Kallerna

Archive: 2000s 2010s 2020s

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

• Please don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
• If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page–my talk page–as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place.
• If I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there.

Please leave a new message.

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mireuk Daebul, Bongeunsa This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bongeunsa Seoul 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Bongeunsa Seoul 2.jpg
• File:Bongeunsa Seoul 3.jpg
• File:Bongeunsa Seoul 4.jpg
• File:Bongeunsa Seoul 5.jpg
• File:Bongeunsa Seoul 6.jpg
• File:Bongeunsa Seoul 7.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

De minimis - only the backside is visible

Hmm, noinko on tapana ajatella? Kai patsaan selkäpuolikin nauttii ihan yhtäläisiä tekijänoikeuksia, vai miten on? --Geohakkeri (talk) 08:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Mistäs tuo lainaus on? —kallerna (talk) 12:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Special:Redirect/logid/390112763. --Geohakkeri (talk) 13:00, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Jaa, taitaa olla ajatusvirhe. Pointtina että kyseessä laaja kuva josta verrattain pieni osa tekijänoikeuksien alla. —kallerna (talk) 13:04, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Sukunimien luokittelu ala- ja pääluokassa

Hei kallerna. Huomasin, että luokkaan Finnish-language surnames kuuluvat sukunimiluokat olivat myös pääluokassa Surnames. Poistin suomenkielisistä sukunimistä pääluokkia (esimerkki, käytäntö overcat). En poistanut piilotettua luokkaa Surnames (flat list), jonka tarpeellisuudesta on keskusteltu. Varmistan vielä ennen jatkamista, että olenko toiminut oikein poistaessani pääluokan? raid5 16:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Joo, mielestäni olet toiminut aivan oikein. Pientä työmaata tossa näyttäisi kyllä olevan kun pääluokassa 219 268 luokkaa... —kallerna (talk) 19:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Kiitos vastauksesta. Luokkamuutoksissa on helppo tehdä virheitä, yritän olla huolellinen. raid5 20:22, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

En ole samaa mieltä luokituksesta (keskustelu Flat lists), voi olla että minulla ei ole riittävästi tietoa asiasta. Joka tapauksessa lopetin luokkien poistamisen. Luulisi botilla voivan lisätä flat-luokkia luokan Surnames by language alaluokkiin (tai mitä päätetäänkin). raid5 11:26, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Tuskin tuosta koskaan tulee mitään "päätöstä" ellei joku vaan aja botilla tai käsin kaikkia kuntoon. IMO olit oikeilla jäljillä. —kallerna (talk) 12:58, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Muokkaajia häiritsevät erilaiset asiat. Sopeudun ajan kanssa vastakkaisiin tapoihin toimia, mutta ”tehdään milloin mitenkin” on rasittavaa. Lisään tai poistan luokkia konsensuksen mukaan, kuitenkaan päättämättömyys tai useampi toimintatapa ei mielestäni ole järkevää (keskustelu Actors of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit). Ei tämä niin vakavaa ole. Puuhastelua riittää muuallakin. raid5 14:26, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Kuvia on paljon ja monet luokitukset ovat niin retuperällä, että Commonsissa on tavallaan villi länsi - voimakkaampi "muokkaa rohkeasti" kuin esim. Wikipedian puolella. Osaltaan se antaa vapaat kädet, mutta johtaa myös käytäntöjen puuttumiseen. —kallerna (talk) 17:37, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Commonsissa virheistäni on huomauteltu vähemmän, siinä mielessä on ollut rauhallista muokata. Luokittelua olisi mukava hahmottaa paremmin, se vaatisi kuitenkin keskusteluiden ja toiminnan seuraamista vuosien ajan. (Surnames by language: Kävin muokkaamani luokat läpi ja lisäsin flat list -luokkia. Sitten lopuksi poistin luokasta Flemish-language surnames luokan Surnames. Jos jaksan, niin teen saman jäljelle jääneille luokille E–G → German-language surnames. Ilmeisesti tein muokkaukset kuten mainitsemassani keskustelussa päätettiin). raid5 18:58, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlas mountains aerial 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Geo location would be nice.) --XRay 11:10, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrup shaft tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:35, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Løkken drill core archive 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:50, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havneholmen winter cycling Cykelslangen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --DimiTalen 13:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havneholmen Aller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 15:12, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havneholmen winter cycling Bryggebroen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --DimiTalen 13:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uutela Canal 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:37, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Parc Astérix in Tour de France This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Stage 20 Tour de France 2024 Col de la Couillole 10.jpg

