herself, but she does not see herself as superior to other people either. Meanwhile, Doro shamelessly plays the part of a god over his people because it serves his purposes and he can get away with it. But not a loving god. Rather he reminds me of the way people will sometimes talk about the so-called "Old Testament God": bloodthirsty and hypercontrolling, demanding absolute obedience and destroying anyone who gets in his way. In which case his favorite son Isaac plays the corresponding supposed role of Jesus: the "good cop" son who draws Anyanwu into trying to appease his father. If this is a distorted image of Christian theology, well, distortion and misuse of Christian faith are certainly a deliberate theme in the book, as Anyanwu overtly calls out Christian enslavers for their hypocrisy.

On a deeper and unspoken level, the book comments on the thought processes underlying patriarchal power structures. Doro has the power to kill and he uses it to control others without a second thought; might makes right. Anyanwu could also use her powers to kill if she chose to, but it doesn't even occur to her. Instead she heals—but everything she has goes to other people, all her nurturing and self-sacrifice. She has total control over her own body's inner workings (while Doro doesn't even have his original body anymore!), and she uses herself as a scientific test subject to learn to heal wounds and diseases, suffering pain and injury so others can recover. She always puts others first, and the rightness of this is so ingrained in the assumptions of the characters that nobody ever questions it. Even when she escapes Doro temporarily, she keeps coming back to him, in part because she can't bring herself to leave others unprotected.

The fact that Doro and Anyanwu both have male and female bodies at different points in the story made me think about how patriarchy isn't defined by anatomy, but by power dynamics. I would not describe either of them as trans characters, but there is a trans resonance with the way Anyanwu remains confident in her womanhood regardless of her physical form, and in the many ways she remains vulnerable to misogyny even when people who don't know her read her as a man.

The bond between Anyanwu and Doro is both twisted and deeply understandable. They're the only two immortals; everyone else they know grows old and dies. They're lonely. Doro wants someone like him, but he can't get that by force, much as he has been trying. Anyanwu's well of empathy seems boundless, but somehow excludes herself. Her threat of suicide makes sense as it's the only way she can escape the cycle of returning to him again and again—she can't trust herself not to keep going back as long as she is like him. And the only way she can be unlike him, as she sees it, is to sacrifice her immortality and die.

The book's protagonist is a healer, and I think one of the book's core questions is who deserves healing, and who is too far gone to ever be healed. Doro tries to punish Anyanwu by forcing her to bear a child by Thomas, an uncontrolled psychic who is so deep in addiction and depression that he has become physically repellent. To Doro's surprise, Anyanwu responds with empathy (her greatest superpower, I think) and begins to heal Thomas's physical and mental wounds. Doro's reaction—to murder Thomas and possess his body—is the moment when he tells on himself the most. He intends to show power and cruelty, and he does, but he also reveals himself as a desperately isolated person who yearns to be healed, to be transformed from something repulsive into someone loveable. The book has the courage to leave it less than settled how possible that really is for him.

So, I guess I'll be continuing this series! I have been warned that not all of the books in it are this good. I'm sure I will cope somehow.
pauraque: drawing of a wolf reading a book with a coffee cup (customer service wolf)
This is the fourth and final part of my book club notes on A Thousand Beginnings and Endings. [Part one, part two, part three.]

I missed this meeting because I was totally exhausted and doubted my ability to form words. I did read the stories, though!


"Daughter of the Sun" by Shevta Thakrar

This love story had a lot going on and I didn't understand it well enough to summarize it. )


"The Crimson Cloak" by Cindy Pon

A dawn goddess falls in love with a human. )


"Eyes Like Candlelight" by Julie Kagawa

A kitsune falls in love with a human. )


"Carp, Calculus, and the Leap of Faith" by Ellen Oh

[Note: This story is included only in the paperback edition, not the hardcover or the ebook.]

A girl whose mom is pressuring her to become a doctor gets support from her dad. )


the end

There were some really cool stories in here and I'm glad we read them. Not everything was to my taste, but the quality of writing was high. It was great to explore folklore outside of Western traditions and see the connections and contrasts.

The group will continue with As the Earth Dreams: Black Canadian Speculative Stories, which is a title that might be relevant to the interests of a few of you here! It's a brand new collection that just came out this year and I'm really looking forward to it.
pauraque: butterfly trailing a rainbow through the sky from the Reading Rainbow TV show opening (butterfly in the sky)
This is part three of my book club notes on A Thousand Beginnings and Endings. [Part one, part two.]

Something I learned in this meeting that I did not previously realize is that a number of the authors in the collection are best known for YA. This does explain why it was shelved under YA in the library, which I have to admit I did not see as significant given that I also had to visit the YA section to find Dracula (because their copy is part of a series of "classic canon" repubs marketed to teens). I had noticed that some of the entries certainly are YA, which I don't consider a bad thing in itself, but in this batch of stories we did experience a disconnect between the marketed-to audience and ourselves.


"Nothing Into All" by Renée Ahdieh

An embittered brother and a doormat sister run across goblins that can turn anything into gold. )


"Spear Carrier" by Naomi Kanakia

[Note: This book was published before Kanakia came out as trans, so it lists this story under her former name Rahul Kanakia.]

A look at the Mahabharata from the POV of one of the five million soldiers in the climactic battle. )


"Code of Honor" by Melissa de la Cruz

A Filipina vampire seeks belonging in New York City. )


"Bullet, Butterfly" by Elsie Chapman

In a war-torn country, a boy disguises himself as a girl to infiltrate a munitions factory. )
pauraque: bird flying over the trans flag (trans pride)
Note: Emezi is nonbinary and started using they/them pronouns after this book was published, so earlier reviews may misgender them, as does the jacket bio.

This autobiographical novel follows Ada, a young Nigerian who is inhabited by multiple spirits. In Igbo the word for this is ọgbanje, which seems to sometimes refer to the spirits and sometimes the host (or maybe trying to distinguish the two is a failure of cultural literacy on my part). From birth, Ada knows she's different, and sometimes living with the spirits is a struggle. At other times they're a source of comfort and protection as she deals with unsettled family relationships, a move to an entirely new culture in the US, and intimate partner abuse. A lot of the time it's both.

Like Stone Butch Blues, this book is so memoir-shaped and episodic that it's hard to parse it as a novel, but it does have novelistic prose which is quite strong and evocative, and there's a satisfying arc. The use of alternating POVs among the different spirits is effective at establishing them as their own voices with their own motivations and interiority. Ada isn't really the main character—we get the spirits' perspectives on entering her body, being born from her trauma, and making decisions about how to deal with her, long before we ever get Ada's own POV. So it's more of an ensemble piece. Conversations between Ada and the spirits take place in an internal mind palace where each entity has a physical form, which helps it feel more vividly concrete rather than an abstract dialogue among inner voices.

The book takes an eclectic perspective on spirituality and mental health. Western psych concepts of dissociative identity are fluidly interwoven with Igbo religious traditions, as well as with Christian spirituality. (Jesus is an occasional visitor to the mind palace.) This feels very honest and unafraid to hold diverse truths, which is refreshing as well as thematically resonant.

Though the character Ada goes by she/her, she does have gender stuff going on, which is presented in the context of one of the inhabiting spirits being male. It was a little startling to me to have this portrayed so frankly, because it's one of those things we talk about in the trans community but not necessarily outside it, and it made me feel a strange mix of comfortable familiarity and high anxiety. Like, yes, there are trans/nb/genderfluid people who experience their gender(s) in whole or in part as plural identity, but you're not supposed to say that in public. But when I take a breath and look past that initial reaction, of course I realize that we can't get where we need to go by sanding the rough edges off our reality in the name of not scaring the straights.

I plan to check out some of Emezi's other books. Since this one is obviously a lightly fictionalized recounting of things that really happened, I'll be interested to see what they come up with when they write outside of their specific personal experiences.

Content notes for the book include: Rape, self-injury, disordered eating, and attempted suicide.
pauraque: drawing of a wolf reading a book with a coffee cup (customer service wolf)
I picked up this book because I saw it mentioned as an example of the concept that "Hell is locked from the inside." That is, if God is the source of all good and you separate yourself from God, then your existence can have nothing good in it, and that's Hell. You can escape anytime by reconnecting with God.

Lewis explores this idea by imagining himself being taken on a journey from Hell (envisioned as a dreary, lonely, mostly-empty town in perpetual twilight) to the outskirts of Heaven. Here the "ghosts" of those in Hell are met by people they knew in life, who try to persuade them to enter Heaven instead of turning back. This is very much inspired by Dante, and like Dante, Lewis gets a guide: the Scottish fantasy author George MacDonald, who I'd never heard of, but apparently he was a great influence on Lewis. (Has anyone read his stuff?)

So, why would the dead turn back? Well, because it turns out the hard part of getting into Heaven is letting go of all the damaging patterns that made you miserable in life: Abusively controlling people and calling it love. Feeling big by making others feel small. Manipulating loved ones because you're scared they'll leave you. None of this has any place in Heaven, but most of the ghosts Lewis meets are so entrenched in it, blustering in pride or cowering in terror behind their emotional walls, that they'd rather go back to Hell than admit there's a better way.

Lewis keenly observes the lies people tell themselves to justify their own self-destructive behavior, and it's startling how little has changed in 80 years! Some of the ways these characters talk are chillingly familiar. Though I don't share the religious side of Lewis's worldview, we're certainly in close agreement in our understanding of how people lock themselves in their own personal hell on Earth.

The book is short but impactful. Lewis had a gift for viscerally expressing what his faith felt like to him, which is something I find valuable as someone who has never experienced religious faith. Part of why I read is to better understand what it's like in other people's heads, and this book did that for me.

(Oh, and I'm not being snarky by tagging this as fantasy. He calls it fantasy in the introduction! He makes it clear that he's writing imaginatively and not presuming to describe what the afterlife is actually like, because he can't know that. Well, I mean, I guess he knows now...)
pauraque: Marina Sirtis in costume as Deanna reads Women Who Love Too Much on the Enterprise bridge (st women who love too much)
This sequel to A Wizard of Earthsea follows a girl named Tenar who is believed to be the reincarnation of a high-ranking priestess. She's taken from her family at a young age and raised by a strict religious order, cloistered away from the rest of the world and taught to navigate the dark underground labyrinth where a powerful magic artifact lies hidden. When a strange wizard comes looking for the artifact and gets trapped in the maze, Tenar has to start thinking for herself for the first time in her life.

I always enjoy this book when I re-read it, but I don't have such strong feelings about it as I do about A Wizard of Earthsea. I think as a kid what I found most compelling was the labyrinth and the worldbuilding around it, this idea of a place where light is forbidden and if you miss one memorized turn you might be lost forever. But I also think some of my memories of it are mixed up with another book I read around the same time that also has someone trying to navigate a completely dark labyrinth and almost dying, which I believe was Walter Farley's The Island Stallion but I'm not completely sure. I just know there are some moments and bits of description that I always think are in Tombs but aren't. [eta: It was!]

Similarly, re-reads always remind me that a lot of what I love about Tenar is not in this book, but in Tehanu (book four). She has character growth here, but by the end she's still really young and hasn't had a lot of crucial experiences yet. This was Le Guin's first crack at writing a novel centering a female protagonist, and while it was obviously an important step in her creative development, I think in retrospect it sometimes does have a little bit of the feeling of her gripping the pencil in an awkward fist trying to Write Female Characters rather than just writing.

Reading as an adult, I especially notice that although Tenar grows up in an all-female religious order, the book still seems suspicious of women's power. Tenar is taught to wield authority with cruelty and violence. The order's eventual leader is a cynical hypocrite, and while other priestesses are sincere believers, their beliefs are revealed to be completely wrongheaded and the beings they worship are actually evil. The book doesn't explicitly state "this is what happens when you put women in charge" but it's sort of implied. We're very much not out of the "wicked as women's magic" era of Earthsea.

The scenes between Tenar and Ged are wonderful, though. He's a little older and wiser than we last saw him, but not so far away from adolescence that he can't understand Tenar's position and the burden of responsibility she bears. It's painfully apparent that Tenar has never had a friend because she's never had a peer—she doesn't know how to interact with people outside of horribly warped power dynamics. Reading as an adult, it's more clear to me that the heart of the book is in the forest after their escape, where they exist as individuals in a liminal space without authority figures or power structures. No wonder Tenar's first instinct is that she wants to stay there; it's her first time breathing freely after a life of near-suffocation. She doesn't want to go back to that, even if it's within a different power structure than the one she's known, and she's able to articulate that and take another path. As a child I don't think I was able to grasp the massive significance of that.
pauraque: Picard reads a book while vacationing on Risa (st picard reads)
This is the third and final part of my book club notes on Wandering Stars: An Anthology of Jewish Fantasy & Science Fiction. [Part 1, part 2.]


"Paradise Last" by George Alec Effinger (1974)

The totalitarian rulers of an assimilationist dystopia try to disperse the Jewish diaspora even further—to distant planets where they can't make trouble. )


"Street of Dreams, Feet of Clay" by Robert Sheckley (1968)

A man moves to a model city run by an overbearing AI. )


"Jachid and Jechidah" by Isaac Bashevis Singer (1964) [tr. the author and Elizabeth Pollet]

To those in Heaven, Earth is their Hell. )


"I'm Looking for Kadak" by Harlan Ellison (1974)

Jewish aliens search for one of their own who abandoned Judaism. )


the end

There was agreement that this anthology is very much of its time and also reflects a specific narrow slice of Jewish culture (first or second generation American, Ashkenazi, not super observant, not Orthodox...) which is not a terrible thing but it makes you wonder what more could be added when thinking about Jewish SF more broadly. Several of the stories had very similar themes and some suffered for being presented together. It was noted that the way anthologies are put together has changed a lot in the subsequent decades; now there's more of an expectation that editors will go beyond authors they personally know and cast a wider net, and in that way you can get more diverse perspectives.

The group plans to continue with The Way Spring Arrives and Other Stories, an anthology of sf/f by Chinese women and nonbinary people.
pauraque: Picard reads a book while vacationing on Risa (st picard reads)
In this sequel to Out of the Silent Planet, Dr. Ransom is dispatched to the planet Perelandra (which Earthlings know as Venus) on an unknown mission. He finds it to be a peaceful world inhabited by many friendly alien animals and two humanoids, a man and a woman. At first he doesn't know what danger he's been sent to protect the planet against, but when he encounters a malevolent being who is trying to tempt the alien woman to evil, he begins to get the idea.

The setting, first of all, is wonderful. Perelandra's colorfully surreal ecology is as vividly realized as Malacandra's was. Lewis imagines Venus as an ocean planet where rafts of living plants form soft, floating islands that bend and curve along with the waves on the water's surface. He has such a gift for writing evocatively about fanciful worlds.

While the first book was primarily about imperialism and left its Christian cosmology as implied background, here theology is at the forefront. This book assumes that the Christian God would still be God even if there were other inhabited planets, and that extraterrestrial life would be part of God's creation and plan even if human understanding of religion has not yet encountered and incorporated it. The Fall and the Incarnation were events that applied only to Earth, and other planets are shown to have their own unique interactions with God, Christ, angels, and Satan. (Yes, I have read Narnia, but I was very young and I remember basically nothing. I'm sure it would be an interesting comparison if I could make it.)

I find that a lot of attempts at Christian allegory fall flat because they're based on a shallow pop-cultural understanding, but this isn't that. These things matter to Lewis, and he is a skilled enough writer to convey what it is like to feel them deeply. He does a particularly good job of depicting a devil that is horrifyingly, revoltingly evil, not a sophisticated villains-are-cool caricature. This evil isn't fun.

I was often fascinated to watch Lewis grapple with his ideas, though at times he gets a bit stream-of-consciousness and it's more like listening to someone try to talk their way through things for the first time rather than reading a polished work that has decided exactly what to say and how to say it. Sometimes he comes up with concepts that surprised me in this context, like Ransom's realization (while conversing with angels) that anatomical sex is not fundamental to gender, but is only one possible instantiation of more abstract principles of masculinity and femininity. Which, like, I know that, but I was not really expecting C.S. Lewis circa 1943 to agree.

The book is also very conscious of presenting a place beyond Earth while the real Earth was in the grip of world war. (When Ransom is in life-threatening situations, he is reminded of soldiers back on Earth, barely more than boys, who may be facing death at the same moment he is.) I often felt that it intentionally had one foot in the fantastic and one foot in the all too real.

Based on what I've been told of That Hideous Strength, I don't think I need to read it. I did read the extensive plot synopsis on Wikipedia, which makes it sound not very interesting, frankly, so I think I'll be okay experiencing this series as a duology.
pauraque: Picard reads a book while vacationing on Risa (st picard reads)
This is the first part of my book club notes on Wandering Stars: An Anthology of Jewish Fantasy & Science Fiction. The group has grown a bit, with some new and returning members. Ten people this week, the most I've seen. There's a mix of Jews and non-Jews, with various denominations and levels of observance represented on the Jewish side. (I guess I sit near the line; my dad is Jewish, and I don't consider myself to be, but growing up my Jewish family was my only family, as my culturally Christian mom was estranged from her family of origin. Anyway!)

Right off, this is a different experience from our reading of the Dark Matter books, where no one belonged to the identity group whose works we were looking at. Here there's a lot more opportunity to discuss lived experience, a lot less uncertainty about unspoken context. And more potential for off-base interpretations to personally hurt, so I'm trying to stay conscious of that.


"On Venus, Have We Got a Rabbi!" by William Tenn (1974)

Hundreds of years in the future, a Venusian TV repairman tells a long tale that comes to center on nonhumanoid Jewish aliens. )


"The Golem" by Avram Davidson (1955)

A short, comedic piece where a golem confronts and attempts to threaten an old retired couple, who could not be less intimidated by him. )


"Unto the Fourth Generation" by Isaac Asimov (1959)

A young businessman is haunted by a family name. )


"Look, You Think You've Got Troubles" by Carol Carr (1969)

A father is distraught because his daughter married a Martian. )
pauraque: Picard reads a book while vacationing on Risa (st picard reads)
Stories of Your Life and Others (which is a title that trips me up as if there's something syntactically wrong with it, though I don't think there is) is a collection of speculative fiction, consisting of high concepts developed in an outpouring of copious and inventive detail. Most of the stories are on the long side, verging on novelette territory. The best of them are well researched and thought through to the point of near-airtightness, thoroughly exploring questions like "what if historical scientific theories had been correct?" and "what would communicating with aliens really be like?" while leaving very few holes for the reader to object "but what about—?" As soon as you start to formulate whatever your issue is with the premise, Chiang addresses it. Having read a lot of speculative short stories lately, I have become very aware of how often sf authors will just state a cool idea and not develop it. Chiang's stories are the polar opposite of that.

Some of the pieces that I found less successful were missing the human element, tipping the balance between ideas and characters too far to the idea side for my taste. Chiang also likes to write about religious themes from an atheist perspective, and while this can produce interesting results, sometimes I felt that his outsider approach lacked insight and greatly oversimplified or distorted the concepts he was exploring. But all of the stories offer a lot to chew on and are fun to think about even when they miss the mark.

My comments on the stories may contain spoilers, because they are kind of hard to talk about without going into some detail.


"Tower of Babylon" (1990)

What if the builders of the Tower of Babel really could and really did build all the way to Heaven?This was my favorite story in the collection. I felt it set an extremely high (no pun intended) standard for pushing a concept to a jaw-dropping extreme while maintaining the focus on the experience of the humans in the story. I love the literalization of ancient concepts of Earth and space, having the characters climbing for months past the sun, moon, and stars. The setting is a perfect blend of fanciful worldbuilding and internally consistent logic. (Just as I was wondering what would happen if a star hit the tower, it was brought up!)

I also found it the most effective of the pieces that explored religion and atheism. Digging through the vault of Heaven and finding yourself back on Earth in an ouroboros... a man goes looking for God and finds himself back in the realm of man. Throughout the story, loving attention is paid to human ingenuity—I especially enjoyed the historically grounded descriptions of Egyptian stonework and engineering—and that prepares you for the conclusion that these are people who never needed God. They are doing it all on their own. (Though it could also be argued that God's contribution was the motivation for them to push their mechanical and logistical skills to the limit! If they can do this, what else can they do? How might the technology they developed for the Tower be put to other uses?)


"Understand" (1991)

A man who experienced brain damage undergoes an experimental treatment and becomes hyperintelligent. This starts out as "Flowers for Algernon" and then takes a leap into Babel-17, though it reverses Babel-17's order of things—language doesn't give him superpowers, but his ever-increasing meta-self-awareness and physiomental capabilities can't be contained within ordinary languages, so he has to make his own. It touches on similar ideas of going beyond human cognition, but goes into far more detail and specifics about all the new levels on which the protagonist's brain is working, from conscious control of autonomic functions to playing 5D chess with the stock market. Nothing is handwaved, almost to the point of tiring excess.

The most interesting part of the story is when the protagonist is challenged by another test subject who has the same powers he does, but different goals—while the protagonist just wants to see how far he can develop his own mind and doesn't care about anything else, his rival wants to use his powers to make a better world. Of course there isn't really such a thing as a benevolent dictator, but at least the rival has altruistic intentions. I think what's missing here is any discussion of why the characters' motivations differ so greatly. Since we don't know what either of these people were like before they became superintelligent, it's hard to tell what the story is trying to say.

The protagonist is extremely unlikeable, which I imagine is intentional given that his increasingly repugnant self-absorption is his downfall, but it limited the story's appeal for me. I would recommend this story as offering a wealth of ideas for people who want to write about superhuman perception and cognition, but not necessarily as a pleasure read.


"Division By Zero" (1991)

A mathematician disproves the consistency of arithmetic and becomes suicidally depressed. So, this is an allegory for losing your belief in God (this is stated in the text) and I think it doesn't work, because math and God are fundamentally different in kind. Math is a way of thinking about things, and if our current understanding of math were wrong, there would be another way of thinking about things that would be closer to right. Thinking and scientific inquiry do not stop just because one framework was incorrect, even if it is a very large and longstanding framework. But if there's no God, that doesn't mean there is another version of God waiting to be discovered; it means where you thought there was something, there's nothing. These scenarios are starkly distinct and I don't see how they can be likened.

The mathematician's husband, who is a scientist, though (gasp!) an experimentalist, repeatedly makes this point, and I don't think it is successfully refuted in the text. He asks if it isn't like when they discovered quantum mechanics and had to rewrite the textbooks, and she keeps saying "no, it's not like that, it's totally different" but why? Just saying it's different doesn't prove anything. Which is funny because rigorous proof is what the story centers on, so when you try to talk about that by handwaving everything, it doesn't work.

The most successful aspect of the story is the husband's POV, where his inability to understand what his wife is going through breaks his ability to empathize with her, to the point where he can't stay in the relationship anymore. That part works.


"Story of Your Life" (1998)

A linguist learns to communicate with an alien species and finds her own way of thinking is transformed. Holy shit, it's a story about doing linguistics that wouldn't make a real linguist die of cringe!! This piece is thoroughly researched and demonstrates fieldwork techniques that are used in real life to learn undocumented languages when the linguist and the informants do not have any common language to begin with.

A lot of things about this story made me think of Daniel Everett, a field linguist who wrote a book (Don't Sleep, There Are Snakes) about his experiences working with people in the Amazon. Everett started his career hoping to translate the Bible into new languages for evangelization purposes, but found instead that the things he learned from his linguistic informants made him question his own faith and change his worldview. The protagonist of "Story of Your Life" also has her understanding of the world deeply changed by learning the aliens' ways of speaking, thinking, and writing. This is another story with a Babel-17 flavor, though it's more nuanced and plausible. The alien language doesn't give her superintelligence, but it shifts her thinking about time and causality in ways that support her humanity rather than pushing her past it. This is an outstanding example of successfully melding a high concept with emotional resonance, as her new outlook helps her find peace and closure around the loss of her daughter.

It also struck me as a good example of a man writing a believable woman, including an empathetic and non-stereotyped depiction of motherhood. It made me feel like Chiang has close female friends who he actually listens to.

I will say it is a bit of a cheat to have your character outright state that a situation reminds her of the kind of thing Borges wrote about. (Though, now that I think about it... Borges did love to namecheck his influences in the text of his stories, so maybe it is appropriate!)

Anyway, after reading this I had to go back and dig up Daniel Everett's demonstration of monolingual fieldwork with a very patient volunteer, so here it is:



"Seventy-Two Letters" (2000)

Victorian scientists co-opt Kabbalah to create golem-like automata. (cn: discussion of antisemitism and violence) This story does a great job of evoking the vibe and attitudes of Victorian science, in both its optimism and its cruelty, and of showing us things the protagonist is far too naive to grasp. As soon as we see this magitech is being used to augment reproduction, we know it's going to end in a eugenicist nightmare, but the protagonist is shocked! Shocked! He only wanted to help the poor factory workers!

More subtly, the story assumes the reader is savvy enough to recognize how knowledge and power are being stolen from the Jewish community, and how little they can do to stop it. The protagonist is surprised to find Roth tortured, broken and defeated—but this only confronts him with the concrete, bloody reality of what is already happening to Roth and his people.

I appreciated the imaginative resolution to the theory of homunculi and their infinite regress, assuming every species has a finite number of generations before it dies out. It's a clever ending to have the characters essentially inventing DNA—the "letters" that spell out our identities.

I think this is the piece that would have benefited the most from a novel-length treatment, because there is a lot here and a lot more that could be said about it.


"The Evolution of Human Science" (2000)

A future academic paper summarizes the impact of superintelligent posthumans on science. Chiang wrote this for an issue of Nature that printed fictional academic papers, and I think it shows that he was writing under a tight wordcount constraint. It's quite short and I don't think that works very well for his narrative style, which thrives on copious detail. I would have liked to see characters living in this world, not just be told about it. Is it plausible that posthumans would be doing all the science and regular humans would be reduced to trying to interpret their results? I don't know, maybe? I don't feel like there's enough here to evaluate the thought experiment.


"Hell is the Absence of God" (2001)

In a world where God, angels, Heaven, and Hell are demonstrably real, a widower wishes to follow his wife to Heaven. Though creative and internally consistent, I don't think this story offers any real insight into religion. It assumes a vaguely Christian cosmology, but it's hard to argue that it really engages with what Christianity has to say about salvation since Jesus is nowhere in the story. The story posits that God is unjust and acts at random, but does any religion actually hold this tenet? If not, isn't it just a distorted, straw man version of religion?

I feel like the authorial perspective is so intensely atheist that the story is destabilized by contradictory assumptions. The premise "what if God were real?" is nonsensical unless you are an atheist, because for theists, God is real and many do not feel that there is any lack of compelling evidence! The depiction of Hell as exactly like normal life only makes sense if you don't believe in God in the first place. I mean, yeah, if you're an atheist, of course "the absence of God" is just normal life! No kidding!

I thought the story worked the best when it talked about the way people are held up as spiritual leaders, sometimes based more on what their followers want to see in a giver of wisdom rather than the content of that person's message. As the story shows, sometimes this takes the form of ableist inspiration porn. I also liked the depiction of people staking out places where angels appear and trying to get hit with a miracle, sort of like storm-chasers.


"Liking What You See: A Documentary" (2002)

A college campus debates a rule requiring students to turn off their brains' ability to perceive facial beauty. Though the author's position on this is fairly obvious (he's for it), I think he does a reasonable job of looking at it from different perspectives and imagining various reasons why people might be against it. The unconventional format of a documentary transcript is put to good use in that way, showing us interviews with different characters.

The story tries extremely hard to separate lookism from sexism, racism, colorism, and classism; Chiang really really really wants to talk about just lookism and not those other things, frequently struggling to get free from them even within the text. But I think what he's trying to do is impossible and only underlines the inherent and complexly knotted intersections. You can talk about facial symmetry all you want, but you're still not going to get away from the fact that a lot of beauty is not culturally universal at all and that it is only one narrow facet of how people are judged by the external.

The conclusion, which presents a new kind of "deep fake" version of a speaker that makes her seem superhumanly charismatic, is startlingly prescient for 2002 and was actually a lot more interesting to me than the core premise of the story.

I also think it might have been a good idea to reverse the order of this story and the previous one, because the stakes of this one are so much lower that it feels anticlimactic through no fault of its own.


I would like to add that this post is 2500 words long and took absolutely forever. /falls over
pauraque: drawing of a wolf reading a book with a coffee cup (customer service wolf)
In this sequel to Parable of the Sower, things get a lot worse before they get better.

I liked this book much less than the first one, and I don't just mean it wasn't really what I wanted to read right now but I felt obligated since I'd been on the library hold list for so long (though that was also admittedly an issue). I found that many things about it were not believable and raised (I think) unintended questions about the plot and the general messaging of the series.

rambling spoilers (cn: fascism, rape)- The US takes a hard turn into Christianist fascism, which leads to everyone in Lauren's growing "heathen" community being arrested and sent to reeducation camps to be tortured, brainwashed, raped, etc. I understand, narratively, why something like this had to happen; now that Lauren's mission is well-developed and she's had some success with it, it has to be severely tested. She loses everything—her community, her husband, her daughter, her freedom—but she still doesn't give up. But the violence was too extreme for me to read, so I only got the gist of what was going on in the middle section of the book, therefore my opinions on the book as a whole may be taken with a grain of salt.

- It seemed implausible to me that Lauren would be able to keep writing in a journal during this period and that it would survive for her daughter to find later, thus allowing the novel's framing story to conveniently continue uninterrupted. But maybe that was explained in a part that I skimmed or skipped.

- I was surprised that Lauren's "hyperempathy" is now characterized as a delusional disorder. In the first book I assumed she actually had psychic powers. It's sf, so why not? The explicit rejection of that interpretation here makes me wonder if Butler realized from reader responses that it wasn't clear in the first book, and felt she really had to hammer home that that wasn't what she meant.

- I had problems with the arc with Lauren's brother. We thought he died in the first book, but he actually survived and was sold into sex slavery. Lauren rescues him but he rejects her religious teachings and joins the fundamentalists instead. The issue I had with this is the revelation that he is gay. For me this put a very weird spin on everything about his storyline—the fact that he's the only important male character who's sexually abused, the constant reiterations of how pretty he is, the religious conflicts between him and Lauren, and how he tries to prevent Lauren from finding her daughter. The presentation of this character felt stereotyped and exploitative to me.

- I also didn't really buy into a lot of things about the eventual global triumph of Earthseed. It's pretty hand-wavey and actually seems too easy after all that's happened. Like, the solution to religious fascism is to just kind of wait until people realize it isn't solving their problems and get tired of it, so they'll be more receptive to your diametrically opposed religious philosophy instead? I am skeptical, and the lack of detail and decades-long time skip seem designed to dodge hard questions about how this would really work. (Come on, give us something we can use!)

- Although the book roundly condemns religious fanaticism, Lauren's fantasy of every child being raised to believe in Earthseed actually strikes an alarming chord of religious intolerance. In her scriptures she writes "embrace diversity or be destroyed" but it does not sound like pluralism is what she really wants. She wants everyone to think like she does, which makes the "destroyed" part come off more like a threat than a statement of moral principle. You can't just be like, it's bad for those other religions to demand conformity, but it's okay for me because my religion happens to be The Truth. All zealots think that! This is partly why religious reforms tend to face the problem that after they topple existing power structures, instead of creating an antiauthoritarian utopia they just calcify into new power structures. This book didn't do enough to convince me that Earthseed would be any different. (It's a little convenient, don't you think, that Lauren's husband gets killed off pretty early in the book, since he's the one who begins to voice some of these concerns?)

- But maybe I'm not giving Butler enough credit. She intended to write more books in this series and never finished them, so we don't know what her plans were. I will say that these two books don't feel incomplete as a duology since they at least follow Lauren's personal story to the end. We just don't know how her reforms will hold up and what happens to the incipient space colonies.

- In the end, I was not sure what the book wants us to think about Lauren and her choices. She achieved her dream, but her daughter argues that she sacrificed her relationship with her family for it, so it's a hollow victory in that way. But I suppose Lauren herself couldn't rightfully complain about the way the book presents her; after all, she's the one who insisted that Earthseed sermons should end with a debate!
pauraque: drawing of a wolf reading a book with a coffee cup (customer service wolf)
Set in the 12th century in the lands surrounding the Indian Ocean, this historical fantasy sees former pirate captain Amina al-Sirafi lured out of retirement for one last big score—a million dinars if she can track down a wealthy noblewoman's kidnapped granddaughter. Of course, the job quickly proves more complicated than that; the alleged kidnap victim may have gone willingly with a very dangerous man, a ruthless Crusader who's searching for a powerful magical artifact. On top of that, it turns out the kid's father was Amina's old crewmate whose unnatural demise still haunts Amina's conscience. Oh, and if Amina doesn't succeed, the grandmother is willing and able to have Amina's entire family killed.

I had so much fun reading this. It's a fast-paced adventure with everything you'd want in a seafaring fantasy—swashbuckling battles, heists and prison breaks, trickster demons and villainous sorcerers, enchanted islands and sea monsters—and the setting brings refreshing new angles on old tropes by drawing from Arab, African, and Asian lore. The story also has heart, with a crew who clearly love each other even when they quarrel, and a compelling and complex protagonist in Amina.

I love that we meet Amina as a middle-aged mother who's put the adventuring life behind her for the sake of family, but comes to realize she was giving up too much of herself and her dreams. It's so rare to see a mature woman as the hero in this kind of story. I also appreciated how her Muslim faith is something she's always able to turn to no matter how bad things get. She struggles with it sometimes, but it's a beacon that draws her to be the best version of herself, and it was great to see that taken seriously.

There are multiple important queer characters, and the implication is that the pirates' world is a relatively safe haven for them. I have read criticisms that this aspect of the book is not historically accurate, but I don't care. This is a book where magic is real, it's not a documentary. (In the interests of not raising false hopes, I should mention that Amina herself is very, very straight, but she's an ally at least.)

My only complaint is that the sequel isn't out yet!

July 2026

S M T W T F S
   1 23 4
567 89 1011
1213 1415 161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags