Plato

This paper presents an immanent critique of Parmenides and Plato, the foundational figures of Western metaphysics of fixity. Against Parmenides, it argues that the immovable One collapses through performative self-contradiction and fails to explain the illusion of change. Against Plato, it demonstrates that the Form of the Good falls into tautology as a self-grounding absolute and remains vulnerable to the Third Man regress. Both attempts to secure a fixed absolute ultimately fail on their own terms. The paper concludes that the (...) only coherent ground is the unfixable One—a dynamic, self-differentiating ground whose essence is the impossibility of fixation. This manuscript is a revised and expanded English version of the author’s original Korean draft from the project The Resurrection of God. Core ideas and philosophical direction are entirely my own. Claude AI was used for translation and stylistic refinement. This is a preliminary draft. (shrink)

By examining the history of philosophy spanning from Plato to post-structuralism, I detected the inherent flaws within those philosophical systems, and through those very deficiencies, deduced the absolute necessity of the One. Furthermore, this being—God, or the One—must possess the attribute of a dynamic, unfixable nature, and by modifying the Hegelian dialectic, I have posited the mechanism through which existence is derived. Consequently, through this return of the Divine, a new horizon for twenty-first-century metaphysics has been opened.

This chapter provides an overview of late antique and medieval transformative philosophies. The first section discusses the following key topics: Plotinus’s transformative system of philosophy, his development of key elements of Plato’s thought, and his own unique positions; methodological modifications and changing contexts in the Neoplatonic transformation of the soul in Porphyry and Iamblichus; Augustine’s Judeo-Christian adaptation and alteration of such key elements of transformative philosophy; and Proclus’s system of anagogic self-transformation toward the One–Good. The second section focuses on additional (...) aspects of transformative philosophy in medieval Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Neoplatonic lore, namely regarding Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, Boethius, Eriugena, Isaac Israeli, Ibn Sina, Master Eckhart, Nicolaus de Cusa, and others. (shrink)

To Turn the Soul collects fourteen essays (three by Eva Brann) inspired by the life and thought of philosopher Jacob Klein. The contributors have been animated by Klein’s legacy—whether because they knew him, studied at St. John’s College, the institution he shaped, or found his writings a rich stimulus for thought and exploration. While the majority of the essays are based primarily on the study of Klein’s writings, they all take up an inquiry inspired by an encounter with his work. (...) Their goal is to deepen or expand Klein’s thought by exploring its consequences, or traveling down avenues of investigation that Klein himself pursued and in some cases even initiated. The essays are offered in the hope that they inspire others to read Klein’s writings and think for themselves about the matters he takes up in them. (shrink)

Offering an in-depth examination of the political philosophy of Plato's Republic, Stephen O. Peprah challenges the prevalent scholarly interpretation that misreads and underestimates Plato's view of the status and role of non-philosophical citizens. Rather than seeing the ordinary human beings who make up the civic population as servile to the select philosophical elite, the argument is not only that they make an important contribution to the polis based on their moral, epistemic, and somatic competences, but that the political community serves (...) their well-being. Grounded in recent work on Plato's political philosophy and within Plato's contractarian commitment (koinonia) in Book II of Republic, this study shows that the individual and the polis have positive, if not equal, standing. Each is positively dependent on the other, and political authority of the philosopher-rulers is justified to create enabling conditions to facilitate this mutual interdependence. And so, by arguing that Plato's just society – Kallipolis – evolves from the collaborative efforts of individuals who aim to deal with a common human predicament (insufficiency), Peprah reveals that Platonic political theory is engineered to be a more inclusive system than previously thought. This study is an important reassessment that shows the artisans of Republic as possessing individual and political agency. (shrink)

Ancient sources label Xanthippe as a “difficult” woman – shrewish, emotional, and hostile to philosophy. While some recent feminist scholars have reinterpreted these sources as being more sympathetic, most stop short of asking about her philosophical life and commitments, assuming that the evidence is simply too sparse to draw any conclusions. This paper argues against this assumption. It establishes that there is a lesser-known ancient tradition, possibly beginning in the works of the ancient Athenian Socratic acolytes and continuing into the (...) fictitious epistolary of the Imperial Greek period, according to which Xanthippe is a philosophical participant, living by philosophical principles, and perhaps even conserving Socratic works after his death. This tradition also suggests that she may have held her own philosophical views which merit future consideration, as she is sometimes associated with topics like moral education, philosophical community, and material wellbeing. (shrink)

The Vanishing Point reads the history of philosophy as a single operation: ontologization. The subject's act of distinction is converted into an independent feature of reality. Across six levels of recursive distinction, every major system delegates the subject's work to an external construct. The apparent progress of philosophy is the relocation of the same error. -/- The book dismantles the mechanism and traces what remains: transparency, the meta-position reclaimed, the Black Flame — the subject as the ungrounded source of its (...) own distinguishing. -/- Fourth volume in the Philosophy of the Left-Hand Path series. (shrink)

This paper traces the sources of Pseudo-Dionysius’ “Spiral of Love” (Divine Names IV, 10) to a single Neoplatonic origin. It demonstrates that all four modes of Erôs between the different beings, namely the reversive, the communal, the providential, and the conservative, go back to Proclus himself, who has explicitly coined and conceptualized all four of them in different contexts of his extant works. Nevertheless, Pseudo-Dionysius adapted this Proclean quadripartition to his own Christian and creationist system.

A question posed by the reading of two incomplete works, two partial translations of Plato’s Timaeus, will serve to introduce us to the study of a specific field of Latin philosophical technical vocabulary. The two translations, one by Cicero (106-43 B.C.), the other by the Neoplatonist Calcidius (4th-5th century), will allow us to analyse the same philosophical question in two different contexts, to observe how this question is expressed differently in the lexical uses of the same language, Latin, but from (...) two different periods, from two different times. We should bear in mind, however, that both authors, by the mere fact of having undertaken the translation of the same text, may have some common objectives: at the very least, and without doubt, a certain informative zeal; probably, a desire to enrich one’s own language (a sure desire in the case of Cicero); perhaps, the pretension of becoming an essential point of reference for the later tradition (in the case of Calcidius and for the medieval Platonic tradition, certainly achieved). In the course of this work, we will be able to deduce to what extent these supposed “objectives” were achieved. But, be that as it may, what will interest us here, above all, will be to analyse the work of translating the Timaeus in itself, from a lexical point of view and sticking to the study of some of the terms that shape the discussion raised by Plato in the first half of his Timaeus. (shrink)

Söz dönüp dolaşıp yine modern okurun kabul etmeyeceği fikirlere gelmişti. “Nefsin çevrilmesini (psukhagôgia) mi kastediyorsunuz?” dedim mecburî bir kabullenişle. “Neden hafife alıyorsun bu fikri?” dedi babacan bir edayla, “Söylev (logos) marifetiyle nefsin çevrilmesinden başka bir şey midir retorik? Söylevin yetisi nefsin çevrilmesi değil midir? Âdili, iyiyi ve güzeli öğretmek ya da dinleyenlerin nefslerine nakşetmek amacı taşıyanlar dışında hangi söylev konuşmaya ya da yazmaya değer?” “İyi ama” diye kekeledim, “nefsin çevrilmesi felsefenin de yöntemi değil miydi?” “Niye şaşırdın?” dedi, “Kendini bilmenin aslî (...) yolu olarak philosophia faaliyeti aynı zamanda bir kendilik sanatı değil midir ve tam da bu nedenle en yüksek sanat (megistes mousikês) değil midir? Bak, böylece senin Lutetialı çocuğun da meseleyi doğru anladığını göstermiş olduk: Kendilik sanatı, hem epistemolojidir hem etiktir hem de estetiktir.”. (shrink)

This paper argues that Occam's Razor cannot be legitimately applied to adjudicate between empirical and rationalist epistemic frameworks. The common assumption that sense data requires fewer justifications than higher abstract concepts such as Plato's Forms is shown to be unfounded. Both sense data processing and abstract conceptual frameworks rely on an indeterminate number of a priori assumptions, none of which can be self-justified, an instantiation of Agrippa's Trilemma. Since the cognitive load of either framework cannot be quantified, the parsimony criterion (...) Occam's Razor depends on is inapplicable. Furthermore, naturalistic and evolutionary objections are shown to be circularly dependent on the very a priori structures they seek to ground. The paper concludes that rationalism and empiricism are epistemically equivalent in their justificatory burden. (shrink)

This paper offers a detailed analysis of Damascius' discourse on Orphic theology in Chapter 123 of On First Principles, focusing on how Damascius correlates the first principles of Rhapsodic and Hieronyman theogonies to his own Neoplatonic first principles. Through detailed textual analysis, it presents a schematic alignment of Damascian principles with Orphic theology.

This article offers a close reading of De Mysteriis VIII 2 (261.7–262.11), where Iamblichus distinguishes the “One God” (θεὸς εἷς), who remains “unmoved” (ἀκίνητος), from “the First God and King” (ὁ πρῶτος θεὸς καὶ βασιλεύς). It argues that these two figures are best identified with Iamblichus’ two highest Ones: (1) the entirely Ineffable principle (One1) and (2) the Simple One (One2). The decisive clue is a liturgical criterion. Read alongside De Mysteriis V 9, the contrast between ἀκίνητος (261.8) and συγκινεῖται (...) (210.3) is not merely cast in the language of rest and motion but functions as a marker of liturgical (i.e. theurgic) addressability, delineating where theurgy can—and cannot—reach. This boundary clarifies how Iamblichus distinguishes One1 from One2 by insisting that One1 remains “untouched” by any ritual linkage even while One2 can enter the economy of theurgic stirring, thereby bringing into view an often-overlooked hierarchy of theurgic accessibility. The argument is further supported by an analysis of the epithets applied to the First God and King in VIII 2 and by comparison with their usage in the Platonic tradition. (shrink)

This thesis examines the philosophical ideologies of three prominent late-Byzantine thinkers—Gemistos Plethon, George of Trebizond (Trapezuntios), and Bessarion—and evaluates which perspective offers the most compelling approach to the revival of Greek philosophy in the 15th century. It contextualizes their work within the intellectual and cultural milieu of late Byzantium, including the preservation of classical texts and the doctrinal negotiations of the Council of Florence. Pletho advocates for a Platonic revival, emphasizing metaphysical hierarchy, divine unity, and cosmology, while Trapezuntios defends Aristotle, (...) stressing logical rigor, empirical reasoning, and compatibility with Christian doctrine. Bessarion, trained in Neoplatonism, seeks to harmonize the two, arguing that Plato and Aristotle share fundamental principles and that their apparent opposition is largely a matter of misinterpretation. By analyzing their arguments, including formal logical reconstructions, the thesis concludes that Bessarion’s reconciliatory approach provides the most persuasive framework for integrating classical philosophy with Christian thought, demonstrating a balance between fidelity to tradition and intellectual synthesis. (shrink)

The essay begins a series of translations and interpretations of Alexander of Aphrodisias' commentary on Aristotle's critique of Plato's theory of Ideas. The authors present a commentary on two passages at the beginning of Aristotle's Metaphysics Α 6. In the first passage, Alexander explains the influences and reasons that led Plato to introduce Ideas. In the second, Alexander clarifies the relationship between Ideas, Forms, and particulars by drawing on Aristotle's concepts of synonymy and homonymy. While the first passage rather repeats (...) Aristotle's original formulations, the second passage offers a deeper explanation not found in Aristotle's surviving texts. (shrink)

This essay argues that collapse is not the negation of order but the condition under which order becomes intelligible. Across political, historical, and cosmic frameworks, breakdown reveals the internal structures that sustain stability. Through a comparative analysis of Plato, G. W. F. Hegel, and Isaac Newton, the essay demonstrates that collapse is consistently theorized as temporally structured rather than accidental. Plato interprets political degeneration as the immanent imbalance of the city and soul; Hegel reconceives historical crisis as the productive negation (...) through which Spirit develops; Newton situates the fall of empires within a lawful, providential chronology that preserves global stability despite local disruption. By placing these accounts in structural comparison, the essay advances a multi-scalar philosophy of collapse, showing that instability does not abolish rationality but discloses the temporal conditions of its operation. (shrink)

This brief offers a structured historical overview of the concept of aether as the “fifth element” within the development of ancient cosmology and its later transformations. Beginning with archaic mythological cosmologies and early Greek thought, it traces the emergence of aether as a distinct celestial substance associated with luminosity, purity, and incorruptibility. Particular attention is given to its systematic formulation in Aristotle’s De caelo, where the fifth body becomes the material principle of the supralunar realm, distinguished from the four sublunary (...) elements by its eternal circular motion. The study then follows the persistence and gradual transformation of the concept through medieval interpretations of the quinta essentia, Renaissance natural philosophy, early modern physics, and finally its restricted survival in modern chemical terminology. Rather than advancing a polemical thesis, this text is conceived as a pedagogical support document for students and researchers in ancient cosmology and classical Greek philosophy, offering a historically grounded synthesis of primary sources and key interpretative traditions. (shrink)

Plutarch and Musonius Rufus have both sometimes been regarded as forerunners of feminism, although the feminist ideas of both thinkers have also been rightly assessed as “incomplete.” What has not been fully explored, however, is the precise difference between the two thinkers’ apparent feminism. This paper will compare Plutarch’s views on women and marriage, especially in the Coniugalia praecepta, the Mulierum virtutes and the Amatorius, with those of Musonius in order to better understand to what extent Plutarch’s “incomplete feminism” can (...) be attributed to the author rather than the cultural background of the period. While the thesis that virtue is the same for men and women is endorsed by both Plutarch and Musonius, in practice they both confine the sphere of women’s virtue to subsidiary roles. However, their justifications are different from each other. While Musonius considers external circumstances, including traditional gender roles, to be irrelevant to the exercise of virtue, Plutarch understands the female nature to be distinct from the male nature in accordance with his Platonic metaphysics and psychology. This discrepancy resonates with their respective views on marriage and sex, specifically on male same-sex intercourse and adultery. In contrast to Musonius, who focuses on procreation as the function of marriage and sexual intercourse, Plutarch places more emphasis on the affectionate bond, especially on the part of the wife. Plutarch is more interested in, and genuinely cares for, the nature and conditions of actual women, and this is what makes Plutarch’s views both attractive and problematic. (shrink)

Relativity is the phenomenon that things relate to things: parents to their offspring; doubles to halves; larger things to smaller things. This book is about how ancient philosophers, particularly Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics, and Sextus Empiricus, understood this phenomenon and how their theories of relativity affected, and were affected by, their broader philosophical outlooks. Many scholars have thought that ancient thinkers were either fundamentally confused about the phenomenon of relativity, or held a view that is a trivial variation on a (...) modern view. This book argues that neither is the case. In fact, ancient philosophers shared a close-knit family of views, referred to as ‘constitutive relativity’: a relative is not simply linked by a relation, but is constituted by it. The book shows that this view is present in Plato, and is exploited by him in some key arguments concerning the Forms and the partition of the soul. Aristotle adopts the constitutive view in his discussions of relativity in Categories 7 and the Topics, and retains the constitutive view in his later discussion in Metaphysics 5.15. The Relatives Argument of Aristotle’s lost work On Ideas also involves constitutive relativity. The book moves on to examine a complex report of Stoic relativity and the role relativity played in Stoic philosophy. Finally, the book discusses Sextus Empiricus’ way of thinking about relativity, which does not appeal to the nature of relatives, but rather to how we conceive of things as correlative. (shrink)

Clement of Alexandria’s Paedagogus contains many quotations and paraphrases of Plato’s Laws. Meanwhile, it is well established that Clement’s Paedagogus owes much of its material to Musonius Rufus and that Musonius’ Discourses also sometimes make allusions to Plato’s Laws. This paper explores the intertextual relations of the three by closely analyzing some passages (especially on sexual morality and on frugal ways of living) and shows that some of the references to Plato’s Laws in Clement’s Paedagogus, though not directly drawn from (...) Musonius, can only have been made under his influence, while Musonius himself had presumably followed the Stoic tradition of utilizing Plato’s Laws in the sphere of practical ethics. (shrink)

Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics can each be understood as claiming that all human beings desire to live well, and that this desire, when accompanied by correct beliefs about the role of virtue in living well, moves people to be virtuous. Call this claim ‘psychological eudaimonism’ (‘PE’). Neither Plato, Aristotle, nor the Stoics, however, investigate PE's warrant. After identifying the claim in these ancients' writings, this paper argues in their stead that PE is warranted by what is involved in understanding (...) others as rational generally, and what is involved in understanding ourselves as practically rational specifically. The former is interestingly and unexpectedly informed by Donald Davidson’s account of linguistic interpretation. The latter is the ancients’ account of practical rationality itself. (shrink)

This article presents a constellational biography of Third Humanism, a current in German classical philology that emerged during the Weimar Republic and peaked in the late 1920s and early 1930s. Through the methodological lens of Konstellationsforschung, it reconstructs the network of scholars – Werner Jaeger, Julius Stenzel, Otto Regenbogen, Richard Harder, and others – whose shared yet contested readings of classical texts offered original interpretations and sought to redefine classical studies as a vehicle for cultural regeneration and political renewal, while (...) rejecting both historicist positivism and irrationalist mysticism. Rather than tracing linear genealogies, the analysis highlights the tensions animating this constellation: between humanist universalism and German nationalism; between scholarly objectivity and pedagogical mission; and between the normative authority of the classical tradition and the exigencies of contemporary crisis. Engaging Plato, Cicero, and key concepts like paideia, humanitas, and Bildung, this current fused philological scholarship with a normative vision of human formation. The article traces its institutional consolidation through journals, associations, and reform, before turning to the divergent positions its members adopted under National Socialism. Drawing on primary sources – including correspondence, reviews, and policy documents – it shows how this attempt to revive classical education was both ideologically vulnerable and intellectually productive. (shrink)

This teaching material explores ancient cosmological conceptions of the world by examining the figure of Atlas and the meaning of “world” (kosmos, ouranós) in Greek thought. Drawing on classical sources such as Plato’s Timaeus, Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Pliny the Elder’s Natural History, and Hesiod’s Theogony, it shows that in antiquity the world was not identified with the planet Earth, but with a unified and ordered cosmic structure, often represented as a celestial sphere. The material is presented here for greater visibility and (...) is also available in the Teaching Materials section, with the aim of providing an accessible framework for understanding the symbolic and conceptual foundations of ancient cosmology. (shrink)

This teaching-oriented text explores structural parallels between Plato’s Demiurge in the Timaeus and the Memphite theology of Ptah, focusing on their shared demiurgic function as organizing principles of the cosmos. Without presupposing historical transmission or doctrinal identity, the study adopts a comparative and interpretative approach to examine how both traditions articulate cosmic order through constructive, intelligible processes rather than creation ex nihilo. Drawing on the interpretative frameworks of Cornford, Brisson, and Breasted, the text is intended as educational and divulgative material. (...) It has been uploaded to the unpublishing section to enhance accessibility, visibility, and pedagogical use. (shrink)

Three claims have dominated contemporary epistemology for the better part of a century: -/- 1. Knowledge is justified true belief; 2. Treating knowledge as justified true belief has been standard in epistemology since Plato; 3. This ancient standard was torpedoed by Gettier’s (1963) paper, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” -/- Taken together, 1–3 form the background of the JTB theory of knowledge (henceforth JTB). According to JTB, a subject S knows a proposition p just in case (i) p is true; (...) (ii) S believes p; and (iii) S’s belief is justified. But in 1963, Edmund Gettier dealt what is generally regarded to be a devastating blow to (iii), and therefore to JTB on the whole. So then, the thinking goes, some new version of JTB must be found, usually by modifying (iii), the J condition. Many many studies have been written on this, with mixed results. But what if the whole JTB enterprise is frustrated precisely because it was wrong-headed from the get-go? (shrink)

In the Republic, Plato presents the story of magic ring of Gyges. The ring makes its wearer invisible, allowing him to commit evil without fear of punishment or retribution. This story is an early presentation of the central problem of moral motivation. It is that three plausible claims seem incompatible. First, we have rational reasons to act morally. Second, there are absolute moral prohibitions. Third, rational reasons for action have motivating force. Some philosophers reject the existence of absolute prohibitions. Others (...) reject the existence of rational reasons for moral action. Still others suggest that rational reasons have no motivating force. There is, however, a solution to the central problem that avoids each of these implausible moves. It is that rational reasons have motivating force only for the right agents, e. g., the practically rational, the fully informed, the virtuous, and so on. This is so because rational reasons for action depend on something having intrinsic value, to which appropriate agents respond in the right way. This answer helps explain why some people might be tempted by ring of Gyges despite having rational reasons to avoid it. It remains an open question, however, whether such a theory of moral motivation depends on anything like a Platonic conception of the good. (shrink)

This collection includes abstracts and research papers from participants in the XXXIII International Conference "The Universe of Platonic Thought: Platonism and Literary Forms of Philosophy." Organized by the Platonic Philosophical Society, the conference was held at the Russian Christian Academy for the Humanitites Named Afrer Fyodor Dostoevsky with the support of the Russian Philosophical Society.

This collection includes abstracts from the presentations of the participants of the XXXII International Conference "The Universe of Platonic Thought: Plato's Legacy in the History of Science and Education." Organized by the Platonic Philosophical Society, the conference was held at the Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities with the support of the Russian Philosophical Society and the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University.

This collection includes abstracts from the presentations of the participants of the XXXII International Conference "The Universe of Platonic Thought: Plato's Legacy in the History of Science and Education." Organized by the Platonic Philosophical Society, the conference was held at the Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities with the support of the Russian Philosophical Society and the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University.

The essay provides a comprehensive historical and methodological framework (a « user’s manual » in short) for approaching Aristotle’s elusive treatise on Ideas – « not quite lost, not quite recovered ». Its starting point is the observation that Aristotle’s anti-Platonic remarks on Forms rank among the sharpest in the corpus, yet they confront the reader with a methodological paradox: on the one hand, his attacks are strikingly coherent and appear to presuppose a long and technically sophisticated debate; on the (...) other hand, precisely because Aristotle so often writes in a laconic, recapitulatory mode, the dossier remains frustratingly obscured by gaps in detail. The result is a familiar interpretive dilemma: either one treats the treatise as essentially unrecoverable and contents oneself with scattered allusions, or one attempts an ambitious reconstruction that risks conflating later paraphrase, doxography, or scholastic smoothing with Aristotle’s own text. The paper rejects this forced choice. It argues that the Peri Ideôn can be approached with genuine philological traction, provided one adopts a rigorous protocol that distinguishes types of evidence and assigns each an appropriate inferential weight. In short, the paper function less as a speculative reconstruction than as an operational guide to what can be reconstructed and to what must remain conjectural. The essay unfolds in three stages. First, it situates the Peri Ideôn within Aristotle’s broader metaphysical preoccupations with universality—what it is to say that something is one over many, and what kind of being (if any) such a universal enjoys. This framing matters because it allows the reader to see that Aristotle’s engagement with Platonic Forms is not an episodic quarrel, but a cluster of pressure-points where issues about science, definition, and predication come to the fore. Second, the paper reopens the textual and editorial dossier with special attention to the transmission-layer through which the treatise is known. Here its contribution is deliberately practical: it explains how the fragments traditionally assembled from Alexander of Aphrodisias’ commentary tradition can now be handled more finely by asking what we should count as a “fragment,” what we should count as a paraphrase, and where Alexander may already be interpreting rather than transmitting. Third, the essay tests this protocol on a set of canonical argumentative nodes – those places where Aristotle’s own writings gesture most clearly toward the treatise and where later readers most insistently return (most notably in connection with the « Third Man Argument », which serves as a case in point). In sum, the essay does not claim to offer a new grand reconstruction, but rather a disciplined way of reading a lost work through layered witnesses. By offering explicit rules of use (what to extract, what to bracket, what to treat as later mediation), the essay aims to make the Peri Ideôn usable again for historians of Platonism and Aristotelianism alike: usable as a map of argumentative options within the Academy, and usable as a key for interpreting the most compressed and allusive anti-Platonic passages of Aristotle’s surviving corpus. (shrink)

While there is little doubt that Aristotle had no sympathy for Plato’s Ideas, it is not always clear what his grievances with them were, and to what extent he did justice to the arguments Plato and other proponents of the Ideas put forward in favour of their existence. His criticism is usually both highly condensed and allusive. In fact, Aristotle seems to assume everywhere that his readers were remarkably familiar with the complexities of a debate that it would be difficult (...) to reconstruct solely on the basis of the traces it has left in his school writings. Hence the great interest of a quasi-canonical source – the Peri ideôn – in which Aristotle addresses the problems of knowing whether there are ideas, whether it is possible to prove that they exist, and whether or not such proofs are all of equal value or not. Yet from the earliest attempts at reconstruction to the most recent interpretations, Aristotle’s lost work on Plato’s Ideas remains an enigmatic text. In particular, we may wonder whether the language and content, as revealed by Alexander of Aphrodite in his commentary on the book Great Alpha of the Metaphysics, reflect the letter of the original or whether it has been reorganised or rearranged, or even reworked in ways and for purposes that were at the sole discretion of the commentator. The translation and the eight essays collected in this volume explore the fragments of the Peri ideôn precisely from the angle of this multi-term equation, each time taking into account the difficulties associated with the testimony of Alexander of Aphrodite, who used the Peri ideôn in order to explain an Aristotelian text other than the Peri ideôn itself. (shrink)

This chapter examines a range of ancient Greek and Roman views regarding hope, developing themes drawn from philosophical sources—including Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoic and Epicurean schools—and discussing approaches and applications in the narratives of Thucydides and in ancient Greek medicine. Selected references to Greek and Roman literature and cultural practices are also included. Together, these ancient sources reveal complex human attitudes about the future, and the chapter considers various criteria used to make judgments about the value of hope. Themes (...) include the relationships of hope to fear and courage, rationality and memory, emotion and pleasure, and human agency and well-being. Throughout, connections are made with current philosophical literature on hope, in the belief that familiarity with the variety and nuance of ancient attitudes can promote a deeper understanding of our own notions of hope. (shrink)

This essential reference text on the life, thought and writings of Plato uses over 160 short, accessible articles to cover a complete range of topics for both the first-time student and seasoned scholar of Plato and ancient philosophy. It is organized into five parts illuminating Plato's life, the whole of the Dialogues attributed to him, the Dialogues' literary features, the concepts and themes explored within them and Plato's reception via his influence on subsequent philosophers and the various interpretations of his (...) work. This fully updated 2nd edition includes 19 newly commissioned entries on topics ranging across comedy, tragedy, Xenophon, metatheatre, gender, musical theory, animals, Orphism, political theory, religion, time, Hellenistic philosophy and post-Platonic ancient commentaries. It also features revisions to the majority of articles from the 1st edition, including 8 which have been completely re-written, and 12 which have had the references substantially revised. Reflecting the growing diversity of Plato scholarship across the world, this edition includes contributions from a wide range of scholars who enrich the field and provide students and scholars with a vital resource for study and reference. (shrink)

This chapter explores Plato’s and Aristotle’s thoughts on omnipresence. Neither Plato nor Aristotle provides a unified theory of divine omnipresence. In each we see tension between opposing tendencies. Plato posits in the Timaeus a world-soul aware of particular things and events throughout the cosmos, although it is unclear whether this implies that the world-soul is omnipresent. But if it is, Plato may face conflict with his doctrine that human souls are the individual loci of responsibility. Similarly, Aristotle’s metaphysics of organic (...) substances seems to preclude any strong notion of an omnipresent being, since it is based on the idea that each organic substance is governed by its own essence-providing soul. Even so, the everlasting species of such substances owe the sempiternity of their life conditions to the eternal actuality of the divine prime mover. While this ultimate principle is particularly associated with the outermost celestial sphere, its effects are certainly omnipresent. (shrink)

Este artículo de divulgación explora la imagen del Huso de Ananké en el Mito de Er de Platón como clave para comprender la arquitectura celeste en la filosofía antigua. Partiendo de la observación astronómica del cielo circumpolar, el texto conecta la descripción platónica con tradiciones simbólicas universales en torno al axis mundi. A través de una analogía entre el huso textil y el cosmos, Platón presenta un modelo de ocho órbitas concéntricas que reflejan no solo el orden astronómico, sino también (...) un marco moral: la necesidad (Ananké), el destino (las Moiras) y la libertad en la elección del alma. El ensayo propone así que el huso no es mera metáfora, sino una representación estructural del universo antiguo y una brújula ética donde lo cósmico y lo humano se entrelazan. (shrink)

Das Verhältnis von Kants Philosophie zum Denken der Antike ist Gegenstand einer anhaltenden Kontroverse. Einerseits wurde im Sinne der querelle des anciens et des modernes behauptet, dass sich Kants Denken aus spezifisch neuzeitlichen Prämissen und Problemstellungen heraus entwickelt habe, sodass von einem Einfluss der antiken Philosophie auf das Denken Kants sensu stricto nicht gesprochen werden könne. Andererseits wurde immer wieder die besondere Bedeutung der antiken Philosophen und Philosophenschulen für die Genese des kantischen Systems herausgestellt. Vor allem Platon wurde dabei wiederholt (...) als wichtige Inspirationsquelle genannt. Das Ziel des vorliegenden Bandes ist es, ein wenig Licht in dieses philosophiehistorische Dickicht zu bringen, indem Kant-Expert*innen und Antike-Forscher*innen miteinander in einen Austausch gebracht werden, um das Verhältnis von Kants Praktischer Philosophie zur antiken philosophischen Tradition anhand von einigen ausgewählten Themenkomplexen zu beleuchten. Im Mittelpunkt der Analysen der Autor*innen stehen zentrale Begrifflichkeiten der Individualethik Kants (Tugend, Glück, Pflicht), seiner Politischen Philosophie (Staatsbürgerschaft, Kosmopolitismus) sowie die Frage nach Kants philosophischer Methode. (shrink)

Adam Rosenthal visited the Centre for the Study of Theory and Criticism at Western University on October 24, 2024, for a roundtable discussion of his recently published book _Prosthetic Immortalities: Biology, Transhumanism, and the Search for Indefinite Life_ (University of Minnesota Press, 2024). The roundtable consisted of Joshua Schuster, Derek Woods, Antoine Traisnel, and Jason Hawes. We collect here revised responses from Schuster, Traisnel, and Hawes, along with Rosenthal’s introductory remarks.

플라톤의 『파이드로스』는 다양한 철학적 주제들을 다채롭게 다루는 대화편이다. 특히 소크라테스의 두 번째 연설, 즉 ‘다시 부르는 노래’는 『파이드로스』 내에서도 가장 이채로운 대목이다. 소크라테스의 두 번째 연설은 에로스와 광기에 대한 논의뿐만 아니라, 일견 에로스와 직접적으로 연관되어 있지 않은 것처럼 보이는 다양한 소재들, 즉 인간의 영혼과 신의 영혼, 몸, 상기와 같은 다양한 철학적 주제들을 포괄적으로 논한다. 그러나 ‘다시 부르는 노래’는 그 철학적인 이채로움만큼이나 해석적으로 난해한 부분이기도 하다. 본 논문은 영혼, 상기, 몸, 신과의 닮아감과 같이 에로스와 일견 무관해 보이는주제들도 기실 ‘다시 부르는 노래’의 (...) 원 주제를 입증하는 데 기여한다는 점을 보임으로써, ‘다시 부르는 노래’를 보다 풍부하게 해석하고자 한다. ‘다시 부르는 노래’에서 영혼과 상기에 관한 논의는, 에로스가 영혼과 몸의 통일체로서의 인간이 신과 닮아가는 자기수양의 과정에 기여한다는 점을 밝히기 위해 필요하다. 이를 통해 자기수양은 고립 속에서 이루어지는 단독자의 활동이 아니라, 사랑하는 사람과 사랑받는 사람 간의 에로스적인 관계 속에서 이루어지는 활동이라는 점이 드러난다. 즉, 에로스는 단순한 광기가 아니라 상기의 성취를 위해서 필요하다는 사실이 입증된다. 이처럼 상기가 에로스를 통해신과 닮아가는 과정이라는 점, 그리고 그 닮아가는 과정의 주체가 영혼과 신체의 통일체로서의 인간이라는 점을 고려한다면, 영혼, 신체, 상기, 신과의 닮아감과 같은 다양한 철학적 계기들은 에로스의 참된 가치를 정당화하는 데 불가결한 계기임을 확인할 수 있다. (shrink)

One doesn’t have to labor to find expressions of the ubiquitous negative attitude ancient Greek male authors expressed about women. This view, however, was not shared by the Socratics, as this volume shows. Among the Socratics, Plato, especially in the Republic, gives extraordinary expression to the Socratic recognition of the moral, political, and intellectual capacities of women – so much so that one contemporary scholar has gone so far as to claim that “the Re­public proposes a revolutionary project for fourth (...) century BC Athens” (Brisson 2012). Plato’s “revolution” has captured the attention of a great many scholars, many of whom have tried to answer the question, “Why?” Why did Plato so radi­cally cut against the ingrained prejudice and argue, as he does in Republic V, that “men and women are by nature the same with respect to guarding the city” (456a)? In this paper, we take up the question that has prompted so many schol­arly proposals. After a brief summary of Plato’s argument for his “revolutionary” proposal, we turn to the arguments some scholars have offered for supposing that Plato’s thoughts about women were entailed by some other philosophical or political commitment. We explain why we do not find such explanations entirely adequate. We then make our own proposal: Plato’s evaluation of the capacities of women to do what would be required of the guardians of the kallipolis was, at least to some degree, informed and motivated by what he regarded as actual ex­amples of especially talented and capable women. (shrink)