Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST

edit
You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for:

This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

-- Environment of New York City Task Force

How adverse is DYK...

edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Maze1995

edit

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Maze1995 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 13 July 2026

edit
  • News and notes: An exclusive club
    Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
  • In the media: Battle for a soul – who won?
    Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!

Tech News: 2026-29

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 16:09, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Bronx Grit Chamber service area orientation map.png

edit
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bronx Grit Chamber service area orientation map.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Least publishable unit commentary

edit

Hey Roy, I was going to start a thread at WT:FAC but thought I'd run it by you first. I have seen you cite and/or oppose based on least publishable unit a few times at FAC (e.g. at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Figure skating at the 2022 Winter Olympics/archive1 and some big ship articles) and think it deserves broader discussion. In my read, while the opening sentence of WP:FACR does say "a featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work", it then goes on to define what that is: conforming to WP:CONPOL, with a discrete set of attributes ("it has the following attributes"). I don't get the sense that least publishable unit commentary is relevant to the designation. On the question of whether such questions should be, I am undecided. Do you share / disagree with this reading? Whonting (talk) 01:31, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

We have human editors so they can apply human judgement. In other words, WP:IAR. RoySmith (talk) 02:14, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Whonting I realize that my initial response may have been unsatisfying. If you are looking for a deeper answer, WP:SUMMARY may be of some value. It says, for example, A fuller treatment of any major subtopic should go in a separate article of its own. And WP:FACR requires that an article stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate. RoySmith (talk) 10:54, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
No it's alright, I just wasn't sure how to continue while distinguishing evaluating cookie-cutter-ness against the FA criteria from SUMMARY/PAGEDECIDE questions. I also wanted to communicate that I wasn't trying to call you out or say you're wrong, instead ask a meta-question on what the FA criteria is (is the process an evaluation against them with judgement applied in their fulfilment, or is it an evaluation against whether something is Wikipedia's best work with the criteria a set of guardrails). Don't have an answer to how to do that, and was unsure if it was going into navel-gazing so hadn't thought it worthwhile saying anything. Whonting (talk) 11:08, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Bronx Grit Chamber

edit

On 21 July 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bronx Grit Chamber, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a human corpse can shut down a sewage plant? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bronx Grit Chamber. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Bronx Grit Chamber), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

  Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-30

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 05:44, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply