My name is Myles.

Thank you for reading

Next up

edit
edit
A sign reading "Caution Fort Macon was made for war not safety please be careful" with a marsh rabbit foraging near the bottom of it
Even those things made in war can be brought back to nature

In Good Article reviews, I try to check either 10 sources or 15% of the total, whichever is larger. Good/Featured topic mock-ups for order Lagomorpha

Extant species only

edit
  • 10.3% Stub-Class
  • 41.4% Start-Class
  • 17.2% C-Class
  • 6.9% B-Class
  • 24.1% GA-Class
  • 3.4% FA-Class
  • 7.6% Stub-Class
  • 24.2% Start-Class
  • 16.7% C-Class
  • 10.6% B-Class
  • 37.9% GA-Class
  • 3% FA-Class

All lagomorphs

edit

This would be a much, much harder goal given the number and ambiguity of extinct genera and species.

  • 16.7% Start-Class
  • 33.3% C-Class
  • 50% FA-Class

Leporidae

edit
  • 14% Stub-Class
  • 7% Start-Class
  • 4.7% C-Class
  • 14% GA-Class
  • 60.5% remaining

^It is highly likely that the list of extinct genera is inaccurate due to synonyms and such that Wikipedia has not caught up to.

  • 66.7% Stub-Class
  • 33.3% B-Class
  • 3% Stub-Class
  • 39.4% Start-Class
  • 24.2% C-Class
  • 6.1% B-Class
  • 24.2% GA-Class
  • 3% FA-Class
  • 25% Stub-Class
  • 25% Start-Class
  • 50% C-Class
  • 60% Stub-Class
  • 40% GA-Class
  • 16.7% C-Class
  • 83.3% GA-Class
  • 29.6% Stub-Class
  • 11.1% Start-Class
  • 14.8% C-Class
  • 11.1% B-Class
  • 25.9% GA-Class
  • 7.4% remaining

Ochotonidae

edit
  • 13.6% C-Class
  • 9.1% B-Class
  • 77.3% remaining
  • Ochotonidae and Ochotona technically need to be split. It isn't clear which would remain the Pika article.


Ochotona topic: all extant and extinct species

  • Plus however many valid extinct species there are.