Calling this book Lando Calrissian and the Starcave of ThonBoka is like calling it Lando Calrissian and the Chai Tea
A Star Wars (retrospective) Story, Part 25
So, this is the end of the Lando Calrissian Adventures trilogy and... We've come so far. Physically. Lando as a character has not moved from day one of this trilogy, but he sure has travelled! And now we are at the conclusion of this trilogy with Lando Calrissian and the Starcave of ThonBoka (1983).
I wanted to take a moment to talk about the title of this book before we get into evaluating its merits beyond that. We learn that ThonBoka translates directly to Starcave. This book is named Lando Calrissian and the Starcave of Starcave. A writer with good comedic chops and an eye for satire might use this title and play with the idea of language, on communications and understanding. A writer more interested in serious themes could even play with the notion of conquest erasing language along with people, as the Centrans in book besiege ThonBoka and starve the inhabitants, the Oswaft.
L. Neil Smith decides that his vacuum-breathing inhabitants of ThonBoka will use their specific abilities during the climactic battle. At no point in the book, however, is the title something that could fit in as a nod to the themes, to the overarching story, or to any character. Make of that what you will.
Calrissian remains the relatively passive protagonist he's been established to be in the preceding novels, Vuffi Raa his droid companion continues to call him "Master" so he can reiterate his catchphrase throughout the book, and the book decides that now is the moment that they shall examine the degree to which a droid can be culpable for their actions. I am once again reminded of the fact that I desperately wish this novel was interested in actually exploring this topic, in exploring the sentience and subsequently the personhood of droids. But alas, this is not to be for me. Instead Vuffi Raa's people are foreshadowed throughout the entire book such that their appearance in the end feels less like a deus ex machina (but reader, make no mistake, a deus ex machina it is).
At the close of the book Calrissian reiterates his desire to settle down, a desire that has been present from the very beginning of these novels because he must be dragged into every single plot by force. So no changes to him there. The main villain of this trilogy has a plot so inscrutable and so nonsensical I begin to wonder how this character even is supposed to exist within the confines of the cartoonish evils of the Empire. How are you too cartoonishly evil for Star Wars? I never thought it could reach that point, but here we are. I wish this book was clever enough to work around the necessity of having a villain largely unrelated to the main line of Star Wars, but. Rokur Gepta is an almost comically unsuitable villain.
There is no connection to Lando, not really. There is a ridiculous degree of power he employs but the origins of that power and its effects on others don't matter. Hell, even the book's setting in a libertarian pseudoutopia doesn't get any sort of significant examination. Smith just seems to lack an eye for where a topic he's brought up can be pushed more. Where it should matter to the largely shenanigans-heavy plot.
Action scenes remain a general strong point for a book with mostly readable prose. This is technically proficient writing. But, I cannot help but wonder why these books exist when so little of note happens within them. Lando Calrissian as a character is intriguing to us in the Empire Strikes Back because he is a former scoundrel trying to go straight. One that might make unsavory dealings with the Empire just to keep himself out of trouble, but to keep his associates out of it as well. A man driven into action because he feels threatened and because he grew to care for the friends he'd made.
I see none of that interest in the Lando Norris of this trilogy. He has almost no characterization beyond getting tugged into adventures this way and that by bumbling into them, and getting saved by his droid companion who generally cannot fail and reliably is the only one moving the plot forward. And it negatively impacts the color of his actions in the films: Was helping Luke and Leia get out of the Empire's clutches and eventually sticking it out with the Rebellion? Or was this yet another adventure he got dragged into with no agency of his own?
Now allow me to break character for a moment. I do like this book and this trilogy. I think this and the first book are both what I generally enjoy in pulp science fiction: good action, decent enough prose, absolutely balls to the walls ideas for different kinds of aliens and phenomena in space. This is fun to me. I'm having fun. But it doesn't square away with the films in character. Which is the real sticking point for me. I am very happy to take stories that are very different in tone, in desired audience, in themes from the original films. But this just feels so divorced from the films to a point where any attempt to tie them in feels hamstrung, haphazard, and ultimately ineffective. So I invite you to ask yourself, why is this a Star Wars book?
I love pulpy sci fi though. It's fun. But I also think these books illustrate the difference between "fun" and "good" remarkably well. Though these books are deeply amusing, there's just nothing to dig into, and any attempts to dig are met with a concrete frustration. The title tells you that right from the outset. Lando Calrissian and the Starcave of ThonBoka is Lando Calrissian and the Chai Tea is Lando Calrissian and the Redundant Redundancy is Lando Calrissian and the Sellout Cashgrab.
TL;DR: I'm going through all of the Star Wars media I can get my hands on in order of its initial publication. I shall discuss it all. Maybe someday I'll even finish it! CLICK HERE FOR THE MASTERPOST

