Commons:Segnalazioni per la vetrina

Shortcut: [[:|COM:FPC]]

Passa alla lista di candidati Passa alla lista di candidati per la vetrina Passa alla lista di rimozione dalla vetrina Passa alla lista di candidati per la rimozione dalla vetrina

Queste immagini sono candidate per la vetrina. Fare attenzione a non confondere questa pagina con le immagini del giorno.

Guida

edit

Candidare un immagine

edit

Linee guida per candidare un'immagine

edit

È importante leggere le linee guida prima di candidare un'immagine.

A seguito è riportato un riassunto dei punti essenziali per candidare e valutare le immagini candidate:

  • Risoluzione - Le fotografie con una risoluzione inferiore a 2 milioni di pixel vengono generalmente rifiutate e rimosse ad eccezione di motivi contrari di particolare importanza. Si noti che le immagini con risoluzione 1600 x 1200 hanno 1.92 Mpx, appena inferiore al limite minimo di 2Mpx.
Ricordiamo che le immagini caricate su Commons vengono visualizzate non solo su schermi tradizionali di PC ma sono utilizzate anche per stampa e visualizzazione su schermi ad alta risoluzione. Non possiamo certo prevedere quali tecnologie verranno utilizzate nel futuro quindi è importante che le immagini scelte per la vetrina abbiano una risoluzione quanto più alta è possibile.
  • Scansioni - È consigliabile seguire la guida alla scansione, che propone suggerimenti per l'ottenimento di immagini ottimali
  • Fuoco - ovviamente ogni oggetto significativo dell'immagine deve essere ben definito e a fuoco.
  • Primo piano e sfondo - Oggetti in primissimo piano o di sfondo possono distrarre dalla vista dal oggetto principale dell'immagine. È il caso di controllare se qualche elemento in primo piano non copra nessun elemento importante e che lo sfondo non distolga l'attenzione e renda confusa l'immagine (per esempio evitare che vi sia una luce forte alle spalle di un viso)
  • Qualità generale - le immagini candidate devono essere di alta qualità tecnica.
  • Le manipolazioni digitali non devono essere effettuate per ingannare, ma vanno usate solo limitatamente e con cura per correggere difetti fotografici. Le manipolazioni comunemente accettate sono il ritaglio e la correzione di prospettiva, focale, colore ed esposizione. Manipolazioni più estese, come può essere la rimozione di un elemento di distrazione dello sfondo, vanno chiaramente descritte nel testo di descrizione per mezzo del template {{Retouched picture}}. Manipolazioni non descritte o descritte in modo insufficiente non permettono la candidatura alla vetrina.
  • Valore - il nostro principale obiettivo è eleggere le immagini con il maggior valore rispetto a tutte le loro simili. Le immagini devono essere in qualche modo speciali, perciò fai attenzione:
    • quasi tutti i tramonti sono esteticamente piacevoli, infatti molte immagini sono simili alle altre,
    • gli scatti notturni sono gradevoli ma generalmente le foto scattate di giorno mostrano molti più dettagli,
    • non tutte le belle foto hanno in realtà un valore che non sia esclusivamente personale.

Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto tecnico abbiamo come parametri l'esposizione, la composizione, il controllo del movimento e la profondità di campo.

  • L'esposizione si riferisce alla combinazione tra tempo di esposizione e diaframma. Questa combinazione permette generalmente di avere una curva di tono che è in grado di rappresentare ombre e luci con un dettaglio accettabile. Questa curva viene detta latitudine di posa. Un'immagine può essere nella banda bassa, media o alta. Le fotocamere digitali (e le loro foto) hanno una latitudine di posa più stretta delle macchine a pellicola. La mancanza di dettagli nelle zone d'ombra non è necessariamente una caratteristica negativa. Infatti questa può essere parte dell'effetto desiderato, mentre ampie zone eccessivamente sovraesposte possono distrarre la vista.
  • La composizione si riferisce alla distribuzione degli elementi nell'immagine. La “Regola dei Terzi” è una buona linea guida per la composizione e eredita molto dagli studi di disegno. Il concetto principale considera l'immagine divisa con due linee orizzontali e due verticali, che dividono l'immagine in tre parti. Generalmente se l'oggetto viene centrato si ha un effetto poco interessante, mentre se l'oggetto viene posizionato in uno dei punti di interesse, ovvero l'intersezione delle quattro linee, si ottiene un effetto decisamente migliore. Le linee dell'orizzonte infatti non dovrebbero essere posizionate nel centro, perché taglierebbero la foto a metà; è invece preferibile scegliere una delle linee orizzontali. Complessivamente bisogna tendere a creare un'immagine dinamica.
  • Il controllo del movimento si riferisce al modo viene rappresentato il movimento nell'immagine. Il movimento può essere bloccato (seguito dalla fotocamera) oppure può essere lasciato scorrere, tuttavia l'oggetto principale dell'immagine deve essere visibile. Nessuna delle due tecniche è migliore dell'altra, la buona riuscita dipende esclusivamente dal tipo di effetto ricercato. Per esempio, fotografando una vettura da corsa che appare statica in relazione allo sfondo, che invece scorre sul retro, si ottiene l'oggetto principale in una condizione statica mentre lo sfondo crea il senso di movimento. (questa tecnica è chiamata "panning"). D'altra parte, fotografando un giocatore di basket in salto, bloccato in relazione a tutto il resto dello sfondo, si otterrebbe un buono scatto proprio per la posa innaturale.
  • La profondità di campo (PdC o DOF dall'inglese depth of field) è la distanza davanti e dietro il soggetto principale che appare nitida (a fuoco). Questo parametro viene scelto a seconda delle necessità di ogni immagine e può parimenti migliorare o peggiorare la qualità di una fotografia. Generalmente viene utilizzata una PdC ridotta per mettere al centro dell'attenzione il soggetto principale, separandolo da tutto il resto dello sfondo. Invece viene utilizzata una grande PdC per enfatizzare la profondità di un immagine. Gli obiettivi grandangolari in genere una grande PdC mentre i teleobiettivi ne hanno una decisamente ridotta. In gran parte la PdC dipende dall'apertura del diaframma: aumenta con il diminuire dell'apertura e viceversa.

Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto grafico prendiamo invece in considerazione nitidezza, profondità, colore, superficie, prospettiva, bilanciamento, proporzione, ecc.

  • La nitidezza si riferisce alle linee di contorno del soggetto principale.
  • La profondità si riferisce alla qualità dell'aspetto tridimensionale del soggetto. Ciò si ottiene soprattutto tramite un'adeguata illuminazione laterale (come quella della prima mattinata o del tardo pomeriggio) e non esclusivamente frontale, al fine di evitare l'appiattimento del soggetto.
  • Il colore è un elemento molto importante e non deve essere né troppo né poco saturo.
  • La superficie si riferisce alla qualità della superficie degli oggetti fotografati.
  • La prospettiva si riferisce all'angolazione dalla quale è stata scattata la fotografia. Essa crea una serie di rette immaginarie che seguono gli spigoli paralleli degli oggetti e si incontrano in un punto che può essere dentro o fuori l'immagine.
  • Il bilanciamento si riferisce alla disposizione degli oggetti nell'immagine e può essere equilibrato o porre maggior peso verso una direzione.
  • La proporzione si riferisce alla relazione tra le dimensioni degli oggetti all'interno dell'immagine. Generalmente si tende a rappresentare oggetti con ridotta relazione, ma una buona tecnica è quella di rappresentare gli oggetti di dimensioni minori in modo più esteso, contrariamente a quanto è in realtà. Per esempio, un piccolo fiore che viene rappresentato con le stesse dimensioni di una grande montagna: questa tecnica viene chiamata inversione di scala.
Ovviamente, non tutte le caratteristiche devono essere necessariamente presenti. Le immagini possono essere giudicate sia per una sola caratteristica che per diverse caratteristiche, anche contemporaneamente.
  • Significato simbolico o rilevanza particolare …Le guerre d'opinione possono iniziare!…. Va ricordato che una pessima fotografia di un soggetto difficilissimo da fotografare è sicuramente migliore di un'immagine ordinaria e tradizionale (come un comune tramonto).
Le immagini possono essere scelte da un fotografo o da un osservatore anche per motivi culturali, tenendo però sempre conto del contesto dello scatto e non di quello dell'osservatore. Un'immagine inoltre può "parlare" alle persone e avere la capacità di evocare emozioni, che tuttavia non devono essere necessariamente piacevoli.

Per ottimizzare le possibilità di successo delle candidature delle tue immagini è consigliabile leggere le linee guida complete.

Come candidare un'immagine

edit

Se credi di aver trovato o creato un immagine che può essere presa in considerazione per la vetrina, che abbia una appropriata descrizione e una licenza adeguata, allora segui queste indicazioni.

Punto 1: copia il nome dell'immagine dentro la casella di testo (includendo anche il prefisso Image: ) a seguito del testo già presente nella casella (per esempio Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG.) ed infine clicca il pulsante candida una nuova immagine.

Punto 2: segui le istruzioni della pagina alla quale vieni collegato e salva le modifiche apportate.

Punto 3: inserisci manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata in cima alla lista candidati: Clicca qui e aggiungi il testo che segue all'inizio della lista di candidature:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG}}

Votare

edit

Per votare puoi usare i seguenti templates:

  • {{A favore}} (  Support) per supportare la candidatura,
  • {{Contrario}} (  Oppose) per opporsi alla candidatura,
  • {{Neutrale}} (  Neutral) per esprimere un parere neutrale,
  • {{Commento}} (  Comment) per esprimere solo un commento,
  • {{Info}} (  Info) per aggiungere delle informazioni riguardanti l'immagine,
  • {{Domanda}} (  Question) per chiedere informazioni.

Puoi inoltre evidenziare che l'immagine non ha possibilità di essere eletta con il template {{FPX|motivo}}, inserendo al posto di motivo le ragioni per cui è chiaramente inaccettabile per la vetrina.

Ogni votante è pregato di motivare il proprio voto con qualche parola, in particolar modo se si vota contro. Ricorda inoltre di aggiungere la tua firma (~~~~). I voti anonimi non sono accettati.

Candidare un'immagine alla rimozione dalla vetrina

edit

Gli standard della vetrina cambiano col tempo. Può succedere che un'immagine che era stata eletta per la vetrina non sia più adatta agli standard attuali.

Questa lista è perciò composta dalle immagini considerate non più adatte a rimanere nella vetrina. Vota:

  • {{Mantenere}}   Keep per far sì che l'immagine rimanga nella vetrina.
  • {{Rimuovere}}   Oppose per far sì che l'immagine venga rimossa dalla vetrina.

Se consideri che un'immagine non rispetti più i criteri delle immagini in vetrina, candidala per la rimozione copiando il nome dell'immagine dentro questa casella di testo (includendo il prefisso dell' Image:) a seguito del testo già presente in essa:

Nella pagina appena creata includi:

  • Le informazioni sull'origine dell'immagine (autore dell'immagine, autore della candidatura);
  • Un collegamento all'iniziale candidatura per l'inserimento nella vetrina (che va inserito sotto ==Collegamenti== nella descrizione dell'immagine);
  • Il motivo per cui l'hai candidata per la rimozione dalla vetrina e il tuo Nome utente.

Dopo aver fatto ciò devi inserire manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata all'inizio della lista di rimozione dalla vetrina.

Politica di elezione per la vetrina

edit

Regole generali

edit
  1. Il periodo di votazione è di 9 giorni completi, a partire dalla candidatura. I risultato verrà determinato alla fine di questo periodo. I voti aggiunti il decimo giorno o a seguito non verranno considerati.
  2. Sono benvenuti i contributori anonimi.
  3. I contributi di anonimi alle discussioni sono benvenuti.
  4. I voti di contributori anonimi non saranno accettati.
  5. La candidatura non conta come voto. Il voto di supporto va esplicitato.
  6. Gli autori delle candidature possono ritirare le loro immagini candidate in ogni momento. Questo si ottiene scrivendo semplicemente "I withdraw my nomination" (in inglese: ritiro la mia candidatura)
    o aggiungendo il testo {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
  7. Ricorda che l'obiettivo del progetto Wikimedia Commons è di costruire una raccolta di immagini utilizzabili da tutti i progetti Wikimedia, inclusi possibili progetti futuri. Perciò non bisogna pensare che questo sia una raccolta dedicata esclusivamente al progetto Wikipedia e per tanto le immagini non vanno valutate in funzione di ciò.
  8. Le immagini vengono rimosse dalla lista di candidature se non hanno voti a supporto (escluso quello dell'autore della candidatura) entro il quinto giorno dalla candidatura (La regola del quinto giorno)
  9. Le immagini dotate del template {{FPX}} non devono essere rimosse dalla lista entro le 48 ore successive al momento in cui è stato applicato il template, purchè non vi sia nessun voto a supporto oltre quello dell'autore della candidatura.

Regole di ammissione e rimozione dalla vetrina

edit

Un'immagine candidata viene ammessa alla vetrina se si verificano le seguenti condizioni:

  1. La licenza è adeguata (ovviamente).
  2. Se ha almeno 5 voti a supporto.
  3. Se il rapporto tra voti pro/contro è almeno 2/1 (se ha due terzi di maggioranza).
  4. Non possono essere ammessi alla vetrina diverse versioni della stessa immagine, ne deve essere scelta una sola versione.

I criteri per la rimozione dalla vetrina sono gli stessi per l'ammissione ad essa, compreso il periodo di voto e la regola del quinto giorno (vedi nelle Regole generali).

Ogni utente esperto può portare a termine una votazione: per istruzioni su come compiere questa operazione vedi la guida per portare a termina la votazione.

Infine, sii cortese

edit

Per piacere non dimenticare che l'immagine che stai giudicando è frutto del lavoro di qualcuno. Evita di usare frasi come è orribile: se devi opporti non fare spiacevoli considerazioni. Inoltre ricorda che è necessario scrivere in inglese se vuoi essere compreso dagli altri utenti e che il tuo utilizzo di questa lingua e quello degli altri utenti può comunque generare incomprensioni se non si ha un'ottima conoscenza, perciò scegli le parole con cura.

Buon voto… e ricorda che.... tutte le regole possono avere qualche eccezione.

Vedi anche

edit

Indice

edit

Candidati per la vetrina

edit
Aggiorna la pagina: purge this page's cache
Shortcut
edit

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 16:04:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 16:01:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 11:53:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 11:31:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 10:51:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 22:35:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 18:22:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 16:45:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 09:37:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 07:22:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 19:13:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 19:07:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 14:56:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 10:41:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  I withdraw my nomination --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 09:36:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 07:00:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 06:02:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 23:32:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 15:48:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 15:49:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 14:32:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 04:49:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 21:56:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 21:00:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 18:36:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 18:26:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 01:24:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 21:10:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 16:20:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 16:19:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 14:47:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 14:31:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  Question Why is only that low resolution given? Otherwise it would be a very good photo --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:35, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 10:13:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 03:03:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 23:26:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 23:26, 15 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 09:43, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Comment I would prefer the image without the labels on the mountains. The labels/arrows should all be a consistent format/layout. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    I gave this quite a bit of thought beforehand: same font, two colors (one for labels with sky in background brighter for darker background e.g. the grass covered peaks inside the landscape. One larger label for the Zugspitze - highest mountain of Germany. I made a lot of effort to realize the labels in a typographically pleasant way. For those who like an unedited version I linked the version without label and non-retouched mast in the image descrption. Tuxyso (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support I prefer it with the labels, it feels more educational and useful. There is a version without labels, if anyone would like to nominate that as an alternative. LetmeEditit (talk) 13:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support --Maryliflower (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Oppose See Commons:Watermarks and Commons:Image annotations. Burned-in text is not the standard. Additional meta-data outside the image is the standard and improves our ability to use media across all Wikipedia projects. When labels are rendered directly into the pixels, they are not programmatically readable by assistive technologies (screen readers), and do not adapt to users needing high-contrast assistance. -- E bailey (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Thanks for raising this, but I think neither of the two linked pages actually supports the oppose. Commons:Watermarks explicitly defines watermarks as content that is not part of the creative work itself and serves to assert authorship/copyright. Peak labels are informational content and part of the work, comparable to labels on a map. Besides, that page is a proposed guideline, not policy. Commons:Image annotations, in turn, explicitly lists "identification of places/objects/locations in panoramic photographs" as a desirable type of information. It governs the annotation tool, it does not prohibit rendered labels.
    On the practical side: image notes simply do not work for a 38,000 px panorama. They are only visible on the scaled-down file page preview, not in the Media Viewer, not in ZoomViewer, not in article thumbnails, not in downloaded copies. Precisely at full resolution, where peak identification matters, notes are invisible. So there is, realistically, no alternative way to offer a labeled high-resolution panorama on Commons — the only "alternative" would be not to create such panoramas at all, which would be a loss, considering the substantial work that goes into them.
    Regarding accessibility: the file has a detailed bilingual description naming all major peaks, which is fully machine-readable (including structured data). That, not pixels or image notes (which screen readers cannot read either), is what assistive technology relies on. Current screen readers additionally perform OCR on images: VoiceOver includes built-in Text Recognition (iOS 14+), and JAWS offers Convenient OCR and Picture Smart AI. And for anyone preferring an unlabeled version for reuse, translation, or high-contrast adaptation it is linked under "other versions" at full resolution. Nothing is lost; the labeled version simply adds value, the same way a labeled map does. Tuxyso (talk) 17:41, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    I would support the version without labels. It has broader use and value. E bailey (talk) 18:33, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support -- In my opinion, the two versions work best together, just like twins. Je-str (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support The labels add genuine encyclopedic value by identifying the peaks directly in the panorama. They are informational content, not a watermark. The digital modifications, including the added labels and removal of the radio mast, are fully documented in the retouching template, with the original version linked. The unlabelled full-resolution version is also available, so both versions complement each other very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:15, 17 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Weak oppose IMHO there is a reasonable middle ground here. As mentioned above, the burned-in text detracts from an otherwise wonderful panorama and limits its usefulness by turning it into a specifically encyclopedic illustration. The labels are useful information, but that information does not necessarily need to be part of the pixels themselves. Commons already provides ways to associate information with particular parts of an image, annotations and, more usefully, Structured Data with depicts (P180) and relative position within image (P2677). That would allow the individual peaks to be identified in a machine-readable and multilingual way while keeping the original panorama clean and reusable. I would prefer the unlabelled panorama as the featured version, and keeping the labelled file as a useful derivative. The existing unlabelled version could also be added here as an Alternative, allowing voters to choose between the two. I also don't think Commons:Watermarks is relevant in this case because these are informational labels rather than authorship or copyright markings. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Thanks for the review! Could you show me an example of how you'd depict the individual peaks? Maybe we could even combine both ideas — Wikidata plus labels? Tuxyso (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Thanks, yes, I think combining both approaches could actually be a good solution. What I had in mind was adding a depicts (P180) statement for each identifiable peak in the file's Structured Data, with relative position within image (P2677) as a qualifier indicating its position. There is already a Commons example using this approach for multiple landmarks File:Werner Haberkorn - Centro da cidade.jpg, where individual buildings are identified with P180 and P2677. This would not visually replace your labels, of course, at present the structured positions are not rendered as labels over the image, so I can see the value of keeping the labelled derivative as well. The advantage is that the peak identities would additionally become machine-readable and multilingual, while the unlabelled panorama is available for unrestricted reuse Wilfredor (talk) 21:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support I like the names inside the image, as long as the original image is linked. More is not needed. -- -donald- (talk) 09:01, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support per donald and others. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 15:28:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 09:20:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 08:21:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 16:35:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 11:57:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 03:37:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 23:13:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vignetting reduced and also less overprocessed --Ezarateesteban 14:09, 15 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 23:19:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Description improved --Ezarateesteban 11:10, 14 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 16:22:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 11:02:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.


Candidati per la rimozione dalla vetrina

edit
edit

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 16:04:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 16:01:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 11:53:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 11:31:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 10:51:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 22:35:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 18:22:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 16:45:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 09:37:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 07:22:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 19:13:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 19:07:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 14:56:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 10:41:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  I withdraw my nomination --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 09:36:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 07:00:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 06:02:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 23:32:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 15:48:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 15:49:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 14:32:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 04:49:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 21:56:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 21:00:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 18:36:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 18:26:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 01:24:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 21:10:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 16:20:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 16:19:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 14:47:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 14:31:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  Question Why is only that low resolution given? Otherwise it would be a very good photo --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:35, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 10:13:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 03:03:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 23:26:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 23:26, 15 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 09:43, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Comment I would prefer the image without the labels on the mountains. The labels/arrows should all be a consistent format/layout. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    I gave this quite a bit of thought beforehand: same font, two colors (one for labels with sky in background brighter for darker background e.g. the grass covered peaks inside the landscape. One larger label for the Zugspitze - highest mountain of Germany. I made a lot of effort to realize the labels in a typographically pleasant way. For those who like an unedited version I linked the version without label and non-retouched mast in the image descrption. Tuxyso (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support I prefer it with the labels, it feels more educational and useful. There is a version without labels, if anyone would like to nominate that as an alternative. LetmeEditit (talk) 13:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support --Maryliflower (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Oppose See Commons:Watermarks and Commons:Image annotations. Burned-in text is not the standard. Additional meta-data outside the image is the standard and improves our ability to use media across all Wikipedia projects. When labels are rendered directly into the pixels, they are not programmatically readable by assistive technologies (screen readers), and do not adapt to users needing high-contrast assistance. -- E bailey (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Thanks for raising this, but I think neither of the two linked pages actually supports the oppose. Commons:Watermarks explicitly defines watermarks as content that is not part of the creative work itself and serves to assert authorship/copyright. Peak labels are informational content and part of the work, comparable to labels on a map. Besides, that page is a proposed guideline, not policy. Commons:Image annotations, in turn, explicitly lists "identification of places/objects/locations in panoramic photographs" as a desirable type of information. It governs the annotation tool, it does not prohibit rendered labels.
    On the practical side: image notes simply do not work for a 38,000 px panorama. They are only visible on the scaled-down file page preview, not in the Media Viewer, not in ZoomViewer, not in article thumbnails, not in downloaded copies. Precisely at full resolution, where peak identification matters, notes are invisible. So there is, realistically, no alternative way to offer a labeled high-resolution panorama on Commons — the only "alternative" would be not to create such panoramas at all, which would be a loss, considering the substantial work that goes into them.
    Regarding accessibility: the file has a detailed bilingual description naming all major peaks, which is fully machine-readable (including structured data). That, not pixels or image notes (which screen readers cannot read either), is what assistive technology relies on. Current screen readers additionally perform OCR on images: VoiceOver includes built-in Text Recognition (iOS 14+), and JAWS offers Convenient OCR and Picture Smart AI. And for anyone preferring an unlabeled version for reuse, translation, or high-contrast adaptation it is linked under "other versions" at full resolution. Nothing is lost; the labeled version simply adds value, the same way a labeled map does. Tuxyso (talk) 17:41, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    I would support the version without labels. It has broader use and value. E bailey (talk) 18:33, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support -- In my opinion, the two versions work best together, just like twins. Je-str (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support The labels add genuine encyclopedic value by identifying the peaks directly in the panorama. They are informational content, not a watermark. The digital modifications, including the added labels and removal of the radio mast, are fully documented in the retouching template, with the original version linked. The unlabelled full-resolution version is also available, so both versions complement each other very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:15, 17 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Weak oppose IMHO there is a reasonable middle ground here. As mentioned above, the burned-in text detracts from an otherwise wonderful panorama and limits its usefulness by turning it into a specifically encyclopedic illustration. The labels are useful information, but that information does not necessarily need to be part of the pixels themselves. Commons already provides ways to associate information with particular parts of an image, annotations and, more usefully, Structured Data with depicts (P180) and relative position within image (P2677). That would allow the individual peaks to be identified in a machine-readable and multilingual way while keeping the original panorama clean and reusable. I would prefer the unlabelled panorama as the featured version, and keeping the labelled file as a useful derivative. The existing unlabelled version could also be added here as an Alternative, allowing voters to choose between the two. I also don't think Commons:Watermarks is relevant in this case because these are informational labels rather than authorship or copyright markings. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Thanks for the review! Could you show me an example of how you'd depict the individual peaks? Maybe we could even combine both ideas — Wikidata plus labels? Tuxyso (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Thanks, yes, I think combining both approaches could actually be a good solution. What I had in mind was adding a depicts (P180) statement for each identifiable peak in the file's Structured Data, with relative position within image (P2677) as a qualifier indicating its position. There is already a Commons example using this approach for multiple landmarks File:Werner Haberkorn - Centro da cidade.jpg, where individual buildings are identified with P180 and P2677. This would not visually replace your labels, of course, at present the structured positions are not rendered as labels over the image, so I can see the value of keeping the labelled derivative as well. The advantage is that the peak identities would additionally become machine-readable and multilingual, while the unlabelled panorama is available for unrestricted reuse Wilfredor (talk) 21:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support I like the names inside the image, as long as the original image is linked. More is not needed. -- -donald- (talk) 09:01, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 18 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  •   Support per donald and others. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 15:28:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 09:20:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 08:21:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 16:35:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 11:57:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 03:37:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 23:13:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vignetting reduced and also less overprocessed --Ezarateesteban 14:09, 15 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 23:19:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Description improved --Ezarateesteban 11:10, 14 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 16:22:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 11:02:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.



Tabella dei periodi di voto per la regola del quinto giorno (5 giorni dopo la candidatura)

edit
Mon 17 Aug → Sat 22 Aug
Tue 18 Aug → Sun 23 Aug
Wed 19 Aug → Mon 24 Aug
Thu 20 Aug → Tue 25 Aug
Fri 21 Aug → Wed 26 Aug
Sat 22 Aug → Thu 27 Aug

Tabella dei periodi di voto (9 giorni dopo la candidatura)

edit
Thu 13 Aug → Sat 22 Aug
Fri 14 Aug → Sun 23 Aug
Sat 15 Aug → Mon 24 Aug
Sun 16 Aug → Tue 25 Aug
Mon 17 Aug → Wed 26 Aug
Tue 18 Aug → Thu 27 Aug
Wed 19 Aug → Fri 28 Aug
Thu 20 Aug → Sat 29 Aug
Fri 21 Aug → Sun 30 Aug
Sat 22 Aug → Mon 31 Aug