@Sporti: , prvi dve mi je uspelo naložiti, tretja mi je pa spodletela. Bom poskusil ponovno jutri. Sem nekje zalsedil, da so bile težave pri nalaganju fajlov nad 100MB in da so te težave medtem že odpravili. Prosim za pomoč pri kategoriziranju naloženih dveh knjig. Lp, ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs22:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Meni vseskozi javlja 'internal error' - nemogoče je preveriti, ali je nalaganje uspelo in ponudi samo možnost, da znova naložim spodletelo datoteko. Bom spet probal čez nekaj dni.--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs17:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Sporti: Sem še nekajkrat poskusil, a brez uspeha. Naložil sem pa 8 datotek s starimi slovenskimi slovnicami, hvaležen ti bom, če preveriš, ali vse štima, predvsem predloge in dovoljenja. A se mogoče da predlogo {{Book dodati že med nalaganjem z UploadWizardom? lp, ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs18:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Sporti: , na več načinov sem se mučil, da bi naložil katero od knjig (velikih PDFjev) z zapisniki, pa brez uspeha, čeprav sem sprobal v treh različnih posodobljenih brskalnikih. Opažam, da je čarovnik za nalaganje že toliko hroščast, da je praktično neuporaben, tudi za manjše datoteke. Osnovna stran za nalaganje mi ne pusti naložiti niti PDFja z dobrimi 400 MB, javlja mi napako "413 Request Entity Too Large", pa imam omogočene chunk uploads v nastavitvah. Zadnje upanje je bil skript https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rillke/bigChunkedUpload.js , ki naj bi bil v pomoč prav pri nalaganju večjih datotek po delčkih; ko se mi datoteka naloži, pa mi aplikacija sporoči napako "FAILED: success" in to je to. Kaj ti si tudi že poskusil s tem Rillkejevim skriptom? kakšen je rezultat pri tebi? LP M★Zaplotnik(edits)19:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Poskušal sem le z Wizardom (naj bi delalo do 1 GB), bom še z Rillkejevim. Včasih je bil dober Commons:Up!, ampak na žalost se je zgubila koda. Commons:VicuñaUploader pa sploh ne odpre datoteke, da bi lahko poskusil naložiti. MMG si pogledal v Special:UploadStash (Troubleshooting: In case the last chunk was uploaded and you see an error, please go to your UploadStash and try publishing from there.). --Sporti (talk) 08:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Nisem vedel, da ta funkcija obstaja. Odpre mi seznam 33 PDF datotek z generičnimi imeni, verjetno je med njimi tudi katera z zapisniki, vsaj dvakrat se mi je naložila v celoti. Katerokoli želim odpreti, mi javi "Internal Server Error Cannot serve a file larger than 1048576 bytes". Samo 1 MB?! M★Zaplotnik(edits)09:35, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Ja isto se mi je zgodilo (FAILED: success). Poskušal sem z url2commons (vrže ERROR : 504 Gateway Time-out), ampak očitno je to precej globalen bug. --Sporti (talk) 10:29, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Sporti, jaz za prenos posnetkov z YT uporabljam vtičnik YouTube Center v brskalniku Maxthon (obstaja tudi za Safari, Chrome, Opero, Firefox). Je namreč edina aplikacija, kar jih poznam, ki omogoča direktno shranjevanje videov z YT v format WebM. Za posnetke od drugod, ki obstajajo v drugih formatih, pa še vedno uporabljam Miro Video Converter, katerega uporabo so včasih priporočali na Zbirkini strani za pomoč pri pretvarjanju. Če se mi bo kdaj zataknilo, bom uporabil novega, ki ga omenjaš. Hvala in LP, M★Zaplotnik(edits)15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Sem poskusil s par videi in tudi meni deluje brezhibno. Eno uporabnejših orodij zadnje čase. Morda se za implementacijo tega orodja skriva želja vodilnih pri Wikimediji, da bi se na Zbirki povečal delež videoposnetkov, ki so procentualno po krivici slabo zastopani. Je bil že čas. M★Zaplotnik(edits)17:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ne verjamem, da je tole ravno visoko na želji vodilnih, drugače bi jih bilo malo več angažiranih na projektu, zdaj je bolj ali manj eden. Je pa priročno, da vse teče na njihovem strežniku, ker je lahko