[sticky entry] Sticky: (Mostly) Friends Only

Sep. 18th, 2026 07:20 pm
lirazel: An outdoor scene from the 1993 film The Secret Garden ([film] the whole world is a garden)




A Few of My Favorite Things )






I use my journal as a journal, so some of it is about the very boring aspects of my life.

These days I lock most things, but there's a bunch of fanfic and fandom rants from years past that is unlocked.

Comment if you want to be added.

Note: if a post is public, it's fine to link to it elsewhere.


lirazel: Langdon watching Mel again, the Pitt ([tv] sensitive person)
Remember that time I went to Colonial Williamsburg to research a fic? I actually wrote that fic! And had a blast doing it!


Title: with the sun in my eyes
Chapters:
1/1
Fandom: The Pitt (TV)
Rating: General Audiences
Wordcount: 11,905
Warnings:  No Archive Warnings Apply 
Relationships: Melissa “Mel” King/Frank Langdon
Characters: Melissa “Mel” King, Frank Langdon, Mel King’s family 
Additional Tags: Alternate Universe - Different First Meeting, Colonial Williamsburg, Nerd4Nerd, Period Costumes, more importantly: period hats, the embarrassment of wearing the same t-shirt as everyone else in your grade on a field trip, too much information about 18th century craftsmanship, felicity is the best american girl fight me, melissa “mel” king is very lonely, Autistic Melissa “Mel” King, Appalachian Frank Langdon, Virginian Melissa “Mel” King, this is extremely cheesy, You Have Been Warned
Summary:

“Whoa! Your dress is so cool!”

Mel jumped at the sound of the loud voice. A boy was standing just to her right, a giant grin on his face, and—was he talking to her? She stared at him, at his sweaty, floppy hair; at his lime-green t-shirt that read East McDowell Middle School in blocky white letters; at the weird dent in his chin. He was clearly a couple of years older than her, old enough that she was surprised he was talking to a girl at all, much less her. The older middle school boys at her church avoided the girls like the plague and always sat on the other side of the classroom during Sunday school. She couldn’t remember the last time an older boy had voluntarily spoken to her.

But this boy didn’t seem put off by her silent gaping. He just bounced where he stood, arms swinging by his sides, and asked, “Where’d you get it?”

It came out more like whuhrdj’gettit and his eyes were so blue they were almost scary, but he looked like he really wanted to know. So she swiped at the tear tracks on her face with the back of her hand and offered, “I got it for my birthday. It’s Felicity’s.”

“Yeah? Who’s she?”



lirazel: The three Bronte sisters as portrayed in To Walk Invisible looking out over the moor ([tv] three suns)
Wow! Most of my experiences of a book resonating with me so deeply that I'm practically vibrating--where I have to slow down and draw out the reading experience--where I know from the first chapter that the book is going to change the way I see the world--are reserved for fiction. I was not expecting to find it in a nonfiction book I found by chance while scrolling through the recently added audiobooks filter on Libby.

But this book articulated so many things I've instinctively felt but previously had no language for around the topic of mental health even as it taught me things I didn't know at all. Khameer Kidia draws on his experiences as a kid growing up in Zimbabwe, a college- and then medical student and then resident in the US, a medical practitioner and researcher and anthropologist in both countries, and a deeply compassionate human being wherever he goes to explain why we have a global mental health crisis, how it manifests differently depending on context, how we have tried and failed to treat it, and what it might really take to promote mental wellbeing for everyone.

It's way too simplistic to say "capitalism was the villain all along!" even though…that's kind of true? But this book doesn't read like a tankie Bluesky screed against some vaguely defined idea of capitalism; instead, it's a thoughtful examination of the ways in which colonialism, imperialism, and the hoarding of wealth by the powerful create a world so difficult to live in that of course people struggle.

Kidia doesn't deny that there are chemicals in the brain that can affect how we feel and operate or that certain medications can help people. But he views mental wellbeing as a holistic part of both individual and communal life that's deeply rooted in people's lived experiences, the support systems they have or don't have, and the way systemic hierarchies affect everything. He's not afraid to come right out and say, "This person probably has (what the Global North calls) severe depression because they don't know how they're going to feed their family tonight, and if you give them money, they will get better." And then backs it up with research that proves that sometimes money is the actual solution.

He's also very respectful of indigenous treatments for mental distress, not in a woo-woo kind of way, but because of an understanding that communities have created mechanisms over generations to make people feel more rooted, secure, and supported and that, when practiced in the context of the communities that created them, these can be as effective as medication or CBT or anything else that Western medicine promotes. I am famously allergic to woo, but this balanced approach seems very wise to me (and also helped me realize that I mostly hate woo because it's usually white people appropriating practices that belong to other cultures that only work within the context of those cultures, not because of those practices themselves. As usual, context is everything).

