oursin: Photograph of James Miranda Barry, c. 1850 (James Miranda Barry)

Over the years, my dearios, I have devoted a certain number of posts to the humble medicinal leech, both in its legit medical uses, and its deployment in woowoo hirudotherapy.

I have even mentioned that this humble creature was so in demand that by the nineteenth century British stocks were in massive decline and leeches were imported from Furrin Parts (I had to referee a paper on this once.)

But now, the leech! is making! A COMEBACK!!!

Medicinal leeches poised for comeback in Scottish Highlands: Project aims to release hundreds into lochs and streams after centuries of habitat loss and exploitation

Shock horror: I discover from that article that the Welsh leech farm that provides them for modern medicinal uses, supplies a non-native species: 'a Mediterranean variety, Hirudo verbana'. As

Hirudo medicinalis are legally protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act due to their scarcity, making it unlawful to harvest them without special permission, ruling them out for medical use.
.
We advise not wading in Highland streams....

But talking of parasitic practices: King’s estate collecting assets of the dead is ‘bizarre feudal remnant’, says Andy Burnham. O for the pens of the Georgian caricaturists.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

What I read

Finished The Gilda Stories - pretty good with a) the proviso that the ones that are set in the future at the time of writing which is now the past strike a little oddly, though further future looks plausible! and b) I wasn't entirely sold by the article I read's claims that it was doing something Entirely New with vampire tropes, because some of those things had been going on more in genre since the late 70s or so - the not needing to kill, the benign exchange, etc, what Gomez was bringing to it was more vampires who are not originally Ye Haut Aristos and bring that with them into eternal life.

Latest Literary Review, which seemed to have rather a lot of snark and condescension going on this month.

Margaret Drabble, The Realms of Gold (1975), which mostly still holds up.

Georgette Heyer, False Colours (1963) - you know, I thought this one was later? because I didn't remember reading it until later on in my Heyer consumption in youth, maybe it was just the missing volume in local library? Not one of the greats, I thought, or maybe I can now spot things coming, like we all can see what's going to happen when he pretends to be his twin at dinner to meet potential betrothed's wealthy grandmother. Yet another plot-pushing accident. Did think that the early mentions apropos of the man of business were going to lead to revelations of shady goings on, but it went in other directions.

Cecilia Rabess, Everything's Fine (2023), about which I saw some discussion somewhere, and which was a deal on Kobo. Hmmmm. I did think it slipped out of dealing with some of the issues by the good old C19th-novel stratagem of LEGACY, even if that was at cost of father's death.

On the go

Have just started Roshani Chokshi, The Gilded Wolves (2019), which was a Kobo deal, and I think I have seen people mention the writer if not this particular book.

Up Next

Well, next week new KJ Charles and the biography of Hilda Matheson, but not sure what before that.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

What I read

Finished If All These Young Men: a) gosh, that is a bit odder than I remembered, though maybe not by contrast with Romer Wilson's other works b) though I did leave rather a long gap and perhaps it would have helped not to do so c) I would really really like a key to the roman a clef elements!

Brit Bennett, The Mothers (2016), which I did not like quite as much as The Vanishing Half.

Casey McQuiston, Red, White, and Royal Blue (2019) (this was a Kobo Daily Deal one day last week) - why did nobody do some Brit-picking due diligence on this, I get it is AU but not that AU, surely, in terms of Royal Family titles etc? Apart from that I found it a bit clunky, and the political thrillery elements a bit pasted-on. I nearly gave up, but did just about keep reading.

Latest Slightly Foxed. (I rather dissent from the essay on Stella Gibbons' Westwood, which seems to be another of those 'man writes on woman writer that she is a bit not very nice about MEN wot a bitch', with particular reference to Gibbons being HORRID about lightly-disguised Charles Morgan. Query: did her contemporaries immediately go 'Aha: Gerald Challis = Charles Morgan' or was this like what Carolyn Heibrun remarked of her Amanda Cross mysteries that there are a lot of pompous English professors out there and they did not necessarily map to the corpses in the books - i.e. there were probably a sufficient number of up themselves male novelists/dramatists swanning around in the 1930s/early 40s for readers to go 'Nah, Hugh Walpole, doncha think?' or whoever.

I then had a fancy to re-read Margery Allingham's Coroner's Pidgin, except I discover that the Faded Page has it down as Pearls Before Swine (1945) (no, I have no idea why: Lugg's pigkeeping activities are fairly peripheral.) This rather nicely brackets Traitor's Purse set at the beginning of the War, as although Campion had not been bopped on the bonce and is amnesiac as a result, he is sleepless, harried, bewildered, and trying to catch a train to get back to Amanda. I give it plus points for the dotty entitled Dowager Marchioness but I am raising my eyebrows at the coded gay character.

Bernardine Evaristo, Mr Loverman (2013) - pretty good but I did not love it in the way I loved Girl, Woman, Other.

Currently reading

Jewelle Gomez, The Gilda Stories (1991). There was a piece about Gomez and this book in today's Guardian. As I was actually able to find my copy - ? purchased at Silver Moon Books in the Charing X Road when it came out, I think - I have started a re-read.

Still working on Deviations. Oh dear, some of that is horribly familiar recurrence.

Up next

There's a new Literary Review. Also have two pophists of 1920s to skim and what I hope is a final novel of the decade.

oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)

Interview with Kit Heyam, author of Before We Were Trans: A New History of Gender:

a new and different story of gender, that seeks not to be comprehensive or definitive, but – by blending culture, feminism and politics – to widen the scope of what we think of as trans history by telling the stories of people across the globe whose experience of gender has been transgressive, or not characterised by stability or binary categories.... the stories this book tells leave questions and resist conclusions. They are fraught with ambiguity, and defy modern Western terminology and categories.
***

Telling Scotland about AIDS:

From the first reports of AIDS in Scotland, individual activists and organisations have sought to educate and protect their local communities. Historian Colin Moore shows how their campaigns evolved from simple pamphlets to fun and innovative messages incorporating sex, comics, football, and even a bright pink bus.
***

This book looks fascinating: Bo Ruberg: Sex Dolls at Sea: Imagined Histories of Sexual Technologies:

Ruberg examines the generally accepted story that the first sex dolls were dames de voyage, rudimentary figures made of cloth and leather scraps by European sailors on long, lonely ocean voyages in centuries past. In search of supporting evidence for the lonesome sailor sex doll theory, Ruberg uncovers the real history of the sex doll.
***

A rather different slant on love over distance and separation: Aimee Fox, '“I Have Never Felt More Utterly Yours”: Presence, Intimacy, and Long-Distance Marriages in the First World War':

Wartime separation gave couples space to develop new forms of intimacy and affection. Through creative, often abstract, alternatives developed to affect a sense of presence, spouses were able to know, embody, and imagine one another. While separated couples frequently desired and imagined physical reunion, its fleeting nature was emotionally wearing and often undermined intimacy and togetherness in immediate and long-lasting ways.
***

Pioneering the sexy horror of the vampire before the Transylvanian Count: Meet 'Varney,' The Vampire Who Popped Up 50 Years Before 'Dracula':

Varney is about the (very) long quest of Sir Francis Varney to acquire blood to live on, in the form of a beautiful young virgin who he can marry and then suck dry. Lacking this wife due to Plot Reasons, he resorts to the women near him to feed on. He wants to “obtain the voluntary consent of one that is young, beautiful, and a virgin” .... Varney is emo, haunted by guilt, full of self-criticism, and a drifter in a world that hates and fears vampires. Who better, then, to become the icon of the undead? Varney’s tall, gaunt, so pale as to have pure white skin, with “eyes like polished tin” and a head full of long black hair.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

What I read

Two more Mick Herrons, Spook Street (Slough House #4) (2017) and London Rules (Slough House #5) (2018), keeping up the high level.

This could not be said of Jonathan Kellerman, City of the Dead (Alex Delaware #37) (2022). This at first seemed to promise that the victim was murdered for some reason to do with her scammy, scammy, proceedings, but no, it does that annoying thing that he has done on previous occasions and personally, I think would have got him blackballed by the Detection Club: a subplot is introduced fairly well into the story, and then after this goes quiet for a while, two-thirds of the way on as a result a character appears, and pretty much through a series of coincidences is determined by Smug Alex to be not merely the killer but a Dangerous Psycho With Form.

Ruthanna Emrys, The Litany of Earth (The Innsmouth Legacy, #0.5), short story, prequel to Winter Tide, rather good.

I discovered, what had somehow previously eluded my attention, that there is a recent Edward St Aubyn, Double Blind (2021), which turned out to be available in ebook at an agreeable promotional price. I must say I did not expect an opening chapter with a naturalist perambulating an off-grid rewilding project and thinking about nature, the climate crisis etc, but I enjoyed this a lot. It reminded me a good deal of the novels of Aldous Huxley (all those discussions of science, genetics, neuroscience, psychoanalysis, the frontiers of cyberspace etc etc) but without that dyspeptic tinge so characteristic of Aldous (also, the woowoo Buddhist is rather ethically dodgy). Plus chucking into the blender a few perhaps rather tick-box contemporary issues, along with things like the separated at birth twins subplot, and young woman struck with potentially mortal disease, that surely heark back to the Victorian 3-decker? Points for female friendship of central characters. Anyway, I just went with the flow.

Jane Gaskell, The Shiny Narrow Grin (1964), about which I wrote when I acquired this rare volume some years back. Is it, I ask myself, the least Gothic vampire tale ever written?

On the go

For a bit of a break after Terry's anomie, picked up Georgette Heyer, The Unknown Ajax (1959) - have not got very far yet, but I'm guessing that - shock-horror 'a weaver's daughter' - is going to turn out to be the daughter of a father doing extremely well in the textile industry? (Eeee, Ah'm not sayin' as t'name is Crowther, but...)

Up next

Probably some more revisiting of Jane Gaskell. Also I have found one (1) of the Coles' (GDH and Margaret, Fabian power couple, except, at least on her side, part of the Mitchison polycule) detective stories for sale at a price which is not somewhat to quite excessively steep (some of them can only be in the 'Collectable' category), and as I have long wished to have a look at these, have it on order.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

I.e. have finally reached a stage with The Sekkrit Projekt where it is not eating my entire life and I have a little wiggle room for doing some me-reading that isn't something short on the Kobo while I'm commuting or sitting in a waiting-room.

What I read

Finished the Tanya Huff short story collection, He Said, Sidhe Said. Read 2 Robert van Gulik Judge Dee short stories (a freebie).

Finally got to Barbara Hambly, The Kindred of Darkness - in her Edwardian vampire series - very good.

What I'm Reading

Marcia Muller, Looking for Yesterday (ebook), the latest (? - most recent for me, anyway) Sharon McCone, enjoying it so far.

What Next

Probably Nicola Griffith, Hild, because there has just been so much positive buzz about it.

oursin: Photograph of Stella Gibbons, overwritten IM IN UR WOODSHED SEEING SOMETHIN NASTY (woodshed)

Have just been watching the DVD, obtained with much difficulty and considerable expense (because we needed to get it for Region 2), of the Hepburn/Richardson/Robards/Stockwell production of Long Day's Journey into Night.

Excellent

Nonetheless:

I was thinking, you wouldn't have to make a lot of textual changes if you turned Mary Tyrone into a vampire who has just gone back onto human blood...

Though that's possibly literalising overmuch stuff about death-in-life that's already there?

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

I recently acquired, at considerable expense, though not as much as most copies have been offered at, Jane Gaskell*'s 1964 vampire novel, The Shiny Narrow Grin. I had been telling myself that if I ever saw it on offer below [a certain figure] I would (assuming I was feeling reasonably financially flush at the time) buy it, damn it, because I have been trying to get hold of a copy for years.

What I have is an ex-library copy with the date-stamp form still in the front - apparently no-one borrowed it from the Belfast public library system after June 1968.

I am aware that I paid a fairly ridiculous amount for it (though still well under that being asked for copies by other dealers). On the other hand, most of my other Gaskells I acquired for prices between 5p and £2, so averaging it out...

I was not expecting it to replicate in any way the experience I had many decades ago upon reading Gaskell's The Serpent (1963), in the original long version rather than split up into 2 or 3 separate volumes.

It's really short and spare and elliptical, very unlike The Serpent, which is the commencement of her id-vortexy fantasy sequence, set in prehistoric South America and Atlantis before and during its fall, centring on the fortunes, or rather, misfortunes, of the princess Cija, which was being regularly reprinted well into the 70s and possibly later. (If it ever does get republished, I suspect it will be without the late final volume, Some Summer Lands, 1977, narrated by Cija's daughter Seka.)

Gaskell also wrote several novels which appear to be realistic novels of early 60s 'youth culture' (Mods, Rockers, etc etc), though I'm currently wondering to myself whether these are in fact fantasies about certain kinds of contemporary urban life. Especially as she wrote two novels with this sort of setting but one being a vampire story (TSNG) and another more or less sf (A Sweet Sweet Summer [1969]), in which London had been conquered by aliens.

The Shiny Narrow Grin could be described as urban fantasy, except not very much like what that has come to mean.

Gaskell pretty much specialised in rather unsympathetic narrators or viewpoint characters, and the protagonist is an alienated, anomic, disillusioned, embittered grammar school girl, Terry (I think stroppy would possibly be rather too strong and definite a term: passive aggression and dumb insolence are her weapons more than direct confrontation). Her parents are separated, she is sharing a bedsit with her friend Kathy, she hangs out with a Mod crowd in West London. Her father has just come back into her life after many years absence. She has a 'steady' boyfriend but also has sex with others. Relationships with both sexes are characterised by rivalry, competition, and struggles for dominance.

The only exception to this is that Terry does seem to have some kind of affection for her mother and for Kathy, even though she also is intermittently embarrassed by them. She perceives them as vulnerable and in need of protection, in a rather condescending way from the heights of what she considers her own sophisticated outlook on life. The reader does rather wonder what Terry is getting out of her exploits with men: at one point she thinks to herself:

I even like lesbians, that most girls shudder off from. There's something so clean about the idea of sex without men.

Anyway, there is a low-key vampire - in that hints are dropped, and the reader may well pick these up, but until very late in the day Terry doesn't realise what she is dealing with.

The novel is signally lacking in the kind of drama one tends to associate with this theme - her life is so unattractive being undead surely couldn't be much worse, indeed, when the vampire asks her 'What is keeping you in your world?' she replies 'Nothing really' and cites Kathy calling her crowd 'All zombies'.

The ending is unresolved and ambiguous. (Am I being a bit too precious in trying to avoid spoilers for an obscure novel which most people are very unlikely to read?)

Interesting things going on, but I may find that because I do tend to be fascinated by early/mid 60s novels, just pre-sexual revolution and the revival of feminism, which revolve around issues to do with gender and sexuality. This may be a weird form of nostalgia.

I can quite see that there would be problems with this novel and its mismatching to different kinds of reader expectations. All the same, there's something there.

Though it doesn't strike the note of horror which Simon Raven got into his 1960 contemporary vampire novel Doctors Wear Scarlet, I'm not sure that's what Gaskell was aiming at anyway.

*NB that entry is slight and the bibliography not even complete. What we do note is that Gaskell was fairly prolific in the 60s and then rather faded out - don't know if that was because she stopped writing or publishing issues.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

Because I don't seem to have done a Recent Reading post since mid-July - for some while it didn't seem like enough to make a post and then it was completely out of hand, so this is probably going to be very selective.

Also, there was quite a bit of re-reading during the period.

Thrillers and mysteries

Gillian Bradshaw, Dangerous Notes (2001). On previous form, I do not get along with Bradshaw's thrillers/futuristic works anything like as well as her historicals, and this I didn't even finish.

Fred Vargas, Wash This Blood Clean from My Hand (2007). I did finish this even though at points it felt interminable. However, that may be because, I think, it is several books into a series? I spotted the villain early on, but that was perhaps because one of Margaret Maron's earlier works used a similar device.

Sff

Sherwood Smith, Treason's Shore (2009) - this wove together all the various strands into a really great conclusion. (Though, really, now all the volumes are out I do think an end-to-end reread is in order in due course.)

Rebecca Ore, Centuries Ago and Very Fast (2009) - Ore is one of those writers where I can see and admire what she's doing while seldom warming up to the specific books. This was pretty much that.

Octavia Butler, Fledgling (2005), which somehow I had never got round to reading until now. Butler is never less than wonderful, but I did feel that this was perhaps using the vampire trope (in admittedly a pleasingly fresh rescension of that tired old motif) to reiterate themes she'd explored before.

Amanda Downum, The Drowning City (2009). Wonderful world creation: however, I'm not sure that reading this on the train, in the interstices of a conference, and on the train again was entirely the best way to keep hold of the complexities of the plot.

Judith Tarr, Bring Down the Sun (2008). I am sure Tarr did her best to make Olympias a figure of woman-power and so on, but let's face it: she's another of the women who are famous for the sons they bore. And at the very least one would like to see her influence Alexander's upbringing rather than ending at the birth.

Mike Carey, The Naming of the Beasts (2009). Standard keeping well up, and total props for not succumbing to certain obvious tropisms.

Anne Aguirre, Blue Diablo (2009). An author whose sf I've found moderately worth reading, doing urban fantasy. Reader, I gave up on it. I am sure there are gems to be found in this genre, but so far I have not found them.

Anne Billson Stiff Lips (1996). I like her film criticism, and as I picked this up for 50p in a charity shop, thought I would give her fiction another go. I liked this - ghost story, everybody is pretty nasty, worked well - enough to take another look at Suckers (1993), her vampire novel: which actually, was better than I remembered until it failed to pay off adequately at the end, where it rather flopped.

YA

Sharon Shinn, General Winston's Daughter (2007). Props for writing a YA fantasy romancey type thing that is about colonialism (though I think making it all about trade/strategic necessity with no issues of religion/belief systems perhaps simplified the situation unduly), and having the heroine sexually/romantically interested in two men, even while engaged to one of them. Also, points for the unexpected subversion of gratitude-trope. Even so - and it was a pleasant read - feel everything turned out just a bit too easily.

Sarah Dessen, This Lullaby (2002) (the one with the guy who came over to me as creepy-stalkery rather than free spirit untrammelled by convention), Someone Like You (1998) and Last Chance (2002): compellingly readable yet somehow annoying. The protags are always comfortably placed in a socio-economic sense and there's a whole tying up the ends with a little take-home message thing going on (and conventional morality) that makes me feel that Charlotte Yonge had a bleaker vision.

Litfict

Karen Joy Fowler, The Case of the Imaginary Detective (2008) - because I read a v positive review somewhere. Liked it better than the Jane Austen Reading Group but found it a touch twee in places.

Penelope Fitzgerald, The Gate of Angels (1990). I thought this was wonderful and exquisite while I was reading it, but the actual details have rather faded.

Kate O'Brien, The Land of Spices (1941) - about an Englishwoman (brought up in Belgium), who is the Reverend Mother of a convent school in Ireland, pre WWI, and a pupil in whom she takes an interest. Query: I can think of several novels by women about nuns (some of them not Rumer Godden) - are there any novels by men about monks/monasteries (relatively contemporary ones, not historical)? This was excellent.

Non-fiction

Ginger S Frost, Living in Sin: Cohabiting as Husband and Wife in Nineteenth-Century England (2009). Read for review. V good - matches up well to her Promises Broken.

Virginie Despentes, King Kong Theory (2007/2009). I like a good ranty feminist polemic as much as anyone, but as I was commenting on someone else's lj recently, an awful lot of it is been there and done that when you've been reading feminist theory as long as I have, and I'm not sure Despentes was saying anything that struck me as terribly new. However that doesn't mean these things don't still need saying over and over again and discovered by new generations and the debates had yet again.

Michael Swanwick, Hope-in-the-Mist: The Extraordinary Career and Mysterious Life of Hope Mirrlees (2009). This was a remarkable effort at digging up information on someone who seems not to have wanted to be found. I wasn't quite sure whether it was entirely reasonable to blame the literary non-productiveness of her later life on the fact that she didn't need the money, because I can think of other women writers of about the same time who also had long blocked periods or failure to complete projects (cf Joan Eason/Who was Sophie, discussed here). (But, true, also writers who thought that they might have written better if they'd written less, but they needed the money.)

Louise Foxcroft, Hot Flushes, Cold Science: A History of the Modern Menopause (2009). Read for review. Good on the whole, but has a couple of bloopers (Freud was something like 12 when Isaac Baker Brown died, rly) and also what looks like a non-citation to something I wrote about Stella.

Robertson Davies, Happy Alchemy: On the Pleasures of Music and the Theatre (1996). A posthumous collection of talks, prefaces, reviews etc. For the completist, I think.

Olga Gershenson and Barbara Penner (eds) Ladies and Gents: Public Toilets and Gender (2009) - what it is to have friends who will put one on the free list for a comp copy. As with any collection of interdisciplinary essays, a bit of a mixed bag, but some really excellent stuff in there on this ever-interesting topic.

Julia Serano, Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity (2007). While some of this was going over ground (e.g. the constructionist vs essentialist debates on sexuality) which was a bit too familiar to me, there was a lot in there that was enlightening and thought-provoking.

oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)

Kathryn Hughes on the history of the woman's magazine on which there is currently an exhibition at The Women's Library. Interesting, but I'm not sure I agree with the categorisation:

the home-making (Englishwoman's Domestic Magazine, Prima) to the campaigning (Englishwoman's Journal, Spare Rib) by way of the liberating (the Freewoman, Cosmopolitan) to the plain entertaining (Peg's Paper, Heat).

Because surely part of the 'porousness' that Hughes invokes was the blending of these various elements in different proportions. (And doesn't mention in the text - I hope they're represented in the exhibition) such magazines as She, and later, Nova.)

Bidisha on Indian Mills and Boonerie. When I was in Pakistan many years ago, I was immensely struck by the vast stacks of yer traditional snowwhite Mills and Boons in the bookshops. And Barbara Cartland, but I think Dame B in fact boasted about how popular her pure virginal heroines were in The East.

Dickens and Fallen Women: review of new book about the refuge for fallen women that he set up (with Angela Burdett-Coutts' financial support). Am not entirely persuaded that in England women were unable to move out of prostitution back into respectable life: William Acton believed this to be a not uncommon trajectory, and I think Arthur Munby makes similar indications in his diary. In fact far from 'they manage these things better in France' once (under the licensing system) a Frenchwoman was registered as a prostitute it was very difficult indeed to get her name off it and not to be harassed by the police des moeurs to go be medically inspected at intervals. But there is long trad in UK of thinking that the French do food/sex/elegance etc so much better that we do huddling in our woad.

Lucy Mangan in Book Corner this week does The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe.

From yesterday - Another gruesome peek we peradventure would have preferred not to have into Peter Bradshaw's murky psychosexual depths as he squees over Twilight the movie.

Is this not hanging on to the legacy rather too long and tightly? Victor Hugo's heirs lose battle against sequels.

Landmark rulings strengthen gay rights in workplace:

Lillian Ladele, the registrar who refused to conduct same-sex civil partnership ceremonies "as a matter of religious conscience", lost her case against Islington council in north London. And Stephen English, a married man who was driven out of his job after being repeatedly called a "faggot" by colleagues had an employment tribunal ruling that he had not been the victim of sexual harassment overturned by the court of appeal.

Purple haze

Sep. 8th, 2007 08:33 pm
oursin: hedgehog wearing a yellow flower (Hedgehog wearing flower)

Back from Grayshott. Lovely time.

Just possibly the very best thing on this particular visit was the walks. Not only was Ludshott Common lovely, turning completely purple in places with the heather coming into flower (and by extreme coincidence, partner's flowers for my return include heather, isn't that something?), and the weather glorious (one overcast day, but at least dry and warm, even too warm, a bit muggy in fact). But every single walk was different, and none of them were the one which just involves making one big circuit, which, pleasant as it is, I have done too many times, because it is the one even new trainers cannot get lost on, suitable for a mixed-level group of walkers, and guaranteed to get them back within scheduled time. So I was well chuffed.

The food was just about as good as it has ever been. (While still remaining healthy.)

The treatments remain stupendous. Possibly the absolute tops was the Hot Stone thing, but it would be a very close call.

Excellent Pilates classes.

On the steam-bath, etc, aspect: insight that things don't have to be things you do for a long time, like the post steam cold plunge, in which one does not tend to linger, but their being there makes an immense difference/contribution. (The pinch-of-spice theory of things in general: that some things you may not need much of, but at a particular given point they are indispensable, or almost.)

Thought about Night Watch, one of the DVDs I finally got a chance to watch: is there not an inconsistency between the point that 'Others gotta choose between Light and Dark' and the facts that certain Others, e.g. vampires, seem to be automatically destined to the Dark side? (Also, don't any Others ever say, stuff your binaries?)

So, in spite of the frazz at the start, and the am-I-getting-a-cold thing mid-week, a very excellent and restorative few days.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

Okay, props to Hambly for the early scenes in Sewell's lunatic asylum. I'm not saying Victorian private lunatic asylums are my Mastermind special subject or anything like that, but I know enough about them that my threshold for being jolted out of willing-suspension-of-disbelief (or muttering 'plagiarism! plagiarism!' when spotting where the details come from) is set pretty low. This was all good. I was in my comfort zone.

Also, neat use of Stoker's own multiple narrative devices.

Plus, really great backstory. So great I wish the novel had been more about this (brilliantly though it was all evoked and built up).

Because, downsides: the canonical characters. Possibly a bit too respectful of them? Because in the original they are all (except Mina) shining exemplars of what EM Forster defined in Aspects of the Novel as 'flat characters'. True, she does manage to round out Sewell somewhat, and to give a bit of depth to others, but not quite enough. Though perhaps it makes sense, given that in the original Renfield is a rather shadowy supporting character defined by weird habits and insanity, that in the story from his (admittedly monomaniacal) perspective, the main characters tend to be rather thin and shadowy.

The fact that the story was stuck with adherence to the main plot moves of the original worked against it a bit, I thought.

And, one big glaring problem for me: the allusions to Freud. In the present of the book he would only have published (jointly with Breuer) Studies in Hysteria. He hadn't yet published The Interpretation of Dreams. I.e. he was still a minor, if interesting, figure on the psychiatric horizon. I'm really not sure that an overworked asylum superintendent, however au fait with continental developments, would have heard of him. Dean Rapp's 1990 article demonstrated fairly conclusively that Freud's first UK readers were not so much the medical and psychiatric professions, more lay intellectuals. Sure, a few doctors were interested, but they were often a bit maverick.

Yes, I can see that Freud works awfully well, in the context of the ur-text, which has surely undergone numerous Freudian exegeses.

But it has the feel that the name has been put in as something the ordinary reader would recognise as resonant of fin-de-siecle thinking about the psyche, rather than the possibly rather more plausible contemporary names that the characters would have been likely to know and be reading (Maudsley? Clouston? even, if they were sufficiently avant-garde, Havelock Ellis and Krafft-Ebing, or maybe Lombroso?).

Overall verdict: readable, but not Hambly at her outstanding best.

August 2026

S M T W T F S
       1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 19th, 2026 01:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios