Finnish retail chain Tokmanni collected roughly 500,000 euros last year by imposing private "fines" on shoplifters.
Tokmanni demands that anyone caught stealing pay not only the value of the stolen goods but also an additional 80-euro "investigation fee."
The charge was imposed in thousands of cases last year.
"We recorded 6,200 shoplifting incidents last year. Every single one resulted in an investigation fee," Jukka Oinonen, Tokmanni's head of security, told Yle.
That means the half a million in recovered fees was generated from 6,200 shoplifting incidents.
While some offenders initially objected to the payment, none had ultimately refused to settle the fee, according to Oinonen.
Practice "highly questionable"
Criminal law expert Matti Tolvanen, however, told Yle that Tokmanni's practice was "highly questionable" and amounted to something that sounded like a fine.
Tokmanni's revenue from shoplifting-related charges may in fact exceed the estimated 500,000 euros by a significant margin.
Yle is aware of cases in which the retailer charged the 80-euro fee to each underage person involved in a single theft incident, potentially multiplying the amount collected from individual cases.
Thefts on the rise
The number of shoplifting incidents began to rise during the Covid years and has continued to grow.
A 2023 survey by the Finnish Commerce Federation found that shoplifting costs retailers losses of around half a billion euros. Retailers say they spend a similar amount on preventing theft.
Minor theft cases handled by the fast-track unit of the Helsinki District Court have risen sharply in recent years.
The K and S groups demand a similar payment from shoplifters when a case reaches court.
Yle was unable to obtain information from either retailer on how many shoplifting cases reach the courts each year or how often the 80-euro investigation fee is invoiced to offenders.
Neither K nor S Group has disclosed whether they recover the costs of retail theft from shoplifters while also passing those costs on to consumers through higher product prices.
S Group declined to respond to Yle's request for comment, while K Group's communications department said, "we are unfortunately unable to comment on this matter."