Commons:Segnalazioni per la vetrina
|
Segnalazioni per la vetrina in altre lingue:
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/− |
Queste immagini sono candidate per la vetrina. Fare attenzione a non confondere questa pagina con le immagini del giorno.
Guida
editCandidare un immagine
editLinee guida per candidare un'immagine
editÈ importante leggere le linee guida prima di candidare un'immagine.
A seguito è riportato un riassunto dei punti essenziali per candidare e valutare le immagini candidate:
- Risoluzione - Le fotografie con una risoluzione inferiore a 2 milioni di pixel vengono generalmente rifiutate e rimosse ad eccezione di motivi contrari di particolare importanza. Si noti che le immagini con risoluzione 1600 x 1200 hanno 1.92 Mpx, appena inferiore al limite minimo di 2Mpx.
- Ricordiamo che le immagini caricate su Commons vengono visualizzate non solo su schermi tradizionali di PC ma sono utilizzate anche per stampa e visualizzazione su schermi ad alta risoluzione. Non possiamo certo prevedere quali tecnologie verranno utilizzate nel futuro quindi è importante che le immagini scelte per la vetrina abbiano una risoluzione quanto più alta è possibile.
- Scansioni - È consigliabile seguire la guida alla scansione, che propone suggerimenti per l'ottenimento di immagini ottimali
- Fuoco - ovviamente ogni oggetto significativo dell'immagine deve essere ben definito e a fuoco.
- Primo piano e sfondo - Oggetti in primissimo piano o di sfondo possono distrarre dalla vista dal oggetto principale dell'immagine. È il caso di controllare se qualche elemento in primo piano non copra nessun elemento importante e che lo sfondo non distolga l'attenzione e renda confusa l'immagine (per esempio evitare che vi sia una luce forte alle spalle di un viso)
- Qualità generale - le immagini candidate devono essere di alta qualità tecnica.
- Le manipolazioni digitali non devono essere effettuate per ingannare, ma vanno usate solo limitatamente e con cura per correggere difetti fotografici. Le manipolazioni comunemente accettate sono il ritaglio e la correzione di prospettiva, focale, colore ed esposizione. Manipolazioni più estese, come può essere la rimozione di un elemento di distrazione dello sfondo, vanno chiaramente descritte nel testo di descrizione per mezzo del template {{Retouched picture}}. Manipolazioni non descritte o descritte in modo insufficiente non permettono la candidatura alla vetrina.
- Valore - il nostro principale obiettivo è eleggere le immagini con il maggior valore rispetto a tutte le loro simili. Le immagini devono essere in qualche modo speciali, perciò fai attenzione:
- quasi tutti i tramonti sono esteticamente piacevoli, infatti molte immagini sono simili alle altre,
- gli scatti notturni sono gradevoli ma generalmente le foto scattate di giorno mostrano molti più dettagli,
- non tutte le belle foto hanno in realtà un valore che non sia esclusivamente personale.
Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto tecnico abbiamo come parametri l'esposizione, la composizione, il controllo del movimento e la profondità di campo.
- L'esposizione si riferisce alla combinazione tra tempo di esposizione e diaframma. Questa combinazione permette generalmente di avere una curva di tono che è in grado di rappresentare ombre e luci con un dettaglio accettabile. Questa curva viene detta latitudine di posa. Un'immagine può essere nella banda bassa, media o alta. Le fotocamere digitali (e le loro foto) hanno una latitudine di posa più stretta delle macchine a pellicola. La mancanza di dettagli nelle zone d'ombra non è necessariamente una caratteristica negativa. Infatti questa può essere parte dell'effetto desiderato, mentre ampie zone eccessivamente sovraesposte possono distrarre la vista.
- La composizione si riferisce alla distribuzione degli elementi nell'immagine. La “Regola dei Terzi” è una buona linea guida per la composizione e eredita molto dagli studi di disegno. Il concetto principale considera l'immagine divisa con due linee orizzontali e due verticali, che dividono l'immagine in tre parti. Generalmente se l'oggetto viene centrato si ha un effetto poco interessante, mentre se l'oggetto viene posizionato in uno dei punti di interesse, ovvero l'intersezione delle quattro linee, si ottiene un effetto decisamente migliore. Le linee dell'orizzonte infatti non dovrebbero essere posizionate nel centro, perché taglierebbero la foto a metà; è invece preferibile scegliere una delle linee orizzontali. Complessivamente bisogna tendere a creare un'immagine dinamica.
- Il controllo del movimento si riferisce al modo viene rappresentato il movimento nell'immagine. Il movimento può essere bloccato (seguito dalla fotocamera) oppure può essere lasciato scorrere, tuttavia l'oggetto principale dell'immagine deve essere visibile. Nessuna delle due tecniche è migliore dell'altra, la buona riuscita dipende esclusivamente dal tipo di effetto ricercato. Per esempio, fotografando una vettura da corsa che appare statica in relazione allo sfondo, che invece scorre sul retro, si ottiene l'oggetto principale in una condizione statica mentre lo sfondo crea il senso di movimento. (questa tecnica è chiamata "panning"). D'altra parte, fotografando un giocatore di basket in salto, bloccato in relazione a tutto il resto dello sfondo, si otterrebbe un buono scatto proprio per la posa innaturale.
- La profondità di campo (PdC o DOF dall'inglese depth of field) è la distanza davanti e dietro il soggetto principale che appare nitida (a fuoco). Questo parametro viene scelto a seconda delle necessità di ogni immagine e può parimenti migliorare o peggiorare la qualità di una fotografia. Generalmente viene utilizzata una PdC ridotta per mettere al centro dell'attenzione il soggetto principale, separandolo da tutto il resto dello sfondo. Invece viene utilizzata una grande PdC per enfatizzare la profondità di un immagine. Gli obiettivi grandangolari in genere una grande PdC mentre i teleobiettivi ne hanno una decisamente ridotta. In gran parte la PdC dipende dall'apertura del diaframma: aumenta con il diminuire dell'apertura e viceversa.
Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto grafico prendiamo invece in considerazione nitidezza, profondità, colore, superficie, prospettiva, bilanciamento, proporzione, ecc.
- La nitidezza si riferisce alle linee di contorno del soggetto principale.
- La profondità si riferisce alla qualità dell'aspetto tridimensionale del soggetto. Ciò si ottiene soprattutto tramite un'adeguata illuminazione laterale (come quella della prima mattinata o del tardo pomeriggio) e non esclusivamente frontale, al fine di evitare l'appiattimento del soggetto.
- Il colore è un elemento molto importante e non deve essere né troppo né poco saturo.
- La superficie si riferisce alla qualità della superficie degli oggetti fotografati.
- La prospettiva si riferisce all'angolazione dalla quale è stata scattata la fotografia. Essa crea una serie di rette immaginarie che seguono gli spigoli paralleli degli oggetti e si incontrano in un punto che può essere dentro o fuori l'immagine.
- Il bilanciamento si riferisce alla disposizione degli oggetti nell'immagine e può essere equilibrato o porre maggior peso verso una direzione.
- La proporzione si riferisce alla relazione tra le dimensioni degli oggetti all'interno dell'immagine. Generalmente si tende a rappresentare oggetti con ridotta relazione, ma una buona tecnica è quella di rappresentare gli oggetti di dimensioni minori in modo più esteso, contrariamente a quanto è in realtà. Per esempio, un piccolo fiore che viene rappresentato con le stesse dimensioni di una grande montagna: questa tecnica viene chiamata inversione di scala.
- Ovviamente, non tutte le caratteristiche devono essere necessariamente presenti. Le immagini possono essere giudicate sia per una sola caratteristica che per diverse caratteristiche, anche contemporaneamente.
- Significato simbolico o rilevanza particolare …Le guerre d'opinione possono iniziare!…. Va ricordato che una pessima fotografia di un soggetto difficilissimo da fotografare è sicuramente migliore di un'immagine ordinaria e tradizionale (come un comune tramonto).
- Le immagini possono essere scelte da un fotografo o da un osservatore anche per motivi culturali, tenendo però sempre conto del contesto dello scatto e non di quello dell'osservatore. Un'immagine inoltre può "parlare" alle persone e avere la capacità di evocare emozioni, che tuttavia non devono essere necessariamente piacevoli.
Per ottimizzare le possibilità di successo delle candidature delle tue immagini è consigliabile leggere le linee guida complete.
Come candidare un'immagine
editSe credi di aver trovato o creato un immagine che può essere presa in considerazione per la vetrina, che abbia una appropriata descrizione e una licenza adeguata, allora segui queste indicazioni.
Punto 1: copia il nome dell'immagine dentro la casella di testo (includendo anche il prefisso Image: ) a seguito del testo già presente nella casella (per esempio Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG.) ed infine clicca il pulsante candida una nuova immagine.
Punto 2: segui le istruzioni della pagina alla quale vieni collegato e salva le modifiche apportate.
Punto 3: inserisci manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata in cima alla lista candidati:
Clicca qui e aggiungi il testo che segue all'inizio della lista di candidature:
- {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG}}
Votare
editPer votare puoi usare i seguenti templates:
- {{A favore}} ( Support) per supportare la candidatura,
- {{Contrario}} ( Oppose) per opporsi alla candidatura,
- {{Neutrale}} ( Neutral) per esprimere un parere neutrale,
- {{Commento}} ( Comment) per esprimere solo un commento,
- {{Info}} ( Info) per aggiungere delle informazioni riguardanti l'immagine,
- {{Domanda}} ( Question) per chiedere informazioni.
Puoi inoltre evidenziare che l'immagine non ha possibilità di essere eletta con il template {{FPX|motivo}}, inserendo al posto di motivo le ragioni per cui è chiaramente inaccettabile per la vetrina.
Ogni votante è pregato di motivare il proprio voto con qualche parola, in particolar modo se si vota contro. Ricorda inoltre di aggiungere la tua firma (~~~~). I voti anonimi non sono accettati.
Candidare un'immagine alla rimozione dalla vetrina
editGli standard della vetrina cambiano col tempo. Può succedere che un'immagine che era stata eletta per la vetrina non sia più adatta agli standard attuali.
Questa lista è perciò composta dalle immagini considerate non più adatte a rimanere nella vetrina. Vota:
- {{Mantenere}} Keep per far sì che l'immagine rimanga nella vetrina.
- {{Rimuovere}} Oppose per far sì che l'immagine venga rimossa dalla vetrina.
Se consideri che un'immagine non rispetti più i criteri delle immagini in vetrina, candidala per la rimozione copiando il nome dell'immagine dentro questa casella di testo (includendo il prefisso dell' Image:) a seguito del testo già presente in essa:
Nella pagina appena creata includi:
- Le informazioni sull'origine dell'immagine (autore dell'immagine, autore della candidatura);
- Un collegamento all'iniziale candidatura per l'inserimento nella vetrina (che va inserito sotto ==Collegamenti== nella descrizione dell'immagine);
- Il motivo per cui l'hai candidata per la rimozione dalla vetrina e il tuo Nome utente.
Dopo aver fatto ciò devi inserire manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata all'inizio della lista di rimozione dalla vetrina.
Politica di elezione per la vetrina
editRegole generali
edit- Il periodo di votazione è di 9 giorni completi, a partire dalla candidatura. I risultato verrà determinato alla fine di questo periodo. I voti aggiunti il decimo giorno o a seguito non verranno considerati.
- Sono benvenuti i contributori anonimi.
- I contributi di anonimi alle discussioni sono benvenuti.
- I voti di contributori anonimi non saranno accettati.
- La candidatura non conta come voto. Il voto di supporto va esplicitato.
- Gli autori delle candidature possono ritirare le loro immagini candidate in ogni momento. Questo si ottiene scrivendo semplicemente "I withdraw my nomination" (in inglese: ritiro la mia candidatura)
o aggiungendo il testo{{withdraw|~~~~}}. - Ricorda che l'obiettivo del progetto Wikimedia Commons è di costruire una raccolta di immagini utilizzabili da tutti i progetti Wikimedia, inclusi possibili progetti futuri. Perciò non bisogna pensare che questo sia una raccolta dedicata esclusivamente al progetto Wikipedia e per tanto le immagini non vanno valutate in funzione di ciò.
- Le immagini vengono rimosse dalla lista di candidature se non hanno voti a supporto (escluso quello dell'autore della candidatura) entro il quinto giorno dalla candidatura (La regola del quinto giorno)
- Le immagini dotate del template {{FPX}} non devono essere rimosse dalla lista entro le 48 ore successive al momento in cui è stato applicato il template, purchè non vi sia nessun voto a supporto oltre quello dell'autore della candidatura.
Regole di ammissione e rimozione dalla vetrina
editUn'immagine candidata viene ammessa alla vetrina se si verificano le seguenti condizioni:
- La licenza è adeguata (ovviamente).
- Se ha almeno 5 voti a supporto.
- Se il rapporto tra voti pro/contro è almeno 2/1 (se ha due terzi di maggioranza).
- Non possono essere ammessi alla vetrina diverse versioni della stessa immagine, ne deve essere scelta una sola versione.
I criteri per la rimozione dalla vetrina sono gli stessi per l'ammissione ad essa, compreso il periodo di voto e la regola del quinto giorno (vedi nelle Regole generali).
Ogni utente esperto può portare a termine una votazione: per istruzioni su come compiere questa operazione vedi la guida per portare a termina la votazione.
Infine, sii cortese
editPer piacere non dimenticare che l'immagine che stai giudicando è frutto del lavoro di qualcuno. Evita di usare frasi come è orribile: se devi opporti non fare spiacevoli considerazioni. Inoltre ricorda che è necessario scrivere in inglese se vuoi essere compreso dagli altri utenti e che il tuo utilizzo di questa lingua e quello degli altri utenti può comunque generare incomprensioni se non si ha un'ottima conoscenza, perciò scegli le parole con cura.
Buon voto… e ricorda che.... tutte le regole possono avere qualche eccezione.
Vedi anche
edit- Per modificare la lista di candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- Per una lista cronologica delle candidature: Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- Per un archivio delle precedenti candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- Per istruzioni su come portare a termine una procedura di voto: Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- Lista di termini base del linguaggio fotografico
- Candidature per le immagini di qualità
- Critica fotografica
- Guida alla scansione
Indice
editCandidati per la vetrina
editFeatured picture candidates
editVoting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 16:04:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created by Photorubel – uploaded by Photorubel – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen (keep talking) 16:04, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Moheen (keep talking) 16:04, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 16:22, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:35, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I really like this image and would be happy to support it. However, I find the noise quite noticeable, and the file also lacked an embedded sRGB profile. I therefore made a lightly processed version with some noise reduction and an embedded sRGB profile, which I am offering via SwissTransfer. If useful, it could either be used to update the file or, if the image is currently part of a competition, as a derivative. Just a suggestion. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 16:01:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created by Arpan.basuchowdhury – uploaded by Arpan.basuchowdhury – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen (keep talking) 16:01, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Moheen (keep talking) 16:01, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:34, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very good technical quality, with remarkably sharp eyes despite the 1.6 s exposure. The light trails beautifully frame the subject and add a unique dynamic quality to the portrait. A truly outstanding photograph. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:25, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 11:53:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Info I think this is the best perspective as it offers a dramatic profile view of the head. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:53, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:53, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 11:31:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#North Macedonia
- Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:41, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 10:51:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Czech_Republic
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 10:51, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 10:51, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support, though the shadows feel a bit harsh. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:43, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- OpposeSorry, the image is not outstanding to me. It would be good if the nature around the building complements the composition with the building. Also, an ideal lighting by weather would be better. It could also be easy to reproduce as the weather condition is not extraordinary --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:19, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 22:35:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
- Info created & uploaded by Максат79 – nominated by me -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:35, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:35, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Mile (talk) 07:18, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support The deep blue sky and delicate cloud structures contrast beautifully with the brightly lit chalk formations. The dog provides an excellent sense of scale, emphasizing the impressive dimensions of the landscape. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:21, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 14:17, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Are the colors correct? The sky looks a bit unnatural for 13:21. --IamMM (talk) 16:30, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment - I agree with IamMM. I imagine the lower exposure needed to capture the detail on the chalk affected the colour, but it also feels... almost undersaturated? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I took a close look at the image and its EXIF data before supporting it. With ISO 64, f/13 and 1/80 s at 1:21 pm, the deep blue sky seems quite plausible to me given the very bright chalk formations. A polarizing filter or some adjustment of the blue tones in post-processing could also play a role. I had a similar experience with my California State Capitol photo, taken at 1/2000 s, f/5 and ISO 100 in bright daylight. I cannot see any obvious masking edges or other indication that the sky is artificial, so I see no reason to assume that it is. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:12, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Typical shot via a polarizing filter, composition is super. Юрий Д.К. 00:41, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 18:22:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Syngnathidae_(Seahorses,_Pipefishes_and_Seadragons)
- Info Alligator pipefish (Syngnathoides biaculeatus), Nosy Be, Madagascar. Note: there is no FP on Commons of the genus Syngnathoides and only one of the whole family Syngnathida (a seahorse). It is found in shallow water in the tropical and subtropical Indo-Pacific, its range extending from East Africa to northern Australia. This fish lives in habitats of seagrass and seaweed, and hides by positioning itself vertically with its head down amidst the similar-coloured fronds of vegetation. The elongated, well-camouflaged body can reach 29 centimetres (11 in) in length. It feeds by sucking up its prey. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 00:39, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 16:45:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Events
- Info created by Herbertkikoy – uploaded by Herbertkikoy – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:57, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support - Feels slightly underexposed. 1/4000 and ISO 640 suggests direct sunlight, which does not seem reflected here. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, underexposed + too overprocessed, left and right crops are not convincing, either. Poco a poco (talk) 18:04, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 09:37:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Megalaimidae_(Asian_Barbets)
- Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:37, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:37, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:57, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 00:39, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 07:22:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:18, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 16:38, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:36, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:57, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 11:00, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 14:18, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:52, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 00:38, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 19:13:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
- Info Construction site of the new electric steel plant in Leoben-Donawitz (Austria) which will include two electric arc furnaces for the production of crude steel from steel scrap. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacks wow-factor for FP. Could be a VI. --Tagooty (talk) 03:29, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Not outstanding enough, lacks wow-factor for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
File:DSC03121 Sinter Plant Chimney at Day, voestalpine Steelworks, Leoben-Donawitz, 2026-02.jpg
editVoting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 19:07:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
- Info Distinctive sinter-plant chimney of the voestalpine integrated steel plant in Leoben-Donawitz. Nightly view is already an FP. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:07, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:07, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:42, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Not outstanding enough, lacks wow-factor for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically well-executed and sharp, but the composition is somewhat cluttered by the numerous power lines and infrastructure in the lower half. The hazy mountain background also lacks sufficient definition, which reduces the overall visual impact. IMO it does not reach the exceptional standard expected for a FP --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 14:56:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Japan
- Info created by Misei sen – uploaded by Misei sen – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 14:56, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 14:56, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Interesting subject and viewpoint, but the composition is too busy for me and doesn’t have enough visual impact for FP,sorry --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 01:15, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 10:41:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 10:41, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 10:41, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:41, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose This is obviously a stitched panorama. Check for stitching errors, see note. --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:53, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Amazing image as a thumbnail, but tops of side towers are completely blurry (especially the left one). Sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:30, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 09:36:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Denmark
- Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 09:36, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Copenhagen’s Kalvebod Bølge waterfront promenade during an open-air electronic music event, highlighting the character of the structure and its role as a vibrant public space. —kallerna (talk) 09:36, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Neutral While the image is well-exposed and documents the event effectively, the composition feels too busy to me. The large crowd dominates the frame, with many overlapping and distracting elements, and I don’t find the overall image sufficiently striking or exceptional for FP --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 01:11, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 07:00:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Tyrannidae#Genus_:_Myiozetetes
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:00, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:00, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support It’s good to have a photo of a bird on the ground—the moment when they feel most vulnerable—even if there are many distracting elements. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:55, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Harmonious colours, the splash of bright yellow stands out. --Tagooty (talk) 03:31, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:48, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 01:16, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:06, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Rasel Hasan Talk 10:53, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 14:19, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 16:32, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:02, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support You can be proud of your image collection :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:22, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 06:02:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Leiothrichidae_(Laughingthrushes)
- Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:02, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:02, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support But jpg artifacts and noise, also oversharpening filter --Wilfredor (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't use sharpening tools, noise reduction is used but no artificial sharpening. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:11, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support oversharpened a bit but nice photo Юрий Д.К. 19:39, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed, colours washed out, below the bar of the images in the FP gallery. For a perched bird, a slower shutter and lower ISO would give a better image. --Tagooty (talk) 03:35, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- The bird was not sitting idle rather moving a lot, therefore I used fast shutter, could have used 1250 instead though. But what you see is not over processed that I assure you as I am not fond of doing that. I am not asking you to change your opinion for that, Thank you. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:25, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Rasel Hasan Talk 10:54, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support though I'd personally have increased the dehaze slider a bit for more visual impact. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 23:32:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Wyoming
- Info Mount Everts at sunset in Yellowstone National Park (panorama). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Good sky and landscape texture. Acroterion (talk) 02:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:03, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 07:14, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:38, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Warm sunlight makes the mountain stand out. --Tagooty (talk) 03:37, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:53, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Maryliflower (talk) 12:25, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:09, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very nice lighting --Benji 06:39, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 15:48:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Fratercula (Puffins)
- Info The 10 FPs are all of the Atlantic puffin. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Low angle and water work well. Acroterion (talk) 02:10, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 07:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:37, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Acroterion —Bruce1eetalk 00:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition and colours. The orange splash on largely blue is very effective. --Tagooty (talk) 03:39, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:11, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose overcat this overcat... --A.Savin 08:34, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Surplus category removed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:45, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:55, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 15:49:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
- Info We have an FP of a perched female. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support A very small subject even with 500mm. Good framing and background. Acroterion (talk) 02:08, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:04, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 07:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:36, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Excellent BIF shot, striking composition and colours. --Tagooty (talk) 03:40, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:23, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:55, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 14:32:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1930-1939
- Info created by Direction Generale de la Presse, Ankara – uploaded by Howardcorn33 – nominated by Howardcorn33 -- – Howardcorn33 (💬) 14:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- – Howardcorn33 (💬) 14:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: this is my first time nominating a photo here. I think this is a good scan of an profile portrait of Atatürk. I hope I have not misunderstood anything about the FPC process here. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 14:34, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Not with this yellow tint. And we can't really see his face here. Among the portraits what we already have, the best seem to be this one or eventually this one. Yann (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- I do not consider it as a portrait photo, more as an artistic profile photo. I believe it really shows off the Western-style clothing here (top hat, gloves, suit), which exemplifies the clothing reforms he made during his presidency. Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People has tints of various colors (yellow, brown, red, green, etc.) so I am not sure what the issue is there. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 15:56, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 04:49:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Netherlands
- Info Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way. Commons:Photo challenge/2026 - May - Horizontal lines/Winners.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very nice texture photo. I love how the stacked surplus building material merges to ribbons and patterns, resembling basic Cosmatesque stonework. – Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your vote and comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very nice! Two classical components of beauty: repetition and symmetry. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:46, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your vote and comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 14:30, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas and Alvesgaspar. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:58, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Acroterion (talk) 01:59, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:17, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:14, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 19:35, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 06:11, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:37, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 21:56:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Nave of St. Lorenz Basilica in Kempten (Allgäu), Bavaria, looking east towards the choir: on the left the pulpit of red-brown scagliola (1685), opposite it the crucifix with Mary and John, in the background the side altars at the choir entrance and the high altar with an altarpiece of the Assumption of Mary
- Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:56, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:56, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:19, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:34, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:35, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 19:34, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Lagarto (Zonosaurus rufipes), Parque Nacional de Lokobe, Nosy Be, Madagascar, 2025-09-21, DD 80.jpg
editVoting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 21:00:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:Gerrhosauridae_(Plated_Lizards) Note: this section doesn't exist yet, I'll create it if the nom is succesful
- Info Red-legged girdled lizard (Zonosaurus rufipes), Lokobe National Park, Nosy Be, Madagascar. This species can grow to up to 40 centimetres (16 in), being the tail half of it length. It can live up to 15 years and is endemic to Madagascar. Note: there are yet no FPs on Commons of the whole family Gerrhosauridae, that comprises 2 genera and 38 species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:00, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:00, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:34, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:23, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 18:36:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Other_land_vehicles
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment - I like this one, but unfortunately the cut-off implement on the left spoils it for me. —Bruce1eetalk 00:15, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 18:26:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 18:26, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 18:26, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 22:45, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:33, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:55, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the level of detail is disappointing when looking at full size Poco a poco (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 01:24:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Jordan
- Info created and uploaded by BarabaszO – nominated by ★ -- ★ 01:24, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 01:24, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful photo and interesting rock formations. Юрий Д.К. 19:32, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, it lacks wow IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 17:39, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 21:10:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Chroicocephalus
- Info Portrait of a black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) in nonbreeding plumage. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:10, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:10, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very good detail and focus, interesting and appealing light, and a clean composition with good subject separation. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:05, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:30, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:37, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 16:20:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
- Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Min968 (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 07:16, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 16:19:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
- Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 16:19, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Min968 (talk) 16:19, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 07:16, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 14:47:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Philippines
- Info created and uploaded by Micluna – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:27, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 14:31:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created and uploaded by Avra10 – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:58, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Question Why is only that low resolution given? Otherwise it would be a very good photo --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:35, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 10:13:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Events
- Info created by Jeshon Jenish – uploaded by Jeshon Jenish – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:13, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:13, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support First-place winner of Wiki Loves Folklore 2026 LetmeEditit (talk) 13:06, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Question Does anyone know if the reports of animal cruelty in these races are fair? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:42, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- I believe so. The Indian government has banned the use of bulls, buffaloes, or any cattle in bullfighting competitions at the federal level because of cruelty to animals. Nevertheless, some states have exceptions since they consider these competitions as 'cultural heritage.' Similar to Spain, there is a strong movement, especially among the younger generation, that wants a complete ban on these races. IamMM (talk) 15:04, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 03:03:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran
- Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco – nominated by ★ -- ★ 03:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 03:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Well, after it became FP on the English Wikipedia, and the image proves the tolerance of Iran in terms of religion (there are 2 cathedrals in the capital, being this one the biggest one) I also believe that this is a special subject with good quality. Thank you ArionStar! Poco a poco (talk) 09:19, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 10:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but I can't see anything notable in this image. We don't need a FP to demonstrate the alleged religious tolerance in Iran. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:09, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose It fails to wow me. The composition is technically clean, but the facade is not amazing to me, the prohibition sign and the branches/shadows on the left spoil the view. Also, the text looks deformed after the denoising (compare with oldest file version). This user contributed many striking, fascinating photographs, but I would not say this image belongs to the collection --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Would support if the cutted car will be retouched (seems not very diffucult to perform). Overall good for me Юрий Д.К. 18:39, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Юрий Д.К.: the car is gone Poco a poco (talk) 17:51, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 22:12, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Panorama-Almkopf-Ammergauer-Alpen-Wettersteingebirge-Zugspitze-Lechtaler-Alpen-2026-beschriftet.jpg
editVoting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 23:26:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
- Info high resolution panorama with integrated labels for the mountains. You see important peaks of Germany and Austria, e.g. the Zugspitze (highest mountain of Germany)
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 23:26, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 23:26, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:43, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I would prefer the image without the labels on the mountains. The labels/arrows should all be a consistent format/layout. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- I gave this quite a bit of thought beforehand: same font, two colors (one for labels with sky in background brighter for darker background e.g. the grass covered peaks inside the landscape. One larger label for the Zugspitze - highest mountain of Germany. I made a lot of effort to realize the labels in a typographically pleasant way. For those who like an unedited version I linked the version without label and non-retouched mast in the image descrption. Tuxyso (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support I prefer it with the labels, it feels more educational and useful. There is a version without labels, if anyone would like to nominate that as an alternative. LetmeEditit (talk) 13:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Maryliflower (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose See Commons:Watermarks and Commons:Image annotations. Burned-in text is not the standard. Additional meta-data outside the image is the standard and improves our ability to use media across all Wikipedia projects. When labels are rendered directly into the pixels, they are not programmatically readable by assistive technologies (screen readers), and do not adapt to users needing high-contrast assistance. -- E bailey (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for raising this, but I think neither of the two linked pages actually supports the oppose. Commons:Watermarks explicitly defines watermarks as content that is not part of the creative work itself and serves to assert authorship/copyright. Peak labels are informational content and part of the work, comparable to labels on a map. Besides, that page is a proposed guideline, not policy. Commons:Image annotations, in turn, explicitly lists "identification of places/objects/locations in panoramic photographs" as a desirable type of information. It governs the annotation tool, it does not prohibit rendered labels.
- On the practical side: image notes simply do not work for a 38,000 px panorama. They are only visible on the scaled-down file page preview, not in the Media Viewer, not in ZoomViewer, not in article thumbnails, not in downloaded copies. Precisely at full resolution, where peak identification matters, notes are invisible. So there is, realistically, no alternative way to offer a labeled high-resolution panorama on Commons — the only "alternative" would be not to create such panoramas at all, which would be a loss, considering the substantial work that goes into them.
- Regarding accessibility: the file has a detailed bilingual description naming all major peaks, which is fully machine-readable (including structured data). That, not pixels or image notes (which screen readers cannot read either), is what assistive technology relies on. Current screen readers additionally perform OCR on images: VoiceOver includes built-in Text Recognition (iOS 14+), and JAWS offers Convenient OCR and Picture Smart AI. And for anyone preferring an unlabeled version for reuse, translation, or high-contrast adaptation it is linked under "other versions" at full resolution. Nothing is lost; the labeled version simply adds value, the same way a labeled map does. Tuxyso (talk) 17:41, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- I would support the version without labels. It has broader use and value. E bailey (talk) 18:33, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- In my opinion, the two versions work best together, just like twins. Je-str (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support The labels add genuine encyclopedic value by identifying the peaks directly in the panorama. They are informational content, not a watermark. The digital modifications, including the added labels and removal of the radio mast, are fully documented in the retouching template, with the original version linked. The unlabelled full-resolution version is also available, so both versions complement each other very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:15, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose IMHO there is a reasonable middle ground here. As mentioned above, the burned-in text detracts from an otherwise wonderful panorama and limits its usefulness by turning it into a specifically encyclopedic illustration. The labels are useful information, but that information does not necessarily need to be part of the pixels themselves. Commons already provides ways to associate information with particular parts of an image, annotations and, more usefully, Structured Data with depicts (P180) and relative position within image (P2677). That would allow the individual peaks to be identified in a machine-readable and multilingual way while keeping the original panorama clean and reusable. I would prefer the unlabelled panorama as the featured version, and keeping the labelled file as a useful derivative. The existing unlabelled version could also be added here as an Alternative, allowing voters to choose between the two. I also don't think Commons:Watermarks is relevant in this case because these are informational labels rather than authorship or copyright markings. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Could you show me an example of how you'd depict the individual peaks? Maybe we could even combine both ideas — Wikidata plus labels? Tuxyso (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks, yes, I think combining both approaches could actually be a good solution. What I had in mind was adding a depicts (P180) statement for each identifiable peak in the file's Structured Data, with relative position within image (P2677) as a qualifier indicating its position. There is already a Commons example using this approach for multiple landmarks File:Werner Haberkorn - Centro da cidade.jpg, where individual buildings are identified with P180 and P2677. This would not visually replace your labels, of course, at present the structured positions are not rendered as labels over the image, so I can see the value of keeping the labelled derivative as well. The advantage is that the peak identities would additionally become machine-readable and multilingual, while the unlabelled panorama is available for unrestricted reuse Wilfredor (talk) 21:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Could you show me an example of how you'd depict the individual peaks? Maybe we could even combine both ideas — Wikidata plus labels? Tuxyso (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support I like the names inside the image, as long as the original image is linked. More is not needed. -- -donald- (talk) 09:01, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per donald and others. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 15:28:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
- Info created and uploaded by Максат79 – nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 15:28, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 15:28, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support LetmeEditit (talk) 12:58, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I don't want to be unfair, but there is something artificial about the extreme sharpness of the feathers. I wonder this is the way we see the animal when looking at it. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:44, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- That is what 600 mm lens and 45 Mpx camera do. Красный wanna talk? 21:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Overprocessing; like I sometimes do. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- I could be a purist but those tools for noise reduction or invention of details destroy the photo Wilfredor (talk) 13:42, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Overprocessing; like I sometimes do. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- That is what 600 mm lens and 45 Mpx camera do. Красный wanna talk? 21:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support maybe a bit overproduced --Wilfredor (talk) 13:44, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose I went through some of the owl FPs in our galleries and confirmed my initial feeling about the unnatural looking of feathers, which look more like hair. Compare, for example, with this photo of Charlesjsharp. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:42, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Some owl species have fine, fur-like feathers that look like fur. Long-eared Owls have soft, downy feathers that can look like fur (“filoplumes – small hair-like feathers on their beaks” [1]). I am not owl expert and I don't know if its the case Wilfredor (talk) 15:42, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support but I agree that it is overprocessed a bit. Interesting bird anyway and very difficult shot imho. Юрий Д.К. 18:34, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 09:20:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Geology and chemistry#Others
- Info At first glance, this looks like small waves in a turbulent sea of lead. In fact, it is a detailed view of a metamorphic rock outcrop at the beach of Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal. All by- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:20, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:20, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:32, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:29, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 18:30, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:45, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The image has a very striking and almost abstract visual quality, and I can certainly understand the support it has received. However, I have some reservations about the technical quality: the fine rock structures appear somewhat soft, and some darker areas lack detail. For me, these issues are just enough to keep it below the FP threshold. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:01, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose per Radomianin --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, couldn't find a sharp area Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 08:21:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Slovenia
- Info Morning shot of Ponoviče Castle above Sava valley, Slovenia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 08:21, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 08:21, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Interesting castle. Did your drone manage to capture a view without the road? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- I think i have it (not edited, yet), but this view with seeing valley add some more, since is on hill. Road gave 1/3 and castle goes to 2/3 diagonal, or beter say cuting. To see just catle on the wood not much interesting. Mile (talk) 05:40, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:33, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:45, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 18:26, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Miz Cracker performing during Queens of Pride, Windsor-Essex Pride Fest, 2026-08-08 17.jpg
editVoting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 16:35:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Work#Other_performers
- Info I really like this 3/4 portrait, as it reminds me of the glamour shots that came out in the 60s and 70s, especially those associated with the USO. Miz Cracker's set included a series of semi-robotic poses, which made for some dramatic shots. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:35, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:35, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Expressive portrait with a striking, almost classic glamour aesthetic. The theatrical pose, intense red background and finely rendered costume create a powerful and well-balanced composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:00, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:31, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin --IamMM (talk) 06:07, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:14, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 11:57:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse
- Info I like these clouds over the fresh green in the spring scenery. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 11:57, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 11:57, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very calming. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:34, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Certainly high quality, but I am missing something exceptional. Yann (talk) 17:24, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- The interplay of clouds and landscape. Milseburg (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support indeed for the interplay of clouds and landscape. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 10:56, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 03:37:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/India#Himachal_Pradesh
- Info Stark mountain-scape sculpted by the Spiti river in the arid high altitude Himalayas. Peaks towering 1,800 m (5,900 ft) above the 3,950 m (12,960 ft) river bed. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:07, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment extraordinary scene, but a bit noisy, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 12:01, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Milseburg: Thanks for the review. I've applied NR. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 14:06, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Noise reduction seems a bit aggressive. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: I've reduced the NR in the land. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:22, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice in thumbnail, but quite poor image quality: nothing seems sharp in this picture. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:15, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support - I'm not quite sure what happened, but I agree that little seems sharp. That being said, there is enough "wow" that I'm on the side of support. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: Thanks for the review. Softness could be due to haze -- the far bend in the river is about 12 km (7.5 mi) distant. The 18-140mm G series lens is Nikon's entry-level offering. --Tagooty (talk) 03:40, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:14, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, now too blurry in detail and full resolution. --Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, detail is too low Poco a poco (talk) 17:52, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose An impressive and dramatic landscape with a strong composition. I have been considering this for several days, but ultimately I have to agree with the concerns raised above: the lack of fine detail and overall softness, especially at full resolution, are too significant for me to support this as an FP. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 23:13:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Agricultural workers
- Info created/uploaded by Ale RaFlo – denoised/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:13, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:13, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Very painterly. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:44, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose The vignetting is just too much, it looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Vignetting reduced and also less overprocessed --Ezarateesteban 14:09, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Traslado de una colmena de abejas melíponas, de la trampa a su lugar definitivo-denoise.jpg
editVoting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 23:19:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Others
- Info created/uploaded by D4NN0BUK0 - denoised/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:19, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:19, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:07, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but there is nothing extraordinary in this picture, and the quality is poor. Moreover, no relevant information is provided either in the nomination or image file. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Description improved --Ezarateesteban 11:10, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:07, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but per Alvesgaspar. Too soft for FP. -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:26, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I think the image would be promotable if the lighting highlighs the motif and where the face's expression is clearly visible. Missing these aspects reduces the value of the moment a lot IMO --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:44, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 16:22:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Electronics
- Info View of a bigger graphics card. As these hardware is seldom here, I would like to give it a try :). Created by PantheraLeo1359531 – uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:22, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:22, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Could be a VI, but I find nothing unusual to make it an FP. --Tagooty (talk) 03:44, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, my intention when nominating was that Commons is missing FPs of modern high-end hardware, so I wanted to figure out what the outcome would be :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:21, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Well executed focus stacked image. That card must be worth like $4500 now! dllu (talk) 05:16, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this claim is correct D:. The price was € 2599 on
20262025-05-27. Good old times😅 --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:23, 14 August 2026 (UTC); (correct date is 2025) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:34, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this claim is correct D:. The price was € 2599 on
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:37, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Well executed but lacking something special. The text upside down is also irritating. Poco a poco (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, that's a good point with the text --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:24, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Upside-down text is annoying for sure but graphics cards are designed so that the fans are facing down. The other side often looks really drab (probably just a featureless flat piece of plastic). dllu (talk) 04:41, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Dllu Correct, the bottom side is more a technical one: File:Palit GeForce RTX 5090 Gamerock 20250530 HOF3873 RAW-Export cens.png :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Exceptionally well-executed focus stacking with outstanding sharpness, detail and control of the complex reflective surfaces. This is a technically demanding subject photographed to a very high standard. As for the upside-down lettering: it is simply a consequence of the card's physical design and presentation. The photographer has chosen to show us the visually most interesting chocolate side of the card - and I think this works very well. A very convincing example of high-end hardware photography. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:45, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Radomianin Thank you for the flattering words :). The image in combination with the larger focal length shows the prominent front with its 3 radiators well, the lettering with holes for radiating heat and the humongous PCIe bracket. A reason for this view :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- That makes sense. The longer focal length really shows the cooler and PCIe bracket to their best advantage. A well-considered perspective :) -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:33, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:39, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 23:58, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Why not. You could remove minor CA at white letters on black back. Just hope it's used for video/photo editing, not games. Mile (talk) 13:57, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you, I will keep it in mind! Don't worry, the card is mainly used for rendering and converting (editing of 4K/8K videos, recording of video games, converting of videos to WebM, (fractal) rendering, ...) :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:59, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Excellent product photograph, and per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Skyscraper on Kotelnicheskaya Embankment with the backdrop of smoke from Wildberries fire.jpg
editVoting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 11:02:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info Skyscraper on Kotelnicheskaya Embankment in Moscow with the backdrop of Wildberries fire from drone attack. My photo Юрий Д.К. 11:02, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 11:02, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Question Known as Kotelnicheskaya Embankment Building? It look very different to the image on Englsh Wikipedia Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, it is Kotelnicheskaya Embankment Building; just taken from completely another angle. Юрий Д.К. 16:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:50, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 19:09, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:07, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment in my opinion, the "detail/clarity" slider has been dragged much too far, and there's noticeable halos and flattening of the image. Other than that, the technical quality is good; very high resolution and sharp. dllu (talk) 05:33, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Upon further thought, sorry. The sharpness and resolution are superb, but I feel that the lighting is a bit flat and the composition isn't as great compared to File:Skyscraper on Kotelnicheskaya Embankment - August 2010.jpg. The dynamic lighting, longer focal length, and water foreground in that picture look much nicer in my opinion. Again, I'm also not convinced by the "detail/clarity" settings for the postprocessing. But this picture is a fine and valuable capture in its own right. dllu (talk) 04:40, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Superb compo and geometry. --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:40, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support 11 milion of books disapeared, while i am killng myselv to find one. Again, not satisfied with Exif. Mile (talk) 16:17, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Question I don't do panoramas, but does the EXIF always disappear? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- The program I use always does so, can't fix this. I've moved useful info to description as an alternative solution. Юрий Д.К. 15:16, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- You can technically fix this using tools such as exiv2 [2]. It's annoying though and requires some technical knowledge of these weirdly difficult to use tools. dllu (talk) 04:37, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Will try. Thanks. Юрий Д.К. 19:16, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- You can technically fix this using tools such as exiv2 [2]. It's annoying though and requires some technical knowledge of these weirdly difficult to use tools. dllu (talk) 04:37, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- The program I use always does so, can't fix this. I've moved useful info to description as an alternative solution. Юрий Д.К. 15:16, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Question I don't do panoramas, but does the EXIF always disappear? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:30, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:47, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:43, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
Candidati per la rimozione dalla vetrina
editFeatured picture candidates
editVoting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 16:04:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created by Photorubel – uploaded by Photorubel – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen (keep talking) 16:04, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Moheen (keep talking) 16:04, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 16:22, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:35, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I really like this image and would be happy to support it. However, I find the noise quite noticeable, and the file also lacked an embedded sRGB profile. I therefore made a lightly processed version with some noise reduction and an embedded sRGB profile, which I am offering via SwissTransfer. If useful, it could either be used to update the file or, if the image is currently part of a competition, as a derivative. Just a suggestion. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 16:01:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created by Arpan.basuchowdhury – uploaded by Arpan.basuchowdhury – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen (keep talking) 16:01, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Moheen (keep talking) 16:01, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:34, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very good technical quality, with remarkably sharp eyes despite the 1.6 s exposure. The light trails beautifully frame the subject and add a unique dynamic quality to the portrait. A truly outstanding photograph. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:25, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 11:53:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Info I think this is the best perspective as it offers a dramatic profile view of the head. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:53, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:53, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 11:31:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#North Macedonia
- Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:41, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2026 at 10:51:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Czech_Republic
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 10:51, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 10:51, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support, though the shadows feel a bit harsh. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:43, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- OpposeSorry, the image is not outstanding to me. It would be good if the nature around the building complements the composition with the building. Also, an ideal lighting by weather would be better. It could also be easy to reproduce as the weather condition is not extraordinary --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:19, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 22:35:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
- Info created & uploaded by Максат79 – nominated by me -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:35, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:35, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Mile (talk) 07:18, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support The deep blue sky and delicate cloud structures contrast beautifully with the brightly lit chalk formations. The dog provides an excellent sense of scale, emphasizing the impressive dimensions of the landscape. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:21, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 14:17, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Are the colors correct? The sky looks a bit unnatural for 13:21. --IamMM (talk) 16:30, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment - I agree with IamMM. I imagine the lower exposure needed to capture the detail on the chalk affected the colour, but it also feels... almost undersaturated? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I took a close look at the image and its EXIF data before supporting it. With ISO 64, f/13 and 1/80 s at 1:21 pm, the deep blue sky seems quite plausible to me given the very bright chalk formations. A polarizing filter or some adjustment of the blue tones in post-processing could also play a role. I had a similar experience with my California State Capitol photo, taken at 1/2000 s, f/5 and ISO 100 in bright daylight. I cannot see any obvious masking edges or other indication that the sky is artificial, so I see no reason to assume that it is. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:12, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Typical shot via a polarizing filter, composition is super. Юрий Д.К. 00:41, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 18:22:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Syngnathidae_(Seahorses,_Pipefishes_and_Seadragons)
- Info Alligator pipefish (Syngnathoides biaculeatus), Nosy Be, Madagascar. Note: there is no FP on Commons of the genus Syngnathoides and only one of the whole family Syngnathida (a seahorse). It is found in shallow water in the tropical and subtropical Indo-Pacific, its range extending from East Africa to northern Australia. This fish lives in habitats of seagrass and seaweed, and hides by positioning itself vertically with its head down amidst the similar-coloured fronds of vegetation. The elongated, well-camouflaged body can reach 29 centimetres (11 in) in length. It feeds by sucking up its prey. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 00:39, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 16:45:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Events
- Info created by Herbertkikoy – uploaded by Herbertkikoy – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:57, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support - Feels slightly underexposed. 1/4000 and ISO 640 suggests direct sunlight, which does not seem reflected here. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, underexposed + too overprocessed, left and right crops are not convincing, either. Poco a poco (talk) 18:04, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 09:37:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Megalaimidae_(Asian_Barbets)
- Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:37, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:37, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:57, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 00:39, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2026 at 07:22:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:18, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 16:38, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:36, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:57, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 11:00, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 14:18, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:52, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 00:38, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 19:13:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
- Info Construction site of the new electric steel plant in Leoben-Donawitz (Austria) which will include two electric arc furnaces for the production of crude steel from steel scrap. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacks wow-factor for FP. Could be a VI. --Tagooty (talk) 03:29, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Not outstanding enough, lacks wow-factor for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
File:DSC03121 Sinter Plant Chimney at Day, voestalpine Steelworks, Leoben-Donawitz, 2026-02.jpg
editVoting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 19:07:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
- Info Distinctive sinter-plant chimney of the voestalpine integrated steel plant in Leoben-Donawitz. Nightly view is already an FP. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:07, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:07, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:42, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Not outstanding enough, lacks wow-factor for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically well-executed and sharp, but the composition is somewhat cluttered by the numerous power lines and infrastructure in the lower half. The hazy mountain background also lacks sufficient definition, which reduces the overall visual impact. IMO it does not reach the exceptional standard expected for a FP --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 14:56:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Japan
- Info created by Misei sen – uploaded by Misei sen – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 14:56, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 14:56, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Interesting subject and viewpoint, but the composition is too busy for me and doesn’t have enough visual impact for FP,sorry --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 01:15, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 10:41:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 10:41, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 10:41, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:41, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose This is obviously a stitched panorama. Check for stitching errors, see note. --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:53, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Amazing image as a thumbnail, but tops of side towers are completely blurry (especially the left one). Sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:30, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 09:36:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Denmark
- Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 09:36, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Copenhagen’s Kalvebod Bølge waterfront promenade during an open-air electronic music event, highlighting the character of the structure and its role as a vibrant public space. —kallerna (talk) 09:36, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Neutral While the image is well-exposed and documents the event effectively, the composition feels too busy to me. The large crowd dominates the frame, with many overlapping and distracting elements, and I don’t find the overall image sufficiently striking or exceptional for FP --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 01:11, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 07:00:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Tyrannidae#Genus_:_Myiozetetes
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:00, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:00, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support It’s good to have a photo of a bird on the ground—the moment when they feel most vulnerable—even if there are many distracting elements. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:55, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Harmonious colours, the splash of bright yellow stands out. --Tagooty (talk) 03:31, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:48, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 01:16, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:06, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Rasel Hasan Talk 10:53, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 14:19, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 16:32, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:02, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support You can be proud of your image collection :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:22, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2026 at 06:02:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Leiothrichidae_(Laughingthrushes)
- Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:02, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:02, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support But jpg artifacts and noise, also oversharpening filter --Wilfredor (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't use sharpening tools, noise reduction is used but no artificial sharpening. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:11, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support oversharpened a bit but nice photo Юрий Д.К. 19:39, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed, colours washed out, below the bar of the images in the FP gallery. For a perched bird, a slower shutter and lower ISO would give a better image. --Tagooty (talk) 03:35, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- The bird was not sitting idle rather moving a lot, therefore I used fast shutter, could have used 1250 instead though. But what you see is not over processed that I assure you as I am not fond of doing that. I am not asking you to change your opinion for that, Thank you. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:25, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Rasel Hasan Talk 10:54, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support though I'd personally have increased the dehaze slider a bit for more visual impact. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 23:32:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Wyoming
- Info Mount Everts at sunset in Yellowstone National Park (panorama). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Good sky and landscape texture. Acroterion (talk) 02:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:03, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 07:14, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:38, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Warm sunlight makes the mountain stand out. --Tagooty (talk) 03:37, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:53, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Maryliflower (talk) 12:25, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:09, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very nice lighting --Benji 06:39, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 15:48:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Fratercula (Puffins)
- Info The 10 FPs are all of the Atlantic puffin. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Low angle and water work well. Acroterion (talk) 02:10, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 07:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:37, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Acroterion —Bruce1eetalk 00:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition and colours. The orange splash on largely blue is very effective. --Tagooty (talk) 03:39, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:11, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose overcat this overcat... --A.Savin 08:34, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Surplus category removed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:45, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:55, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 15:49:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
- Info We have an FP of a perched female. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support A very small subject even with 500mm. Good framing and background. Acroterion (talk) 02:08, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:04, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 07:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:36, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Excellent BIF shot, striking composition and colours. --Tagooty (talk) 03:40, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:23, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:55, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:58, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 14:32:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1930-1939
- Info created by Direction Generale de la Presse, Ankara – uploaded by Howardcorn33 – nominated by Howardcorn33 -- – Howardcorn33 (💬) 14:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- – Howardcorn33 (💬) 14:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: this is my first time nominating a photo here. I think this is a good scan of an profile portrait of Atatürk. I hope I have not misunderstood anything about the FPC process here. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 14:34, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Not with this yellow tint. And we can't really see his face here. Among the portraits what we already have, the best seem to be this one or eventually this one. Yann (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- I do not consider it as a portrait photo, more as an artistic profile photo. I believe it really shows off the Western-style clothing here (top hat, gloves, suit), which exemplifies the clothing reforms he made during his presidency. Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People has tints of various colors (yellow, brown, red, green, etc.) so I am not sure what the issue is there. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 15:56, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2026 at 04:49:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Netherlands
- Info Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way. Commons:Photo challenge/2026 - May - Horizontal lines/Winners.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very nice texture photo. I love how the stacked surplus building material merges to ribbons and patterns, resembling basic Cosmatesque stonework. – Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your vote and comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very nice! Two classical components of beauty: repetition and symmetry. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:46, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your vote and comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 14:30, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas and Alvesgaspar. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:58, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Acroterion (talk) 01:59, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:17, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:14, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 19:35, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 06:11, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:37, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 21:56:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Nave of St. Lorenz Basilica in Kempten (Allgäu), Bavaria, looking east towards the choir: on the left the pulpit of red-brown scagliola (1685), opposite it the crucifix with Mary and John, in the background the side altars at the choir entrance and the high altar with an altarpiece of the Assumption of Mary
- Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:56, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:56, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:19, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:34, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:35, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 19:34, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Lagarto (Zonosaurus rufipes), Parque Nacional de Lokobe, Nosy Be, Madagascar, 2025-09-21, DD 80.jpg
editVoting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 21:00:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:Gerrhosauridae_(Plated_Lizards) Note: this section doesn't exist yet, I'll create it if the nom is succesful
- Info Red-legged girdled lizard (Zonosaurus rufipes), Lokobe National Park, Nosy Be, Madagascar. This species can grow to up to 40 centimetres (16 in), being the tail half of it length. It can live up to 15 years and is endemic to Madagascar. Note: there are yet no FPs on Commons of the whole family Gerrhosauridae, that comprises 2 genera and 38 species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:00, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:00, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:34, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:23, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 18:36:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Other_land_vehicles
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment - I like this one, but unfortunately the cut-off implement on the left spoils it for me. —Bruce1eetalk 00:15, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 18:26:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 18:26, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 18:26, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 22:45, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:15, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:33, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:55, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the level of detail is disappointing when looking at full size Poco a poco (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2026 at 01:24:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Jordan
- Info created and uploaded by BarabaszO – nominated by ★ -- ★ 01:24, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 01:24, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful photo and interesting rock formations. Юрий Д.К. 19:32, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, it lacks wow IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 17:39, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 21:10:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Chroicocephalus
- Info Portrait of a black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) in nonbreeding plumage. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:10, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:10, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very good detail and focus, interesting and appealing light, and a clean composition with good subject separation. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:05, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:30, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:37, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 16:20:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
- Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Min968 (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 07:16, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 16:19:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
- Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 16:19, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Min968 (talk) 16:19, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 07:16, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 14:47:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Philippines
- Info created and uploaded by Micluna – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:27, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 14:31:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created and uploaded by Avra10 – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:58, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Question Why is only that low resolution given? Otherwise it would be a very good photo --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:35, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 10:13:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Events
- Info created by Jeshon Jenish – uploaded by Jeshon Jenish – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:13, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:13, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support First-place winner of Wiki Loves Folklore 2026 LetmeEditit (talk) 13:06, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Question Does anyone know if the reports of animal cruelty in these races are fair? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:42, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- I believe so. The Indian government has banned the use of bulls, buffaloes, or any cattle in bullfighting competitions at the federal level because of cruelty to animals. Nevertheless, some states have exceptions since they consider these competitions as 'cultural heritage.' Similar to Spain, there is a strong movement, especially among the younger generation, that wants a complete ban on these races. IamMM (talk) 15:04, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2026 at 03:03:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran
- Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco – nominated by ★ -- ★ 03:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 03:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Well, after it became FP on the English Wikipedia, and the image proves the tolerance of Iran in terms of religion (there are 2 cathedrals in the capital, being this one the biggest one) I also believe that this is a special subject with good quality. Thank you ArionStar! Poco a poco (talk) 09:19, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 10:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but I can't see anything notable in this image. We don't need a FP to demonstrate the alleged religious tolerance in Iran. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:09, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose It fails to wow me. The composition is technically clean, but the facade is not amazing to me, the prohibition sign and the branches/shadows on the left spoil the view. Also, the text looks deformed after the denoising (compare with oldest file version). This user contributed many striking, fascinating photographs, but I would not say this image belongs to the collection --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Would support if the cutted car will be retouched (seems not very diffucult to perform). Overall good for me Юрий Д.К. 18:39, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Юрий Д.К.: the car is gone Poco a poco (talk) 17:51, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 22:12, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Panorama-Almkopf-Ammergauer-Alpen-Wettersteingebirge-Zugspitze-Lechtaler-Alpen-2026-beschriftet.jpg
editVoting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 23:26:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
- Info high resolution panorama with integrated labels for the mountains. You see important peaks of Germany and Austria, e.g. the Zugspitze (highest mountain of Germany)
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 23:26, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 23:26, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:43, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I would prefer the image without the labels on the mountains. The labels/arrows should all be a consistent format/layout. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- I gave this quite a bit of thought beforehand: same font, two colors (one for labels with sky in background brighter for darker background e.g. the grass covered peaks inside the landscape. One larger label for the Zugspitze - highest mountain of Germany. I made a lot of effort to realize the labels in a typographically pleasant way. For those who like an unedited version I linked the version without label and non-retouched mast in the image descrption. Tuxyso (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support I prefer it with the labels, it feels more educational and useful. There is a version without labels, if anyone would like to nominate that as an alternative. LetmeEditit (talk) 13:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Maryliflower (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose See Commons:Watermarks and Commons:Image annotations. Burned-in text is not the standard. Additional meta-data outside the image is the standard and improves our ability to use media across all Wikipedia projects. When labels are rendered directly into the pixels, they are not programmatically readable by assistive technologies (screen readers), and do not adapt to users needing high-contrast assistance. -- E bailey (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for raising this, but I think neither of the two linked pages actually supports the oppose. Commons:Watermarks explicitly defines watermarks as content that is not part of the creative work itself and serves to assert authorship/copyright. Peak labels are informational content and part of the work, comparable to labels on a map. Besides, that page is a proposed guideline, not policy. Commons:Image annotations, in turn, explicitly lists "identification of places/objects/locations in panoramic photographs" as a desirable type of information. It governs the annotation tool, it does not prohibit rendered labels.
- On the practical side: image notes simply do not work for a 38,000 px panorama. They are only visible on the scaled-down file page preview, not in the Media Viewer, not in ZoomViewer, not in article thumbnails, not in downloaded copies. Precisely at full resolution, where peak identification matters, notes are invisible. So there is, realistically, no alternative way to offer a labeled high-resolution panorama on Commons — the only "alternative" would be not to create such panoramas at all, which would be a loss, considering the substantial work that goes into them.
- Regarding accessibility: the file has a detailed bilingual description naming all major peaks, which is fully machine-readable (including structured data). That, not pixels or image notes (which screen readers cannot read either), is what assistive technology relies on. Current screen readers additionally perform OCR on images: VoiceOver includes built-in Text Recognition (iOS 14+), and JAWS offers Convenient OCR and Picture Smart AI. And for anyone preferring an unlabeled version for reuse, translation, or high-contrast adaptation it is linked under "other versions" at full resolution. Nothing is lost; the labeled version simply adds value, the same way a labeled map does. Tuxyso (talk) 17:41, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- I would support the version without labels. It has broader use and value. E bailey (talk) 18:33, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- In my opinion, the two versions work best together, just like twins. Je-str (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support The labels add genuine encyclopedic value by identifying the peaks directly in the panorama. They are informational content, not a watermark. The digital modifications, including the added labels and removal of the radio mast, are fully documented in the retouching template, with the original version linked. The unlabelled full-resolution version is also available, so both versions complement each other very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:15, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose IMHO there is a reasonable middle ground here. As mentioned above, the burned-in text detracts from an otherwise wonderful panorama and limits its usefulness by turning it into a specifically encyclopedic illustration. The labels are useful information, but that information does not necessarily need to be part of the pixels themselves. Commons already provides ways to associate information with particular parts of an image, annotations and, more usefully, Structured Data with depicts (P180) and relative position within image (P2677). That would allow the individual peaks to be identified in a machine-readable and multilingual way while keeping the original panorama clean and reusable. I would prefer the unlabelled panorama as the featured version, and keeping the labelled file as a useful derivative. The existing unlabelled version could also be added here as an Alternative, allowing voters to choose between the two. I also don't think Commons:Watermarks is relevant in this case because these are informational labels rather than authorship or copyright markings. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Could you show me an example of how you'd depict the individual peaks? Maybe we could even combine both ideas — Wikidata plus labels? Tuxyso (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks, yes, I think combining both approaches could actually be a good solution. What I had in mind was adding a depicts (P180) statement for each identifiable peak in the file's Structured Data, with relative position within image (P2677) as a qualifier indicating its position. There is already a Commons example using this approach for multiple landmarks File:Werner Haberkorn - Centro da cidade.jpg, where individual buildings are identified with P180 and P2677. This would not visually replace your labels, of course, at present the structured positions are not rendered as labels over the image, so I can see the value of keeping the labelled derivative as well. The advantage is that the peak identities would additionally become machine-readable and multilingual, while the unlabelled panorama is available for unrestricted reuse Wilfredor (talk) 21:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Could you show me an example of how you'd depict the individual peaks? Maybe we could even combine both ideas — Wikidata plus labels? Tuxyso (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support I like the names inside the image, as long as the original image is linked. More is not needed. -- -donald- (talk) 09:01, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per donald and others. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 15:28:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
- Info created and uploaded by Максат79 – nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 15:28, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 15:28, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support LetmeEditit (talk) 12:58, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I don't want to be unfair, but there is something artificial about the extreme sharpness of the feathers. I wonder this is the way we see the animal when looking at it. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:44, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- That is what 600 mm lens and 45 Mpx camera do. Красный wanna talk? 21:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Overprocessing; like I sometimes do. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- I could be a purist but those tools for noise reduction or invention of details destroy the photo Wilfredor (talk) 13:42, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Overprocessing; like I sometimes do. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- That is what 600 mm lens and 45 Mpx camera do. Красный wanna talk? 21:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support maybe a bit overproduced --Wilfredor (talk) 13:44, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose I went through some of the owl FPs in our galleries and confirmed my initial feeling about the unnatural looking of feathers, which look more like hair. Compare, for example, with this photo of Charlesjsharp. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:42, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Some owl species have fine, fur-like feathers that look like fur. Long-eared Owls have soft, downy feathers that can look like fur (“filoplumes – small hair-like feathers on their beaks” [3]). I am not owl expert and I don't know if its the case Wilfredor (talk) 15:42, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support but I agree that it is overprocessed a bit. Interesting bird anyway and very difficult shot imho. Юрий Д.К. 18:34, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 09:20:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Geology and chemistry#Others
- Info At first glance, this looks like small waves in a turbulent sea of lead. In fact, it is a detailed view of a metamorphic rock outcrop at the beach of Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal. All by- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:20, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:20, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:32, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:29, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 18:30, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:45, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The image has a very striking and almost abstract visual quality, and I can certainly understand the support it has received. However, I have some reservations about the technical quality: the fine rock structures appear somewhat soft, and some darker areas lack detail. For me, these issues are just enough to keep it below the FP threshold. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:01, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose per Radomianin --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, couldn't find a sharp area Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2026 at 08:21:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Slovenia
