Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2026 at 14:42:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Plantaginaceae
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 14:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 14:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Superb. To look at 100%, nice depth of field (f/20)... --JackyM59 (talk) 15:14, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:05, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2026 at 13:13:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
- Info created/uploaded by Alexandr frolov – nominated by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:13, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:13, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Question The sky was added? --Wilfredor (talk) 13:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand the question Wilfredor? AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:41, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Was the sky added in post-production or is it the real sky at the moment? Wilfredor (talk) 13:57, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand the question Wilfredor? AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:41, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see any obvious signs of a sky replacement. The sky has clearly been heavily processed, but I cannot find evidence of an artificial replacement. The lighting is consistent, the cloud structure appears natural, and there are no visible masking artefacts, halos or unnatural edge transitions around the statue, the goat or its horns. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2026 at 09:38:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#India
- Info Fields of Yugar in the arid Tsarap River valley, well above the tree line. Elevations: fields 3,850 m (12,630 ft), river 3,820 m (12,530 ft), Cho Kirze peak on left 5,650 m (18,540 ft). Zanskar, India}. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:38, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:38, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition, good use of light and shadows Cmao20 (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support One feels small. --JackyM59 (talk) 15:15, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Maryliflower (talk) 17:05, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2026 at 08:35:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Order_:_Mantodea_(Mantises)
- Info created by Mohdalsaleh – uploaded by Mohdalsaleh – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:35, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:35, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support A special mix. The wing wave color combined with the ant color creates a beautiful touch.RH🦋 (talk) 08:54, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Out of focus, sorry. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:30, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but per Alvesgaspar, very little is in focus here. Cmao20 (talk) 11:40, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Colors and composition are good. Focus is right, but it could be sharper. May be that could be improved? Yann (talk) 16:28, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Yann Thank you for your feedback. We will contact the photographer to see if a sharper version can be provided or if the focus can be improved. If possible, an updated version will be uploaded. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 22:47, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2026 at 08:12:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
- Info Created by Vincent van Gogh / Museum of Fine Arts, Boston – uploaded by DcoetzeeBot – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 08:12, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:12, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:40, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support 向史公哲曰 (talk) 13:04, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:52, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2026 at 07:59:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes
- Info Quality image for Grey heron chick (Ardea cinerea), swallowing a small fish at the Mubarak Al-Kabeer Reserve, Bubiyan Island, Kuwait. missing a snapshot in Kuwait of this FI category. created by Mohdalsaleh – uploaded by Mohdalsaleh – nominated by روتانا -- RH🦋 (talk) 07:59, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- RH🦋 (talk) 07:59, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2026 at 07:53:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Nord
- Info created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 07:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 07:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Pleasant composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2026 at 07:06:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Anthozoa
- Info Elephant ear anemone (Amplexidiscus fenestrafer), Nosy Kalakajoro, Madagascar. The common name is a minomer since this is actually a coral species that is often forming small colony in 5–25 metres (16–82 ft) depth on the top reef in tropical waters Indo-West Pacific area. The visible part of its body corresponds to its oral region and forms a flexible disc, when it is deployed, endowed with cone-shaped tentacles. Its diameter can reach 40 centimetres (16 in) and its diet is highly varied and goes from the production of its zooxanthellae to numerous animals which find themselves trapped by the oral disk as benthic invertebrates, crustaceans, worms, echinoderms and even fishes. Note: there are no FPs on Commons of the whole order Corallimorpharia (containing 11 genera and 46 species). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:06, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:06, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support.RH🦋 (talk) 08:03, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support It's creepy, but how can I not open the full size? Our photographers explore from the ocean deeps to far-off galaxies to get these stunning shots and I'm gonna hold back just because it triggers my phobia? No way! -- IamMM (talk) 20:19, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2026 at 18:46:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
- Info RMV Scillonian III arriving in Penzance en route from St. Mary's. Since 1977 Scillonian III operates the principal ferry service to the remote Isles of Scilly and is one of only three ships in the world still carrying the status of Royal Mail Ship (hence RMV – Royal Mail Vessel). In the background St Michael's Mount. The vessel is due to be replaced by the Scillonian IV for the 2027 season.
- Created, uploaded and nominated by ArildV
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 18:46, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful composition with a happy sunbeam on the boat that contrasts with the background --JackyM59 (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2026 at 15:41:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:41, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment We might need a new section in ‘Objects’ if the image is FP.
- Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:41, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting subject and good quality but I feel that the crop is a bit tight. Cmao20 (talk) 11:37, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2026 at 14:32:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Italy
- Info Cypress tree alley at sunset in Asciano, Tuscany. Taken by Eric Kilby, uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 14:32, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Юрий Д.К. 14:32, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:09, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:10, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Lovely colours and composition, almost like a painting. --Tagooty (talk) 09:41, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:50, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:46, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 15:23, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Steven Sun (talk) 15:54, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Painterly image of a classic Tuscan landscape, with umbrella pines on the hilltop. Acroterion (talk) 01:01, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2026 at 09:01:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Muricidae
- Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:01, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:01, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:31, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:04, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Am I wrong or most of the parts closer to the camera are out of focus? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:39, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- No, but this is a very small object (6.6cm in total end to end length) so I think the amount of detail we have is pretty exceptional. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:45, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Parts closer to the camera are out of focus, which should not be the case in a studio photograph. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Could you please make image notes, where the parts closer to the camera are out of focus? I checked the Apex (bottom left), the end of the sipho (bottom right), an the tips of the lateral spines, which face the viewer (upper row), and as far as I can see all are in focus. --Llez (talk) 18:50, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not sure it is out of focus, maybe the overall unsharpness has some other reason. Please check the outline of the three upper photos. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:39, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2026 at 08:35:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
- Info created by Sahagun Ethan – uploaded by Sahagun Ethan – nominated by Sahagun Ethan -- Sahagun Ethan (talk) 08:35, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Sahagun Ethan (talk) 08:35, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support but please check the verticals --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:07, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the careful review, the pylon's lean is intentional to the bridge's design (transversely inclined), so I've left it uncorrected to preserve its true form. Sahagun Ethan (talk) 17:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for your explanation Uoaei1 (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the careful review, the pylon's lean is intentional to the bridge's design (transversely inclined), so I've left it uncorrected to preserve its true form. Sahagun Ethan (talk) 17:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 14:08, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support ----Famberhorst (talk) 17:14, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2026 at 07:27:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Info created by Clint Wirick USFWS – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support Great composition, but not quite sharp in my opinion. Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is below FP standard. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 14:10, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2026 at 05:17:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Saddam19 – uploaded by Saddam19 – nominated by Saddam19 -- Saddam19 (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Saddam19 (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Many pixels, but nevertheless lack of details. Looks upscaled. I wonder how this image was promoted as QI, as it does not meet the criteria. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:51, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose per Uoaei1 -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:22, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that the detail at full size is very poor, however I don't think that's necessarily a fair way to judge the image. I think what it shows is that these phone cameras often promise extremely high resolution but do not actually deliver usable detail at anything close to full size because the sensor size is so small. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra promises to be able to shoot pictures at 200 megapixels, but it clearly can't produce usable pictures at that size. I don't think upscaling has taken place - it's the native resolution of the sensor, it's just that setting this as the native resolution of the sensor is very silly. Anyway, the picture is sharp enough at 11 megapixels. My oppose comes from the fact that I miss an outstanding composition here. The view is nice, but I would like more sky, and I miss the excellent leading lines that make your other nomination so compelling. Cmao20 (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2026 at 04:15:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Rosales#Family : Rosaceae
- Info Flower of a Rosa canina. Focus stack of 16 photos.}} (Diameter ~58mm.)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:15, 16 July 2026 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:15, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support but maybe a bit dark --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:04, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Elegant and lovely. Cmao20 (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:31, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Good detail, striking composition with delicate colouring. --Tagooty (talk) 09:44, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment However, the brushstrokes on the outside of the lower petals shouldn't be visible--Ermell (talk) 14:13, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Ermell: * Done, Correction. Thanks for your review.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Good now.--Ermell (talk) 19:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2026 at 17:19:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species_:_Vulpes_vulpes_(Red_Foxes)
- Info This is the second nomination for the photo after the photographer uploaded a new file with higher and better quality. A beautiful shot of a red fox mother with Juvenile in Kuwaut. created by BirderSajan – uploaded by BirderSajan – nominated by روتانا --RH🦋 (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support with this new version -- RH🦋 (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Much better processing but at cost of downsampling. The crop is IMHO not good, it's kind of halfway, either you show the full bodies or you go rather for a portrait with head, necks and a bit of the back. Poco a poco (talk) 19:15, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco I asked him now to fix the cropping. RH🦋 (talk) 20:00, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support better than the old version --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 22:50, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Good for me now. Юрий Д.К. 09:11, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:03, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support A special moment. Cmao20 (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:25, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:31, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support lovely --Wilfredor (talk) 17:57, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:52, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:37, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:43, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support ----Famberhorst (talk) 17:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2026 at 16:38:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia
- Info Created and uploaded by Ted.ns – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very atmospheric. --Maryliflower (talk) 08:25, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Maryliflower. Careful composition and nice mood. Cmao20 (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:21, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:57, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support ----Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2026 at 13:22:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
- Info Tiger cowrie (Cypraea tigris) with half of its mantle extended, Ambalihabe, Madagascar. Note: there are no FPs on Commons of the whole family Cypraeidae (cowries) that comprises 60 genera and hunderts of species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:22, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:22, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Excellent given the challenges of underwater photography. Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Too narrow DoF, nothing much is in focus. Background also disturbing. WB questionable - red. --Mile (talk) 17:01, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Dear friend, it's sharp where it has to be. It's not a studio photo of a sport shoe, things look at the bottom of the ocean like this. WB looks good to me, the areas that should be white are white. Poco a poco (talk) 19:08, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:31, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2026 at 12:22:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Portugal#Faro
- Info: Submarino Beach panorama; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:22, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:22, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:03, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:53, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support A majestic panorama with beautiful colours and lots to look at. Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Could be a Windows 10 wallpaper :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Maryliflower (talk) 08:27, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:27, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:30, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:41, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2026 at 12:19:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info Church of the Ascension (Kolomenskoe) in Moscow, built in 1532. My photo. Юрий Д.К. 12:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 12:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support: nice to see the scaffolding finally gone! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:25, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very clean and nice colors. --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:52, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support There is a strange dark halo effect around the building, though, particularly on the right hand side. FP for me but it could be improved with some work on that. Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Sky is a bit "fake", remove some Vibrance/Sat on blue. Also highligths should be lowered. Picture is too hard to observe. --Mile (talk) 16:54, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- I will see what I can do with halos. Sky looks natural for me, but I will try to de-saturate a-bit. Юрий Д.К. 17:13, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Done Corrections made. Юрий Д.К. 09:01, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support ----Famberhorst (talk) 17:16, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2026 at 10:44:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
- Info created by Ghasem bavi – uploaded by Ghasem bavi – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:44, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:44, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice expressions and composition but sorry, the noise and blown highlights are too severe for FP in my opinion. Cmao20 (talk) 11:25, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2026 at 08:54:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Mushrooms
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Info The photo shows variations in the flesh color of russula mushrooms. Cleaning russula immediately during collecting allows for the removal of damaged by larvae mushrooms. These damaged russula are common, accounting for up to 70% of all crop. As a result of cleaning, damaged mushrooms remain in the forest for a spores, and as a potential food for insects and other animals.
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Nice light Cmao20 (talk) 11:24, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support: excellent depiction! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:26, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Remarkable detail and composition. I was surprised to see several FPs of "baskets of mushrooms" in the Gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 14:12, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- very nice still life image. I suppose they are edible and you already ate them all! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:10, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:30, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:03, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2026 at 08:46:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Spain
- Info created & uploaded by Moahim – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support I always think Moahim applies too much noise reduction, but it isn't enough to spoil this well-composed and elegant photograph. Cmao20 (talk) 11:24, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 11:59, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 12:22, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful colour-composition, and very good detail. --Tagooty (talk) 14:13, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 22:51, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment There is a line of darker blue in the sky right above the bridge in its left part see note. What is this? --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:02, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:30, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful composition and excellent light. Regarding the dark blue line in the sky: with a 4-second exposure, it is most likely the light trail of a passing bus, truck or another vehicle crossing the bridge. To me, this is a perfectly natural long-exposure artefact and not a flaw. Great photograph! -- Radomianin (talk) 17:27, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Am I wrong of only the part of the bridge closer to the camera is sharp? I don't care about the water, of course. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:43, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2026 at 04:53:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Rosales#Family : Rosaceae
- Info created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:53, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:53, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:23, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Too tight crop, uninteresting composition. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:28, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Okay, but this image will remain on this page until the end of the voting period so that other users can see what kind of images are not welcome at FPC. Petro Stelte (talk) 15:40, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- All images and creators are welcome at FPC! As well as the honest evaluations of reviewers. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:12, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Perhaps I would believe it if someone else told me so. Petro Stelte (talk) 07:53, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment In the more than twenty years collaborating with FPC, this is surely one of the nastier comments a user made about my honesty and impartiality as a reviewer. This kind of inelegant ad hominem attacks should not be tolerated here. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:59, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- All images and creators are welcome at FPC! As well as the honest evaluations of reviewers. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:12, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support I would to say that the colors a bit dull (very likely shot during an overcast weather), but the flower is quite sharp and nice. Юрий Д.К. 10:07, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2026 at 20:42:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Acrididae (Short-horned grasshoppers and locusts)
- Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 20:42, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 20:42, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:20, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:15, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:07, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 13:09, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:50, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:21, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:29, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2026 at 18:43:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Playing (having fun)
- Info created and uploaded by Michelly Matoss – nominated by ★ -- ★ 18:43, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Nice colors and smile. -- ★ 18:43, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:22, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:28, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose A good quality image, nothing more. Neither the theme or the picture are exceptional. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:29, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- The theme is: Carnival bloc in Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. Carnival is a popular cultural event in the country. ★ 16:04, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I know how important is Carnaval in Brazil, ★. I'm Portuguese, remember?... But what we see in this picture is just a beautiful lady dancing, with no obvious connection with the particular event in Goiânia. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2026 at 13:57:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
- Info Majestic view of a significant Catholic pilgrimage site. No FPs of this subject. created by Jacek Halicki – uploaded by Jacek Halicki – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 14:56, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:13, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:44, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Nice drone shot, where it's much harder to be centered than if you're on the ground. Acroterion (talk) 22:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 12:23, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Acroterion. – Aristeas (talk) 14:04, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Neutral A nice view but a pity for the slightly off-centered POV, too many shadows and limited detail Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:30, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2026 at 13:57:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Liliaceae
- Info IMO beautiful and elegant. created by Aristeas – uploaded by Aristeas – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful full-screen texture --JackyM59 (talk) 14:59, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:12, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:37, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:00, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support R1F4T (talk) 21:02, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:14, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 11:59, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 12:24, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20! – Aristeas (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- You are very welcome. Cmao20 (talk) 16:21, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition and colours. I like the shallow dof, in contrast with the now fashionable focus stacking photos. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:31, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- I agree. I actually thought it might pick up oppose votes for that reason, but I agree that focus stacking was unnecessary in this case and would misunderstand what kind of picture this is supposed to be. Cmao20 (talk) 16:21, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Truly wonderful! Wolverine X-eye 16:08, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Da sticht die Auflösung der Kamera gut hervor. Eignet sich prima in dem Ausschnitt, aber gleichzeitig sind die feinen Strukturen der Pflanze klar erkennbar --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:44, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 22:55, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:31, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:54, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2026 at 12:13:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Others
- Info Drying the cottom silk fabric, Myanmar, 2023. Created by Sopyaylynn – uploaded by Sopyaylynn – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:28, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Steven Sun (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Strong support Excellent from the perspective of subject, composition, and colours. Cmao20 (talk) 14:01, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:05, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Colours, composition. Superb --JackyM59 (talk) 15:00, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:10, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 16:00, 14 July 2026 (UTC) (simple, clear and efficient)
- Support --Mile (talk) 17:38, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:12, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:26, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:30, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:44, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:01, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Beautifully composed, with striking diagonal leading lines, vibrant colours, and a perfectly placed human subject that brings the scene to life. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:43, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Per Radomianin. Acroterion (talk) 21:58, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Strong support A potential POTY. ★ 01:35, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Strong support per Cmao20 and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 13:59, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Composition and colours outstanding --Tagooty (talk) 14:15, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Amazing composition and colours. I wonder why the woman's face is painted! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:48, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:31, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2026 at 12:08:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography
- Info Exam tables, École polytechnique, France, 2020. Created by Jérémy Barande / Ecole polytechnique, uploaded on Flickr – uploaded to Commons by Titlutin – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 12:08, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment It looks almost like a black and white photo, but blue spots on several chairs and some small yellow-ish squares on the floor tell us it's not. (zoom in) Zquid (talk) 12:08, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 12:08, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Steven Sun (talk) 13:47, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support Good abstract, but not all that sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Deceptively simple, looks like b/w.--Paracel63 (talk) 16:01, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support向史公哲曰 (talk) 16:54, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:12, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support lack DoF --Wilfredor (talk) 18:26, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:31, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:45, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:01, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:37, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Acroterion (talk) 22:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support One of the most depressing images I have ever seen, but the striking visual is what brings out the support. Wolverine X-eye 16:13, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:29, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Despite the overall unsharpness, which is mitigated by the composition and creepy subject. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:48, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:22, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2026 at 11:11:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:11, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:11, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Steven Sun (talk) 13:57, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:19, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Stunning photo—the details and the light... It makes you want to follow the path. --JackyM59 (talk) 15:03, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:09, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:12, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:45, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment The specks of dust in the sky and on the water's surface should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 21:10, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- A good example of an appropriate exception to the rule of thirds. Acroterion (talk) 00:07, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:13, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:50, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 11:25, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 12:24, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Stunning composition with a touch of minimalism. – Aristeas (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:30, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:33, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:51, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. I couldn't have said it better. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:31, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:22, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2026 at 11:07:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful subject and excellent, slightly unusual composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:19, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:08, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:45, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:12, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 12:25, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support Indeed beautiful and excellent. IMHO the castle itself is a little bit soft, either the focus was in the foreground or noise reduction etc. has reduced the sharpness. But overall still very nice. – Aristeas (talk) 13:57, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Not convinced by the compo, sorry. You gave the uninteresting bridge in the foreground too much weight in the compo, and per Aristeas. Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2026 at 08:45:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Agaricaceae
- Info Parasol mushroom (Macrolepiota sp.) in grass, early stage with conical cap; 7 cm (2.8 in) across, 6 cm (2.4 in) height. Focus stack of 46 images. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:45, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support I like the range of colours in the bokeh contrasting with the almost white mushroom. -- Tagooty (talk) 08:45, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:39, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:47, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Looks so fresh and clear, not overly bright.--Paracel63 (talk) 15:59, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:13, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support The Parasol is in the shadow --Wilfredor (talk) 18:27, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:13, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:12, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 12:26, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Great detail Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:34, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 15:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2026 at 05:27:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- Info created by saddam19 – uploaded by saddam19 – nominated by Saddam19 -- Saddam19 (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Saddam19 (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support A stunning view. Not great quality at full size but a downsample at a still reasonable 11 megapixels is sharp and has no severe technical flaws, so I'm happy to support. Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:07, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:32, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:45, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 13:54, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding view! Bravo! Wolverine X-eye 16:14, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose A great view but it looks overcooked to me, sorry. Detail is not good. Poco a poco (talk) 19:42, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2026 at 20:03:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Thraupidae_(Tanagers_and_Allies)
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:03, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:03, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:35, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:38, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:39, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Interesting bird and background Юрий Д.К. 11:54, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 13:01, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:44, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 16:00, 14 July 2026 (UTC) (sharp, lovely colours, nice gaze)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:48, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:46, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:17, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:49, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:47, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Юрий Д.К. – Aristeas (talk) 13:53, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice colours, but insufficient DoF - tail and back are a bit fuzzy. --Tagooty (talk) 14:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry but I disagree, in wildlife photography the most important part to have in focus is the eye and head which not only is achieved here but also goes even further as the whole bird in this image is in focus except the tail and back foot. These two last elements are never expected to be in focus for wildlife photography as telephoto lenses are required to shoot far away subjects (like here with 600mm) and that which such a big zoom small DoF always happens. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cool birdie. Wolverine X-eye 16:16, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:39, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2026 at 20:01:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Petromuridae
- Info No FP yet of the species, genus and family. Almost no picture of this animal on Wikimedia Commons.
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:01, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:01, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:39, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 08:16, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:03, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 16:00, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, but the blurred foreground is too distracting. Yann (talk) 18:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- I personally like having a foreground, subject and background as it gives a nice 3D perspective to the image. Also I very much like how the foreground perfectly echoes the background with the same bokeh smoothness and how foreground, midground and background all perfectly have the same tilt. Moreover when I photographed this shy specimen I had to hide behind rocks to very slowly approach without it seeing me and I could only very slowly bring up the camera from behind the rock and get a few burst shots before it escaped. In any case, even if I would have had the choice to go more up, I would definitely always prefer this composition because as I've said I like having 3D shots and moreover it allowed to perfectly be at subject eye level -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:09, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:46, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Acroterion (talk) 00:54, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:52, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Yann --Tagooty (talk) 14:18, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support I think the background enhances the image and gives it a cool look. Wolverine X-eye 16:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support mainly for the value of having a high resolution image of a species with no other good images on Commons and indeed few on the internet. However, the composition does not work for me. It's not so much that the foreground is blurred but that the whole surroundings - foreground and background alike - are a blurry featureless blob. I so much prefer animal pictures that put them in context with their surroundings than ones that just focus narrowly on the subject. This is a good identification photo but for me it is not necessarily a great photo. Cmao20 (talk) 16:28, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Neutral Great detail, distracting foreground, too much of it. Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that the unsharp foregroung is too distracting. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:50, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2026 at 17:25:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity – wide
- Info created by Leonardo da Vinci – uploaded by Binarystring – nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:25, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support I'm surprised it was not nominated before. -- ★ 17:25, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support:I might have been one of the earliest people to nominate this painting.向史公哲曰 (talk) 11:36, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:33, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:10, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Question Who’s the photographer, or what is the source? The file description page says only “Online Taken on 23 July 2013”, but that’s both ambiguous and meaningless, and the Exif/metadata are rather generic. IMHO we should correctly and clearly credit the photographer(s) or the responsible company in order to appreciate their work, even if this “only” a reproduction of a two-dimensional artwork. In this case this is even more important, because the digital reproduction has been released under CC BY-SA 4.0, and in order to fulfil the conditions of that license people need to know who is/are the creator(s) of the reproduction and how they want to be attributed. No offence, I really like the reproduction, but I can’t vote for a photo with unclear attribution. @Binarystring: Can you please help us here? Is this your own photo, or where does the file come from? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose for now and to prevent speedy promotion per Aristeas. “Online Taken on 23 July 2013” is just not adequate documentation of where this photograph came from. Cmao20 (talk) 16:30, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:22, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2026 at 14:33:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kyrgyzstan
- Info A recent high-resolution view of Jengish Chokusu / Victory Peak / Pik Pobedy (7439 m) and Vazha-Pshavela Peak (6918 m) at sunset, seen from South Engilchek Base Camp in the Central Tian Shan, Kyrgyzstan. Commons has historical coverage of this remote region, but comparatively few modern high-quality freely licensed photographs from South Engilchek. This image adds a detailed contemporary view of one of the most significant high-mountain landscapes of Kyrgyzstan. Created by Maryliflower – uploaded by Maryliflower – nominated by Maryliflower -- Maryliflower (talk) 14:33, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Maryliflower (talk) 14:33, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Of course! Here is the magics I often talk about. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:11, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 18:24, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:34, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 20:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:36, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:40, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MB-one (talk) 09:43, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Magic indeed. Cmao20 (talk) 13:42, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:17, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:01, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:13, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:35, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:47, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Magical, and good quality (considering the very difficult light). – Aristeas (talk) 13:40, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:43, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:44, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:55, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 16:22, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Mehr Padin
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2026 at 13:32:35 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
aerial view
-
flat view
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Iran
- Info Mehr Padin castle is a national heritage in Iran. it's a 14th-century castle in Mehriz. The castle consists of two layers of walls and nine round towers, and the entire castle is surrounded by a large moat. Interior of the castle includes structures like houses, governor's seat, religious buildings, stables and storehouses.
- Info created by 10-shahramsalimi – uploaded by 10-shahramsalimi – nominated by محک -- Mrнк (گپ) 13:32, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Mrнк (گپ) 13:32, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose For some important reason, it is supposed to provide some information about the theme depicted in a nominated image. That is not the case here, and in many other recent nominations. Not always images speak for themselves. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:23, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Done @Alvesgaspar: There is a problem with the pre-made form here. It said "DISCRIB IT" in a line and I did it there, but it was deleted after saving.--Mrнк (گپ) 19:17, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- That informative text should be put under the heading Info, just before the identification of the creator and nominator. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Done--Mrнк (گپ) 05:19, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- That informative text should be put under the heading Info, just before the identification of the creator and nominator. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Done @Alvesgaspar: There is a problem with the pre-made form here. It said "DISCRIB IT" in a line and I did it there, but it was deleted after saving.--Mrнк (گپ) 19:17, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:24, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support The two images make for an excellent documentation of an impressive monument. – Aristeas (talk) 13:39, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:03, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Maybe 1st should have some rotation to anticlockwise. But good shot. Representive.--Mile (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment There is a reason for me to keep the oppose vote: I don't see the reason to add a second picture because the first (and best) contains enough visual information about the subject. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- The rhomboid shape of the walls is not at all obvious from the first image alone. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:02, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2026 at 04:29:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
- Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 04:29, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Min968 (talk) 04:29, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support. The Artist's immense skill and precision. Superior quality and size of the reproduction. -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:00, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 04:22, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:57, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2026 at 04:27:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
- Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 04:27, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Min968 (talk) 04:27, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support. The Artist's immense skill and precision. Superior quality and size of the reproduction. -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:00, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 04:21, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:56, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2026 at 00:26:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Estonia#Järva County
- Info created & uploaded by Feliks Sarv – nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 00:26, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 00:26, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 20:09, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting mood, but disappointing image quality (focus, noise). I do not understand why these camera settings have been chosen. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 16:00, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:48, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Striking view with impressive mood. Agree that the ISO/exposure time settings are odd (ISO 800 and 1/800 s – if there was no wind, ISO 100 and 1/100 s should have worked well at 24 mm focal length –, but IMHO the technical quality is still very good. – Aristeas (talk) 13:36, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Zquid (talk) 22:29, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2026 at 22:02:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Varanidae_(Monitor_Lizards_and_Komodo_dragon)
- Info created by Mohdalsaleh – uploaded by Mohdalsaleh – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 22:02, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 22:02, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support I was about to nominate this photo! A rare snapshot in Kuwait, very good position and quality.RH🦋 (talk) 22:41, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:27, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:01, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:57, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:05, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:42, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Excellent action shot, remarkable detail. --Tagooty (talk) 08:52, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:37, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:27, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Zquid (talk) 22:26, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2026 at 13:44:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Geraniaceae
- Info Photographed in my garden. Everything in this picture is natural: the flower itself, the light, the shadows, and the colors. Created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Nice colors Юрий Д.К. 14:43, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Details and a nice display --JackyM59 (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Careful composition. Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:48, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. To be honest I consider Pelargonia as rather boring (because they are the dominating petit bourgeois balcony plant here in southern Germany), but you show how to take an attractive and charming photo of them. – Aristeas (talk) 13:16, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Not found of the centered composition and tight crop. I would prefer more generous spacing all around and a larger space in front of the flower. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:37, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Okay, but this image will remain on this page until the end of the voting period so that other users can see what kind of images are not welcome at FPC. Petro Stelte (talk) 15:41, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- The picture is likely to pass, I'm not sure it would be justified to say that this vote indicates that these images are 'not welcome at FPC.' Cmao20 (talk) 16:35, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- I think it's justified after this nomination.Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black-White-Cat-Sitia-Crete-4.jpg Petro Stelte (talk) 17:08, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Once again, please understand that all images and creators are welcome here, as well as the opinions of the reviewrs. Critics should always be directed at nominations, not creators! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Perhaps I would believe it if someone else told me so. Petro Stelte (talk) 07:54, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment In the more than twenty years collaborating with FPC, this is surely one of the nastier comments a user made about my honesty and impartiality as a reviewer. This kind of inelegant ad hominem attacks should not be tolerated here. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:02, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- The picture is likely to pass, I'm not sure it would be justified to say that this vote indicates that these images are 'not welcome at FPC.' Cmao20 (talk) 16:35, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support I would to say that the colors a bit dull (very likely shot during an overcast weather), but the flower is quite
Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2026 at 11:28:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/India#West Bengal
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by Joydeep -- Joydeep (Talk) 11:28, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Joydeep (Talk) 11:28, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition --JackyM59 (talk) 19:42, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry, QI for sure but I'm not seeing any tension or dynamism in the composition to elevate this to FP. It's a pleasant picture but I would want outstanding light or a more unusual composition. Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support I find the composition convincing and the colours (especially of the river) pleasing, I do wish for more detail but good enough for FP overall. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:26, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm with Cmao20. I wouldn't call it a striking composition. I definitely miss something here to consider this shot among our finest images Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Black-winged Kite
Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2026 at 07:34:15 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Black-winged Kite (Elanus caeruleus) in flight with wing elevation during the upstroke.
-
Black-winged Kite (Elanus caeruleus) in flight with wing depression during the downstroke.
-
Black-winged Kite (Elanus caeruleus) in flight with wings in full abduction during a glide phase while making a turn.
-
Black-winged Kite (Elanus caeruleus) in flight with wings in full abduction during a glide phase after making a turn.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Elanus
- Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:34, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:34, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Impressive set. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:28, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support It's very impressive to capture multiple images of a bird in flight in such detail. LetmeEditit (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, good quality and nice series of shots, but packing this as a set is not valid IMHO, your forced it too much. There are many other situations in flight that are not shown here, therefore the set is random / uncomplete. Poco a poco (talk) 17:25, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:49, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support valid set of passage of time in my opinion, just like these other examples : 1, 2, 3 -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:10, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Not a valid comparison IMHO because in all 3 explamples you show a closed and complete set of images for a certain succession (towers stand --> are fallen, wahle starting/ending the deep dive, lion bathing with mud). This set may be a succesion of images but I don't see how to include them under a common title. Poco a poco (talk) 11:37, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- I see nowhere in the rules that a set of passage of time should be "closed and complete". As for the common title for this succession of images I think that "Black-winged kite in flight" or something in these lines fits perfectly -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:43, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Not a valid comparison IMHO because in all 3 explamples you show a closed and complete set of images for a certain succession (towers stand --> are fallen, wahle starting/ending the deep dive, lion bathing with mud). This set may be a succesion of images but I don't see how to include them under a common title. Poco a poco (talk) 11:37, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:02, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:42, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Giles and LetmeEditit. – Aristeas (talk) 13:11, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2026 at 02:57:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#Boston
- Info created by Fletcher – uploaded by Fletcher – nominated by Wobbanight -- Wobbanight (talk) 02:57, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Wobbanight (talk) 02:57, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support Good quality and nice light but maybe a bit low wow for FP and it's a shame about the cut off boat at the bottom Cmao20 (talk) 11:24, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Good quality, no magic. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:59, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Good light but crop too tight at the bottom. Unexceptional buildings -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry, there’s something interesting in this view, namely the contrast between the boats and the high-rise buildings, but this would work only if we had a more generous crop at the bottom and maybe a slightly different perspective and light. – Aristeas (talk) 13:08, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2026 at 07:18:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Herpestidae_(Mongooses)
- Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:18, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:18, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 09:29, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 09:40, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Details and the surrounding environment --JackyM59 (talk) 09:55, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:00, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:34, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but composition is poor, partially because of the unfocused elements in the foreground. Also, the nose of the animal, which should obviously by sharp, it is not. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:42, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support - Krigore (talk) 10:08, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 16:01, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support I like the composition overall but it is a shame about the out of focus nose. Maybe not your best, but FP in my opinion. Cmao20 (talk) 11:20, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- I nominated this for I never saw another Indian grey mongoose in water before and among the rest of my images I like this frame best. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:59, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose A bit of a messy setup, but my main concern is the low detail of the subject, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 11:47, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support technical shortcomings but nice scene, overall FP to me. Though I think a slight crop in the top to center the mongoose may be nice. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:31, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak support per UnpetitproleX. I don’t care about the sharpness of the nose; just like in portraits of people, the eyes or at least the frontmost eye must be sharp, and this is the case here. – Aristeas (talk) 13:01, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2026 at 01:16:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#North Dakota
- Info The Little Missouri River in Theodore Roosevelt National Park, North Dakota, with storm clouds just before sunset. Created, uploaded, and nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 01:16, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Acroterion (talk) 01:16, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:07, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Nice thumbnail but overprocessed at full resolution. Low level of detail possibly due to a destructive post-processing or agressive noise reduction (tree at the left, water, sky) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Perhaps I fussed with it a little too much. NR was minimal, and sharpening was just about a default setting in Topaz. The dynamic range between sky and landscape is a bit challenging. An image with no NR and no sharpening is here: File:Little Missouri in Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1A.jpg Acroterion (talk) 02:42, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comparison. The original version is better in my view. Moreover, the current nomination is "uncalibrated" (color space) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- I've replaced it with the alternative, thanks for the review. Acroterion (talk) 03:06, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comparison. The original version is better in my view. Moreover, the current nomination is "uncalibrated" (color space) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Perhaps I fussed with it a little too much. NR was minimal, and sharpening was just about a default setting in Topaz. The dynamic range between sky and landscape is a bit challenging. An image with no NR and no sharpening is here: File:Little Missouri in Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1A.jpg Acroterion (talk) 02:42, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose The river would probably help with the compo but we can hardly see it, detail is not good. Poco a poco (talk) 06:38, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful to me Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:55, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Superb light and faded yellows --JackyM59 (talk) 17:19, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful golden light, wonderful autumn mood. – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:28, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Nice Юрий Д.К. 09:21, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 09:38, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Shark Observatory Bay
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2026 at 22:41:45 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
South view (from the shark observatory)
-
North view (facing the shark observatory)
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Egypt
- Info: Shark Observatory Bay and its fringing coral reef, Ras Muhammad National Park; all by --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:41, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:41, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Two beautiful, well-composed photographs Cmao20 (talk) 00:40, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose It's difficult to associate them as a set. Nice pictures but I wouldn't call them extraordinary, detail is no the best either IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 06:39, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:53, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:32, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 08:56, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 09:35, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose I conccur with Poco a poco. I also fail to see the relevance of grouping the two pictures, even if they depict the same region. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:48, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment @Poco a poco and Alvesgaspar: the rules state that a valid set is "a group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible". We are not limited by the nature of the subject, so it can be a plant, an animal, or, in this particular case, a bay depicted from 2 opposite viewpoints. Let's not invent restrictions for no reason. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:13, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- I didn't affirm that it isn't a valid set, but that here it isn't obvious to realize that we are looking at the same subject from 2 different POVs, like e.g. it would be in a set like this one. My main argument to oppose though is the fact that I don't see anything special in these images anyhow either as a set or as single candidates Poco a poco (talk) 16:03, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:17, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2026 at 22:40:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Science#Text
- Info created by Anonymous – uploaded by Fæ – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Maybe we should start using this alphabet in our assessments here!.... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:08, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:25, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:27, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Nice. I took the liberty to refine the gallery link. We can either sort this as a caricature, or as an alphabet of initials; I have used the latter, because this image is a nice surprise among the other instances of letter art. – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas, and also sort of a 'whimsical' nom, which I find interesting. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:33, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:23, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:49:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
- Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 19:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC)- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:13, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- Krigore (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 21:16, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose What's featurable here? Stupid me fails to see... --A.Savin 22:25, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Great composition, good quality. --Yann (talk) 05:41, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Nice Tunneleffekt, impressive image. – Aristeas (talk) 19:07, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:30, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:31, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 09:35, 11 July 2026 (UTC)- Comment A nice eye for a view worth capturing. --JackyM59 (talk) 09:58, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry Wilfredor, this is indeed a very good composition but image quality is too poor. I don't think there are mitigating factors here, as similar images can be easily taken if one is patient enough. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:51, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose IS OK, but i would remove fenece to lock on subject. --Mile (talk) 16:54, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
Alt version
- Info cut version based on Mile comment --Wilfredor (talk) 00:33, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Also fine. Yann (talk) 10:39, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Strong support This version is much better. I was about to suggest a crop myself until I saw this. LetmeEditit (talk) 15:37, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 16:02, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support i suposse crop would stay, but still beter than original. --Mile (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 18:39, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support I preffer this one --Wilfredor (talk) 01:20, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:26, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Both are good, but since the nominator prefers this version, I also support this one. --Petro Stelte (talk) 10:48, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support: I wasn't bothered by the barriers, but this is better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:28, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support I actually preferred the other one, but sure, still FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- I preferred this one too, but since others saw it as visual clutter, I opted for this version; generally, I don't explain my photographs because I prefer the viewer to grasp the essence themselves... There is a certain symbolism in the two barriers, In the absence of actual people, the two objects stand there alone, watching it leave saying goodbye.. Wilfredor (talk) 14:23, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- I definitely see what you mean. I hadn’t managed to put my finger on why quite so clearly, but I definitely find the original picture more emotionally affecting. Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:46, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Simpler and maybe better. – Aristeas (talk) 12:56, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Good enough now, with the so-so image quality mitigated by the inspired omposition. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:53, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Here we go again. What's featurable here? As it seems, Commons is no longer a resource for media with educational value. But what shall it be otherwise? "Yet another ChatGPT"? Laughable, just laughable --A.Savin 09:49, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- A.Savin, criticism is always welcome, but calling this “laughable” and comparing it to ChatGPT doesn't add anything useful. If you object to the nomination, your opposition must be argued in accordance with FPC rules. Please explain what specific FPC criteria you believe this photograph does not meet. Wilfredor (talk) 14:21, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2026 at 09:07:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Tunisia
- Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by Smailtn -- SAIDI Ismail (talk) 09:07, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support -- SAIDI Ismail (talk) 09:07, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice light but sorry, not convinced by the perspective. I think I'd need something with a stronger composition to make this motif special enough for FP Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Cmao20, I've corrected the alignment and reduced the framing to better showcase the bridge SAIDI Ismail (talk) 12:11, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Better, but still not enough in this motif for FP to me, sorry. Cmao20 (talk) 10:50, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support Much better for me Юрий Д.К. 12:18, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Neutral - An interesting motif, but in my opinion there is a bit too much sky, which only highlights the fact that the stars have turned into lines due to the long exposure. - Krigore (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 21:26, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you Krigore, all fixed SAIDI Ismail (talk) 07:35, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree, furthermore detail is not the best and some PC is needed Poco a poco (talk) 06:47, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you Poco a poco, all fixed SAIDI Ismail (talk) 07:35, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose There is a mirror effect in the water but the bridge is not special enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Barcelona March 2015-2a.jpg (delist)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2026 at 18:48:49
- Info I believe this version should be replaced by the one below, whose dimensions are more correct. Please note that the better version was presented as an alternative in the original nomination, but it was too late to gather the necessary votes. Original nomination: (Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barcelona March 2015-2a.jpg)
- Delist and replace -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Sure. Cmao20 (talk) 00:27, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Okay. --Petro Stelte (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Poco a poco (talk) 06:50, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delist and replace UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:09, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Good idea, thank you. – Aristeas (talk) 18:48, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delist and replace -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:52, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Wilfredor (talk) 01:22, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Result: X delist, X keep, X neutral → not delisted. /Note: This looks like a delist-and-replace nomination (or something else special). Therefore it must be counted and processed manually. FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 13 Jul → Sat 18 Jul Tue 14 Jul → Sun 19 Jul Wed 15 Jul → Mon 20 Jul Thu 16 Jul → Tue 21 Jul Fri 17 Jul → Wed 22 Jul Sat 18 Jul → Thu 23 Jul
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 09 Jul → Sat 18 Jul Fri 10 Jul → Sun 19 Jul Sat 11 Jul → Mon 20 Jul Sun 12 Jul → Tue 21 Jul Mon 13 Jul → Wed 22 Jul Tue 14 Jul → Thu 23 Jul Wed 15 Jul → Fri 24 Jul Thu 16 Jul → Sat 25 Jul Fri 17 Jul → Sun 26 Jul Sat 18 Jul → Mon 27 Jul
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a
<noinclude>...</noinclude>section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:- A category for the month and year, like Category:July 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
- A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
- A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
- If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
- Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
