Borrowing Others' Eyes
It might just be me, but there seems to be a meme going around in creative outlets to investigate America, particularly of the 20th century. I'm faintly tempted to purse my lips and think about the potential for ethnocentrism (not chauvinism, not with another look at the My Lai massacre underway). But on the other hand, I'm very much in the target audience of these programs. I have an abiding curiosity for history and stories in general. So I eat this stuff up with a spoon (when I can).
I say it might just be me because I've been turning over an idea for something that takes another look America. I'm not sure what it ought to be - that something I'm turning over in my head. It's a story. Mostly. It has characters I invented and several more than I didn't invent but can't help thinking of when I think of America. But it's not just literature. I don't feel comfortable with this being text, music is central to what is in my head. But maybe that's just because it's in my head. I can also smell and taste details important to what I would want to create. If I had a million bazillion dollars it might be a TV show. An experimental TV show.
* * * * * * * * * *
Loosely related, I've been thinking about the matter of points of view. For a while now I've been letting relativism inform how I listen to people, particularly those in the news with whom I don't agree.
Trying to consider how other people might exist as more than their few actions or words I know about is a practice I've worked on for absolutely ages. It's perhaps dangerous ground because it's the sort of thing that gets a person accused of being a lily-livered loosey-goosey Commie liberal. For ages a thief was a thief. He was not a person but a deed in the flesh. But... Jean Val Jean was a thief. If you read Les Miserables you get that this was a person who made several poor choices in a lifetime of many better actions. And this gets sticky when a. I consider real people who've committed real crimes and b. particularly crimes that physically hurt other people, whether assault, rape or murder. The thing is, civilizations tend to opt for locking up people who do these things or exiling them and never looking back. Cross the line and society would much rather forget all about you than struggle with the substance of your life, good, bad and neutral.
It's an emotional response, I think. It's fear, it's betrayal, it's fury. It's the response to fucking with a secure, civilized life. It's atavistic, it's tribal and it's extremely powerful. I certainly don't want to undermine it. I don't intend to say that it's wrong to lock up a rapist and throw away the key. But to some degree I want to consider the person-who-raped and the choices made that led to the crime. Because if we are going to continue to believe in the necessity of punishing crimes we have to believe that a choice is required to commit a crime. Sometimes the only way to really do that is the proverbial walking in another man's shoes.
( Collapse )
It's funny, the reason this comes back around to my mind is (really!) because the Dalai Lama is on Twitter. About every day there's a meditation posted reiterating a call toward compassion, peace, courage, etc. Lost cause bleeding-heart that I am, it matters to me to see what other people are seeing. If there's to be any effort put into preventing bad things like crime, war or generalized hatred there has to be a meeting of minds. And it won't happen as long as we think that "we" have nothing to do with "them."
I say it might just be me because I've been turning over an idea for something that takes another look America. I'm not sure what it ought to be - that something I'm turning over in my head. It's a story. Mostly. It has characters I invented and several more than I didn't invent but can't help thinking of when I think of America. But it's not just literature. I don't feel comfortable with this being text, music is central to what is in my head. But maybe that's just because it's in my head. I can also smell and taste details important to what I would want to create. If I had a million bazillion dollars it might be a TV show. An experimental TV show.
* * * * * * * * * *
Loosely related, I've been thinking about the matter of points of view. For a while now I've been letting relativism inform how I listen to people, particularly those in the news with whom I don't agree.
Trying to consider how other people might exist as more than their few actions or words I know about is a practice I've worked on for absolutely ages. It's perhaps dangerous ground because it's the sort of thing that gets a person accused of being a lily-livered loosey-goosey Commie liberal. For ages a thief was a thief. He was not a person but a deed in the flesh. But... Jean Val Jean was a thief. If you read Les Miserables you get that this was a person who made several poor choices in a lifetime of many better actions. And this gets sticky when a. I consider real people who've committed real crimes and b. particularly crimes that physically hurt other people, whether assault, rape or murder. The thing is, civilizations tend to opt for locking up people who do these things or exiling them and never looking back. Cross the line and society would much rather forget all about you than struggle with the substance of your life, good, bad and neutral.
It's an emotional response, I think. It's fear, it's betrayal, it's fury. It's the response to fucking with a secure, civilized life. It's atavistic, it's tribal and it's extremely powerful. I certainly don't want to undermine it. I don't intend to say that it's wrong to lock up a rapist and throw away the key. But to some degree I want to consider the person-who-raped and the choices made that led to the crime. Because if we are going to continue to believe in the necessity of punishing crimes we have to believe that a choice is required to commit a crime. Sometimes the only way to really do that is the proverbial walking in another man's shoes.
( Collapse )
It's funny, the reason this comes back around to my mind is (really!) because the Dalai Lama is on Twitter. About every day there's a meditation posted reiterating a call toward compassion, peace, courage, etc. Lost cause bleeding-heart that I am, it matters to me to see what other people are seeing. If there's to be any effort put into preventing bad things like crime, war or generalized hatred there has to be a meeting of minds. And it won't happen as long as we think that "we" have nothing to do with "them."
contemplative
cheerful
blah