- Info Morning shot of Ponoviče Castle above Sava valley, Slovenia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 08:21, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 08:21, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Interesting castle. Did your drone manage to capture a view without the road? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- I think i have it (not edited, yet), but this view with seeing valley add some more, since is on hill. Road gave 1/3 and castle goes to 2/3 diagonal, or beter say cuting. To see just catle on the wood not much interesting. Mile (talk) 05:40, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:33, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:45, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 18:26, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Miz Cracker performing during Queens of Pride, Windsor-Essex Pride Fest, 2026-08-08 17.jpg
editVoting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 16:35:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Work#Other_performers
- Info I really like this 3/4 portrait, as it reminds me of the glamour shots that came out in the 60s and 70s, especially those associated with the USO. Miz Cracker's set included a series of semi-robotic poses, which made for some dramatic shots. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:35, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:35, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Expressive portrait with a striking, almost classic glamour aesthetic. The theatrical pose, intense red background and finely rendered costume create a powerful and well-balanced composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:00, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:31, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin --IamMM (talk) 06:07, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:14, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 11:57:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse
- Info I like these clouds over the fresh green in the spring scenery. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 11:57, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 11:57, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very calming. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:34, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Certainly high quality, but I am missing something exceptional. Yann (talk) 17:24, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- The interplay of clouds and landscape. Milseburg (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support indeed for the interplay of clouds and landscape. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 10:56, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2026 at 03:37:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/India#Himachal_Pradesh
- Info Stark mountain-scape sculpted by the Spiti river in the arid high altitude Himalayas. Peaks towering 1,800 m (5,900 ft) above the 3,950 m (12,960 ft) river bed. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:07, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment extraordinary scene, but a bit noisy, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 12:01, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Milseburg: Thanks for the review. I've applied NR. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 14:06, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Noise reduction seems a bit aggressive. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: I've reduced the NR in the land. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:22, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice in thumbnail, but quite poor image quality: nothing seems sharp in this picture. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:15, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support - I'm not quite sure what happened, but I agree that little seems sharp. That being said, there is enough "wow" that I'm on the side of support. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: Thanks for the review. Softness could be due to haze -- the far bend in the river is about 12 km (7.5 mi) distant. The 18-140mm G series lens is Nikon's entry-level offering. --Tagooty (talk) 03:40, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:14, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, now too blurry in detail and full resolution. --Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, detail is too low Poco a poco (talk) 17:52, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose An impressive and dramatic landscape with a strong composition. I have been considering this for several days, but ultimately I have to agree with the concerns raised above: the lack of fine detail and overall softness, especially at full resolution, are too significant for me to support this as an FP. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 23:13:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Agricultural workers
- Info created/uploaded by Ale RaFlo – denoised/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:13, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:13, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Very painterly. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:44, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose The vignetting is just too much, it looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Vignetting reduced and also less overprocessed --Ezarateesteban 14:09, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Traslado de una colmena de abejas melíponas, de la trampa a su lugar definitivo-denoise.jpg
editVoting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 23:19:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Others
- Info created/uploaded by D4NN0BUK0 - denoised/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:19, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:19, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:07, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but there is nothing extraordinary in this picture, and the quality is poor. Moreover, no relevant information is provided either in the nomination or image file. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Description improved --Ezarateesteban 11:10, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:07, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but per Alvesgaspar. Too soft for FP. -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:26, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I think the image would be promotable if the lighting highlighs the motif and where the face's expression is clearly visible. Missing these aspects reduces the value of the moment a lot IMO --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:44, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 16:22:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Electronics
- Info View of a bigger graphics card. As these hardware is seldom here, I would like to give it a try :). Created by PantheraLeo1359531 – uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:22, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:22, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Could be a VI, but I find nothing unusual to make it an FP. --Tagooty (talk) 03:44, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, my intention when nominating was that Commons is missing FPs of modern high-end hardware, so I wanted to figure out what the outcome would be :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:21, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Well executed focus stacked image. That card must be worth like $4500 now! dllu (talk) 05:16, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this claim is correct D:. The price was € 2599 on
20262025-05-27. Good old times😅 --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:23, 14 August 2026 (UTC); (correct date is 2025) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:34, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this claim is correct D:. The price was € 2599 on
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:37, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Well executed but lacking something special. The text upside down is also irritating. Poco a poco (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, that's a good point with the text --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:24, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Upside-down text is annoying for sure but graphics cards are designed so that the fans are facing down. The other side often looks really drab (probably just a featureless flat piece of plastic). dllu (talk) 04:41, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Dllu Correct, the bottom side is more a technical one: File:Palit GeForce RTX 5090 Gamerock 20250530 HOF3873 RAW-Export cens.png :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Exceptionally well-executed focus stacking with outstanding sharpness, detail and control of the complex reflective surfaces. This is a technically demanding subject photographed to a very high standard. As for the upside-down lettering: it is simply a consequence of the card's physical design and presentation. The photographer has chosen to show us the visually most interesting chocolate side of the card - and I think this works very well. A very convincing example of high-end hardware photography. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:45, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Radomianin Thank you for the flattering words :). The image in combination with the larger focal length shows the prominent front with its 3 radiators well, the lettering with holes for radiating heat and the humongous PCIe bracket. A reason for this view :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- That makes sense. The longer focal length really shows the cooler and PCIe bracket to their best advantage. A well-considered perspective :) -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:33, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:39, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 23:58, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Why not. You could remove minor CA at white letters on black back. Just hope it's used for video/photo editing, not games. Mile (talk) 13:57, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you, I will keep it in mind! Don't worry, the card is mainly used for rendering and converting (editing of 4K/8K videos, recording of video games, converting of videos to WebM, (fractal) rendering, ...) :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:59, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Excellent product photograph, and per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Skyscraper on Kotelnicheskaya Embankment with the backdrop of smoke from Wildberries fire.jpg
editVoting period ends on 22 Aug 2026 at 11:02:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info Skyscraper on Kotelnicheskaya Embankment in Moscow with the backdrop of Wildberries fire from drone attack. My photo Юрий Д.К. 11:02, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 11:02, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Question Known as Kotelnicheskaya Embankment Building? It look very different to the image on Englsh Wikipedia Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, it is Kotelnicheskaya Embankment Building; just taken from completely another angle. Юрий Д.К. 16:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:50, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 19:09, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:07, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment in my opinion, the "detail/clarity" slider has been dragged much too far, and there's noticeable halos and flattening of the image. Other than that, the technical quality is good; very high resolution and sharp. dllu (talk) 05:33, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Upon further thought, sorry. The sharpness and resolution are superb, but I feel that the lighting is a bit flat and the composition isn't as great compared to File:Skyscraper on Kotelnicheskaya Embankment - August 2010.jpg. The dynamic lighting, longer focal length, and water foreground in that picture look much nicer in my opinion. Again, I'm also not convinced by the "detail/clarity" settings for the postprocessing. But this picture is a fine and valuable capture in its own right. dllu (talk) 04:40, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support Superb compo and geometry. --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:40, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support 11 milion of books disapeared, while i am killng myselv to find one. Again, not satisfied with Exif. Mile (talk) 16:17, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Question I don't do panoramas, but does the EXIF always disappear? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- The program I use always does so, can't fix this. I've moved useful info to description as an alternative solution. Юрий Д.К. 15:16, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- You can technically fix this using tools such as exiv2 [4]. It's annoying though and requires some technical knowledge of these weirdly difficult to use tools. dllu (talk) 04:37, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- Will try. Thanks. Юрий Д.К. 19:16, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- You can technically fix this using tools such as exiv2 [4]. It's annoying though and requires some technical knowledge of these weirdly difficult to use tools. dllu (talk) 04:37, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- The program I use always does so, can't fix this. I've moved useful info to description as an alternative solution. Юрий Д.К. 15:16, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Question I don't do panoramas, but does the EXIF always disappear? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:30, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:47, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:43, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
Tabella dei periodi di voto per la regola del quinto giorno (5 giorni dopo la candidatura)
editMon 17 Aug → Sat 22 Aug Tue 18 Aug → Sun 23 Aug Wed 19 Aug → Mon 24 Aug Thu 20 Aug → Tue 25 Aug Fri 21 Aug → Wed 26 Aug Sat 22 Aug → Thu 27 Aug
Tabella dei periodi di voto (9 giorni dopo la candidatura)
editThu 13 Aug → Sat 22 Aug Fri 14 Aug → Sun 23 Aug Sat 15 Aug → Mon 24 Aug Sun 16 Aug → Tue 25 Aug Mon 17 Aug → Wed 26 Aug Tue 18 Aug → Thu 27 Aug Wed 19 Aug → Fri 28 Aug Thu 20 Aug → Sat 29 Aug Fri 21 Aug → Sun 30 Aug Sat 22 Aug → Mon 31 Aug