old man in the library got a phone call, someone on the other end says loud as fuck “hey pittsburgh phil what are you up to?” and pittsburgh phil responds “i’m in pittsburgh”
girlfriend reviews hentai jigsaw puzzle
award winning film critic/fully grown adult/it he they/bisexual bigender arospec/in a monogamish relationship/cowpuppyskunk/white/tme/USA/don’t follow me if you’re under 18
old man in the library got a phone call, someone on the other end says loud as fuck “hey pittsburgh phil what are you up to?” and pittsburgh phil responds “i’m in pittsburgh”
See more posts like this on Tumblr
#opwe’ve been watching a lot of videos of raccoons and we think they’re cute because they’re kinda like babies? like they have little hands and they’re chunky and mostly crawl around but sometimes unsteadily stand on their hind legs. we compared our emotional reactions to vids of raccoons to vids of guinea pigs and the raccoon ones gave us extremely visceral cute aggression like we were crying and ripping paper and shit and the guinea pigs were like “those would be fun to have as pets”
maybe scientists just need to study me in a lab idk
i can’t think of a single transfeminine person with a platform of any sort who i havent seen spuriously accused of sexual misconduct. laverne cox i guess? i can only suppose that’s because she entered and exited the cultural conversation before it was timely for her to have a tiktok or someone would totally have fabricated evidence of grooming
oh wait. i haven’t seen anyone accusing finnster of grooming yet. i guess it goes without saying that i consider this to be a matter of time.
i don’t understand how it totally passes over peoples heads that the socially normative ways that folk sexually fixate on bodies is still fetishism even if it’s not like specifically a sexual fixation on feet or whatever. like just because it’s socially normal to sexually fixate on breasts doesn’t mean breast fetishism isn’t a thing. fetishism doesn’t mean “sexual fixation that is weird” or even “sexual fixation that is bad”
explain to me why “overly detailed drawings of feet” counts as fetishism but “boob socks with cleavage and visible nipples” doesn’t. no claims that breasts are inherently sexual body parts and feet aren’t, if i see that i need an essay explaining how that could be by tomorrow morning or i’m failing you for this semester
it is not actually incomprehensible to imagine that a group of marginalized women might be intimidated by a group of men harassing them. i don’t think you even have to have a 101 level of feminism understanding to get this one folks
it’s transandrophobic to misgender a trans man and call him a woman. it’s also transandrophobic to acknowledge a trans man as a man with structural privilege over trans women. really and truly just showing that “transandrophobia” doesn’t have a real meaning beyond being an antifeminist signal
i truly don’t think someone can have like a reasonable nuanced and fully fleshed opinion that they can succinctly argue on trans issues if they can’t acknowledge the bare minimum that coercively assigned sex at birth isn’t an objective unchanging biological reality totally divorced from socially enforced standards. like if the entire premise of someone’s argument about transphobia hinges on their presumed “femaleness” being biologically innate that’s just a nonstarter honestly . dispose of opinion in proper receptacle
you know that meme about talking to trans people about gender vs talking to cis people about gender? it’s like that only replace “cis people” with “trans people who also happen to be blackpilled MRAs and know exactly what they are doing”
i made fidel castro in saint’s row 2 just to see if i could and from the front he’s kinda questionable but from the side he looks so much like Castro that it’s kinda scary?
also i made him as buff and fit as possible because i thought it’d be funny but i get jumpscared every time i see his sculpted abs (i made him have his Moral Vest visible at all times of course)