precej dolgotrajno in zahtevno za procesor in internetno povezavo. Sčasoma bodo verjetno še kaj dodelali, zdaj npr. ne moreš ustaviti postopka ali pa ponoviti, če ne uspe, včasih vrže tudi še kakšno drugo napako. Deluje pa dobro tudi, če je velikost čez 1GB, ko ti ustvari zahtevo za Server-side upload. --Sporti (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Nekateri že naloženi videi niso v najvišji kvaliteti, video2commons pa ne omogoča nalaganja čez obstoječe, tako da sem nekatere naložil znova. --Sporti (talk) 14:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ja kategorije in opis se lahko skopira, čakam samo na review najprej, preden se kaj briše. Je pa iskalnik po youtubu malo čuden, ne najde ravno vsega vedno... --Sporti (talk) 21:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello MZaplotnik. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd006018:45, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Happy fear - lučke povsod, svobode nikjer.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Why did you move two closed FPs that were featured to the log? If you do that, the users will get no FP notification and the photos will not be added to the right galleries by the bot. Only 'not featured' should be moved manually to the log. I'll restore that edit now. --cart-Talk17:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Sporti, ja, tega sem se bal. Sem iskal, ali je nalagatelj v kakšni povezavi ali s produkcijsko hišo, ki je posnela reklame, ali z naročniki reklam, pa je tudi jaz nisem našel. LP, MZaplotnik(talk)10:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Special Barnstar
For all your good work with keeping FPC clean from 'withdrawn' and reviewing/closing nominations. It is this kind of work that keeps the project running smoothly. Cart(talk)22:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
Spet sem naložil nekaj video posnetkov in bi bilo fino, če jih potrdiš, ker jih čaka skoraj 12000 in vprašanje kdaj bodo drugače na vrsti ([14]).--Sporti (talk) 09:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Share your experience in this survey
Hi MZaplotnik,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Share your experience in this survey
Hi MZaplotnik,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Share your experience in this survey
Hi MZaplotnik,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal!
With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Done. Super, da so to uredili, ker jih kar precej umakne video po nekaj časa. Sicer pa trenutno ne deluje nalaganje z Youtuba. --Sporti (talk) 18:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Not sure why the Bot skipped processing this set (also 'ping' Eatcha about this) or why you archived it. When you do so, you must also do all the other tasks the Bot normally do. Archiving it to log is not enough. I have fixed the rest now: [16][17][18][19][20]. When you archive a promoted image from FPC, please first make sure the bot has done its job. --Cart(talk)11:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hallo MZaplotnik, ich habe gesehen, dass du hier erst gestern vorbei aktiv warst, deshalb wiederhole ich hier meine Frage, die die Kärnter Slowenin Mimi Malenšek betrifft, die es in der de-WP nicht gibt - Soll so sein ;-). In der slowenischen Wikipedia gibt es einen ausführlichen Artikel über sie, den ich leider mangels Sprachkenntnis nicht verstehe. Zusätzlcih gibt es noch einen Artikel in der slowenischen Wikisource unter https://sl.wikisource.org/wiki/Mimi_Malen%C5%A1ek - da versteh ich zwei Dinge nicht, da wir in der deutschsprachigen Wikisource nur Transkriptionen haben also nur Abschriften von freigegebenen Werken. Aber die zweite Frage ist zum Foto. Ist denn dieses Foto nicht unter einer freien Lizenz, dass es sich nicht auf Commons befindet? Vielleicht kannst du mir da weiterhelfen. Vielen Dank nach Slowenien. lg -- K@rl (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Rather, I have to come to Slovenia in September. Can you tell me if you need a green pass for restaurants, museums etc? Thanks.--Commonists18:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Slovenia will quickly turn to orange state but hopefully we will not have another lock-down till winter. Masks are obligatory in public interiors and EU-covid certificate is requied almost everywhere -- even in some open air events. You can have a scanned copy on your phone and just show QR code, that is mostly enough. Another option is test, which is only valid 48/72 hrs and will not be free anymore. Our government decisions change quickly so you look for update info before you travel. MZaplotnik(talk)20:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Janezdrilc Sliki s Kunšperka imata preveč digitalnega šuma. Slika Bizeljskega gradu pa mi je osebno všeč, čeprav bi ji lahko očital, da objekt preveč zakrivajo drevesa. Bizeljsko Castle 26.jpg pokaže več, jaz bi predlagal njo. LP MZaplotnik(talk)10:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hvala za konstruktivno kritiko. Pri Bizeljsko Castle 26 me moti neposrečeno vreme, saj je nebo čisto belo oziroma se zdi, kot da ga sploh ni. Moram enkrat trofit priliko na sončni dan pa pred brstenjem dreves, ko grad postane še bolj zakrit. To pot raje ne bom predlagal katere za izbrano. Mogoče te ob priliki še kdaj poprosim za mnenje te vrste. Hvala še enkrat. --Janezdrilc (talk) 14:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Podpiram nominacijo; mislim, da miši še nismo imeli med izbranimi slikami. Navijam za tretjo sliko (16), se najbolje obnese pri povečavi. Hvala ti! MZaplotnik(talk)17:13, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Tole še, če preveriš: File:Our Lady of Lourdes Basilica (Brestanica) 04.jpg. Cerkev je slikana iz edine lokacije, ki omogoča celovit, neokrnjen pogled na zgradbo. Ker pa je stranica s transeptom obrnjena proti severozahodu, jo sonce osvetli šele pozno popoldne, zato so drugi deli dnevi skorajda neprimerni za slikanje. Zimski čas sem izbral zaradi dejstva, da je kar se da minimalno zastrta z drevesnim listjem. --Janezdrilc (talk) 11:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Pozdravljen, slika iz Brestanice ima v spodnjem delu za moj okus preostre sence (pričakovano za zgodnjo jutranjo uro nastanka fotografije), a glede na okoliščine, ki si jih opisal, to ne bi smela biti ovira za izglasovanje. Poleg tega se mi zdi nagnjena v levo (mogoče jo lahko zarotiraš?). Hvala za vse fotoprispevke iz lokalnih okolij, potrebovali bi več sodelavcev, kot si ti. MZaplotnik(talk)14:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Glede nagnjenosti v levo: jaz ponavadi nagnjenost preverim tako, da sliko karseda povečam, nato pa z drsnikom pomaknem sliko tako, da rob stene zgradbe približam robu ekrana. Ko tako približam navpični rob levega zvonika k levem robu ekrana, zvonik visi celo malenkost v desno. Sem pa danes naredil še tri posnetke z iste lokacije: 1, 2, 3. Njihova vsebinska šibka točka je morda živo rdeča streha Petrola pod cerkvijo. V tem smislu je prednost zimskega motiva (zgoraj) ta, da je ta streha čisto v senci in jo zlahka prezreš. Spotoma, hvala za kompliment. Vsaj v domačih krajih bi rad čimveč znamenitosti pokril, da lahko vsak dobi predstavo, kako kakšna stvar zgleda na terenu. --Janezdrilc (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Dear License reviewer,This is to inform you that a new page, Commons:Permission requests, has been created to centralize and manage requests for permission to external sources. The page is intended to help streamline the review process by providing a dedicated space where users can submit and track their permission requests.You may wish to visit the page to familiarize yourself with its purpose and format, and to monitor any new submissions that may require your attention. By default, license reviewers may process requests on the page. Any questions may be directed at Commons talk:Permission requests.Thank you for your continued work in ensuring proper license compliance across Commons.
2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
heylenny (talk/edits) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
Latest comment: 14 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!