Avatar

GreatWyrmGab

@greatwyrmgold / greatwyrmgold.tumblr.com

Trying to be less terminally online. Failing. Trying to figure out my gender. That's going better. Trial pronouns: She/her
Avatar
Reblogged

Saw this book at Ropecon a few weeks ago and for some reason the only thing I could imagine a book called "Demons: A Secular Look" being was an otherwise empty book with just one chapter titled "Demons aren't real stupid."

Avatar
Reblogged

I've said before that the transfeminism I express here is not yet a real political movement, on the basis that it does not posses any actual movement. And while some of this of course is just the relative recency of viable versions of transfeminism and the public popularity of anti-feminist, anti-trans, and anti-transfeminist sentiments, some of it is also a tumblr problem.

Tumblr does not understand what a political discussion should look like. Inevitably, it devolves into a discourse™, and once it does, any semblance of a connection to the materiality of the subject matter is lost completely.

The spectre of the ship wars haunts this website's culture, it hardly means anything to be "pro-ship" or "anti-ship" because the discourse devolved so far past the domain of practical, material action, that it left the realm of politics entirely.

Transfeminism on tumblr has become mired in these discourses. Actual transfeminists who have actually read or write feminist and trans liberation theory understand the utility of terms like transmisogyny, tma/tme(or it's more useful alternatives like transmisogynized or transfeminized), they understand that any notion of "misandry", including "transmisandry" is a rudderless, antifeminist, utterly unsupported idea, and they understand the ways in which society does not view transfems as men or as meaningfully possessing male privilege.

They hold these positions, which are highly controversial on tumblr, and yet they make up barely a footnote of their actual theory and organizing, which are pointed squarely at the material demands of the people, especially transfeminine people, but also transmasculine people and cis women, who, unlike everyone on tumblr, they are actually fighting to liberate.

The fact that people reblogging posts about transmisandry are anti-feminists does not mean that you are a feminist because you reblog posts about transmisogyny. You are engaging in discourse, not politics.

This is not me saying both sides are wrong, far from it, one side is obviously correct and the other a glorified hate and harassment campaign, but that the way tumblr conducts political discussions as discourse is fundamentally unproductive, and leads to cases where trans woman making correct theoretical points get read in the worst possible fashion and then paraded around the site as the discourse machine takes away the political nature of the discussion in lieu of little more than harassment.

This what happened to isff. Especially after her brief ban by tumblr, she became the center of a still-ongoing hate and harassment campaign which cloaks itself as political discussion by making her into the subject of the discourse rather than a person with thoughts, beliefs, or agency. This discourse took her arguing for youth and sexual liberation and the abolishing of the family as supposedly advocating for child sexual abuse, and her arguing for transfeminism as showing her to be a TERF or even a "TIM".

This was also what happened to Tara Knight. "Puppygate" happened when a transfeminist not knowledgeable of or interested in the tumblr discourse machine wrote a series of articles that was actually about how found families reproduce the dynamic, also found in traditional family structures, of coercive exploitation towards woman and the most feminized. It was received that way on platforms other than tumblr, and while people regardless of platform pointed out the original essay's flaws, on tumblr the article was transmuted by the discourse machine into supposedly being about murdering disabled trans women, Tara's exes, and AI.

I say this all to point out that engaging in tumblr discourse should never be mistaken for real political action that actually contributes to the liberation of women and trans people. I will continue to use this blog to try and win over those who have been deluded by it into anti-feminist, anti-trans positions, and to introduce people who happen to fall onto the correct side of that discourse to real feminist theory and encourage them to go and engage in real feminist action, but that requires an acknowledgement that the vast majority of this blog, and of tumblr (and to a lesser extent, the internet), is none of those things.

Avatar
Reblogged

As someone with a professional understanding of modern progressive* income tax law and a hobbyist understanding of premodern economics, I can't help but wonder how the Belzerg tax system works.

*"Progressive" here means "larger incomes get taxed at a higher rate," plus some other specific details. It's a mathematical label, not a political one.

okay so amall update on my tme/tma hot takes;

yeah okay the way progressive leftist tme people talk about imane khelif is so blatantly transmisogynistic and they dont seem to give a shit about trans women. they talk about how horrendous it is that shes accused of being a trans woman and dont give a shit about what it might be like to be a trans woman. to not have childhood pictures to show, to not have the ability to get your genes tested and prove that you are not a tr***y, to not have an out to the worst possible scenario, being a trans woman

Avatar
Reblogged

You ever just stop to wonder... how in the actual fuck did Spec Ops: The Line get made? Seriously, at the absolute peak of the PS3, Xbox 360 Call of Duty clone shooter era, some mad bastards somehow managed to talk the risk averse, focus testing money men of the videogame industry into letting them make a game convincingly pretending to be a AAA military shooter that slowly reveals itself to be a borderline psychological horror that takes its own entire genre and rips it apart with a sincerely vicious contempt for everything it stands for and everyone who would enjoy it. Spec Ops: The Line is a full 6 hour videogame about how this game and every other one like it are morally reprehensible and completely irredeemable and you personally are a shitty person for playing them. How did that happen?! How did it get approved?! Did the people in charge even know what they were paying for?!

By including a multiplayer mode where you and your internet pals run around shooting guns at opposing players and not thinking about the ramifications of anything.

Money Men don't care what the plot's about. They aren't here for the art. Does it look like Call of Duty? Does it have a PVP mode where you can go bang bang shooty guns? RUBBER STAMP. Go make me money.

It really might have been as easy as saying "Call of Duty meets Fight Club." It mighty even have been as easy as saying "Call of Duty."

It could be argued that the very fact that they were able to get Spec Ops: The Line greenlit is in and of itself indicative of the very culture of mindlessly dogmatic follow-the-leader jingoism towards Call of Duty and its copycats that the game aggressively criticizes.

That they were allowed to make Spec Ops: The Line is proof in and of itself of why Spec Ops: The Line needed to be made.

Avatar
Reblogged

Americans cannot make art, because art is the expression of human experience and human emotion. Americans have no experiences and no emotions. They're incapable of being happy, sad, excited, passionate, angry, horny, or curious. Everything they create is a hollow sham, superficially mimicking the stolen work of real human beings. Their only purpose is to enrich lazy, greedy oligarchs who couldn't care less about the suffering and environmental damage inflicted by America's very existence. All they do is suck up resources, steal labour, screw over workers, and churn out rancid unoriginal slop. Americans cannot make art because they have no souls. Anti-American until I die.

legitimately cannot tell if this is satire or not

Not satire. Americans are incapable of reasoning, forming taste or opinions. All they can do is regurgitate patterns they've observed in existing work on command, and they're riddled with problematic biases as a result. e.g. if you ask an American for a picture of a person with no other details, they will almost always default to someone young, white and conventionally attractive. Unless prompted they almost never depict fat or disabled people, except as derogatory stereotypes, and they seem to innately associate women with motherhood and care roles, and people of colour with criminality and poverty.

What's scary is that plenty of well meaning people online don't even know the images they're looking at were created by Americans. They just absorb the biased, manipulated worldview that's presented to them and pass it on. Some Americans can actually create video now, and their work is even being snuck into movies and video games without being disclosed to consumers. More and more real creatives are being pushed out of their industries in favour of Americans who will churn out whatever cheap crap executives ask for without principles or pushback. Americans are destroying creative industries.

smoking that shit that made the monsters high

Everyday y'all show me how y'all are too pussy to say white people

It’s white people, op. You mean white people. White people are the ones you’re describing. They can’t understand human emotion because they’re a subspecies of human. They’re a mutation. They don’t have feelings, they can only mimic feelings to seem disarming.