 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP Rangeblock Calculator | IP Range Edit Check | Checkusers | Oversighters |
User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI
| Main namespace | |
|---|---|
| Other namespaces | |
| All namespaces | |
| Navboxes with templates |
|
| Inline images | |
| Help pages | |
| Related topics | |
| Search | |
| Immediate requests | Entries |
|---|---|
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Wikipedians looking for help | 1 |
| ...from administrators | 1 |
| Requests for unblock | 71 |
| Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests | 35 |
| Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests | 112 |
| Wikipedia template-protected edit requests | 21 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 0 |
| Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests | 554 |
| Requested RD1 redactions | 1 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 2 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 44 |
| Open sockpuppet investigations | 46 |
| Click here to locate other admin backlogs | |
Administrative backlog
Reports
User-reported
- ~2026-40144-05 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On User_talk:~2026-40144-05: vandalism after final warning. I became aware of this user for their continual AfC submissions that seem to be non-sense, spam or test edits such as Draft:Axn New Shows & Season of the Month (November 2026) and Draft:Hits Now New Shows & Season of the Month (September 2026) along with a dozen or so more. Looks like they've also received multiple warnings from other editors for other forms of disruptive editing. This is creating a lot of messes. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:25, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- Jubin Hato (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Dodon, Kyrgyzstan (diff): vandalism after final warning. continually replaces pages named variations of dodon with what seems to be their own (rejected) page proposal. Jackjd0 (talk) 05:45, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
|
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion backlog
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 10 items Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 62 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-reported
- InsuredIndex (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (see their userpage). ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 05:21, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- Betrau (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:Betrau/sandbox. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:56, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from unregistered accounts. Nearly all TA/rookie edits are either unsourced fancruft, good faith but poor quality contributions that violate our WP:MOS, or outright vandalism. I think a 6 month — 1 year protection might do the trick given that this page has been protected multiple times in the past few months despite being relatively new. Giovanni Potage (talk) 04:06, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 22:26, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:34, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 04:06, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock is socking. Needs creation protection. Jerod Lycett (talk) 11:20, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Akandeyusuf (talk · contribs) blocked by Sohom Datta. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – TAs repeatedly removing Controversy section without sufficient explanation. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:02, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Poor edits despite talk page discussion. Danners430 tweaks made 14:27, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:59, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Talk page is being treated as a forum. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:30, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Not done. Talk pages are only protected in the most severe cases of disruption. There have been two TAs in July. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC)- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:00, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Constant vandalism of a recently deceased person's page Fishygy (talk) 14:32, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:00, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 15:35, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EaglesFan37 (talk) 19:15, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:03, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Yue. Staraction (talk · contribs) 06:04, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Article has a TA hopping disruptive editor, has been marked as a LTA (I am unsure of the master). Will sometimes immediately change to a new TA to undo a revertion. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:17, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. AriuCH (talk) 19:27, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- * Pppery * in solidarity 00:21, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Pppery: I think that your response was lost. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- Indeed. Well I forgot what I was going to do here, so just review this independently ... * Pppery * in solidarity 03:10, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Pppery: I think that your response was lost. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yue🌙 (talk) 03:49, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Possible WP:HIGHRISK template. ~2026-40660-86 (talk) 19:49, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Eight substitutions. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring from temps. Firestar464 (talk) 20:54, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Considering Ali Khamenei and Assassination of Ali Khamenei fall under WP:ARBPIA this should too. Hotel Arifornia (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:12, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Not done WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If there is actual disruption requiring protection, please re-request on that basis; continued requests by accounts apparently created to request protection solely on the basis of "these other articles are protected" will be considered disruptive and removed. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:25, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Netstars22 (talk to me!) 23:08, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Any sysop who wishes to can modify this protection at their discretion without first consulting me. Staraction (talk · contribs) 23:15, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Having looked at contributions on the underlying IP for these accounts, this isn't their first rodeo this week. : User(s) partially blocked: underlying /38 (talk · contribs) (from User, User talk, and Wikipedia namespaces). for awhile The Bushranger One ping only 01:34, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- Having looked at contributions on the underlying IP for these accounts, this isn't their first rodeo this week. :
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by temporary accounts. Channel has been off the air since 2020 but these accounts are persistently adding shows and claiming the network is currently airing them. No sources provided. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 00:52, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several users are uploading the copyrighted crest to Commons and keep changing the already-updated logo with those files. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 01:40, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will revert to its previous protection level if it is still in effect, or become unprotected otherwise. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:03, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Several new accounts and temporary accounts edit warring to removed sourced information and add a non-notable person to the "notable people" section OceanGunfish (talk) 03:42, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- The disruption is from viewers of this TikTok video. TonySt 04:08, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent vandalism aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 04:06, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will revert to its previous protection level if it is still in effect, or become unprotected otherwise. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:01, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I want to believe the recent edits to this page are sockpuppetry...? Unsure. Not too familiar with page protection, so apologies if this doesn't apply/I'm messing anything up. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 04:13, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. EaglesFan37 (talk) 04:30, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level of edit warring from IPs for BLP in news. 107,590 recent contributors (talk) 05:24, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Reason: Originally, this page was a cross-namespace redirect to Wikipedia:Community portal. Then, in conjunction with Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 43#Proposal: Move main page to a different namespace, the page was changed to a test for a new location for the main page and the page was permanently protected. That test was then abandoned with the decision that the main page should remain where it was, and the page made a redirect to the main page and then, following an RfD, back to its original target. However, the permanent page protection was never removed, so I request that the page be unprotected, back to the status quo. Bsherr (talk) 20:48, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
Reason: I really miss the funny people that used to put funny things on his page on Friday evenings, and now my Friday nights are boring and depressing because I do not have anything to look forward to. 😔 ~2026-40925-43 (talk) 04:40, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:20, 21 July 2026 (UTC) |
| 23 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:25, 21 July 2026 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
|||||||||||
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I plan on filling out all the Bivalve-related redlinks, and I do not want the might of these mollusks to fill the backlog. - RealGatba (talk) (contribs) 23:13, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
I have created over 40 articles which has reliable, independent sources (excluding an set index article) out of the 55 articles I created, primarily about US articles, including mostly factories, some vehicle models, and a few biographies such as Whirlpool Clyde plant, IC Bus CE Series, and J. Douglas Adams. I was still planning to continue contributing and creating new articles every week. My old request I requested it on June 28th of this year was not done because it has less than 25 articles. This is my second attempt to grant my autopatrolled rights. Thomasfan1916[built buses?] 20:46, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I do a lot of category fixing, editing, and sorting on multiple pages to sort them into the correct categories, create subcategories when needed, etc., and i think this tool would help with that! HighlandFacts (talk) 14:32, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
Would like to use when I get my computer back, will use to do edits that if done manually would be tedious. Beta Beta Beta - talk 22:06, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to use AWB to assist with some repetitive edits, and to further my Wikipedia experience. Ighs (talk) 10:56, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to have AWB to execute repetitive tasks such as adding navboxes, without having to do it manually.Zzxt000000001 (talk) 15:08, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
Hi! I'd like to request AWB permissions to make a significant change in backlogs, cleanup categories, and the like! Of course, I am a person, and won't simply make edits willy nilly. (Though this may be obvious), I'll check each edit and make sure they're correct before actually doing them. Also, I'll probably use it to alleviate MOS:CURLY stuff. WikipediholicRat (talk) 23:57, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like AutoWikiBrowser rights to bulk fix CS1 date errors, where I've seen errors arise if the month's number is used instead of being spelled out Nontes (talk) 05:32, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting AWB access to efficiently perform routine article cleanup, fix formatting, and handle repetitive maintenance tasks. — Raihanur (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights CelesteQuill (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Hi, my ECR was revoked for making 162 minor & pointless edits when I was new here. Now that I have made more than 700 constructive edits, hereby I want to regain this right, please feel free to check my edits after ECR revoke, thanks. CelesteQuill (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
hi, some permissions have already been assigned automatically, but I would like to further expand my Wikipedia contributions with this option. Haggis MacHaggis (talk) 08:25, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Experience with WP:GAN reviewing, and recent changes patrolling. Furthermore, I am a experienced editer, making and nominating a WP:GAN article (61016), I have also have been on this platform for about a year and understanding of key rules in Wikipedia, such as WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:DICT, WP:NPOV, and WP:CRYSTALBALL. I have also made this to help with the huge backlog, and review as much articles as possible on Wikipedia. Wikiediter2029 (talk) Nosey? Stalk My edits 15:10, 20 July 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I would like to request permission to approve pending edits on the pages I regularly edit, as I would be happy to help review and approve constructive contributions. Katanicx (talk) 16:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting pending changes reviewer rights I'd like to do what I can to eat away at an (albeit small) portion of the backlog. WikipediholicRat (talk) 14:52, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
I have been quite active on Wikipedia. I spend considerable time identifying and reverting obvious vandalism, fixing BLP issues immediately and cleaning up unsourced and dubious additions in the articles I follow and watch. I would really like to obtain the privileges to review pending changes so I can help ensure that all articles substantiate edits under the pending changes in good faith and in compliance with the policy. I understand that most of the work would consist of detecting obvious bad things such as vandalism, BLP breaches, plagiarism, libel, personal attacks and accepting edits that passed the basic checks without going into extensive discussions on sources, bias or expert accuracy (these are discussed by the watchers later). I have studied Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes in detail and I am aware of the instructions, I will accept edits that do not seem to violate some core principles, revert or correct wrong ones and do not carry out even basic review more than that. ArchivioItalia ✉ 05:59, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
For a little over a week and a half, I've been patrolling recent changes to spot vandalism or otherwise disruptive edits. Occasionally, I come across such an edit on a page that's had pending changes protection applied to it. For these kinds of edits, while I'm able to revert bad-faith edits, I'm unable to accept good-faith edits and must leave that task to those with the pending changes reviewer permission. I feel that this setup is less-than-optimal. If I were able to both reject and accept those changes, I would be reducing the backlog of pending changes and could thereby expedite other processes on Wikipedia by giving other users less work. Considering this, I'd like to request the pending changes permission in order to do so. Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
OK, I've reviewed what I was told at my last request. I now have over 200 mainspace edits. I've tried singing up to CVU/A, and now I'm just waiting. Requesting rollback permissions to try AntiVandal, Interceptor, and Huggle. And everything else. Patrolling RecentChanges seems to be the only thing I do nowadays, and I would like rollback to be able to fight vandals better. AZenit3 [Chat?-stuff I've done] 01:47, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Been patrolling recent changes for some time now with Twinkle, and I would like to try using more advanced tools like Huggle which require this permission. TheNerdzilla (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello. I have rollback in my account at Simple Wikipedia. Having tried this evening to counter the activities of ~2026-33439-05 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), I think it would be useful to have rollback here too. I work almost exclusively on cricket articles at present, and it is a subject that frequently attracts vandals. Thanks. Jack (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have been doing RC patrol for the last while, and would like rollback to be able to more efficiently fight vandalism. I understand that my changes that I make while using this tool are my responsibility. signed, A Random Hylian (Parry)(swing) 12:26, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Here to renew my temporary rollback rights Kadermonkey (She/Her) (talk) 04:28, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
I've been patrolling recent changes frequently. While my account is still somewhat new (nearly 2 months old), I do have over 1.2k edits so far - with many involving reverting vandalism (but I have also wrote new articles, reported users, participated in afd, and improved articles). I always warn users after I revert their edits. Ever since I have gained access to Twinkle, it has made patrolling so much easier. I would like rollback permissions to be able to use the antivandal and interceptor tools too. Those tools would make reverting much more efficent. FlammablePizza (talk) 19:29, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi. I've been reviewing drafts at AfC, COI requests and NPP for quite a while now. Might consider trialing Huggle in the medium term as part of my modest toolbox. Thanks :) PK650 (talk) 06:36, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting rollback rights in order to combat vandalism more easily with WP:Interceptor, particularly on recent changes, which I have been patrolling for a while. I have read and understood WP:Vandalism, and aim to follow all of its guidelines. Every nonconstructive edit I have reverted (mainly via Twinkle), I have added a user warning to the editor's talk page. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 19:50, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Request made one day in advance. My rollback privileges expire tomorrow, and I have been using Interceptor constructively. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 01:13, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
I am an Extended Confirmed editor with over 2 months of experience, 1,000+ edits, and a steady daily editing pace. I spend a significant amount of time on Recent Changes patrol using Twinkle, where I regularly revert blatant vandalism and issue appropriate user warnings/welcomes. I am requesting the native rollback tool to handle obvious vandalism and page-blanking more efficiently, as well as to use counter-vandalism gadgets like Huggle and Interceptor that require it. I understand the tool is strictly for clear-cut vandalism and will never use it in content disputes. MarioWonderExpert talk) 13:17, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to request Rollback rights. My last request was on 18 May. According to previous advice, I have tried to follow a clear workflow, including issuing warnings and reporting Vandalism, Block evasion, and Disruptive editing at AIV, RFPP, and AN/EW. In addition, I use Twinkle for warnings, reports, and reverts. AriuCH (talk) 18:27, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
Hello! I would like to request rollback permissions to streamline correcting cascading vandalism. I have no history of editorial conflict, have experience in anti-vandalism work, a healthy edit count, and would also like to integrate automation into my editing workflow. Additionally, I am aware that rollback permissions are not — ipso facto — a license to act, and that any action taken must be taken with the assumption of the rolled-back edit(s) being undeniable vandalism. If there are any particular concerns I do not address, please feel free to inform me thereof. Thank you! Chat-qui-Aboie (talk) 06:32, 7 July 2026 (UTC) Chat-qui-Aboie (talk) 06:32, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
I've done quite a bit of Counter Vandalism work, and I've come to request rollback rights. Thanks! Giovanni Guasconti (a word with me) 03:37, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
I've recently been using SWViewer and Twinkle to revert vandalism, so this permission would be very useful for me. I'm already very familiar with how it works, as I already have this permission on other Wikimedia projects. -- 🐦🔥 Aws 💬 Talk 14:23, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to rquest Rollback permissions firstly in order to make use of tools like Huggle & AntiVandal. Secondly rollback permissions will allow me to increase the speed of my workflow as most of it consists of RC patrolling edits by unregistered & new accounts. My contribution history demonstrates that I have multiple months of RC Patrol experience and no history of edit warring. At the time of writing this I have 656 live edits of which 220 are in the Main namespace and 262 are in the User Talk namespace, this shows my track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits. Vydrakk (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Hi! I've been fixing small mistakes in Wikipedia off and on for about eight years now (more specifically five years in the English Wikipedia, eight in Finnish Wikipedia), ending up with about 740 global edits, out of which roughly 500 are in the English Wikipedia, and recently I've been interested in upping my participation in patrolling recent edits. I've been eyeing using Interceptor to improve the work, but that unfortunately is off-limits to non-rollbackers. Thanks! Seqv (talk) 22:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to becomes a rollbacker because I am experienced in reverting vandalism. I already have experience from 2024, but I went back to doing it this year. I am aware of counter vandalism using the filter log. I revert and warn with editing tool Twinkle, which is mostly used to revert vandalism. Even if someone makes disruptive edits or removes content, I am also quick to revert and warn them. Rollbacking will be easier and quicker for me to revert edits that are problematic, vandalism, and disruptive. Beyhive Navy 🐝🪖 (talk) 11:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to fight vandalism more effectively, and tools like Huggle and Interceptor seem like they would be very useful in doing so. Wikipedia is awesome :) WikipediholicRat (talk) 00:29, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
Hi. I am requesting TE rights so I can make edits to template-protected template faster. I have numerous (over 5) template requests, of which I believe around 5 have been accepted, and have made over 3 sandbox edits. My main template edite are those which help readability on Dark Mode while minimally affecting light mode, such as my series of edite to Wdefcon templates ({{Edit COI/backlog}}, {{AfC information}}, etc.). With TE, I would be able to make more of these, alongside others. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 22:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
Requesting temporary account IP viewer rights to help with counter-vandalism on Eastern European and Balkan articles. This will also let me spot disruptive and banned accounts and catch sockpuppet evasion. Nishjan (talk) 18:31, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to request temporary account IP viewer rights, just in case more than one temporary account disrupts Wikipedia. I reported two edit wars, one containing multiple unregistered users and one with a registered user. On a template, I also reverted vandalism two weeks after a temporary account vandalized it. Slackintosh (talk) 21:30, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
I regularly check for and remove/tag certain blog/tabloid sources that are frequently reintroduced to pages by nobility SPAs, many of whom are block-evading. When I can identify an IP-hopping LOUTSOCK (e.g. "Brazil IP obsessed with descendants of Pedro II") it's easier to anticipate where else disruption might be occurring under different IP addresses. JoelleJay (talk) 10:54, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
|
.
Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
|
|
- User:Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes
- Newbie edits to templates
- Tagged speedy removed
- Tagged possible BLP issues
- Tagged article blanking
- Tagged shouting
- Tagged nonsense characters
- Tagged repeating characters
- Tagged possible vandalism
- Tagged possible userpage spam
- Tagged possible link spam #1
- Tagged possible link spam #2
|
Barnstars
 |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you! Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
 |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
 |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC) |