WritingWithColor (Posts tagged tokenism)

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

What Makes an Ethnic Villain “Ethnic” or “Villainous?” How Do You Offset it?

anonymous asked:

Hello WWC! I have a question about the antagonist of my story. She is (currently) Japanese, and I want to make sure I’m writing her in a way that doesn’t associates [sic] her being Asian with being villainous. 
The story is set in modern day USA, this character is effectively immortal. She was a samurai who lost loved ones due to failure in combat, and this becomes her character[sic] motivation (portrayed sympathetically to the audience). This story explores many different time periods and how women have shown valor throughout history. The age of the samurai (and the real and legendary female warriors from it) have interested me the most, which is why I want her to be from this period. 
The outfit she wears while fighting is based on samurai armor, and she wears modern and traditional Japanese fashion depending on the occasion. She acts pretty similar to modern day people, though more cynical and obsessed with her loss. She’s been able to adapt with the times but still highly values and cherishes her past. 
She is the only Asian main character, but I plan to make a supportive Japanese side character. She’s a history teacher who knows about the villain and gives the protagonists information to help them, but isn’t involved in the main plot otherwise. 
Are the way I’m writing this villain and the inclusion of a non-antagonist Japanese character enough to prevent a harmful reading of the story, or is there more I should do?

Why Does Your Villain Exist?

This makes me feel old because David Anders plays a villain with this kind of backstory in the series Heroes starring Masi Oka. 

I think you want to think about what you mean when you say: 

  • Villainous (In what way? To whom? To what end?)
  • Harmful (What tropes, narratives and implications are present?)

I’m relatively infamous in the mod circle for not caring too much about dimensions of “harm”. The concept is relative and varies widely between people and cultures. I don’t see much value in framing motivations around “What is less harmful?” I think for me, what matters more is: 

  • “What is more true?” 
  • “Are characteristics viewed as intrinsic to background, or the product of experiences and personal autonomy?”
  • “Will your portrayal resonate with a large audience?”
  • “What will resonate with the members of the audience who share the backgrounds your characters have?” 

This post offers additional questions you could ask yourself instead of “is this okay/not okay/harmful.” 

You could write a story where your antagonist is sly, sadistic, violent and cold-blooded. It may not be an interpretation that will make many Japanese from combat backgrounds feel seen or heard, but it’s not without precedent. These tropes have been weaponized against people of Japanese descent (Like Nikkei Japanese interned during World War II), but Japan also brutalized a good chunk of Asia during World War II. See Herge’s Tintin and The Blue Lotus for an example of a comic that accurately showcases the brutality of Japan’s colonization of Manchuria, but also is racist in terms of how Japanese characters are portrayed (CW: genocide, war, imperialism, racism).

You could also write a story where your character’s grief gives way to despair, and fuels their combat such that they are seen as calculating, frigid and deeply driven by revenge/ violence. This might make sense. It’s also been done to death for Japanese female warriors, though (See “Lady Snowblood” by Kazuo Koike and Kazuo Kamimura here, CW: sexual assault, violence, murder and a host of other dark things you’d expect in a revenge story). 

You could further write a story where your antagonist is not necessarily villainous, but the perceived harm comes from fetishizing/ exoticizing elements in how her appearance is presented or how she is sexualized, which is a common problem for Japanese female characters. 

My vote always goes to the most interesting story or character. I don’t see any benefit to writing from a defensive position. This is where I’ll point out that, culturally, I can’t picture a Japanese character viewing immortality as anything other than a curse. Many cultures in Japan are largely defined by transience and the understanding that many things naturally decay, die, and change form.

There are a lot of ways you could conceivably cause harm, but I’d rather hear about what the point of this character is given the dilemma of their position. 

  • What is her purpose for the plot? 
  • How is she designed to make the reader feel? 
  • What literary devices are relevant to her portrayal?

(Arbitrarily, you can always add more than 1 extra Japanese character. I think you might put less pressure on yourself with this character’s portrayal if you have more Japanese characters to practice with in general.) 

- Marika. 

When Off-Setting: Aim for Average

Seconding the above with regards to this villainess’s story and your motivations for this character, but regardless of her story I think it’s also important to look specifically at how the Japanese teacher character provides contrast. 

I agree with the choice to make her a regular person and not a superhero. Otherwise, your one Asian character is aggressively Asian-themed in a stereotypical Cool Japan way (particularly if her villain suit is samurai-themed & she wears wafu clothing every so often). Adding a chill person who happens to be Japanese and doesn’t have some kind of ninja or kitsune motif will be a breath of fresh air (well, more like a sigh of relief) for Japanese readers. 

A note on characterization—while our standard advice for “offset” characters is to give your offset character the opposite of the personality trait you’re trying to balance, in this case you might want to avoid opposites. You have a villainess who is a cold, tough “don’t need no man” type. Making the teacher mild-mannered, helpful, and accomodating would balance out the villainess’s traits, but you’ll end up swinging to the other side of the pendulum towards the Submissive Asian stereotype depending on execution. If avoiding stereotypes is a concern, I suggest picking something outside of that spectrum of gentleness to violence and making her really boring or really weird or really nerdy or a jock gym teacher or…something. You’re the author.

Similarly, while the villainess is very traditionally Japanese in her motifs and backstory, don’t make the teacher go aggressively in either direction—give her a nice balance of modern vs. traditional, Japanese vs. Western sensibilities as far as her looks, dress, interests, values, etc. Because at the end of the day, that’s most modern Japanese people. 

Sometimes, the most difficult representation of a character of color is making a character who is really average, typical, modern, and boring. 

- Rina

writeblr Japanese Japanese women Villain antagonist tokenism characterization representation stereotypes immortality superheroes supervillains asks

What is Tokenism?

Tokenism refers to giving the empty appearance of inclusivity or diversity, often to avoid criticism. In writing, tokenism refers to adding minorities to an otherwise homogenous cast (think a cast of white male characters in the West) in name or appearance only, without putting in the effort to develop these characters.

The problem with tokenism is that token characters are forced to be the sole representation of their particular group. The consequence is twofold. First, undeveloped token characters often become platforms for stereotypes. Think the sassy Black friend, the smart Asian friend, etc.

Second, token characters often become creator mouthpieces. Many of us have heard someone excuse their racism by saying they have a POC friend. The token character, the proverbial Friend of Color, can be made to excuse or even promote biases about their race, ethnicity, or culture.

There is no inherent issue with having only one of a particular identity, or having a white protagonist and a POC best friend. The problem comes when you make the character a spokesperson for their identity and/or saddle them with stereotypes and cliches. To avoid tokenism, write the character from a place of empathy, make them three dimensional, do your research on their identity, and avoid stereotypes.

Further Reading:

This Q&A is an excerpt from our General FAQ for Newcomers, which can be found in our new Masterpost of rules and FAQs. Take a look to learn more about writing POC representation!

-Writing With Color

writing with color writeblr representation poc representation writers on tumblr tokenism writing advice writing tips faq

aurorae-writes asked:

Should my writing have Muslims in my fantasy world? It is set in a fantasy world where they don't have our worlds religions, but I still want to represent everyone. Would it be weird if it on my fantasy planet I had added Muslim characters?

Including Muslims in a fantasy world with no other real-world religions

It depends on you whether your story should or should not have Muslims. Is it really needed? I assume the character featured in your story would not be the only Muslim existing in that world, so does it add anything to the plot to have Muslims? It has already been said in the blog before; if you want to include characters with certain backgrounds they can’t be there just for the sake of representation. You will end up falling in the “token character trap” where your character being Muslim does not contribute in any way, but can also clash with, for example, other aspects of the worldbuilding you already had planned and established (i.e., magic; you can have a look at old posts to understand this better). 

-Asmaa

More reading:

Muslim Fantasy Worldbuilding Religion tokenism asks

Black Changeling Character

Kitkat asked:

Hi!  I‘m right now working on ironing out a book idea I’ve had for a while, but I wanted to ask something before the plot gets too set in stone and all.  So my MC (one of three; two of which are non-white) is black.  Her parents passed away when she was young from a car accident.  She doesn’t and hasn’t ever really had any stereotypes related to her skin color.  She‘s strong and brave but also gets to struggle and show weakness.  However, my current idea for a kind of plot twist is that the real her died in the car crash and the current her is actually a changeling.  Would it be best if I didn’t do this?  Since it’s a bit iffy for her to be non-white but not human, I wanted to check with a PoC before I proceeded.  Thanks!

Characterization and avoiding tokenism

To keep this from getting iffy, while keeping your MC a changeling, is to make sure there are other Black characters aside from them, specifically, human ones. This would solve any tokenism issues that could possibly pop up and help to negate dehumanizing Black people.

Execution here is important though, so having sensitivity readers could help catch any red flags that could slip into your work. Especially since you’ll be developing a fantastical being (Changelings/Faeries?) either drawing heavily from existing lore or simply having your creations inspired by existing lore. 

Be sure to be mindful of how you’re creating their biology, culture, etc. and how it would impact a Black character. How will they be perceived by readers and in-story characters? You’ll want to remedy any potential pitfalls (such as having heavily bestial changelings that could dehumanize your Black MC by falling into stereotypes). I don’t know if it’s part of your story, but having other Changelings or supernatural beings could possibly help here as well to show the diversity within said group.

Changeling and Autism 

Another thing that comes to mind is how Changeling myths have been historically connected to Autistic people in some places. You could look into this angle as well to see if you can draw inspiration if that is an angle you want and are able to carefully pursue. Doing some research into this and keeping in mind Disability/Neurodiversity stereotypes is important here too though, since there is a lot of dehumanization possible via this angle as well. If there are “this is what it’s like to be human” type comments and themes in your book you want to make sure you don’t add any ableism by dehumanizing characteristics and mannerisms that are typically seen in Disabled and/or Neurodiverse people, especially, in this case, Autistic people. 

~ Mod Alice

Black characters Changeling supernatural beings Autism tokenism changelings black women asks

dreadmenace asked:

Hi! I've heard the way to avoid tokenism is to include multiple characters of the same race in your story, but what is the best thing to do when your cast is very small? Some of my stories only have 2-3 major characters. Would it be better to make all of them the same race, or is it alright that there's only one character of a specific race if I do my best to make them well-rounded, three-dimensional, and sympathetic?

Preventing Tokenism in a Small Cast

I like your last idea best no matter what you decide regarding their races: to make the few characters you have well-rounded, three-dimensional, and sympathetic. Whether that does mean they’re all one race, two Black and one Japanese, each a different race, or however you happen to spin it. Do what is best for your story, and don’t feel confined by any invisible rules on how diversity should be selected.

Having more than one character of a race is quite helpful and relieves the pressure of putting all your representation into one person, though. This is why we can’t recommend it enough! You might be concerned about your outspoken, extroverted Black girl is being portrayed in a stereotypical way, but she has a foil in another Black female character who is as quiet as the other girl is loud.

If stereotypes and tokens are a concern for you:

Secondary characters are important too, and count for representation, if you establish them well. Depending on cast size, you might not be able to help having one main, recurring character of a given race but there are other ways we can get to know more characters, even if they’re not in the main cast.

Some ways that even a small cast can be enriched by other characters:

  • Main character’s family member, significant other, or friend shows up for a scene or two (or more). It’s likely your MCs would interact with the people important to them, and more regularly with those they are close with, even if they’re not in every scene/chapter.
  • Main character heavily mentions and describes another character (even if he never appears in the action, we feel as if we know him well.).
  • A character is introduced through flashback.
  • If secondary characters unable to physically appear, they might appear via letters, email, phone calls, skype etc.
  • Secondary characters get “mini-arcs” and growth. Again, they’re not the main focus, but have an appropriate level of action in their lives that we are given closure for in the end.

~Mod Colette

dreadmenace tokenism stereotypes representation writing advice general race diversity characters asks poc stereotypes

starvingphoenix asked:

I have an idea for a beauty and the best type story about two queer boys. As I'm currently seeing it "the beast" would be black and "beauty" would be mixed. However, I can easily see this falling into a light-skinned= beautiful trope so I'm wondering if I should change this. I'm also wondering if there's a danger in associating blackness with being beastly. Is there any advice you can offer for things to do or avoid to ensure I don't write something problematic?

Queer Black Beauty and the Beast: Dark Skin Beast & Light Skin Beauty

I’m uncomfortable with this dynamic, as is.

The mixed-race person, who happens to also be lighter, is the beauty. The darker Black person is the beast.

This reinforces harmful colorist and dehumanizing roles. It adds nothing new that we haven’t seen before (i.e. Mixed Black People are better looking, more acceptable, and less animalistic than monoracial Black people).

Suggestion 1: Light Skin Beast and Dark Skinned Beauty

You could make the light-skinned man the beast and the darker-skinned man the beauty. From a representation standpoint, it’s nice for the dark Black man to be represented as the beautiful one.

Potential pitfalls with this would be harmful stereotypes still being enforced against another race of color. I’d suggest you include people of the same mix as the Light-skinned beast, who are perceived as normal and beautiful so we know it’s just the beast who is deemed unattractive. Also, avoid “Reverse racism” like plots with this dynamic. The beast should not be persecuted and hated by villagers because he is light.

Suggestion 2: Beauty and the Beast are both dark-skinned

You could make them both of darker skin tones. There’s so many shades of brown, so it’s not like they’d have to be exactly the same skin tone, but keeping them both on the darker side of brown would equalize the playing fields a bit. You aren’t associating dark skin to ugly when the Beauty character is dark-skinned as well.

Suggestion 3: Keep Roles the Same, But Address the Problems

If you were to keep this dynamic, I believe you would need to address it directly. The dark-skinned person being a beast could be symbolic for society’s perception of dark people as beastly or ugly. The beast may not be a literal beast, or ugly at all. Simply by society’s standards. Such a complex theme is best tackled by someone with experience as a dark-skinned Black person, or equiped with tons of research and appropriate readers. That goes for the queer aspects of this too.

Be aware: you are not providing escapism with such a plot. It’s clearly a tale of race, colorism and stereotypes which isn’t always a bad thing, but again, you should know what you’re dealing with and be ready to write it respectfully.

Suggestion 4: Play up non-racial connotations of the Beast

You could provide another explanation as to why the beast is Beast and commit to it fully. Sell this explanation so fully that their skin tone undoubtedly has nothing to do with their being the Beast. This theory is helped when you have other dark Black characters portrayed as attractive, even better if queer dark-skinned men.

Maybe the Beast is just really mysterious and isolates himself, howling is heard from his property at night (pet dogs? wolves? Who knows) and rumors start to bloom.

~Mod Colette

From the queer side of things, you have two potential minefields with the dark/light dichotomy, and the beauty/beast dichotomy.

Attraction: Since “queer” is broad, I’m going to assume both Beauty and Beast can be either gay or bi/pan/poly. The caution is making the Beast bi/pan/poly and Beauty gay or favouring one gender very highly. This reinforces the concept bi/pan/poly is beastly, and they only “become loving” when they settle down with same sex attraction.

This narrative is already really prevalent within gay individuals especially, where any support of bi individuals is conditional on them expressing same gender attraction only. Should you have this split in the story, then you’re basically reinforcing this belief among society as a whole that bi individuals are beastly when bi/unattached, and only Good People when they settle down appropriately.

I’d strongly suggest both sides having the same type of attraction, just to mitigate this. You can either make them both gay or both bi with similar attraction preferences, but having one side gay and one side bi could lead to problems, although a gay Beast and a bi Beauty would also be acceptable from my perspective (if there are issues with this I’m not familiar with, especially in regards to skin tone, please comment!).

If Gaston is present this goes double for his attraction type, as he is genuinely the villain. If his attraction is the same as Beauty/Beast, that helps. 

Gender presentation: This, meanwhile, is a double bind. There are a lot of toxic beliefs around PoC queer men and gender expression, which leads to the following equations:

  • Masculine dark skinned man, feminine light skinned man= Beauty is feminine, queer men are more attractive when effeminate, darker skin people are masculine monsters (see: all of the toxic beliefs around masculine Black men)
  • Masculine light skinned man, feminine dark skinned man= Beastly queer men are feminine, black queer men are more attractive when not messing with gender, darker skinned people are feminine monsters (see: most queercoding in villains is making men effeminate, and they’re often darker skinned than the heroes as well)
  • Both more feminine= fine (so long as queer masculine side characters aren’t demonized, should they exist)
  • Both more masculine= fine (so long as queer feminine side characters aren’t demonized, should they exist)
  • Both dark skinned= fine

You do have some flexibility with a Beauty and the Beast retelling so long as you keep the pre-existing gender presentations when the Beast starts falling in love. Because people know the Beast won’t stay a monster, some of the unfortunate implications are mitigated. But that’s only true if end-of-story Beast keeps the same presentation as beginning-of-story Beast. Also, some people will be turned off by those unfortunate implications at the start, making the story less escapist.  

Even if you avoid the light skin/dark skin problem, you’ll still going to get accused of recreating heterosexuality if you have one side be more feminine or masculine than the other. It’s, unfortunately, inescapable in the current political climate. Do keep an eye on yourself to see what your motive is, but if you’re a queer writer you’ll be more familiar with the gender dynamics in same sex relationships (just do try to read m/m lit written by men who love men, to see how they write about themselves). 

This isn’t even counting how Black queer gender identity/expression is very, very different from white queerness, to the point I know lesbians have Black-exclusive identities (stud, which is related to butch), and there’s some argument that “boi” is PoC/Black exclusive. Not to even get into PoC drag communities, and most Houses are Black or Latinx founded. 

If Gaston is present, this also goes double. He is toxic masculinity incarnate, so there needs to be special attention placed on determining how he interacts with the narration. Black+ toxic masculinity without a positive masculine character will be a fairly bad thing to perpetuate, and even if he’s white, having some positive Black masculinity would be a good idea.

All in all, this isn’t to dissuade you from writing a Black queer version of Beauty and the Beast— it’s just pointing out issues that have the potential to exist in all PoC queer stories. So long as you’re aware of them, you have less likelihood of going into the story unknowingly perpetuating unfortunate ideals.

I’d really strongly suggest having more than Beauty and Beast be queer PoC characters, just because the intersecting issues are so fraught with possible bad paths. This is a case where tokenism would be exceptionally harmful, since they are technically twofer tokens. You need a wide variety of characters to make sure all identities aren’t singular tokens, because you plain old have more room to have tokens since you’re focusing on multiple identities at once.

~ Mod Lesya

starvingphoenix colorism racism dehumanization fantasy supernatural beings black black men mixed race queer color symbolism gender tokenism lgbtqia ASKS

thatlethalsoul asked:

I have a huge group of mercenaries that I'm building up to write about for a Team Fortress inspired writing, but I'm super conserned on how to make my "sneaky and shifty" spy character of the team. What races/ethnicities would you guys reccomend I avoid putting into this role to avoid the worst negative stereotyping?

Avoiding Stereotypes by Avoiding Tokenism

If you only have one of any particular ethnicity on a team, none of them will avoid negative repercussions. 

We’ve spoken about tokenism before, and this is a prime example of why you should avoid it. Having only one member of any ethnicity on a team means all of their traits are representative of their ethnicity, so you’ll be enforcing the worst of the behaviour.

On the flipside, avoiding having the Token PoC be any sort of “meaty” role in fear of avoiding stereotypes denies them their humanity. Part of good representation is letting us be the messy people we are— which includes sometimes doing stuff that fits stereotypes, even if they’re negative. The problem isn’t the “they have negative traits.” The problem is “there’s only one of them of that ethnicity.“ 

By having 2+ of any one ethnicity, you give people the room to be themselves because there’s another member of the team not like that. It breaks down the unconscious associations between the character’s ethnicity and the negative traits, by removing “of course [character]’s behaving like that, they’re [ethnicity]!” with “but [other character] doesn’t do that, and they’re [ethnicity], too.” 

(You will always get people insisting the one who doesn’t behave in the morally reprehensible way is just “one of the good ones”, but this helps cut them down— also why it’s important to have a diverse background cast with similar variety in personality types, jobs, and moral alignments)

Fear and Representation

I’m going to talk about a deeper issue I see here, which is fear of messing up. You don’t want to hurt people by doing it wrong, don’t want to be yelled at for reinforcing negative things.

This fear hurts you more than it helps you.

We get a lot of “how do I avoid stereotypes” questions. We get a lot of “how do I not hurt people” questions. We don’t answer the majority of them because if you write from a place of fear, you will not represent PoC well.

Writing good representation is not handling a bomb that’s about to explode if you press it wrong. Writing good representation is about a curiosity, love, and respect for people not like yourself. You’re curious about their stories and are invested in telling them. You love them as people, as their genuine reality. And you respect them enough to want to do them justice in your writing.

If you approach writing diversity with fear, you will not let us be human. Because by fearing writing us, you end up creating model minorities because you just can’t let them be evil, that’s bad. You other us even further by not letting us have the same internal lives and same shades of experience as white people.

People mess up. People have complex morality. Not letting us mess up or have other moral alignments than goodie two shoes strips us of our personhood.Put all types of us into your stories. Some things you Don’t Do— like Jewish blood mages and Natives who are so much simpler but so much happier because of it— but if you approach us like people with different backgrounds, you’re at least on the right track. And if you make it that multiple people of the same ethnicity exist, then you don’t have to worry about one character being the be all end all of representation.

The thing about these types of questions— “what stereotypes do I avoid"— is you’re not really asking What Do I Not Do. You’re asking “can you tell me what to do so I don’t get yelled at for it”, as if there are magic lists of 100% Safe Traits for different ethnicities.

Safe Traits are not people. Until you ease down your fear of being Safe, of Not Reinforcing Bad Things With One Character, you will not be able to truly tackle representation in your work. The work you have to do is much deeper than putting in “acceptable representation.” 

You have to redefine “acceptable representation” in your mind. It cannot mean “a character who is safe to write without hurting anybody.” What it can mean, however, is “showing the diversity of humanity by displaying multiple people having worthwhile, nuanced, dynamic, and messy stories to tell that reflect their lived reality.”

~Mod Lesya 

>>  I’m super conserned on how to make my “sneaky and shifty” spy character of the team. What races/ethnicities would you guys reccomend I avoid putting into this role to avoid the worst negative stereotyping?

I’d especially stay away from making this character Jewish since that’s already a stereotype for us, and East Asian since there’s a negative trope about East Asians being “inscrutable” (i.e. “you can’t tell what they’re thinking so they could totes be plotting bad stuff!”)

Standard disclaimer that if you have a cast of many many Jewish characters or many many East Asian characters you can make one of them sneaky because the rest of them will show that it’s not an inherently Jewish (or East Asian) trait, but it sounded like you wanted a variety of ethnicities for this project so probably best just to stay away from making the Spy either of those two groups.

–Shira

thatlethalsoul representation tokenism villains diversity characters characters of color character creation model minority Jewish East Asian bomb mention tw othering asks
intheindigo

How to write fic for Black characters: a guide for non-Black fans

eshusplayground

  1. Don’t characterize a Black character as sassy or thuggish, especially when the character in question is can be described in literally ten thousand other ways..
  2. Don’t describe Black characters as chocolate, coffee, or any sort of food item.
  3. Don’t highlight the race of Black characters (ie, “the dark man” or “the brown woman”) if you don’t highlight the race of white characters.
  4. Think very carefully about that antebellum slavery or Jim Crow AU fic as a backdrop for your romance.
  5. If you’re not fluent with AAVE, don’t use it to try to look cool or edgy. You look corny as hell.
  6. Don’t use Black characters as a prop for the non-Black characters you’re actually interested in.
  7. Keep “unpopular opinions” about racism, Black Lives Matter, and other issues pertinent to Black folks out the mouths of Black characters. We know what the fuck you’re doing with that and need to stop.
  8. Don’t assume a Black character likes or hates a certain food, music, or piece of pop culture.
  9. You can make a Black character’s race pertinent without doing it like this.
  10. Be extremely careful about insinuating that one or more of a Black character’s physical features are dirty, unclean, or ugly.

Feel free to add more.

eshusplayground

Adding more…

  1. Be wary of making Black characters seem animalistic, uncivilized, or subhuman in comparison to white characters. Watch out for: comparing us to monkeys, gorillas, chimpanzees, apes, and other animals.
  2. Words like Negroid, colored/colured, Negro, and the n-word do not belong in the mouths of contemporary characters you want to portray as sympathetic.
  3. Not all Black people are African American.
  4. Africa is not a country but the second-largest continent on earth with some 54 different countries with thousands of ethnic groups and 1,500 to 3,000 languages and dialects.
  5. Resist the urge to make a Black character seem uneducated and ignorant compared to white characters.
  6. Capitalizing Black shows that you recognize that the word unifying people of African descent, particularly the diaspora, should be described using a proper noun.
  7. Please, say “Black people,” not “blacks.”
  8. Give Black characters the same psychological and moral complexity as white men are given by default.
  9. Make sure that you don’t write a Black character as happily subservient to a white character.
  10. Understand and show that you understand that Black characters don’t exist to be the caretakers of white characters.
eshusplayground

And more…

  1. Do your own homework instead of expecting, asking, or demanding Black fans to do it.
  2. Before approaching that Black person you admire so much for being so articulate about race issues (this is sarcasm) to beta read your work: 1) make sure it’s something they’ve expressed interest in doing, and 2) you offer something in return for their time and expertise.
  3. Be prepared for fans to have issues with what you came up with and open to suggestions.
  4. Having only one Black character in a story that takes place in a huge city, country, or galaxy looks weird. Really, really weird. Scary weird.
  5. Don’t use a Black character’s death to motivate a white character.
  6. Portray Black characters with complex and multifaceted identities. We are more than just Black. We are also women, LGBT, Jewish, disabled, neurodivergent, immigrants, etc.
  7. There is a huge chasm between hypersexual and desexualized.
  8. Remember: what’s progressive for a white character is not necessarily progressive for a Black one.
writing advice Black Black women Black Men Stereotypes lists tokenism writer reference Black stereotypes reblog

Token Muslim Protagonist and Finding Comfort in Faith

@docloudscomeinpurple asked:

2 questions: Is it still tokenism if the sole Muslim character is the protagonist? I know I definitely want my main character to be Muslim, but should I make another character Muslim to avoid making him a token? ALSO the story centers around the main character being kidnapped, and while he would be presumably scared shitless like anyone else, I was wondering how you think his faith might color his reaction to that situation?

Hello,

Short answer: no. Tokenism is defined as only a perfunctory effort to be inclusive, whereas having the Muslim character be the protag involves a lot more effort and fleshing out of the character. Mod Colette’s advice on avoiding token characters in a story with very few characters is to humanize a character even within a brief mention, like, “If only my sister were here. She always knew how to calm me down.”

Regarding the second part of your question, regardless of type of faith, most believers find comfort and solace in their beliefs and turn towards prayer during difficult times. 

-Mod Yasmin

muslim islam tokenism token asks
fireandwonder
mybrainmadethis

This is the cast of the hit TV comedy Brooklyn Nine Nine:

image

It is a well-rounded cast.  The characters are different people with different dreams and goals and personalities and priorities, and they work together.


These two are Amy Santiago and Rosa Diaz, two Latina women:

image

Although they are both Latina women, they are very different characters.  Amy is a nerdy, easily-excited perfectionist and Rosa is a blunt, tough-as-nails badass.

If I were to ask “what’s your opinion of the Latina character on Brooklyn Nine Nine”, you would have to respond with “which one?”.


These two are Captain Raymond Holt and Terry Jeffords, two black men:

image

Although they are both black men, they are very different characters.  Captain Holt is strict and humourless, Terry is a musclebound teddy bear.

If I were to ask “what’s your opinion of the black man on Brooklyn Nine Nine”, you would have to respond with “which one?”.

A lot of people don’t like “tokenism” in fiction.  And, it’s true, if you’re adding in a black character just for the sake of representing all black people in your fiction, it can be an example of poor writing.

But, when you watch Brooklyn Nine Nine, none of the characters above feel like token characters.

Now, if I were to remove Amy Santiago from the show, many people might think of Rosa as the token Latina.  And, as the only Latina, many people might think that she was there to represent all Latina women. They might say “Is that really what you think all Latina women are like?  That they all wear leather jackets and grunt in monosyllables and beat people senseless?  What a terrible stereotype!

If I were to remove Captain Holt from the show, many people might think of Terry as the token black man.  And, as the only black man, many people might think that he was there to represent all black men.  They might say “Is that really what you think all black men are like?  That they’re all vain, overmuscled behemoths, tamed into domesticity?  What a terrible stereotype!”.

It is precisely because the show features multiple examples of each of these demographics that they escape stereotyping.  If you see one Latina woman who exhibits aggressive traits, you might think that all Latina women have anger management problems.  If you see two Latina women, though, and one is aggressive and the other isn’t, you would not reach that conclusion.  It would be impossible for someone to watch an episode of Brooklyn Nine Nine and come away thinking “ah yes, now I know what all Latina women are like” or “ah yes, now I know what all black men are like”.

It is fine not to approve of tokenism in fiction.  It’s fine!  Including a character purely to check that character’s ethnicity or gender or disability or sexuality off of a checklist can be terrible writing.  Token characters can perpetuate negative stereotypes, or even help to create new ones.

But, if you don’t like token characters, the answer isn’t less diversity.


It’s more.

it-used-to-be-fun

Word

tokenism characters people of color words shows reblog

lovewishconserve asked:

My story: 6 teen American girls of different backgrounds find each other and go on a quest to make the world a better place. The girls' backgrounds are: Native American (tribe TBD), Jewish, Muslim, African American, Latina (specific heritage TBD), and white Christian/lesbian. The Native American is the leader but each girl will play a unique roll and shine. Is it ethical for me, a white-passing Jewish girl, to write this story from a 3rd person omnicient perspective if I do extensive research?

Writing from many different heritage POV’s in the same story

I’m concerned about the one-of-each approach to choosing your characters’ ethnicities. Unless there’s some specific plot reason for so much disparity, like “representatives from different groups pick their best and brightest to Do A Thing”, it starts to ping my “why so many different groups/lack of multiple people from same marginalized group” meter.

For example, having two Muslims and two Jews seems more realistic to me than one Muslim, one Jew, one Latina, one Native American, etc. Putting it another way: if a Black girl wanted to change the world, I don’t instantly picture her choosing a group with no other Black people in which to do that in. The Black people I know who are trying to change the world are definitely doing it alongside at least some other Black people even if not everyone in the group is Black. The same thing goes for lesbians – not every lesbian would feel safe joining a group of entirely straight girls to accomplish social change.

Another way you can do this having some of the groups overlap, like having the character you listed as African-American be Muslim too (leaving you with two Muslims: one Black and one not), having someone besides the white Christian girl be into girls, etc.

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with writing this in omniscient as long as you’ve read books by people in the groups you’re writing about to get a feel for how they write themselves, as opposed to seeing them through the White Gaze as we’re all programmed to do. (That’s another reason to cut back on the number of groups represented—less voices to master.)

–Shira

I have a few gut instincts with this. My biggest one is I’m looking at “make the world better” and “Native American leader” and wondering if you might not be pulling from the idea that because Natives had a culture that spans working with nature for so long, you’re potentially pulling from Noble Savage roots for making her the leader. There are a lot of subtle biases for Natives that include headstrong warriors, magical natives, noble savages, and basically a whole bunch of “positive” stereotypes that make Natives look like the best possibility for saving the world.

We’re not.

We’re just as divided on how to make the world a better place as the average culture. Our techniques don’t work for the industrial world, because they were built at a different time and place. Yes, they were sustainable, and yes, they were wonderful… but the time for them is gone. We need to rebuild society and while Indigenous attitudes of “respect/work with the earth” should be a core part of that… we don’t own that attitude. And we don’t know how to go about it instinctually. The world is different and we’re struggling as much as others.

My next biggest instinct is how you appear to be tokenizing everyone. It feels checklist-y, to me, because sure you have a white Christian but she’s lesbian, so she’s not majority group. Everyone you’ve said only has two things that make them marginalized (gender and either race or orientation), which means you seem to be writing archetypes instead of people. When you only have one of each member of the group, they become the representation for the group, meaning you actually have less freedom to create good characters. You end up so focused on getting the representation Correct and Respectful that the characters become stick figures, unable to breathe and be people because you’re scared of misrepresentation.

If you look at the difference between shows that only have one primary female character, and ones that have multiple female characters, you’ll see the difference. Sailor Moon, for example, has 10 female characters to pull from. Usagi would be utterly irritating if she were on her own, and probably unwatchable because most girls aren’t like that. Some are, but not all. However, most girls aren’t like Sailor Mercury, either— but some are. The pattern continues throughout the Senshi, where they are all very specific types of girls and each one on their own would be average to even poor representation, but together they create an actual cast of diversity that represents girls as a whole incredibly well, simply because there are ten of them.

Apply the same principle to your work. If you want to be representative, give yourself breathing room. Tokenization happens when there’s only one person of a group “thrown in” because people have some invisible quota for how much diversity a work needs. You won’t be offensive if you swap out one race/religion for another, and in fact you could even have better representation because now you have more “hold points”, so to speak, for each race.

Related— don’t be afraid to have people be two things. Nothing wrong with a Native lesbian and a Black Muslim, especially since Muslim is a religious marker and not any indication of skin tone.

Finally, watch out for internal conflict in the group. I can’t speak for others, but Natives can highly mistrust Christians as a whole, no matter how much this girl is non practicing. Do keep in mind Christianity is an organization that hurt Natives very deeply, from missionaries trying to destroy our religions to many residential schools being religious, and in Canada they only closed down completely in the 1990s. Christianity has left very recent scars on our communities and not all of us can get over that.

Check your motive for including her. Is it to prove that not all Christians are bad? Will you slip in a motive that she learns to overcome white guilt? Is it to teach these marginalized groups a lesson about not being judgemental? Is it because you feel you need a member of the dominant religion in the group, for whatever reason? Pardon me for the potentially inaccurate questions, but I’m wary of why the mix is the way it is. You have a ton of potential for it to go really sour, and I want to pose questions to make sure you’ve checked your own potentially subconscious biases.

~Mod Lesya

lovewishconserve diversity POV native american Noble Savage people of color representation tokenism religion asks

asexuallaracroft-deactivated201 asked:

I'm in a science fiction/fantasy seminar at my uni and our final project is to write a collaborative scifi novel with each chapter written by a different person, centering around the main characters, etc. From what I can gather, most of my classmates' characters are either white men or aliens and I want to write a WOC character but not have that character be the token minority. Do you have advice on how I could avoid tokenism even though I have no control over my classmates' characters?

Solo PoC Character and Avoiding Tokenism

I’m sorry this is such a late late late reply! I hope your project went well despite this!

As for the question, there was only so much you could do. The thing you could (actually always should do) is fully develop your character, give them agency and be respectful in their portrayal. You could also add in other non-white characters as family or friends even by just mentioning them. Another thing you could do is discuss the idea of diversity and see if more people are open to it.

~ Mod Alice

laracrvft science fiction tokenism characters representation asks