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 21:54, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pagoda Street Chinatown Singapore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PetarM 18:48, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canopy Walk Kent Ridge Park Singapore 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --E bailey 18:29, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silver Garden HortPark Singapore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Faber trail 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Kadı 12:19, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phasawan viewpoint Ko Pha Ngan 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vitorperrut555 23:19, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boats Mae Haad beach sunset Ko Tao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 13:32, 23 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Vitorperrut555 21:57, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hin Tha Toh Ko Tao 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 13:32, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John-Suwan Viewpoint Ko Tao 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:31, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John-Suwan Viewpoint Ko Tao 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hin Tha Toh Ko Tao 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hin Tha Toh Ko Tao 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --D-Kuru 08:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santhiya Koh Phangan Resort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fullerton Pavilion Singapore sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:36, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat trip Diamond Tours Ko Tao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:34, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore view from ION Orchard 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:45, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Air conditioning units alley behind Boat Quay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:48, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Peak Mount Kinabalu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:08, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laban Rata Mount Kinabalu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:18, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaya Island Filipino-Moro refugees Kampung Lok Urai stilt houses Pondo Village Kota Kinabalu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --D-Kuru 08:17, 27 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:18, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. John's Peak Mount Kinabalu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:21, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sub-alpine scrub Kinabalu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donkey Ears Peak Mount Kinabalu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trail Mount Kinabalu 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:10, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. John's Peak Mount Kinabalu 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:31, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria Peak Mount Kinabalu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:30, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mae Haad beach Ko Tao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 08:48, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marina Bay Sands Singapore 2026 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:17, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore cable car Mount Faber 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 09:39, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nepenthes villosa Mt Kinabalu Sabah Borneo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 12:25, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. John's Peak Mount Kinabalu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Impressive, maybe FP? --Gower 19:33, 2 March 2026 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, feel free to nominate. --Kallerna 09:17, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinabalu Sabah Borneo Kampong Kundasang panorama 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 10:40, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rain Vortex Jewel Changi Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 10:40, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rainforest cloud forming Kinabalu Sabah Borneo Kampong Kundasang 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 17:04, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinabalu Sabah Borneo Kampong Kundasang 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 10:40, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinabalu Sabah Borneo Kampong Kundasang 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 10:40, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaya Island Filipino-Moro refugees Kampung Lok Urai stilt houses Pondo Village Kota Kinabalu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 12:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Tao Mae Haad street 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 12:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca' Foscari Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vitorperrut555 02:30, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MRT Center 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:40, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telekom Srbija TK centar 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 15:13, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Sava 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:47, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yugoslav Ministry of Defence building 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 15:13, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Sava 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:47, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Holy Great Martyr Demetrius Belgrade 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 15:13, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lille Langebro winter 2026 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:15, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Strand winter 2026 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --TheBritinator 11:56, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lille Langebro winter 2026 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:15, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyhavn winter 2026 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --TheBritinator 11:56, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel d'Angleterre winter 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:04, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cykelslangen winter 2026 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice leading line (bridge) and interesting texture of the frozen water. --D-Kuru 22:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frozen Inderhavnen winter 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyhavn winter 2026 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:20, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havnebad Islands Brygge winter 2026 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support There looks to be a small stitching error that I marked with an image note, but overall good quality (nice work capturing a person who is bathing in the ice water!) --D-Kuru 22:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC) Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 05:20, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalvebod Brygge winter 2026 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:14, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria Peak Mount Kinabalu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:03, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oslo Opera House 2023 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vitorperrut555 23:12, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 18 April 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2024 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:24, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zillertal Alps aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bryggebroen Halveholmen Copenhagen 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:03, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Request to Use Your Photo of the Pelješac Bridge in a Book

Hello,​ I hope you are doing well.​ I am currently preparing a book and I would like to use your photograph of the Pelješac Bridge. The book may be published commercially.​ Although your image is available under a Creative Commons license, I would like to kindly ask for your explicit permission to use it in my publication. I would also appreciate it if you could confirm the preferred format for attribution.​ If possible, I would also like to ask whether you would allow minor adjustments such as cropping or layout adaptation for print.​ Thank you very much for your time and for your excellent work. Best regards, An Ruiheng Pavoooo (talk) 18:19, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for asking, yes you are free to use and edit the photo as you like. kallerna/Wikimedia Commons should be fine. —kallerna (talk) 19:43, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Copenhagen view from Christiansborg's Tower 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:14, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acropolis of Athens Cecropia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 21:30, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Votsalakia beach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plasmium 22:33, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Votsalakia swimming pool 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:46, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.

Round 2 will end at 2 May 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:09, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilia Poulopoulou Thiseio 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 82 Djurgården ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

You may be an eligible candidate for the U4C election

Greetings,

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) seeks candidates for the 2026 election. The U4C is the global committee responsible for overseeing enforcement of the Universal Code of Conduct. Elections are held annually, if elected a committee member serves for two years.

This year the U4C requires candidates to hold administrator rights on at least one wiki, which is why you are being contacted as you appear to hold this right. There are other requirements, such as candidates must be at least 18 years old and may not be employed by the Wikimedia Foundation or other related chapters and affiliates. You can find more information in the call for candidates on Meta-wiki. Additionally, the committee's working language is English; some ability to communicate in English is required.

The election opens on 18 May, if you are eligible and interested you have until 10 May to submit your candidacy. There will week between for candidates to answer questions from the community. Voting takes place privately in SecurePoll, successful candidates must receive at least 60% support. More information is available on the 2026 Elections page, including timelines and other candidacy information. If you read over the material and consider yourself qualified, please consider submitting your name to run for the committee. If you think someone else in your community might be interested and qualified, please encourage them to run.

In partnership with the U4C -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!

Hi everyone,

Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.

Here are your top three winning images:

• First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area.
  Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
• Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia.
  Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
• Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers.
  Attribution: public domain

You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results

I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.

Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!

Regards,
ZI Jony
For the POTY Committee 20:08, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fugltinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:26, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Observatorio IRAM Pico Veleta 2.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Observatorio IRAM Pico Veleta 2.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/Wilfredor (talk) 22:01, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Genex Tower 19.jpg

File:Genex Tower 19.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Genex Tower 19.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ralf Roletschek 20:28, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Rename File:Trento aerial view.jpg ?

Hi Kallerna, in photo File:Trento aerial view.jpg is not town Trento and the Adige valley (that valley is more left ... West), do you want to rename your photo to a new title, something like File:Latemar, Val di Fiemme - Fleimstal, Predazzo, Moena and the Fassa Valley, Dolomites aerial view. (Rosengarten group, Fanes and the main chain of the Alps are in background) but Predazzo is in foreground, LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 18:54, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! I will rename the image. —kallerna (talk) 02:52, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 July 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tromsdalen panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tromssa Tromsdalstinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svartisen glaciers aerial 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramsalt Bodø 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stormen Biblioteket Bodø 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 July 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parken Copenhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodø lighthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodø marina 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Bodø.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tromssa Storsteinen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 15:51, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Good highlight picture bro

Ranch9613 💬 20:37, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! —kallerna (talk) 12:05, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Savukuva New York Timesissa

Moi! Satuin huomaamaan, että yhtä valokuvaasi on käytetty New York Timesissa: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/03/opinion/doctors-medicine-uncertainty.html. Näyttäisi olevan yksityiskohta savukuvasta File:Smoke_Kustavi_2016.jpg. kyykaarme (talk) 07:23, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Sama kuva näyttäisi olevan. Jos on sama, niin tiedoston keskustelusivulle sopisi ilmoitus:

{{Published | cite = web | small = yes | legal = ? | title = I Told My Patient She’d Never Go Home. I Was Wrong. | url = https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/03/opinion/doctors-medicine-uncertainty.html | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20260804115714/https://static01.nyt.com/images/2026/08/04/opinion/03lamas/03lamas-superJumbo-v2.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp | archivedate = 4 August 2026 | work = The New York Times | date = 3 August 2026 | note = user talk kallerna [[User_talk:Kallerna#Savukuva_New_York_Timesissa|Savukuva New York Timesissa]] ~~~~}} raid5 12:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

On se tuosta kuvasta napsaistu, ja aika erikoista että New York Timesin tyylinen "laatumedia" ei ole huomioinut lisenssin mukaisia linkkejä alkuperäiseen valokuvaan. Kiitos viestistä! Miten onnistuitkin huomaamaan että on juuri tuosta kuvasta kyse? —kallerna (talk) 13:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Ehdottamassani mallineessa {{Published}} on kysymysmerkki, jonka voi tarvittaessa vaihtaa. raid5 13:23, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Kun näin käyttäjänimesi artikkelin lopussa, niin aloin ensin käydä läpi lataamiasi kuvia vanhimmasta päästä lähtien ja 500 kuvaa per sivu, mutta luovutin pian. Sitten tsekkasin käyttäjäsivullasi olevan gallerialinkin, ja sieltä se löytyi. :) kyykaarme (talk) 08:20, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Aa, artikkelissa oli kuitenkin viittaus. Kuvia taitaa tosiaan olla sen verran paljon että manuaalinen läpikäynti olisi aika urakka. Jännä sinällään että ovat tuon kuvan löytäneet käytettäväksi kun sitä ei ole varsinaisesti linkitetty minnekään. —kallerna (talk) 08:49, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 August 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danmark Rundt 2026 stage 5 Rødovre 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for a live sports image --Benjism89 18:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danmark Rundt 2026 stage 5 Rødovre 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 16:50, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 August 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalvebod Bølge - Bølgen 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:05, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaktus Towers 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --S.Marchenko 11:15, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bryggebroen Havnebus Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 August 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cykelslangen 2026 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:57, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalvebod Bølge - Bølgen 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --DimiTalen 14:54, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemini Residence Bryggebroen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 13:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fisketorvet shopping center 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 13:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dybbølsbro 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 13:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 August 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amager Bakke Copenhagen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amager Bakke Copenhagen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amager Bakke Copenhagen 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havneholmen Allerhuset 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 August 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havneholmen Allerhuset 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 06:56, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havneholmen canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 06:56, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaktus Towers 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 06:56, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cykelslangen 2026 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:39, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 13 August 2026 (UTC)