Throughout, the book is engaging, operating on multiple levels as diagnosis of a global health problem, multiple case studies both long-term (his mother) and short-term (patients he saw for a single appointment), a critique of colonialism, a sort of microhistory of the last fifty years of Zimbabwe's history, and a memoir of his own growth both as someone who experiences mental distress and someone who treats it.

I don't tend to enjoy memoir, and when a writer mixes personal experiences with cultural criticism or historical narrative, it usually doesn't work for me. But Kidia is an incredible writer in addition to being a skilled anthropologist and a caring doctor, and the way he uses the experiences of his family members, his patients, and his country in this book is really masterful. Moving backwards and forwards through time, talking about how colonialism affected both his parents and the country he grew up in, contrasting life and expectations and values in the US with Zimbabwe--he's weaving so many threads together that a less talented writer and thinker would have surely dropped a few or at least created troublesome tangles. But he carried me right through to the very end.

David Graeber (forgive me! I'm a caricature of myself!) popularized the slogan "freedom and care" as a way of describing the animating principle of anarchism. I don't quite consider myself an anarchist, despite how much anarchic thought has influenced me, but "freedom and care" are ideals I strive to live by. This book is an articulation of what happens when care is subjected to a market economy that doesn't actually care about it and where the burden for providing care falls disproportionately on under- or unpaid women, particularly black and brown women--and where that market economy creates entire societies that are leeching the resources and labor from other, poorer societies.

Kidia's prescriptions are a) redistribute wealth globally because humanity is an interconnected web, b) prioritize autonomy and dignity for those who are dealing with mental distress (this is where the "freedom" part comes in), and c) find treatments--from mutual aid to indigenous spiritual rituals to group houses to community aid workers--that work for the specific community you're working in. Things don't always translate across cultures or even across cities. One-size-fits-all solutions both do not work and also fundamentally misunderstand how people actually live in the world.

As is typical when I come across a book written by someone who is a keen-eyed observer of the problems of society but also works hard to care for those he can, I came away both discouraged and encouraged. The scale of the problem is huge. But economic eras wane, new ways of organizing ourselves emerge if we work hard enough, and change is always possible.

Protip: read the appendices first. Even if you listen to the audiobook. He talks a lot about language and why he uses the words he uses and I think it's really helpful in understanding his project.
lirazel: Jess from New Girl sitting at a laptop ([tv] the internet is my boyfriend)
It's just a place I'm sticking some of the stream of consciousness things I've written on Tumblr as I've spent the past year or so educating myself as much as possible about the people who are in control of technology aka our tech overlords. So this is just backup of all my "thinking out loud" posts I've written as I attempt to figure out what I think.

Read more... )
lirazel: ([tv] i love my life)

Title: friendly advice
Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: The Pitt (TV)
Rating: General Audiences
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Cassie McKay & Samira Mohan
Characters: Samira Mohan, Cassie McKay
Additional Tags: Post-Season/Series 02, samira deserves a future she’s excited about!!!!, let her use her skills!!!, let women look out for each other!!!!, cassie Notices people and we love that about her
Series: Part 3 of unionizing the e.d.
Summary:

“You should think about applying to them,” McKay says. “I know it’ll be a time crunch, but you’ve got your reference letter already, right?”

“Abbot wrote it for me,” Samira says automatically, mind still whirling.

“Oh, great. I’m glad you asked him. Anyway, it shouldn’t take much for him to tweak it a bit, and I’m sure he’d do that for you.”

Samira places her hands flat on the desk in front of her, hoping the firmness beneath her hands will steady her. When did her heart start beating so fast? “You’re saying I should apply for a fellowship in emergency psychiatry?“


lirazel: ([tv] i love my life)
divide and conquer (3266 words) by Lirazel
Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: The Pitt (TV)
Rating: General Audiences
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Frank Langdon & Samira Mohan
Characters: Samira Mohan, Frank Langdon
Additional Tags: eldest daughter prodigal son, samira and frank are breaking cycles and being the future of medicine, let the senior residents be senior residents!, mentorship as praxis, be the change etc. etc.
Series: Part 2 of unionizing the e.d.
Summary:

Langdon catches her as she’s coming out of North 2, popping up like an oversize jack-in-the-box, his sudden appearance jolting Samira out of thoughts of what tests she needs to run for David Armitage, 53, chest pains.

“Hey. You doing anything after work?”

It takes a second for his words to connect and then she eyes him warily. “Why are you asking me this?” It’s definitely the first time he’s ever inquired about her life outside the E.D. and she can’t even begin to guess why he’s asking.

“I want to talk through our plan of attack,” he says. Off her blank look, he adds, “For our R4.” She still doesn’t know what he’s talking about, and it must show on her face, because he sighs and makes an impatient gesture. “You know, what we talked about last week in the break room.”

lirazel: Max from Black Sails sits in front of a screen and looks out the window ([tv] they would call me a queen)
What I finished:

+ Listened to More Everything Forever: AI Overlords, Space Empires, and Silicon Valley's Crusade to Control the Fate of Humanity by Adam Becker.

WHAT A BANGER! I anticipated that this would be about how fucked up our tech overlords' worldviews are from a moral and public policy perspective, and that certainly played a large part in it. But it ended up being more about why they're wrong about the very tech they're hyping--why the claims they make are not actually possible given, like, physics and the nature of the universe. Which is not an angle I'd seen explored before, and I would have expected it to all be over my head. But Becker is absolutely fantastic at explaining complicated tech and science-y things in a way that I could understand--at least enough to know that these Silicon Valley guys are full of shit.

The moral arguments are woven into all of this; Becker has a lovely humanist approach to the world and a deep appreciation for the humanities. He's clearly repulsed by the perspectives and priorities of the people who are running our digital world (and, increasingly, our physical one as well), so I felt safe in his hands. I often feel alienated from STEM subjects both because math doesn't come easily to me and because the current discourse around it seems so anti-human to me. But Becker reminded me that there's really no boundary between the humanities and STEM and that if you appreciate both, you better serve whichever one you're focused on. Life, nature, the universe is one interwoven textile and needs to be understood as such.

The more I learn about the decision-making class in Silicon Valley, the more I believe that they hate all the things that make us human--art, care, struggle, nature, bodies, again, death, humility, the mutuality of relationships. All of these people are absolutely terrified of death and yet, if they did succeed in their (futile) endeavors to live forever, what would they do with all that time? They're certainly not investing in learning about the world as it is or getting to know other people or creating beautiful things or just enjoying nature. So what would be the point of living forever? They have no answer to this and if they weren't doing such terrible, terrible things to our society and nature, I would feel profound pity for them. As it is, I'm just angry. It's baffling to me that we allow the most morally vacuous people in the world to make consequential decisions about the fate of humanity.

My one complaint is that I wish Becker had read the book himself. Judging by his new podcast Dreaming Against the Machine, he's got the voice for it, and I always, always prefer to have the writer read the book if it's possible. The guy who read it did fine, but there's just no replacing the personality of a writer.

+ Read The House of the Patriarch, the 18th Benjamin January series. You may ask yourself, "Is 18 simply too many books in this series?" And the answer is "NO!!!!" There can never be too many books in this series!

For those of you who are new to my favorite currently-being-written series of books: these historical mysteries follow Benjamin January, a free man of color, in 1830s-40s New Orleans and beyond. The mysteries are good, but they're really an excuse to explore Ben's world: the complicated and colorful people he knows and loves and fears and hates, the vivid and singular and meticulously-researched world of antebellum New Orleans. These are books about power and oppression, about resisting it and not being able to resist it, about building relationships with people who are very different than you are, about how those relationships are really the only thing worth anything in a world of darkness and cruelty. I love them with all my heart.

This is one of the not-in-New Orleans books; Ben is searching for a young white woman who disappeared in upstate New York's "burnt over district" in a time of weird religious groups. A favorite topic of mine! My first thought was, "We're going to get a Joseph Smith cameo!" but no, we're a few years after he left for Illinois, so while he's mentioned a time or two he does not show up. The historical cameo we do get is much more unexpected and made me laugh. The cameos are always such a fun part of the not-in-New-Orleans books, and Hambly's writing is grounded enough that Ben never quite turns into the Forrest Gump of the antebellum US (and Mexico and Cuba and France and wherever else he goes!).

The mystery itself is engaging--I was very invested in Eve Russell, who became one of my favorite one-off characters--and, as usual, Hambly makes fantastic use of a period of American history that doesn't get a lot of fictional attention. I especially appreciated that palpable danger that the non-white characters were in even in ostensibly "free" New York--there are traffickers everywhere just waiting to capture free black people and sell them into slavery down south. No one can breathe easy because everyone is in danger all the time. Of all the fictional media I've encountered, this series as a body of work is one of the best at communicating the totality of the chattel slavery system--how it affected every single thing about life for black people, every moment of every day. How no one was ever, ever safe and how hard people had to fight for even the relative safety that a few were able to find. How it tainted the whole society, how it curdled souls. I always come away with an understanding of just why the Civil War had to happen, why the abolitionist movement probably never would have succeeded without violence. Slavery had to be ripped out at the roots.

Anyway, since we weren't in New Orleans, I missed Rose and Hannibal and Livia and Dominique and Shaw and Olympe and everybody back home, but we did get some excellent Chloe scenes, which are always a bonus! (Chloe!!!) As usual, I spent the whole book going, "When will Ben get to go home? When will he get to have a bath and a good meal and a full night's sleep and see his wife and children???" because nobody whumps their main character the way Hambly does.

But somehow no matter how dark the subject matter of these books are, they never make me feel hopeless. Heavy with the reminder of all the things that people do to each other, yes, but also fiercely grateful for all the ways we find to take care of each other. Gah, I love these books!

+ Listened to Culture Creep by Alice Bolin, a collection of essays at the intersection of feminism and pop culture. Your degree of enjoyment will depend largely on how willing you are to read personal essays that dive deep into things that most people would say "it's not that deep" about (Animal Crossing, wellness tracking, teen magazines, the Playboy Mansion). Most people's eyes would probably glaze over, and honestly I'm not sure if I would have kept up with this if I was reading it, but listening to it while working was enjoyable enough. I don't care for memoir as a genre unless the writer is really freaking fantastic, so when things are too person, I tend to check out, but this managed to be rooted enough in the texts themselves for me to never do that, and Bolin has some really sharp insights throughout. All in all a fine audiobook experience.


What I'm currently reading:

+ Listening to God, Human, Animal, Machine: Technology, Metaphor, and the Search for Meaning by Meghan O'Gieblyn. Well this is a unique book! It's philosophy and technology all tangled up together, at once personal and universal, about the past and the future, meaning and consciousness and nature. O'Gieblyn is incredibly smart and the book is very challenging in a way I appreciate. I also appreciate that she grew up fundamentalist and went to a Bible college before becoming an atheist; there's this one moment where she talks about how a process that took society centuries of bloody struggle (moving from Christian to secular societies) is something that those of us who were raised in rightwing Christianity have to do on our own in the course of a few years, and I have never heard anyone talk about it that way. But yeah, it's really hard to go from "the world is 6,000 years old" to "the universe is billions of years old" and all that those things imply in a short period of time! It's a lot for an individual human being, and she does an incredible job of evoking the disruption of that and also how things linger even when you don't want them to.

+ Reading Hunting Shadows by Charles Todd, 16th in the Inspector Ian Rutledge series of historical mysteries. This series is set in the UK just after WWI and has a shell-shocked Scotland Yard inspector as its protagonist. These are suitably engaging and twisty mysteries for when that's what I want. They kind of all blur together in my head, but that's fine--I don't need everything to be Benjamin January. I don't like cozy mysteries, and these are not, but they also don't lean too far into the gritty darkness either. It's a good balance, well written, and I continue to enjoy this series as I dip in and out of it.
lirazel: Two Victorian women are seated, one hides her face behind her hand, the other holds a book in front of her face ([books] facepalm)
Finished:

+ Listened to Like, Follow, Subscribe: Influencer Kids and the Cost of a Childhood Online by Fortesa Latifi. This was good but harrowing. Influencer culture seems so gross to me in general, but when you add children to the mix, I find it actually morally wrong. Latifi is scrupulously fair to the family vlogging parents she interviews, trying to understand their points of view even when she disagrees with them. She's always giving the benefit of the doubt in a way that feels generous without crossing into stupid territory, though I am considerably less generous myself.

I like how she started with the mommy bloggers and talked about how they were different--back then, the focus was on the experience of motherhood, not on the children themselves, and also the moms could easily write under a pseudonym and not tie their children to their blogs. These days the focus is very much on the children, and the most interesting parts of the book are where she talks to the kids themselves. You've got a wide range of reactions from a teenage girl who hates her mom's influencing and admits that she's stopped telling her mom anything about her life because her mom always turns it into content even when she says she won't to kids who think that being an influencer is the best thing ever.

One thing that I now know that I can't unknow is that the "family" vlogging/content that does the biggest numbers is anything where kids are scared/hurt/upset/vulnerable and wow, sometimes I really hate the world.

My biggest takeaway is that I am so so so so glad that my sister and I are on the same page re: kids and social media (in short: no) because I genuinely don't know how I would handle it if she was plastering my niblings' faces all over the internet. They are obscenely adorable children (this is not just me being biased--perfect strangers stop us in stores to tell us how beautiful they are) and also hilarious and smart, so they'd do numbers, but oh my God, I am so glad that literally the only things they use the internet/phones for are FaceTiming with me or my parents.

If you can handle the dystopia of it all, this is a very good one to read. If you want a little glimpse into what it's like to decide if it's for you, Jane Marie on The Dream podcast just interviewed Latifi, so you could listen to that episode.

+ Orlando. As I said while I was reading it, I did not love this one the way I love some of Woolf's other stuff, but it was certainly interesting. There were things I really liked about it. The prose is wonderful, of course. I liked the stuff that was deconstructing the genre of biography and what we can know about historical figures, though I wish there had been more of it, frankly. The stuff where she was making fun of the Victorian era was incredible and funny and of course a Bloomsburian would knock that out of the park. And of course because it's Woolf, there are some sharp insights into gender and writing and how those two intersect.

But as a whole work, I really came away with a "I don't really get it" feeling. I understand what she's doing with certain parts of it, but I'm not sure I understand the overall project or what the meaning of the gender shift is.

But I'm glad to have read it!

+ Listened to "You Just Need to Lose Weight": And 19 Other Myths about Fat People by Aubrey Gordon. I knew most of the ideas she would hit here since I have been listening to her Maintenance Phase podcast since literally the first episode and have never missed a single episode lol. But I just like Aubrey so much, so it was fun hanging out with her--she's so smart and funny and compassionate and steely when she needs to be. This is one of the best Anti-fat Bias 101 books out there, so if you're new to that movement, I highly recommend it.

+ True Grit by Charles Portis. A friend on Tumblr had posted a quote from this book and I was like, "Omg, that's amazing," so I picked it up and OMG THIS BOOK IS AMAZING. A truly perfect example of the power of narrative voice, it made me giddy!

It's the 1870s and Mattie Ross is 14 years old when her father is murdered and she hires a marshal to go with her to hunt down the culprit and bring him to justice. An elderly Mattie is telling us the story sometime in the 1920s and this is the kind of book that first person was invented for.

There are two film adaptations of this book and both are good, but they are not nearly as good as the book itself (though all the props in the world to baby Hailee Steinfeld for being a perfect Mattie) because even with voice-overs, film adaptations cannot truly replicate her voice, which is the single best thing about the book. The plot is fun! The characters are all very well drawn! But Mattie's voice is a truly incredible literary achievement. Line after line just blew me away. Mattie is pragmatic and unflappable and steely and humorless and pious and ruthless and yet you never lose sight of the fact that she is still a child. I don't know how he did it. There were parts of it that were so funny (especially the chasm between some of the more outlandish/dramatic parts and the matter-of-fact way that Mattie tells the story) that I wanted to hug Portis.

One thing I kept thinking about while reading it was how sorry I am for anyone who reads it without knowing a ton about the Bible. Because for the first fourth of the book, there are Biblical allusions on every single page--after that, the rate of them slows down, but they're still there. And I truly feel that anyone who isn't picking up on them is missing out. I strongly, strongly believe that the Bible should be taught in literature classes from elementary school and Christian history and theology in history classes from the same age because you simply cannot understand vast swathes of both literature and history if you aren't familiar with this stuff. And also you miss out on great jokes!

Perhaps my favorite bit was this:

I do not know to this day why they let a wool-hatted crank like Owen Hardy preach the service. Knowing the Gospel and preaching it are two different things. A Baptist or even a Campbellite would have been better than him. If I had been home I would never have permitted it but I could not be in two places at once.


As somebody who grew up a Campbellite (though we NEVER would have used that word to describe ourselves; it's pejorative), this had me rolling.

Wait or this:

I had hated these ponies for the part they played in my father's death but now I realized the notion was fanciful, that it was wrong to charge blame to these pretty beasts who knew neither good nor evil but only innocence. I say that of these ponies. I have known some horses and a good many more pigs who I believe harbored evil intent in their hearts. I will go further and say all cats are wicked, though often useful. Who has not seen Satan in their sly faces? Some preachers will say, well, that is superstitious "claptrap." My answer is this: Preacher, go to your Bible and read Luke 8: 26-33.


Or this:

I confess [Election] is a hard doctrine, running contrary to our earthly ideas of fair play, but I can see no way around it. Read I Corinthians 6:13 and II Timothy 1:9, 10. Also I Peter 1:2, 19 ,20 and Romans 11:7. There you have it. It was good for Paul and Silas and it is good enough for me. It is good enough for you too.


I LOVE THIS BOOK. And will be buying myself a copy.

I am sad to discover that Portis didn't write any other historical fiction about women, but I will have to read his other books even if they don't sound like my thing just because he's so damn talented.

Currently reading:

+ Listening to the audiobook of Culture Creep, essays by Alice Bolin about life in the 2020s through a lens of feminism and pop culture. She's a great writer with some really good insights. I'll have more to say when I'm done.

+ Still haven't picked up The Magician's Daughter yet, but I will finish it at some point.

+ I was craving some Benjamin January yesterday, so I started The House of the Patriarch, book 18. I've been drawing out this series over the course of years, but I am nearing being caught up and then what will I do???? (Start over at the beginning, I guess.)
lirazel: Abigail Masham from The Favourite reads under a tree ([film] reading outside)
Trying to bring this back!

What I finished:

+ Disciples of White Jesus: The Radicalization of American Boyhood by Angela Denker. This was not exactly what I expected, which was a more sociological exploration of the way that white Christian boys are being taught white supremacist/Christian nationalist beliefs. Instead, it was a very personal journalistic exploration that drew on sociological data. Denker did things like travel to Columbia, SC to meet the pastor of the young man who murdered worshipers at Mother Emanuel church in Charleston, talked to pastor teaching confirmation classes in rural Midwestern communities, and drew on her own work as a pastor to get an angle on what white Christian boys are being taught about masculinity.

This is very much a book for Christians; it is written from a progressive Christian perspective and as such would probably be annoying to people who are progressive but not Christian. Still, I don't regret listening to it and I am glad this resource is out there for Christians who are trying to combat extremism within the church.

What I'm reading:

+ Orlando by Virginia Woolf for book club. I'm about 1/3 of the way through, and I am glad this wasn't my first Woolf. The language and the flashing insights are gorgeous, of course, and I actually love how deeply weird it is with things like time--it's absolutely written on a mythic scale which I think is very cool--but I think if this was my first Woolf I would be more wtf??? about it. The casual racism is a lot!

I don't know that I will ever love this like I do Mrs. Dalloway, but it's certainly an interesting reading experience and I am enjoying myself! We'll see how I feel when I'm done.

+ The Magician's Daughter by H.G. Parry. Despite my intense annoyance at books about female protagonists whose titles frame them in relationship to a man, I checked this one out on a whim. It has the energy of an old-school YA fantasy novel (complimentary) and I'm enjoying it! It doesn't feel formulaic or as simplistic as most YA does today, even if it doesn't quite have the richness of my old faves.

I was taken from the beginning; the story starts out with a teenage girl who's been raised on a magical island in a crumbling castle, knowing nothing about the rest of the world except what she's read through books. Classic Lauren-bait, 11/10, no notes. Once we leave the island, things don't hit quite as hard for me, though I'm reserving my judgement until I finish it.

It turns out it's one of those "magic is disappearing!" books, which I think is an overdone trope, but this is certainly one of the better versions of that story I've read. The worldbuilding is quite fun, even if it isn't very innovative. There's no romance, the main relationship is between the protagonist and the man who raised her, which is well done. Hopefully we'll get some real emotional oomph in the last third of the book and I will be able to unabashedly recommend this to people who are looking for a light but not insubstantial read.

+ "You Just Need to Lose Weight" and 19 Other Myths About Fat People by Aubrey Gordon. I just needed an audiobook to listen to while I was cooking on Sunday, and I was like, "Wait! Aubrey from my beloved Maintenance Phase podcast has books! I can just listen to her read them!"

I knew a lot of this stuff already, but Aubrey is such a great person to hang out with--funny, compassionate, uncompromising when she needs to be. The work of fat advocacy she does must be exhausting considering the everything of our current culture (for a while there in the 2010s I really did think we were making strides on the topic of bodies, and then the one-two punch of Covid and weight loss drugs happened and now we're right back to heroin chic and it's so awful), but I admire her so much for doing it.
lirazel: ([tv] i love my life)

Fic: boiling over
Chapters:
1/1
Fandom: The Pitt (TV)
Rating: Teen And Up Audiences
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Frank Langdon & Samira Mohan
Characters: Samira Mohan, Frank Langdon
Additional Tags: not tagging robby because he doesn’t come off well here, but he’s haunting the narrative, Missing Scene, Post-Episode 10, eldest daughter prodigal son, the kids from robby’s first marriage that he doesn’t care about anymore because he’s got a new family, oh sorry was that snarky?, anyway the senior residents should unionize, let them commiserate over the way robby treats them, my ‘langdon should be the brother of every woman in the ed (except mel)’ agenda, my ‘samira has done nothing wrong and someone needs to acknowledge that’ agenda, another name checked off of langdon’s amends list
Summary:

“How’re you feeling?”

Samira looks up to see Langdon coming through the door of the breakroom, pulling it closed behind him.

“I’m fine,” she says, aiming for wry, though it comes out more terse than she’d hoped.

“By which you mean ‘kind of tingly but also wrung-out’?” Her surprise must show on her face, because he shrugs as he sits down at the chair across the table from her. “I have some experience with panic attacks.”

“You?” It doesn’t fit with how she thinks of him, easy confidence that tilts over into cockiness more than it should. But then, she’s never known him well.


 

lirazel: Langdon watching Mel again, the Pitt ([tv] sensitive person)

Title: no-fault
Chapters:
1/1
Fandom: The Pitt (TV)
Rating: Teen And Up Audiences
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Melissa “Mel” King/Frank Langdon, Abby Langdon & Frank Langdon, Melissa “Mel” King & Abby Langdon
Characters: Abby Langdon, Frank Langdon, Melissa “Mel” King
Additional Tags: Future Fic, POV Outsider, abby does not deserve this but at least she’s going to get some amusement out of it, ‘just friends’ huh?
Summary:

She tosses the plastic bottle into the buggy just as Tanner says, “…and Mel says that ponies aren’t baby horses, they’re something different. A baby horse is called a colt.”

“That’s right,” Abby says automatically, the words snagging on long-buried memories of Saddle Club and Misty of Chincoteague. And then, a delayed second later: “Who’s Mel?”

Because she usually does listen when he talks, and she thought she knew the names of all of his friends and all of his friends’ siblings and that she and Frank have both trained him well enough that he wouldn’t call an adult by their first name without some kind of title in front of it. But she definitely doesn’t remember hearing about a Mel before. A new kid in class? Or, God, a character from one of the more annoying shows he and Penny watch, the kind whose shrillness and obnoxious flashing make Abby flee the room?

She absolutely isn’t expecting the explanation Tanner gives.

“Daddy’s friend.”

The buggy jerks to a stop, the broken wheel—there’s always a broken wheel—dragging across the linoleum. Penny giggles at the sound it makes, but Abby doesn’t hear her, her mind suddenly gone blank.


lirazel: Anita and the other Shark girls dance in West Side Story ([film] dance at the gym)
This weekend I got to see Lawrence of Arabia on the big screen, and y'all, it was such a great experience! The theater was almost full and we actually got our intermission and yes, I spent more than four hours in that building, but it was totally worth it imo.

We used to know how to make movies! The cinematography and special effects and production design are just insane--every frame is just swoon-worthy. God, what a good-looking movie. There are many movies that are better in a theater, but this one is one where I'm like, "If you see it on a smaller screen, you aren't really seeing this movie." The long shots of the tiny dot in the distance growing larger and larger through the heat waves coming off the sand! MY GOD! The colors! The huge casts of riders on camel or horses or in tents! The train stuff! The dunes and the escarpments and the echoes! The costumes and the texture of the fabric! The on-location sets! CINEMA!

I get very upset thinking about how huge movie budgets are today and how they all look so fake and slick and uninteresting and the color is bad most of the time and the lighting is bad most of the time and I just don't understand how we've regressed in this medium as much as we have. Also: film will always be superior to digital, I don't care what anyone says.

Anyway, visuals aside, I hadn't seen the movie in like 20 years and I was pleased to find that it's also just a well-done story. Like, there are issues with it! The brownface casting is Not Cool! The white savior of it all is...something else!

But also, it's just such a good movie actually? Everyone's at the top of their game. No offense to Albert Finney, but I am so very glad that O'Toole got cast because I just don't think anyone else could have played that character in such an unnerving way. His scary blue eyes! I'm like, "Yeah, that's a man with ghosts and demons and delusions of grandeur and severe mental health problems who is wavering on the edge of a breakdown at all times but I also get why people are so enamored of him." There's also something striking about O'Toole's gigantic head and narrow little shoulders that add something extra to the whole performance.

OMAR SHARIF! God, I love him in general but specifically in this role. Just top tier. I'd forgotten about Lawrence and Ali's meet-cuteugly with all the insults and the murder. Ali as the conscious of the film is another thing I'd forgotten.

It's very weird being like, "Damn, Anthony Quinn and Jose Ferrer are so good in this, but also they should never have been cast." Like, I don't blame them that much, as Latino men in the early 60s, but lbr it's shameful that Omar Sharif was the only Arab in the main cast. Sir Alec Guiness looks disturbingly like King Faisal, actually, it's bizarre. But brownface is still brownface, and I Do Not Approve. Shout-out to my man Claude Rains, who is always fantastic. Was Quinn nominated for a supporting actor Oscar for this? If he wasn't, he should have been.

It's significantly less racist than it could have been? Which is not to say that it isn't racist, but the Arab characters are all real people with believable motives, and the movie never once questions that they are right and correct to want both the Turks and the Brits out of their country that isn't a country yet.

I also deeply, deeply appreciate the script. It doesn't try to explain to us why Lawrence is Like That. We get one single line about him being illegitimate, but that's it. The why of it all is left up to us as viewers. Was he born that way? Was he dropped on his head as a child? Is all of this coming from daddy issues or the trauma of British boarding school? We will simply never know! Which is as it should be! In a contemporary film, there would be a scene in childhood that ~explains~ the character, and it would piss me off. Here, people are just complicated. Because they are people. It's not a biopic in the way we now understand that genre, or at least it defies all the tropes. It's about a couple of years in the life of one person.

And the psychosexual stuff isn't overdone. It's absolutely 100% there--this is a very gay movie even if the movie doesn't really know it's gay--but it isn't heavy-handed. The scene with Ferrer as the Turkish bey? INSANE. So good.

And yes, there is something extremely problematic about the only significantly English-language film about the Arab Revolt being centered around a white English dude. But also: he was a real person and the movie realizes that he was as bad for the Arab independence movement as he was good for it, which I appreciate.

I would totally understand why a contemporary person would be like, "Between the brownface and the white savior-ing, I do not need this film in my life." That is a very valid and in fact morally superior opinion! However, it's a movie that already exists, not one that's being made now, and there's nothing we can do to change it at this point in time, and it's an incredible bit of filmmaking, so I do deeply appreciate it while also judging it hard for all the ways it should have been better.

Anyway, my opinion is that if you ever get a chance to see this film in the theater, you should take that opportunity because you will leave it thinking, as my dad Paul Simon says, that's why God made the movies.
lirazel: Janice Rand from Star Trek TOS in pink ([tv] justice4janicerand)
I do a lot of work where my hands are occupied but my mind is not (hello, rehousing!!!) and may main exercise is walking so I listen to a lot of podcasts, and I am always looking for more.

My favorite ongoing podcasts are In Bed With the Right, Know Your Enemy, If Books Could Kill, Maintenance Phase, Panic World, and A Bit Fruity. These are the shows I listen to every episode of and (most of them) support on Patreon so I get extra episodes. Oh, and On the Nose from Jewish Currents.

There are a number I also like but don't listen to every episode of, just dipping in and out as they interest me. These include Behind the Bastards, Hoax!, HyperFixed, Search Engine, Straight White American Jesus, Culture Study, Decoder Ring, American Hysteria, Strongwilled, 5-4, and The Dream.

Then there are my classic favorites that I haven't listened to in a while but loved madly: You Must Remember This, You're Wrong About, and You Are Good.

One limited run I listened to lately was What Happened in Nashville, about the unregulated fertility treatment industry through the lens of a big scandal that happened in my hometown and found it interesting.


Things I like in a podcast:

+ Culture and/or history and/or current events through a leftist/feminist lens. It's really important to me that these are serious thinkers or deeply insightful people, even if what they're talking about is lighter fare
+ People who take culture and internet culture seriously but want to deeply critique it
+ Stuff about religion--not in the sense of being religious but in the sense of talking about how religion works in the world
+ Stuff that is well-researched
+ Stuff about moral panics
+ I tend to be drawn to podcasts that are created by people who are first and foremost either writers/journalists or scholars (with the exception of A Bit Fruity, all my favorite current podcasts are created by people in those categories)
+ Anything Michael Hobbes is involved with lol
+ Oh and my guilty pleasure is anything about cults (other people listen to true crime stuff, I listen to cult stuff)

Things I don't like in a podcast:
+ Humor podcasts (a lot of these people are very funny, but none of these podcasts are comedy podcasts)
+ Generic culture/pop culture stuff (by which I mean the sort of overviews of just what's going on in the world of pop culture)
+ Fiction (I'm sorry, but Welcome to Night Vale is the only one that ever truly worked for me)
+ Pure news podcasts
+ Interview podcasts that focus on celebs
+ Honestly anything about celebrities, I just don't care
+ Self-help stuff

July 2026

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567 891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2026 01:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios