Usernameunique
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive notice
editHi there! Thanks for signing up for the June 2026 GAN backlog drive! We have noticed that you have made little to no reviews during the drive. We, the coordinators, would appreciate if you'd pick up at least one GAN to review until the end of the month! Thank you. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 12:26, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of May Morning (Maryon) is under review
editYour good article nomination of the article May Morning (Maryon) is 
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Finnfrog99 -- Finnfrog99 (talk) 12:45, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of May Morning (Maryon) has passed
editYour good article nomination of the article May Morning (Maryon) has 
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Finnfrog99 -- Finnfrog99 (talk) 22:24, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Clair Blank is under review
editYour good article nomination of the article Clair Blank is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 13:02, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Clair Blank is on hold
editYour good article nomination of the article Clair Blank has been placed 
on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 13:22, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Ann Dallas is under review
editYour good article nomination of the article Ann Dallas is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc -- MSincccc (talk) 18:21, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Ann Dallas has passed
editYour good article nomination of the article Ann Dallas has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc -- MSincccc (talk) 06:01, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
WikiCup 2026 July newsletter
editThe third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, while peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.
Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:
MCE89 (submissions) with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews
Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews
Reconrabbit (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews
A.Cython (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews
Generalissima (submissions) with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Clair Blank has passed
editYour good article nomination of the article Clair Blank has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 19:22, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
Evert Baudou 1925-2026
editThe recently deceased archaeology professor Evert Baudou might be worth some attention on English Wikipedia by Usernameunique and @Chiswick Chap. A major 20th century figure in the discipline. Martin Rundkvist (talk) 16:12, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of The Luck of Cumberland is under review
editYour good article nomination of the article The Luck of Cumberland is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RadioactOlive -- RadioactOlive (talk) 00:08, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of The Luck of Cumberland has passed
editYour good article nomination of the article The Luck of Cumberland has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RadioactOlive -- RadioactOlive (talk) 00:47, 15 July 2026 (UTC)