Underestimate much?
Oct. 12th, 2008 01:46 pmMy eye has just been caught by a Waterstone's ad for the the new eBook reader from Sony: '160 books under one cover'.
And it goes on:
'Imagine having your entire book collection whenever, wherever'.
Only 160 books? I think not. I get through more than that in the course of a year. It doesn't begin to touch the dimensions of my entire book collection.
Plus, on top of that, I very much doubt that I could get more than a minute proportion of my collection in eBook format.
Okay, this might work for travelling purposes and having a reasonable if limited library in a portable form.
Not going to replace bookshelves any time soon.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 12:56 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, I don't like e-book readers at all.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 03:04 pm (UTC)I always said that, and then I actually saw one of the Sony Readers. They are lovely. They've finally come up with a screen that works on an e-book.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 01:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 07:31 pm (UTC)As for 160 books being a library, clearly the ad writers have never met a reader.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-13 12:06 am (UTC)160?!!
Date: 2008-10-13 08:44 pm (UTC)I've seen the screen of these things and I think THAT's a good technological innovation-dovegreyreader and a few other book bloggers have been trying them out and apparently they really don't hurt your eyes-but given the price of the Reader AND the individual books (like itunes, ebooks are still about a tenner even though you don't get the physical object-I get most of my books from Oxfam for £2-3), as well as the things you've pointed out, I can't see them taking on just yet.
The other problem with them is people generally don't want to flick through 10+ books on the train the way you might do with albums on your ipod.
A possible advantage in the future though could be that books wouldn't have to go out of print as they wouldn't be wasting any money getting printed/sitting in a warehouse-potentially making lots of obscure titles widely available?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-18 11:05 pm (UTC)