most men have two fuckable holes. some men have three. but, against all odds, julius caesar (100 BC to 44 BC) managed to amass an astounding 25 holes by the time of his death
guys. guys. U GUYS. GUYSSSSSS are we all seeing this
More you might like
Anonymous asked:
Gwayne & Daeron in their forced sister-wivesdom: talking (deserved) mad shit behind Ormund's back. Gwayne & Daeron, when they have an one-on-one with Ormund: maybe being unclecousin's little treasures is not the worst idea, actually...💚 We need more sensual handholding, and suggestive lean-ins, and rancid vibes!
licherally this!!!!! the audience wants to be transfixed and uncomfortable!!!!!!!!! get more weird with it NOW
star trek tos: a summary
[VD: A Star Trek TOS compilation of Kirk and Spock sharing sweet
or suggestive moments, set to Wii music. Scenes from both the show and
the movies are featured, and they’re always followed by side characters
and Enterprise crew members watching on and seeming amused, pleased, or
vaguely judgemental and aware. The compilation ends on Bones and Kirk
walking away and Spock saying, “Jim, be careful.” Kirk looks pleased,
while Bones pointedly replies, “We will.” Spock arches a dramatic eyebrow. End VD]
EMMA (2020)
dir. autumn de wilde
Fun fact: this scene is a direct reference to a pretty common joke in Regency-era erotic cartoons:
Historically, English women did not wear any version of underwear under their dresses until the very late 1800s (unless they were menstruating). When dresses slimmed way down during the Regency era's neoclassical movement, skirts became much easier to fully lift - apparently leading to many women warming their bare skin in this way.
It was a common enough practice that there was even a suggestive slang term for it, as others have pointed out:
Nice to know these gentlemen were eating ass
Throughout Hitchcock’s catalogue of work characters resemble each other, as seen in the many instances of mistaken identity in films as diverse in tone as North by Northwest and The Lodger (1927), in which a visitor to a town is suspected of being a serial killer, though, unlike Uncle Charlie, the lodger is innocent. The doppelganger is an oft-discussed motif of Vertigo, but it is an equally important element in Shadow of a Doubt in which the doubling of characters takes on a “vividly vampiristic” nature. The two Charlies are doubles of each other, sharing not just a name and a seemingly telepathic bond, but also, as relatives, a bloodline, something Charlie highlights when she exclaims, “We have the same blood.”
Blood forms a link between Dracula and Mina too, for during Dracula’s infernal baptism of Mina he forces her to drink from him, and Uncle Charlie appears to hint at his literary predecessor, stating, “The same blood flows through our veins, Charlie,” thus recalling Dracula’s words to Mina: “Flesh of my flesh, blood of my blood; kin of my kin.” However, there seems to be more than a familial, blood bond between the two Charlies. This is recognized by the characters themselves, for Charlie states, “We’re not just an uncle and niece,” which is something her uncle echoes, asserting, “We’re no ordinary uncle and niece.” Indeed, there does seem to be a romantic element to the relationship which borders perilously on the incestuous.
Enter Uncle Charlie, dressed like a catalog and with all the preternatural calm of a vampire claiming a bride, played by an unabashedly creepy and hard-to-pin Matthew Goode.
HOTD Episode 1.01 and teleplay / Mia Wasikowska on filming Stoker / Victoria Williams, “Reflecting Dracula: The Undead in Alfred Hitchcock’s Shadow of a Doubt,” in Images of the Modern Vampire: The Hip and the Atavistic (eds. Barbara Brodman and James E. Doan) / Genevieve Valentine, review of Stoker
The ring-giving scene is perhaps the most unsettling in the film. It is uncomfortable to watch because it makes the relationship between uncle and niece a site of intense emotion without clearly defining it. There is the romantic rhetoric, but there is also the age gap and family connection as well as the confusion produced by the duplication of names. The uncategorizable quality of the relationship is part of its threat, because it suggests that conventional hierarchical and relational cues involving age and sex […] may be disregarded, giving rise to something both freer and more intense. This is suggestive at once of incestuous boundary-crossing and of vampiristic voraciousness (incest and vampire themes figure in the film).
Paula Morantz Cohen, Alfred Hitchcock: The Legacy of Victorianism
at least trinity looks hot and has her purse dog with her ♡
me when im dog shit at poetry