oursin: Fotherington-Tomas from the Molesworth books saying Hello clouds hello aky (Hello clouds hello sky)

Today I met [personal profile] cassandre for lunch - we had actually scheduled this for last Thursday but in view of the promised HEAT EVENT we rearranged.

We lunched at Honey & Co Daily, a deli/restaurant on the corner of Store Street and Alfred Place Gardens in Bloomsbury. Recommended.

Much catching up and good conversation.

We then flaneursed around Bloomsbury, commenting on whether Miriam/Dorothy Richardson in Pilgrimage would have passed through the places we did - doubt the Insect Hotel in Russell Square was there in her day - took in a ferret around Skoob Books, which still lurks behind the Brunswick Centre. Noted that there is also a new independent bookshop inside the Centre.

It was undoubtedly a much more pleasant day for the undertaking, even if the grass in the squares was still parched.

Excursed

Oct. 16th, 2025 05:04 pm
oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)

Went out this pm: had to make a trip at some point to Institute Whereof I Have The Honour To Be A Fellow to pick up the ID card I muddled the info about where and when to pick up on the day of the welcome reception -

- and discover that due to the systems upgrade in progress which also means a delay in allocating new fellows institutional email addresses, mine has not yet actually been processed anyway, ooops ooops, they will post it to me, much apologies.

So I got in a nice bit of flaneuserie down Alfred Place Gardens as aforementioned herein, and I also, since I was in the area, took in this exhibition: The Word for World: An exhibition and book presenting the maps of Ursula K Le Guin, which I'm not sure I'd have made a special expedition to see, but as it was in an adjacent Bloomsbury Square, fitted in very well.

(Adjacent Bloomsbury Square in which the riffraff do not have access to the central gardens, only keyholders, mutter mutter.)

Nicely done, but I fancy I would have made more of it had I read the works to which the maps related a bit more recently than I have (Le Guin re-reads having been a bit of a back-burner project for a while).

oursin: The stylised map of the London Underground, overwritten with Tired of London? Tired of Life! (Tired of London? Tired of Life!)

So yestere'en there was a get-together for the Fellows of the institution I have had the honour to be award a Fellowship of, so I thought I ought to Make The Effort and turn up at least for a little bit.

So I trotted off, and in spite of some hitches with the Tube (several trains going to the wrong branch) got to the right stop, and lo, the Scientologists are still infesting Tottenham Court Road, what is this thing that this thing is?

So I crossed the road, going, surely the traffic flow used to be one-way? Confusing.

And went down a side-street, and came to this lovely and surprising thing, which I am sure wasn't there last time I was in these parts, early in 2020:

Alfred Place Gardens

and was charmed.

Then on to venue, where everything seems same as it ever was.

Hearing aids still not optimum in room full of overlapping conversations: but I did manage to have some fairly coherent conversations, including one with old academic acquaintance who was most gratifyingly complimentary about The Biography, all these years later.

So I think a win, even if I did suppose that this event would also include some admin stuff relating to Fellowship, which it didn't.

oursin: The stylised map of the London Underground, overwritten with Tired of London? Tired of Life! (Tired of London? Tired of Life!)

I don't know if anyone else has clocked this, which sounds like another of those vexatious cases brought by Christian homophobes, about the rainbow pedestrian - or as I was wont to call them in my youth, 'zebra' - crossings. The logic is, shall we say, convoluted.

Camden resident Blessing Olubanjo has told the local authority to get rid of the three blue, pink and white-painted pedestrian crossings... or else she would begin judicial review proceedings. She complained that the markings, installed in 2021 during Transgender Awareness Week, infringed her rights as a Christian and constituted “unlawful political messaging”. In a letter to the Town Hall, she said: “As a Christian and a taxpayer, I should not be made to feel excluded or marginalised by political symbols in public spaces.” Ms Olubanjo has been supported by Christian Legal Society, which has cited a section in the Local Government Act 1986 prohibiting councils from publishing material that appears to promote a political party or controversial viewpoint, and the crossings were a form of ‘publication’.

(Okay, it is part of the larger campaign which is about anti-trans actions and whingeing about not being allowed to pray harass women entering abortion clinics.)

But where is this that she is protesting?

Why, in the very heart of Bloomsbury, and not just Any Old Bit of Bloomsbury ('living in squares, loving in triangles') but Marchmont Street.

Where we may find the iconic Gay's the Word bookshop as featured in the movie Pride (inaccurately described there as being in Soho) and a blue plaque for Kenneth Williams, and close by one for Boulton and Park.

Anyway Camden Council '“entirely rejects” her argument, and [said] that the borough has “no place for hate”' and the views of local people taken by The Local Democracy Reporting Service were very much on the side of leaving the crossings be.

oursin: The stylised map of the London Underground, overwritten with Tired of London? Tired of Life! (Tired of London? Tired of Life!)

The Forgotten Square of Bloomsbury: Tragedy and oddity in Regent Square:

The western end of St George’s Gardens leads out to Wakefield Street, which runs back up to Regent Square. Here, you’ll find one of London’s more unusual plaque dedications: “Stella and Fanny”, as the plaque attests, were noted cross-dressers at a time when such pursuits were considered suspicious or even "an offence against public morals and common decency". In 1870 the pair were arrested and charged with the “abominable crime of buggery”, on only the most circumstantial of evidence. They were subjected to humiliating physical examination without consent, and traduced throughout the press. They were later acquitted. The case was a landmark in British LGBT history and deserves an article in its own right. If you want to find out more, the National Archives has published an excellent account of the case and other documentation relating to their lives.

***

The Reverend James Mahomed, Chaplain to the London Hospital:

Reverend James Dean Kerriman Mahomed was Chaplain of the London Hospital from 1890 to 1898. James was the grandson of Sake Dean Mahomed (1759-1851), also known as Shekh Din Muhammôd, who was the first Indian to write a book in English and who had opened England’s first Indian takeaway restaurant and first ‘shampooing vapour masseur bath’, where clientele included George IV and William IV. Dean Mahomed converted from converted from Islam to Protestant Christianity in 1786, around the time of his marriage to Jane Daly, an Irish Protestant, and his seven children with Jane were brought up as Christians. His grandson James DK Mahomed was born in 1853 in Brighton, near to the fencing, gymnastics, boxing and callisthenics academy in Hove, run by his father Frederick, son of Dean Mahomed. Several of Frederick's children went on to notable careers: James’ brother, Frederick Henry Horatio Akbar Mahomed , became a doctor, studying at Guy’s Hospital, London, where he did pioneering work on hypertension. After studying at Keble College, James was ordained a minister of the Church of England. His first clerical posts were in the East End, as curate at St Anne's, Limehouse and at St Philip’s, Stepney Way, Whitechapel (now the Whitechapel Library of the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, QMUL), before he moved to a post at St Anne’s, Highgate.On 7 January 1890, James' return to the East End was agreed when he was unanimously confirmed as Chaplain to the London Hospital, succeeding against a very strong field of candidates[.]

***

Eliza Sharples Carlile:

There, Eliza Sharples lectured in the Blackfriars Rotunda (a place ‘long devoted’, wrote the Christian Advocate, ‘to the purposes of radicalism and infidelity’) where she castigated Church and state with equal ferocity. With Carlile still imprisoned, she threw herself into his defence, fired by the twin principles which would animate her life and work: the strident pursuit of knowledge and the unhindered right to free discussion. Organised Christianity, Sharples argued, was a barrier to both, and Carlile a martyr in their name.
From the Rotunda stage Sharples declared herself ‘a free and independent woman.’ In the press, she was branded the ‘Pythoness of the temple.’ That year, Sharples also became editor of The Isis – a weekly paper dedicated ‘to the young women of England for generations to come, or until superstition is extinct’ – through which her ideals were further expounded.
....
Though venerating the memory of Carlile (who had been dead for six years), Eliza sought help. ‘Mr C. died’, she wrote, ‘leaving the three children entirely unprovided for’ and so ‘subjected to every degree of wretchedness, often without food.’ Her firm feminism was still in evidence, but she was acutely aware of her own precarious position: ‘Alas! For woman,’ she wrote, ‘hard indeed is her lot to want in her last hour what she has expended her health and her strength in bestowing.’

***

A women’s history guided tour along London’s Suffragette line - not 100 miles from where I sit....

oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)

You are talking about a library in Bloomsbury....- there are contenders for the title of Weirdest Library pretty much within spitting distance, I used to work in one just up the road and boy, we had a fair amount of Weird Shit, I'm telling you.

Occult? Try upstairs! Inside the world’s weirdest library, now open to the public

Look at his little face! how many libraries has he even been into? How many libraries just round the corner does he even know about? E.g. Senate House has the Harry Price Library: the Swedenborg Society; etc etc.

Now, if you are reporting on an exhibition, this is the way to do it that demonstrates that you know about the subject rather than going gosh! and wow!:

Death of the Department Store, which is both 'end of an era' and 'here is the history' and 'Zola mucked about with the actual history in his novel'.

oursin: C19th engraving of a hedgehog's skeleton (skeletal hedgehog)

Okay, it's popping up again (as it were): lately spotted (although it's actually from 2015) A Conservation inspection of Jeremy Bentham’s Mummified head:

The head is kept inside a Victorian bell jar, inside his own hand carved wooden box (with his name and various UCL logos on the outside). The box takes 4 keys and a couple of people to (carefully) open it. We don’t say exactly which safe and where, for security reasons.

***

Other antique relics to be found nearby in the Bloomsbury vicinity: The 17th Century Forge by Tottenham Court Road

***

De Gruyter offering some freebies and massive discounts on ebooks for Pride Month.

***

Fascinating post on the 'Now You See Us' exhibition at the Tate, a particular C19th woman artist, what that says about women artists of her day more generally, and indeed, not just her day: Now You See Us: Positioning Ann Mary (Severn) Newton as a British Female Artist:

Basically, to be a successful female professional artist you needed family connections, spousal support (or to be able to not marry), a secure income, good health, have constant vigilance about your reputation as well as safeguard against sexual violence and find a place or community you can be supported in. And you will be better known today if your work has been bought by national or large regional galleries. It is some what alarming to reflect that over the last 25 years I have found that much of this is still true for women working in the arts and heritage. . .

***

Intriguing article here from Journal of Popular Romance Studies: Historical Accuracy, Racism, Courtney Milan, and The Duke Who Didn’t Conform to Genre Norms.

oursin: image of hedgehogs having sex (bonking hedgehogs)

Admittedly with a certain amount of skipping, because there was Quite A Lot on his Very Important Work in mathematics, economics, philosophy, which was really of a rather technical nature beyond a humanities hedjog such as I.

I had really clocked it some while ago because a review I read mentioned that he developed a massive pash (though it doesn't actually look as though it developed into an affair) on Margaret Pyke, older than him, in an open marriage, and later one of the major pillars of the National Birth Control subsequently Family Planning Association. And I have an ongoing interest in this group of ladies who were often in these social vanguards but having to position birth control as an uber-respectable cause.

Less about her than I might have hoped but a fair amount about the wider milieu, including her husband who was running an pioneering experimental school.

Plus everyone was running off and being psychoanalysed, and it's amusing to see how short the analyses were back in that era - none of this 'twenty years, beginning to make progress'. It was more 'six months on the couch, my repressions are GONE! GONE!'

Ramsey did eventually marry a woman who was very into the concept of open marriages and to some extent it looks as though they only married on account of at that date even men could lose their positions at Cambridge for unlicensed fornication - cases of William Empson and JBS Haldane the most notorious. Also had an affair with someone else I've come across in another context (housing reform and community development).

Gosh Wittgenstein sounds an entire pain from the reaction of just about everyone who came into contact with him, even if they acknowledged his GEEENNYUS. (Among other things he was apparently gratuitously rude to Lydia Lopokova when staying with the Keynes, though one does feel Lydia was probably capable of defending her own corner.)

So I enjoyed it for perhaps rather personal reasons of encountering old acquaintance and appealing to certain rather niche interests of mine.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

What I read

Finished Hild, and decided a slight hiatus would be in order before commencing upon Menewood.

Simon R Green, Not of This World (Gideon Sable #4) (2023), the usual mixture and maybe phoning it in a bit, but kept the mixture moving.

Julie Schumacher, The English Experience (2023): moderately enjoyable, but alas, does not come up to Dear Committee Members.

Barbara Ehrenreich, Had I Known: Collected Essays (2020): okay, from a fairly lengthy career and some are v much of their time and others hold up more, but pretty good on the whole.

Marian Keyes, Grown-Ups (2020) which was a Kobo Deal, and extremely addictive, though I'm not sure the ending quite worked for me.

Surprise Cat Sebastian novella, Luke and Billy Finally Get a Clue (2023). Set in 1953 which just about makes it histfic I guess. The characters are professional baseball players but this is pretty much offstage details.

On the go

Cheryl Misak, Frank Ramsey: A Sheer Excess of Powers (2022). Ramsey was a brilliant genius mathematician/economist/philosopher in the 20s who died v young. I was interested by the reviews because he was clearly hanging out not only on the fringes of Bloomsbury but with various people connected with experimental schools/psychoanalysis/birth control/new forms of relationships/socialism etc in whom I Am Interested. I am not so very bothered by the technical details of what he was doing in his specialist subjects - though interestingly he sounds a bit of a precursor to that group of somewhat later Oxford women philosophers who have had 2 group bios of recent years - but the other stuff is great. Also pretty well-written if clearly for an audience which needs certain quirks about English culture explained.

Up next

There is that Robin Stevens, Menewood, a new Candas Jane Dorsey Epitome Apartments mystery, a new Annick Trent (protag is a surgeon in the 1790s, I shall be reading with critical eye), and next week, new Courtney Milan and new Alexis Hall. Also still several birthday books. Plus, latest Literary Review and volume of essays on Middlemarch by virtual acquaintance which was free on Kobo.

oursin: George Beresford photograph of Marie of Roumania, overwritten 'And I AM Marie of Roumania' (Marie of Roumania)

I do think people crying WOE WOE UNTO THE INTERNET AND IN PARTICULAR, SOCIAL MEDIA, are often riffing on a very coarse, broadbrush, simplistic picture of How People Actually Engage, and that there are people pottering about engaging with their fairly small group of friends and occasional FOAFs?

E.g. This I think has a lot of Point Thahr Misst, even if I will give him some kudos points for the salonierres: ‘We’re gripped by graphomania’: why writing became an online contagion and how we can contain it.

Are there not spaces where:

They played games with portraits, jokes, ambiguities, a whole array of forms where writing and language weren’t violent or brutal but instead were tender media for the production of more pleasure and, in particular, more friendship.

is still true?

***

And thinking about women and the spaces they inhabit and that are overlooked, this is an interesting take on the recent Eileen Orwell book: have I not myself oft made this apercu that Olivia Laing makes: 'I’ve been wondering lately if feminism is subject to a Groundhog Day-style curse in which all previous knowledge is periodically obliterated' (and she slily slides in the fact that there was a Quite Recent previous biography of Eileen...)

But what I also find interesting here, in view of my recent consideration of Literary Sad Girls, is that she takes issue with Funder's tendency to present Eileen as sad victim rather than more complicated, and this does make me wonder about trends in biographies of women, and whether there is a genre of Sad Girl biographies of women who could be presented in quite other lights?

***

I'm raising my eyebrows at this cosplay version of Bloomsberries in Sussex, because it's very prettified from the kind of rather squalid rusticity one gets an impression of from the contemporary letters and diaries: ‘The house sings with colour and with life’: how the fashion world fell for Charleston, the Bloomsbury set’s country home. Also, that quote: NOT Mrs Parker, shame on you.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

What I read

A lot of comfort re-reading, what with the domestic - well, not actually disaster, but certainly major hassle? - and general sense of anomie.

Also read, Jeevani Charika, Playing for Love (2022), because I have liked the other books of Charika's I've read, but this didn't quite do it for me.

Also the whole of Tansy Rayner Roberts' Teacup Magic sequence, Tea and Sympathetic Magic (#1) (2018), The Frost Fair Affair (#2) (2020), Spellcracker's Honeymoon (#3) (2021), and Lady Liesl's Seaside Surprise (#4) (2021). Clearly they hit the spot that was the spot where I was at.

On the go

The H.D. and Bryher book still languishes.

Will Loxley, Writing in the Dark: Bloomsbury, the Blitz and Horizon Magazine (2021) and it's very readably written, and on the whole I think it's fair to Virginia Woolf and does get how misogynist/ageist some of the attitudes towards her were but even though it does get her Three Guineas critique of patriarchy slots her in as 'non-political' which I think is using a rather narrow definition perhaps??? Otherwise it's pretty much a bloke-fest, and moreover fairly privileged metropolitan blokes, and while they are interesting, I feel the shadows of the women in that Lost Girls book... and all of them banging on about How On Earth Can One Create Great Litrachur under the Blitz or write at all, when I think of all those women writing their gradually being rediscovered 'middlebrow' novels or keeping Mass Observation diaries (and Rebecca West was writing Black Lamb and Grey Falcon, you wankers, and as I recall running a dairy farm), alongside dealing with evacuees and blackout and rationing and ARP and firewatching and just bloody carrying on, and you know, the prams in the hall that might not have even contained their own offspring did not stop them, retrospective large quantitites of codfish to Cyril Connolly, really. This may be about my annoyance with the subjects...

Think I may have given up on Pin Money out of sheer irritation at the unsatisfactory pdf, which just did not play nicely.

Up next

And the good news is, the latest Slightly Foxed.

Also it turns out that there is another recent biography of Elizabeth von Arnim: Joyce Morgan, The Countess from Kirribilli, the ebook of which is a very eligible price.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

What I read

Finished Sense and Sensibility - not one of the top Austens, hmmmm? she upped her game along the way. Am also of opinion that there is a certain amount of desperate fixing going on to get things to come out (further to my post on Jane Austen - It's Really Domestic Horror am honestly surprised no-one gets pushed off a cliff or poisoned - am now reading Mansfield Park and surely with Mrs Norris's snapping up of unconsidered trifles someone could contrive that she snapped up something that would turn out to be lethal? While we concede that Charlotte Lucas sets the bar for married felicity very low indeed, it never seems terribly high.).

Livia Day, Drop Dead in Red (Fashionably Late, #2) - moderately entertaining but did some 'introduce pertinent to mystery stuff (of perhaps over-complexity) very late in the day', which I feel might have got a caution from the Detection Club.

Aster Glenn Gray, A Garter as a Lesser Gift (2022) - somehow this just did not grab me in the way it clearly grabbed a lot of people.

Everina Maxwell, Ocean's Echo (2022), which did grab me, although possibly I had a slight cavil that the pacing rather suddenly went from fairly slow-build to helter-skelter one damned crisis after another.

CL Polk, Even Though I Knew The End (2022): alas, while I am entirely there for Depression-era noir involving lesbian occult investigator, there was something about the actual cosmology setup that I did not madly care about.

Oh yes, there was also the most recent issue of The Scribbler.

On the go

Mansfield Park and yes, there is just much more nuance here, the Crawfords have layers.

Up next

There is the latest Literary Review.

I have also discovered that the ebook of Will Loxley's Writing in the Dark: Bloomsbury, the Blitz, and Horizon Magazine (2021) is available at a very eligible price.

Plus, new Cat Sebastian next week!

oursin: Lady Strachan and Lady Warwick kissing in the park (Regency lesbians)

This is an absolutely spiffy set of china plates: Duncan Grant and Vanessa Bell, The Famous Women Dinner Service, 1932 - 34.:

A bold, feminist statement
In the Famous Women Dinner Service, women are invited to sit at the head of the table, so to speak. Their lives, achievements and accomplishments become the focal point of the conversation.

A closer look at the list of women whom Bell and Grant chose to include reveals their profound understanding of the importance of female histories and stories which are often untold, suppressed, or erased completely.

In October 1931, Vanessa Bell somewhat offhandedly wrote to Roger Fry that the project ‘ought to please the feminists’. And indeed, the Famous Women Dinner Service follows in the footsteps of her sister Virginia Woolf’s 1929 essay A Room of One’s Own, but also anticipates contemporary feminist politics.

Many of the ‘famous women’ celebrated in the plates led complex and unconventional lives, resisting tradition and societal expectations in favour of individual freedom. Some used stage names and pseudonyms to follow their chosen professional paths. Others had to do so in order to express an alternative sexual identity. Across the collection, the women crafted identities which subverted social mores and for Bell, it was ‘an illustration of women in different capacities’ and a reflection of Bloomsbury’s new sexual politics. Dr Hana Leaper, who has catalogued the plates since their rediscovery and co-curated the 2018 exhibition at Charleston, considers The Famous Women Dinner Service a joyful sorority.
(We cannot imagine that sister Virginia had no input, can we?)

But figure to yourselves my entire bogglement that this was commissioned by Kenneth Clark, later to be known as 'Lord Clark of Civilisation' from the multi-episode BBC2 series. Which, from my rather cobwebbed memories, did not give ye gentylle sexxe much part in it. (Though at least one observes that in certain respects he was not ahem distant from the mores of the Bloomsbury set.)*

In Dept, Synchronicity Synchronises, the very same day this article came to my attention: "Storming then Performing": Historical Non-Monogamy and Metamour Collaboration. I have met one of the co-authors: at the very last conference I attended before Everything Shut Down, Granada Feb '20.

[W]e suggest that while our existing societal and social-scientific norms primarily focus on competitive sexual behaviors, much can be learnt from historically documented practices of consensual non-monogamy. These practices—however flawed—point to potentially emancipatory ways of living, loving and building relationships, families, and communities.

*Dept of Six Degrees of Separation: I was once on a radio intellectual chat programme with his son Alan.

oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)

More weirdness from the Harry Ransom Center - okay, when I was there I was nose-down in the British Sexology Society/George Ives collections and a few other related things, so I never really delved into the bizarre depths: collection of famous people's hair compiled by the Romantic poet and essayist Leigh Hunt: 'Hunt's interest in hair is well documented' - we wonder if he had a separate collection of locks snipped from unwary passers-by...

***

Only recently seeing the light of day, or at least, exposed to the general view: Lost stash of 400 erotic drawings by Duncan Grant comes to light: Explicit works by 20th-century gay artist were secretly passed from lover to lover for decades. Actually, not lost, just not known about, kept secret for very good reasons, as even after 1967 I suspect anyone found in possession might have been done for gay porn.

***

Honestly, I think they should have said they were doing C18th anti-clerical porn re-enactment: Priest arrested for having threesome with corset-wearing dominatrices on church altar - or maybe they were? Though C18th anti-clerical porn usually involved dominatrix nuns...

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

What I read

Well, I did indeed complete the Cat Sebastian binge: It Takes Two To Tumble, A Gentleman Never Keeps Score and Two Rogues Make A Right. And that is it until the next thing Ms Sebastian brings out (? sequel to Hither, Page?)

Read the Ben Aaronvitch Tales from the Folly, new collection of assorted shorts mostly written to specific remits, okay if a bit slight.

Having mentioned Angus Wilson's As If By Magic (1973) last week I dug this up for a re-read, and it is really not anywhere near the top of my list of Sir Angus' works - the whole Hamo strand of the plot was heavy going - one can bear, maybe, with his extremely specific and objectified erotic interests (I suspect this will drastically date the the novel for some readers) but not the constant string of his cringe-making misadventures. The Alexandra strand worked better for me.

The new Barbara Hambly Benjamin January, House of the Patriarch, is very good indeed. It takes January to the 'Burned-Over District' of New York State during the Second Great Awakening of weird religious movements, spiritualism, etc. Also, I approve of the way Hambly works real historical individuals into the narrative - I was complaining recently about the way Laurie R King has been doing it in recent works, scattering them wholesale more or less as set-dressing rather than particularly material to the story - Hambly is far more restrained, and tends to take them at the more obscure periods of their life. This one worked particularly well, I thought, with the wider theme.

Discovered during the resort to unvisited shelves, Olivia by 'Olivia' (Dorothy Bussy nee Strachey). My copy is actually the original 1949 Hogarth Press edition, for which I paid more or less peanuts secondhand. I first read this while minding the bookstall at a church jumble sale when I was about 13 - memory fails to recall what I made of it, except that I was engrossed. Probably about the same time as I first read Frost in May and put it in rather the same box? Anyway, one of those v good short intense novellas (I am not sure where the comparison with Claudine at School comes in, which may be about lesbian passions in a girls' school but has an entirely different feel to it.)

On the go

Re-read, first for many a year, of Rebecca West, The Fountain Overflows (1957).

Up next

Well, there is the new Robin Stevens forthcoming (?tomorrow?), and an intention to go on to the posthumously edited sequel volumes to The Fountain Overflows

oursin: George Beresford photograph of Marie of Roumania, overwritten 'And I AM Marie of Roumania' (Marie of Roumania)

A Degrees of Separation story and maunderings on the past.

Finished the Goldhill book on the Bensons yestereen, and he concludes with an anecdote from his time at Kings College Cambridge when the very elderly Dadie Rylands was still in residence, Rylands having been AC Benson's last crush (though Goldhill did not know at the time that he was going to develop a Benson obsession) -

- and also the unnamed young man at Kings with whom V Woolf had lunch as recounted in A Room of One's Own. He was, apart from Frances Partridge, who I think survived him, the Last Bloomsberry Standing.

It so happens, my dearios, that very shortly after I had graduated, after the job as genealogical researcher had collapsed due to global economic circumstance, I took a job (as I may have mentioned) as an Accounts Trainee at an Academic Publisher of Antient Lineage, which at that time had a London HQ on the northern boundary of Bloomsbury -

In those halcyon days, graduating without the burden of a student loan, and Things Being Very Different, one could live (admittedly in a rather grotty bedsit with a deeply weird landlady) in central London within one's means and even save a little, at least if one was of a frugal disposition, and positions such as mine even paid for one to do the relevant professional qualification with time off to pursue it.

There were also at the Academic Press, Editorial Trainees, who, I now in retrospect suspect to have been previously undergraduates at the Antient Institution of Highah Learninz with which the Press was associated and to have got these posts through connections, rather than applying as I had done by way of the Handbook of Graduate Opportunities. I fancy they were of the sort of cohort that these days would be interns in similar positions (except the Academic Press no longer has a London HQ), simply because, when we got chatting during our tea-breaks - for in those days, o best-beloved, we had tea-breaks, which we took in a canteen, in which we were served tea by tea-ladies, and as I recall there might also have been buns and cakes and so forth - they were leading a somewhat more glam life than I was, on overdrafts. (A concept that horripilated my upwardly mobile young woman from the provinces soul.)

Anyhow, one of them was a young man who - no, I am not sure whether I would entirely designate him as camp or whether he was just a typical product of that particular environment whose mannerisms had no particular bearing on sexual orientation or gender identity - happened to mention that one weekend he had been at some do where he had been introduced to Dadie Rylands, o the thrill.

So I can now add Virginia Woolf (and AC Benson, I suppose), not to mention, Lytton Strachey, John Maynard Keynes, Dora Carrington, etc, to the significant cultural figures I am very few degrees of separation from.

oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)

Two dos, both in the same Bloomsberries-associated venue on Monday and Friday this week (though oddly enough, the invites gave different addresses - but several of the houses on that side of the square are all connected, and in the event, entrance was through the same main one, both times, with some matter of emergency handwritten notices.

(I observe that the last time I had occasion to visit this Hystorick Space was over 2 years ago.)

Once was a book-launch, second time was the launch of a research group falling generally within my field of interest.

At both there were two people whom I have not seen for lo, ages, and now twice within the week. At the first were several old acquaintances besides, at the second not.

One of those whom I did know this evening communicated to me a piece of gossip about my erstwhile bestie 'Q' that gave me an inward malicious smirk and the thought of 'predictable!'.

Thinking about the Bloomsberries, I was thinking about how very complicated these buildings are and how one would not wonder did anyone blunder into the wrong bedroom, or at least the bedroom not originally intended, but then realised that much of the confusion comes about through the knocking together of formerly separate residences by the Institutionz of Teh Highah Learninz that now occupy them.

And then thought about that epigram about 'living in squares and loving in triangles', which is neat, but isn't 'triangles' rather too neat and two-dimensional to describe the complexity of Bloomsbury relationships?

oursin: C19th engraving of a hedgehog's skeleton (skeletal hedgehog)

Lately, that is, two minutes ago, discovering that there is a free Kindle edition of A Room of One's Own, and while I have a pretty Penguin paperback with by now somewhat yellowing pages, I thought, why not, as the reason I was even looking was because I had had need of a particular quotation from that work and it would be useful to have an e-version to copy and paste from at similar necessity -

But, anyway, my dearios, having made my purchase, I was offered the opportunity to 'Follow the Author' to get new release updates and improved recommendations.

And indeed I concede that the Bloomsbury industry shows no sign of ceasing to go marching on so bits and bobs I daresay will continue to emerge from time to time, but I do not really think that we can hope for anything really substantial in the way of new releases from Ms Woolf -

OR CAN WE?

Does Amazon know something we do not? Have they reanimated her corpse? Do they have a cadre of channelers even now bringing through Orlando: the Millennial Years? (And will she, like those composers channeled by Rosemary Brown, have found being noncorporeal somewhat deteriorating to her genius?)

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

What I Read

Ben Aaronovitch, The Last Station (2017) - rather short - only a novella - does to be getting along with, but one would like to know where the series arc is going.

Ann Leckie, Provenance (2017) - I found this a bit of a slow starter, but then it got going and was doing some very interesting things with plot, worldbuilding, character trajectory, etc. Not sure I loved it quite as much as the Ancillary sequence.

Sandra Schwab, The Return of the Earl (2017). Okay, this was a freebie. It's an m/m romance. It's short, there's nothing much really going on besides the romance story, I was astonished that the protag believed something he was told by his horrible hateful malicious father about his lover and had been embittered for years as a result, and the first half to two thirds of the book seemed like the prose equivalent of lingering moody shots in a movie of the protag wandering about a wintery landscape that reflects his frozen heart, or meandering about a gloomy mansion symbolising the weight of the past.

KJ Charles, An Unsuitable Heir (2017). This did not have the problem of nothing going on but the romance: winding up the various threads set in motion in the preceding volumes of the trilogy. I should probably reread from the start.

On the go

Still Sexual Forensics.

Lois McMaster Bujold, Sidelines: Talks and Essays (2013). A bit repetitious, though she does state upfront that she recycled material for different occasions. Some interesting things, but somehow never gets that 'aha' moment that one comes to in Le Guin's essays.

Timothy D'Arch Smith, The Frankaus: Prejudice & Principles Within a London Literary Family (2015). This is a distinctly irreverent, very well-written and entertaining, history of the author's forebears.

Up next

Well, I seem to have several things on the go, also the recent arrival of various things I very much want to be at.

***

And on literary matters more generally, this afternoon I observed that the Tavistock Hotel now has a bar called the Woolf and Whistle. The windows sport a quote from Virginia in cursive neon lettering. This, I may remind my dr rdrz, is the hotel about the noise and general inconvenience caused by which she complained copiously in her diaries.

oursin: Drawing of hedgehog in a cave, writing in a book with a quill pen (Writing hedgehog)

In one of those buildings which are now part of one of the Institutionz of the Highah Learninz in the Bloomsbury area, and are really not entirely fitted for purpose when you take into account things like accessibility, because the entire row if not the whole square is probably Grade II listed and therefore limits what one can do with the internal arrangements, also precludes bulldozing the lot and building something new.

Also, actual conference took place in a space which has massive associational resonances (a member of the Bloomsbury Group wrote An Important Book in it) but is a) not air-conditioned and first thing was draughty because somebody opened the windows at the back and later on stuffy and soporific and b) acoustically awful, though I think some of the problem I had in hearing the first speaker was not just because I was sitting rather far back but because, although they may have been miked, they muttered. Less of a problem with subsequent speakers, though I did move further forward for the after-lunch sessions.

All in all, very interesting, slightly tangential to my general line of interests, but one of those subjects that demonstrates what very diverse approaches you can get with different people from different disciplinary fields looking at a particular subject.

Also, managed to ask at least one question during discussions, and had a good conversation with one of the speakers at tea-time.

Although some weeks ago attendees were asked to advise on dietary restrictions re lunch, the day before there was an email saying, oops, no catering, find yourself. So as it was just around the corner, went to former Place of Work where I still have the entree.

Where I encountered a former colleague and had some discussion of Recent Changes - possibly it is not quite the thing for someone who was there as long as I was to moot the idea that people staying forever in the same workplace tend to get ossified, as does the place itself: but I think I perhaps did somewhat to counteract that effect by having Outside Scholarly Interests, visiting archives for research purposes, etc? Maybe? (unlike certain colleagues whom I suspect still hang on and will do until their lifeless corpse is discovered in the stacks.)

August 2026

S M T W T F S
       1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 19th, 2026 02:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios