Johnj1995

Tagging pages for deletion

Just a reminder that any time you tag any page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/CFD/RFD/etc.), you need to post a notice on the talk page of the page creator informing them of the tagging. It can be helpful if you use Twinkle and set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator" and make sure all CSD criteria boxes are checked off. Then Twinkle will post these messages for you which is convenient. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Johnj1995,

Why did you tag my article for relation? I am new to Wikipedia, and I must write an article about a very famous activist and writer. Can you please remove speedy delation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhafir-burhan (talk • contribs) 03:43, 16 Mar 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Johnj1995,

You keep tagging an article for deletion without giving any valid reasons. I am therefore asking for an independent review. You seem to be bias and flagging pages for deletion for no valid reason. The article is about a famous Syrian activist that contributed to the Syrian revolution against the Assad regime. His name is Nabil A. Baradey Please do not flag the article for speedy deletion. Just ask an independent group to review it. ^^^^

Hello, Johnj1995, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhafir-burhan (talk • contribs) 02:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

CSD U2s

Hello, Johnj1995,

Redirects from old user pages to new user pages are permitted when an editor changes their username. There are typically a lot of incoming links and even though the username isn't currently used by an active editor, they are not tagged for speedy deletion unless the editor deletes their main user page and the page becomes a broken redirect. But user talk pages are usually retained.

Thanks for all of your contributions, I come across your deletion taggings every day which makes things easier for admins patrolling CSD categories. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. I only tagged this page because the user moved their user page and then reverted the move, which triggered a "User self-renaming or moving user talk pages into article talk space" filter. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Johnj1995, I also wanted to add, "Thank you!" for all of the work you do. I think I come across your tagging and edits on a daily basis which is quite a commitment as a Wikipedia editor. Just today, you retagged some CSD G5 articles and drafts where you not only spotted the tagging mistake but spent time tracking down the original sockmaster and correcting the tag. It may seem like a minor matter but if there is a question about the page deletion, it really helps things to have a correct deletion summary.

I hope you consider requesting some additional editor permissions and taking on some more responsibilities. Some of them can really making your editing easier and as such an active editor, they could come in handy. Thanks again! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence

Hello, Johnj1995, Every day I see past and present incidents where you have corrected misapplied templates, frequently by new editors. These are not edits that get a lot of attention so I thought I'd award you a barnstar for catching these errors and straightening up draft pages and articles that might be infrequently viewed by others. Thank you for your diligence! Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Changing CSD Tags

Please don’t change speedy deletion tags as you did here. It’s just annoying to deal with. Also read WP:R3 before putting R3 speedy deletion tags into redirects. That redirect wasn’t recently created and thus didn’t qualify for R3 speedy deletion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 19:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Sometimes my eyes need checking

My apologies. It is indeed not user space. I think I need to have my eyes checked. -- Whpq (talk) 01:48, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

F2

Hi, please do not talk file talk pages for speedy deletion as WP:CSD#F2. This criterion only applies to file description pages, not their corresponding talk pages. Previous discussions, most recently Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 81#File talk pages which consist only of boilerplates, wikiproject tags, and/or text which has been copied to Commons, did not find support to delete local talk pages of files hosted on Commons. ✗plicit 13:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jane Bowles.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Jane Bowles.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:13, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

The source credits: "Photograph: Terrence Spencer/Time & Life Pictures/Getty Images" -- Whpq (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

WP:OVERLINK

Please review WP:OVERLINK – we don't link to countries in the vast majority of cases. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Johnj1995

I work for CAAC and I'm so glad that making the list of airports in China more standard and more professional with your help! But there are still some problems I can't solve: 1. The construction work of Dalian Jinzhouwan International Airport has not started yet (this project just premitted by State Council and CMC on October 2022, and then it needs NDRC's premit to start constructing). Also the project of Nagqu Dagring Airport was abandoned already due to choosen location in a too-high elevation. Foshan Gaoming International Airport(Pearl River Delta International Airport) is not under construction too, there is 25 airports under construction formally, but I can't edit the Template:Airports in China; 2. I added the talks to Urumqi Airport and Wuxi Airport for moving the article to the correct name, but there is no effects, especially senior-editor refused my request for moving "Ürümqi Airport" to "Urumqi Airport" after I pasted the evidence of movement's feasibility. 二武是大猫 (talk) 14:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

G11s on userspace drafts

Hello Johnj1995 -- I've declined a couple of your recent G11 speedy requests on old userspace article drafts. Generally this kind of material is viewed as harmless unless highly promotional in nature. If you feel strongly, then blanking is acceptable if the editor is long-term inactive, or you can of course take the drafts to WP:Miscellany for deletion. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 02:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Newark - Hong Kong

I am confused about this connection. The source says that the connection restart is delayed but the booking machine says it is bookable here and now. Am I wrong footed here? The Banner talk 21:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Source is https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/231210-uans24inc, which says that "United continues to file following route although reservations remain unavailable or only available at highest fare classes". United previously opened reservations for this route earlier this year, but this was only at the highest fare rate and the schedule for this flight (until March 30, 2024) was later removed: https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/231002-uanw23hkg Johnj1995 (talk) 22:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

So, I am wrong footed. Clear. The Banner talk 22:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the help at those two movies!

Thanks for redirecting the articles to drafts! I'm incredibly new to AfD & speedy deletion criteria. Didn't even notice The Haunted Cop Shop of Horrors 2 got moved to draft space, sorry! Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 04:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Tim Hamons

How did you come to suspect that this draft was generated by artificial intelligence? Was the lack of references one of the factors? Robert McClenon (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Aha! It's the first sentence, in which the bot says what it was doing. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for tagging it. I rejected the draft because of the lack of references, which is especially a problem with a BLP. Then I nominated the draft for deletion. Wikipedia needs a lot of work to be done by bots, and it is done by bots, but it doesn't articles written by bots. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Unrecognized countries

It is not a draft. It's in draft space, but it is webhosting by a CU-blocked user, and most of what they produced were hoaxes. Drmies (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

• Please tell me if Draft:Games I Been is a draft, or an abuse of draft space. See also User talk:Lasha563--the list of deleted drafts, and their comments at the bottom--and then considering restoring the tags. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

  User:Drmies, sorry I didn't see this earlier. I re-removed with it because WP:UCSD don't apply to draftspace. I believe that is because WP:G13 results in automatic deletion eventually so it is seen as busywork to expand WP:U5 to cover draftspace as well though you could inquire more about the reasoning at WT:CSD. The Pages were created too early for WP:G5 to apply unless an older blocked account is found, and draftspace duplicates are explicitly covered by WP:NOTCSD point 16. We are allowed to redirect those to get rid of them under limited circumstances, and I have done so with Draft:Unrecognized countries. But unless both title and scope are a close match that will draw complaints, so I have left the rest for WP:G13. Apologies for the procedural tangle. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 18:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

  • As for Draft:Games I Been I think that is a test page, potentially WP:G2, or maybe a deliberately disruptive creation disguised as a test, potentially WP:G3. But if it turns out it does attempt to cover some actual sporting event then tagging will only result in delaying WP:G13 when the WP:G2 is removed so I am not going to touch it so it can be deleted in another three months when it will be indisputably eligible for G13. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
  • After reading their talk page, I would bet that this was subtle disruption, possibly intended to waste our time and tie us in procedural knots, but listing at WP:MFD or taking any further time on this would just be giving them what they want, all G13 requires is that we do nothing. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 19:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
    • I don't think they do subtle disruption. G13 means this stuff is left for months. They weren't out to get us tangled up procedurally. Drmies (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
      • You would know them better than I. Drafts aren't indexed by search engines, so length of time is mostly unimportant as the pageview change is usually nil. But if you are willing to take the heat on any redirects that may not be quite perfectly right then go ahead, I just prefer not to have to answer any complaints unless I am on firm ground in terms of both policy and procedure. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
        • The heat, if any there were, wouldn't have been on you. Drmies (talk) 21:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

may I get a private copy of the removed message in my talk page ?

Hello,

This is with respect to that change which I can not see : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wisdood&diff=prev&oldid=1209468033

Yours sincerely, Wisdood (talk) 09:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

PS Was it a sort of spam ?? --Wisdood (talk) 10:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

It was spam and was probably similar to this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:2007_FIBA_Americas_Championship&oldid=1209468182 Johnj1995 (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

hello dear johnj1995

thank you for trusting me to edit the article of chinese airports during this period. but now, i'm tired to discuss with some wiki managers, and follow their command that make me very confused. so i decided to quit every wiki editing, so please continue to maintaining the airports list in china. and many many thanks. 二武是大猫 (talk) 17:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

User talk pages not normally deleted?

You removed a speedy deletion request with the edit summary "User talk pages are not normally deleted". A quick look through my watchlist gives me three user talk pages that I successfully nominated for speedy deletion recently:

• User talk:2400:C600:462F:8312:1:0:8DE7:B3CE (G10)
• User talk:2600:1006:B065:70C8:92D9:D8DD:7A91:76B2 (G10)
• User talk:Baronsmith61 (G11)

Evidently they are deleted, including under G11 which was what you removed. It's not really necessary to delete it, blanking achieves basically the same effect, but it is done. And it does send a stronger message, I would say. So I think removing the tag was improper. I'm not going to re-request speedy deletion since you've now removed the promotional material, but I just wanted to let you know. --Un assiolo (talk) 20:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Per WP:DELTALK, user talk pages are generally not deleted as they are usually needed for reference by other users. Individual edits may be deleted or redacted for privacy reasons or because of harassment or other serious violations. Exceptions to this are occasionally made if there is a good reason for the deletion. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

A user talk page that has no history or content other than spam or abuse is not needed for reference by anyone. This is the case with the three listed above and with the one from which you removed the template. --Un assiolo (talk) 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

PRODs

Hello, Johnj1995,

Just a reminder, if an editor has removed a PROD tag from an article or file, it shouldn't be added back, even if the editor who removed didn't offer an explanation for its removal. It looks likes you added back all of the PROD tags removed by User:108.49.49.128 which was incorrect and I, GB fan and Explicit reverted your edits. There might be an exception for sockpuppets but, to be honest, I haven't run into that yet on this platform. Basically, a PROD tag can only be added to an article or file once.

Thank you for all of your many, many helpful contributions while you are patrolling. It's appreciated! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

I only reverted the removals because the IP had been replacing the prods with redirects and not removing any other content on the page. Three speedy templates (including a g7 that you later converted to a prod) were also removed by the IP. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

CSD tagging of page created by Ramesh kumar AM

Hello, Johnj1995,

Just a reminder that any time you tag any page for deletion , the page created is an product that is indian govt initiative and we are the manufacturer we are adding these information for indian citizens to create awareness ,let us know if you need further information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramesh kumar AM (talk • contribs) 04:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Good tag, John. Page was obvious spam. —C.Fred (talk) 10:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Southend airport

Hi and thanks for adding a reference. I'm trying to make up my mind on how explicit referencing should be on airline-destination tables in airport pages. Suppose airline X flies from airport A to 10 destinations and we have a reliable independent source which substantiates 4 of the destinations from airport A. Should that reference be added once next to the name of the airline X in the wikitable, or should it be added 4 times next to each destination. The former makes the wikitable easier to read and more attractive, but the latter makes it more explicit - ie you know exactly which URL to look at. I'm tending towards adding a reference just once, but wondered what you thought. Pmbma (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

UAA

Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example, the German wiki is another. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 08:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

User page

Would you like your user page protected from recreation? Per policy, I could do either ECP or full protection—your choice. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you but not necessary at this time. Protection would only be useful if the page was repeatedly created as vandalism. This was probably created accidentally after I edited a page that that user created. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Tagging unsubmitted drafts for CSD

Hi John, I've noticed a bunch of your CSD tags on draft articles - there's really no need to tag these most of the time, especially not for things like "test edit". If you put a CSD tag on them, you're asking an admin to come around and look at this one specifically kind of urgently. If you just leave it, Liz or Explicit or josh or whoever will just come by in six months and sweep it into a bin. Saves everyone some energy to just ignore them. -- asilvering (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Chauhan sept of Rajput-Sikh lineage

Hi, Johnj1995! You recently nominated Draft:Chauhan sept of Rajput-Sikh lineage for speedy deletion because the page was created by a known sock puppet. In this case, the article was created by IP 180.229.33.160, and you linked to the SPI for Truthfindervert. However, I'm not seeing this IP address listed as one of the suspected or confirmed sock puppets. Can you provide more information as to why you connected this IP address to Truthfindervert? Thank you! Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Quick question - CSD on talkpage

Hi Johnj1995 - quick question because I'm inexperienced with page moves and deletions - I just moved Commend International to draftspace and inadvertently created a redirect from mainspace to draftspace - which you've put a CSD notice on, which makes sense. I just wanted to ask if the talk page (which is now a redirect to Draft talk) needs to get CSD'd as well, or if that just gets taken care of automatically due to the main redirect getting CSD'd. Sorry if this is a stupid question - I don't normally work on this kind of stuff BugGhost🦗👻 16:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Literally the minute I sent this message, both the article and the talk page got deleted - so I guess that answers my question! Thanks, and sorry for the bother! BugGhost🦗👻 16:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion of Hill Top educational institute

Brother why are you deleting my article give Syed Shahzaman1 (talk) 12:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Who's Co Zane?

Not seeing the WP:G11ness. . . . . -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Should not have been tagged, after seeing the message on the user's talk page. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

CSDs for promotional edits

I declined three CSDs you requested in draft articles for promotional only articles. All three had only an infobox, which was not inherently promotional. They may be non-notable, but there's no reason right now to delete them as they're drafts. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

User:SK Global Entertainment/sandbox

whoops, apologies for the edit conflict there. I can revert my tagging as G11 is fine. Star Mississippi 02:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Battle of Pangal CSD declined

Sock edits were before master was blocked, so don't count as block evasion. On the 6 month count, I see non-automated edits 5 months ago. Thanks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Seasonal flight

When a flight is not year round but seasonal, it is enough to move it to a section "seasonal". Just plain removing it is not the best option. The Banner talk 15:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

And the end dates are in the given source, so I restored them. Please be more accurate. The Banner talk 15:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Nayanahari Abeynayake

Hi there! I noticed that you marked Nayanahari Abeynayake as unsourced (), despite it having many external links. In cases such as this, it may be more helpful to include a {{no footnotes}} tag instead. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nivia Sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accessories.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for adding the sockmaster to the G5! I hate CSD on my phone. jellyfish ✉ 21:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Request to Move Page "Sabang, Aceh" to "Sabang

Hello, I apologize in advance for my mistake in moving the article in an inappropriate way. I would like to request that the "Sabang, Aceh" page be moved back to "Sabang" which was moved by someone in 2012. Ariankntl (talk) 03:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

The city of Sabang in Aceh is a major topic that is more widely known than other entities with similar names. Per Wikipedia policy, disambiguation pages may be moved to "Sabang (disambiguation)" if needed. Please help, thank you. Ariankntl (talk) 03:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: File:Junior The Jenius performing at Skyway Theatre in Minneapolis, MN.jpeg

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Junior The Jenius performing at Skyway Theatre in Minneapolis, MN.jpeg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: File:RABBY HASAN.png

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:RABBY HASAN.png, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Redirection Arben Isaraj

I didn't understand where exactly you disagreed with the action I took. If you want to write on the talk page the redirect, why do I have to open a discussion about something so blatantly wrong. LefterDalaka (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism with No edit summaries

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mariscal Sucre International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. 119.234.32.102 (talk) 04:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Guayaquil Airport. 119.234.32.102 (talk) 05:13, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 119.234.32.102 (talk) 04:57, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Septimius Awards

I declined the CSD on Septimius Awards as the edits were hours before the sockmaster was blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:35, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

E_F⁵ 03:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Missing edit summary

This revert of yours has no edit summary.

WP:FIES: all edits should be explained (unless the reason for them is obvious)—either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page [...] especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors Paradoctor (talk) 03:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

@Paradoctor I also warned him see above. He never listens. I wld suggest a 13 year block and ban from all reverts 111.65.45.143 (talk) 10:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

Collapsing an erroneous message. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 14:38, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

I noticed that you tagged Draft:Max auberg Roander for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag from the page because it does not meet the criterion or criteria specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion before tagging pages for speedy deletion. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

@Rsjaffe Are you serious? That page most definitely meet the criteria for speedy deletion (heck, you can tag it as G2 or G11). @Johnj1995 I'm sorry that Rsjaffe gave you this message because it most certainly is wrong and you are absolutely allowed to remove this erroneous message. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 22:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

@OhanaUnited, in retrospect, looks like I was looking narrowly at just the G2 that was requested. I still wouldn't call it G2. G11, yes. Probably should have just deleted it as G11 rather than declining the G2. Thanks for pointing that out. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Source is PD as a Us Government work. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Sebastian Vegas update

bro Sebastian Vegas is going on loan to colo colo https://www.instagram.com/share/_7TD5QLLa The page for transfers is always correct Ant5000 (talk) 02:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

The Wee Littles moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Wee Littles. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is clearly unfinished and therefore not ready for publication. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

U5 edits

Good afternoon (at least where I live), I noticed that you are tagging lots of articles for U5 speedy deletion. While I appreciate trying to rid wikipedia of crud (I tag old spam pages for u5 when I’m bored sometimes), I’d recommend waiting for the pages for a bit (I try to wait at least a few months) to see if the account actually could submit a draft or whatnot.

A new editor could potentially be using the user namespace as intended to create drafts, and then move it to the draft or main namespace when it’s finished. Draft namespace is self cleaning and isn’t checked for sanity with few exceptions. (WP:NDRAFT)

Waiting for the account to abandon their account makes clear that they are misusing the User namespace as a web host, which is the intention of the criterion.

Happy editing! -1ctinus📝🗨 00:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Re Amsterdamned II

Your change to the CSD tag there was wrong - Akariprescott was the account whose block was being evaded - the "master" wasn't blocked until after the creation. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:02, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ann Putnam Senior

Hello, Johnj1995. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ann Putnam Senior, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion: Capital Cities/ABC

Hi there, and thank you for all your help improving Wikipedia! I wanted to let you know that I have declined your recent G7 and A10 speedy deletion nomination of Capital Cities/ABC because neither apply given that the article was created in 2005. Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions, comments, and/or concerns. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Page Creation for MANIGANDAN MANJUNATHAN

hi please help me in creating a page for Manigandan Manjunathan 103.72.72.145 (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangladesh Development Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bangladesh Development Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Peace, G4† (talk, ask questions, dispute a tagging) 19:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Quick draftification

Hello there, and thank you for your help making Wikipedia better! I wanted to reach out because I noticed your recent draftication of Draft:Ewa Maslowska, which occurred 7 minutes after the article was last meaningfully edited. Per DRAFTNO, articles shouldn't be draftified if they are actively being edited. In practice, this means articles shouldn't be draftified if they have been meaningfully edited in the past hour.

I understand and sympathize with wanting unsourced articles out of main space, but we also need to recognize that it can come across as bitey to draftify an article too quickly -- especially considering that articles in mainspace do not need to be complete, and editors are allowed to develop articles in the mainspace.

I hope this makes sense. Let me know if you have any follow-up questions. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:25, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

After a second glance, I also want to remind you to notify editors when you move their articles to draftspace. Given that you regularly move articles, it may be worth considering adding the MoveToDraft script, which alerts you when it may be inappropriate to move an article and automatically notifies editors about the move. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:28, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Malysse-Sterima moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Malysse-Sterima. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is written in Dutch. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 12:05, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries

Hey there! I recently noticed one of your edits did not include an edit summary, so I wanted to check your general usage. Turns out that over a third of your major edits do not include edit summaries (). Please add them. It makes it much easier for people looking through page history to understand what you did. They don't have to be in-depth. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:46, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Airline / Destination sourcing

What are your thoughts on using a reference to an OAG paper (yes, old-fashioned paper !) timetable printed post-2020 (ideally in 2025, but depends on what's available in public libraries) as a source for a route ? As it's going to be published by OAG, I'm inclined to treat it as both independent and reliable. I don't have the money to subscribe to the OAG web-based products and if something is available in large public libraries around the world, other people can get access without having to subscribe lots of money either. I know we'd all prefer something which involves just a single copy-URL-and-paste-into-browser approach to verification, but these sources aren't always easy to find. Pmbma (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

@Pmbma: Jim Liu at AeroRoutes sources some of his postings from OAG filings, such as https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/250326-izns25eu so a web source may be available here. It would be okay to source a printed document and later change the reference if a web source is found. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your opinion. I'm inclined to start adding references to the OAG paper timetables - better to have a reference to a paper timetable than no reference at all. If you see web references at a later date, please don't hesitate to add them where appropriate to wikipedia.Pmbma (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

I've made some changes over 28, 29 and 30 March 2025 (although you may see slightly different timings based on the time zone you live in) to a large number of airports to backfill references based on paper OAG timetables where none exist on English language wikipedia. If interested, have a look at my edits to Pegasus Airlines on Sabiha Gökçen International Airport#Passenger to see a sample of this. I'm planning on doing a lot more of this to back-fill references where we have no references for many airports and it's non-trivial to find sources from Aeroroutes. I know you've spent a LOT of time adding routes to airport/destination tables with sources, and I value your opinion - if you have any thoughts or comments, please do let me know. Of course, there is absolutely no obligation whatsoever on you to spend any time on this at all - it's really to give you a chance to comment before I go ahead further.Pmbma (talk) 17:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

My page

Hi. You made a mistake on my page this person is actor Dih250 (talk) 20:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

LAX-SGN/BKK edit

Hey, I was checking the LAX wikipedia and saw that you edited the change that you would need a change of planes. It technically depends on how you would view it as, United has said per their DOT filing and their Twitter replies in how they will use one of the HKG-bound flights' 787's from LAX and use on the route, SGN will use the UA152/153 callsign, while BKK will use another flight number. How would you think as this as it is a difficult thing to debate on to keep SGN/BKK or not..

Let me know what you think, thanks!

PS ishrion aviation (a top aviation analyst also has said on twitter on smth like this). Ryanaviator (talk) 04:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. This would be similar to United's flights from Tokyo-Narita to Kaohsiung, Koror and Ulaanbaatar. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:24, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey John! After a few days, United has posted their scheduling with saying that UA152/153 would be doing SGN, I believe that putting SGN only would be justified as UA said they will be using the 787 on 152/153 for the flight. This is known as a tag-flight meaning that once arriving into HKG, it goes for SGN on the same aircraft as a 5th-freedom.

lmk if you want to approve the edit and addition if SGN Ryanaviator (talk) 04:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

List of Slot English Series On 2 TV2 (Malaysia)

Hello, Johnj1995,

Once a PROD tag has been removed, by any editor, it can not be replaced back on to the article. If deletion is still a goal, it needs to be nominated for an AFD discussion. Thank you for all of your contributions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:38, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: 2024 Ghana Movie Awards

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 2024 Ghana Movie Awards, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A simple list of facts cannot be copyrfghted. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Question about CSD for Draft:Arjune (student)

Hi, I saw you changed the template I added for CSD to Draft:Arjune (student), and I must admit I'm a bit confused as to how it could be considered promotional in nature? I wasn't 100% sure about which template would be best, but I definitely don't see any evidence of advertisement. Your edit summary just said 'invalid' so I was wondering if you could expand upon that a bit. Thanks you 05:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC) Zzz plant (talk) 05:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:A'cktee

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:A'cktee, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:55, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Layerwire

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Layerwire, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:24, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morikawa Kyoriku (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QEnigma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add WP:RS, WP:IS before resubmission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morikawa Kyoriku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QEnigma (talk) 04:30, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Johnj1995! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QEnigma (talk) 04:30, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Updated images reverted

Hello, I would like to know why the updated images of the former presidents of South Africa have been reverted. MyEnchantedLeader (talk) 03:09, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

These images have been nominated for speedy deletion as copyright violations. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

👍 MyEnchantedLeader (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

For more undestand

I have updated the article’s title to better reflect its content. I hope you understand, and I kindly ask you to remove the page from the delete list. Thank you.

Speedy deletion declined: Susan Muwonge

Hello Johnj1995, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Susan Muwonge, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kitamura Kigin has been accepted

Kitamura Kigin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Astra Travasso (talk) 14:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Bjørn Sorg Høie-Hauge moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bjørn Sorg Høie-Hauge. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:17, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

AI SEO

Hello - I see you moved Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) to Answer Engine Optimization and wonder if you think AI SEO should be moved to "Artificial intelligence search engine optimization." Thanks! Gjs238 (talk) 20:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morikawa Kyoriku has been accepted

Morikawa Kyoriku, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 10:08, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Talk:Progressive scan DVD player

I saw your removal of CSD G8 on Talk:Progressive scan DVD player with the comment that the page is a redirect, however it is not--this is an orphaned talk page. —danhash (talk) 19:34, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Israeli monarchism moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Israeli monarchism. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Allblessed (talk) 19:41, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Adams (activist) has been accepted

Henry Adams (activist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 04:00, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Reversions

Thank you for reverting the blatant vandalism on 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC). In the future, leaving a simple edit summary such as rvv will allow other editors to quickly understand that you were not engaged in an edit war. Keep up the good work! — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

On tagging UPE articles for deletion

I feel we should keep the drafts around to detect new incarnations of this UPE ring. The {{undisclosed paid}} warning templates basically act like traps to catch unsuspecting members who remove them. That said, noting these down and finding them when they are eventually recreated also works too. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 05:28, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

FYI

After speedy deletion I've restored a page you had tagged as A7/G11. On restoration I totally agree with your A7 tag. You may nominate it for deletion if you like. You'd have my support unless the page creator has new sources up their sleeve. My grandfather lived during the same time period, owned several grocery stores plus a canned food brand; I have seen sources better than this for him. Doesn't make him notable. BusterD (talk) 23:41, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletions of sockpuppet-made pages

Oh, hey! I just noticed you tagging Draft:Pinapple for speedy deletion under G5. I just wanted to ask: did you notice me doing the same thing with Draft:Flash Forward (game jam), User:The Madness Auditor/Userboxes/Madness Combat, and Draft:Bababnas? Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 20:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Danners430 _{tweaks made} 06:18, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Especially when reverting edits, it’s rather important to explain why you’re reverting, which you haven’t been doing. Is there a reason? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 06:25, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

The fact you are continuing to edit merrily while completely ignoring editors that are wishing to discuss concerns on your talk page is in itself concerning. Please be aware that communication is mandatory on Wikipedia - see WP:COMMUNICATE. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 07:00, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pokhara Airport (domestic) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 06:58, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Pokhara Airport (domestic), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. You are still removing content which has a valid source. Where's the source that the flight, as you say, has ended? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 14:10, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Guys, guys, stop fighting! Just adhere to WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT and add independent sources. No independent sources, no mention. It is simple as that. The Banner talk 14:59, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

That’s what I’ve been trying to achieve… right now the biggest issue though is this user seems to believe ignoring talk page messages makes the problem go away Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:03, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Dallas Fort Worth International Airport! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations: try the Citer tool, or in the wikitext editor, try the reFill tool, and in the Visual Editor, the reference dialog can convert some bare urls into a full citation. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:04, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

@Johnj1995 again at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport - please use templates like Cite Web where possible. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 16:59, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

And yet again at Soekarno–Hatta International Airport… Danners430 _{tweaks made} 05:57, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

@Johnj1995 why are you still adding bare references? Stop please. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 14:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

@Johnj1995 and more. The fact you’re also ignoring your talk page is highly concerning too… as an experienced editor, you should be well aware that communication is mandatory. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

For personal reasons, I have chosen to no longer edit airport destination lists and to not have any further involvement in discussions related to these articles. While I will continue to make edits on Wikipedia, you may consider me retired from editing articles about airports and aviation. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Editor creating hoaxes?

@Johnj1995 - I see that you have tagged a number of drafts created by User:Noah Arshadi as hoaxes, as well as warning on his talk page. Can you give me a little more info about how you know these are hoaxes? (I'm not familiar with the "teams" / leagues.) It seems to merit an indefinite block. — ERcheck (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

i am in a roblox soccer league with about 300 people, it is on discord, and we wanted to be able to see everything easier, so using wikipedia and only using drafts would be fair instead of actually making a public page Noah Arshadi (talk) 20:30, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

As @Johnj1995 indicated, this is not an acceptable use of Wikipedia. — ERcheck (talk) 20:45, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

I (and another user) tagged some drafts about RF24 as hoaxes in early June and they were deleted by materialscientist. Therefore, I believe that most of these drafts are either hoaxes or are otherwise out of scope. To reply to Noah Arshadi, Wikipedia pages, including those in user space "do not serve as personal webpages, blogs, or repositories for large amounts of material irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia." Johnj1995 (talk) 20:40, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

@Johnj1995 - Tagging hoax for seems quite appropriate as the drafts are written as if these teams and tournaments are real. — ERcheck (talk) 20:57, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

thx on Draft bitmanip

I was editing my mistake on {insertnamehere} and you'd already updated the page to add the correct page name, thank you for the fast response. are you able to action the move as well? Lkcl (talk) 05:26, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bit_manipulation_instruction_set Lkcl (talk) 05:27, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of Geneva School of Diplomacy and International Relations content

Hi Johnj1995, I noticed you removed some content from the article on the Geneva School of Diplomacy and International Relations, citing that it was unverified. I restored the material because it is supported by reliable, mainstream media sources, which I’ve cited. This includes investigations into the school’s accreditation and for-profit status. If you have concerns about the sources or the way the content is presented, I'd be glad to discuss and work together on improving the article. Please let me know your thoughts! Thanks. Robinsonodora (talk) 19:15, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Ostia Sciences

Hello Johnj1995, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Ostia Sciences, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 18:47, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Ostia Sciences Inc.

Hello Johnj1995, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Ostia Sciences Inc., a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 18:47, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shanghai Pudong International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:30, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Palma de Mallorca Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 14:02, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Palma de Mallorca Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 19:29, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ngurah Rai International Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 20:42, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Leach

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Leach, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Deletion of this page may be controversial or is under discussion. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:43, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Airport Airline/Destination tables

Hi... I know you sometimes add links from aeroroutes.com to airport airline/destination tables. I've created a citation template that might make it a bit easier to use. Essentially, it autofills the last1=, first1=, language= and website= fields for you.

Instead of
<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Liu|first1=Jim||language=en|website=Aeroroutes.com|url=https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/230905-pcnw23ein|title=Pegasus Adds A321neo Eindhoven Service in NW23|date=5 September 2023|accessdate=25 March 2025}}</ref>

You can now write
<ref>{{AeroRoutesRef|url=https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/230905-pcnw23ein|title=Pegasus Adds A321neo Eindhoven Service in NW23|date=5 September 2023|accessdate=25 March 2025}}</ref>

The url, title, date and accessdate fields can be entered in any order. The title is optional.

Admittedly not a huge difference - but maybe saves a little bit of typing, and ensures that some of the fields need be entered just once. You can find details at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:AeroRoutesRef
If you have a few minutes, let me know what you thinkWibwob28 (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

I've added some documentation on the template. Let me know what you think 31.94.19.4 (talk) 17:36, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Edits to Kuwait International Airport

You made several edits recently to Kuwait International Airport. I like to make the following comments:

1. I didn't come across any clear policy about how to deal with multi-airport cities as defined by IATA. We see some cities in the world with specific mention of airport, like London and New York, but why not all multi-airport cities? Your comment about it not being consistent with other airport articles does not make it wrong. I think other articles need to be corrected too. However, you know that such change is not easy. You have to start somewhere, and I'm starting from Kuwait. I like to read your view on the subject at the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports under subject "Cairo and Abu Dhabi Airports".

2. You mentioned that bigorre.org is not a reliable source. Do you have any reason that makes you to believe that the NOTAM there about the closure of Sohag International Airport's runway is not correct?

3. You changed the spelling of Asyut to Assiut, in contrast to the name used in the city's article, and the name adopted by IATA for the city.

4. You merged three different subsidiaries of the Air Arabia Group under the name of the parent company when they operate under separate licenses and separate airline codes. When someone clicks on the Air Arabia link, it goes to the article of one of the operators, which operates only one of the three segments listed in Kuwait Airport, but not the other two. This is incorrect. Each operator has its own article which is not linked properly if you merge everything under one name. Despite all the cooperation these three airlines have among themselves (including having one booking website), they are still legally three entities, not one. Imdashti (talk) 11:13, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Note

https://www.flashscore.com/team/al-kholood/Mqs1WbFK/

Upload this logo if want help, thanks! 93.143.82.218 (talk) 22:14, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Primrose Hill poster.jpg

Hi Johnj1995, Thanks for the notification regarding File:Primrose Hill poster.jpg. I had uploaded the file just before finalizing the draft for the new article on the film. The article is now live and the poster has been placed in the infobox, so the issue should be resolved. Thanks again for the heads-up! Виктор Јованоски (talk) 23:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Abdelnasser Abdelfattah

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Abdelnasser Abdelfattah, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Awarded Grand Cordon of the Order of the Rising is a credible claim of importance negating A7. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: AlAgha Group

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of AlAgha Group, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Sources present in the article represent a credible claim of impoirtance sufficient to negate A7. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:SBOTOP Indonesia

Hello Johnj1995, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:SBOTOP Indonesia, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 05:58, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:SBOTOP

Hello Johnj1995, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:SBOTOP, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 05:58, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Danners430 _{tweaks made} 09:20, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Soekarno–Hatta International Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 06:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Bro I’m from Myrtle and so is Jax and Macon and we are notable

It’s not vandalism Maroman194 (talk) 19:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Revision Suggestion/Revision of user:W3rn3rMilk's Work

Hello Johnj1995, I would like to have a small chat about removing my work. I added some links to the sources I used. I simply seem to have forgotten to add them. I'm truly sorry, and hope you value my work. Although, I would like to propose an idea: Instead of simply deleting someone's work, I suggest that you provide them with a warning asking them to revise their work so their work isn't erased. Of course, with the exception of malicious intent. Thank you for your time, -W3rn3rMilk — Preceding unsigned comment added by W3rn3rMilk (talk • contribs) 02:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Rude

How dare someone tell me not to do something. Anna2553 (talk) 14:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Disputing why this file fails Wikipedia's first non-free content criterion

You place a template on an image for an article I posted, File:Portrait of Steve Hurd.png and disappeared. It would've been nice if you had allow me to explain my predicament but you seem to have deleted your account, uncool!

It’s discouraging that the administrator of this complaint, Johnj1995, who made this an issue, is Not an Active User on the User Page and Talk page shortly after posting the “Replaceable non-free use template.” I’m surprised that Wikipedia administrators can disappear without having a civil discussion about an issue they created.  It would be helpful to understand better how they arrived at their conclusion.

After exhaustive internet searches, I am unable to find another source for an image of the artist other than his social media page. I am unable to obtain an image directly from him. Interacting with the subjects of my articles does not help me write an objective article, so I'd like to avoid that on ethical grounds.

The artist/subjects of the articles I've written would not have a problem with their images and work discussed on Wikipedia in the fair and informative manner I strive to produce. It's low-resolution, so it has no commercial value. Its sole purpose is to aid in the description of this article.

Ache Erie (talk) 16:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Noting that @Johnj1995 is not an administrator, although the file he tagged was then deleted by administrator @Explicit. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and, in particular for living people where it is possible that someone might take a picture of them in the future (namely, anyone who isn't either serving a life sentence or this guy), fair-use copyrighted pictures are not allowed.

Avoiding conflicts of interests as much as possible is definitely the right mindset to have while writing about someone. However, for the purpose of obtaining a free image, it is generally accepted that directly asking the subject for one is okay (and even encouraged!) and does not constitute a conflict of interest. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for clearing that up. Ache Erie (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

CSD G1

Hi, I've declined the tagging of Draft:How to help kids with disability as G1. Patent nonsense, surprisingly, has a pretty narrow definition. If the draft contains coherent sentences that aren't of the colorless green ideas sleep furiously kind, it isn't patent nonsense, and you can wait for nature to reclaim it instead. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy declined

Hello John! I just declined your speedy deletion request at Draft:1ST Airport Taxis, as it wasn't unambiguously promotional. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising for what is understood under that banner. A lot of drafts have some promotional aspects to them, and just leaving them until they are deleted via G13 (or maybe even fixed!) is the correct route. Thanks. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Kedar Narsingh KC

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kedar Narsingh KC, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:25, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nepalese fifty-rupee note

Hello Johnj1995, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nepalese fifty-rupee note, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 20:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nepalese five-rupee note

Hello Johnj1995, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nepalese five-rupee note, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 20:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nepalese ten-rupee note

Hello Johnj1995, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nepalese ten-rupee note, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 20:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nepalese twenty-rupee note

Hello Johnj1995, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nepalese twenty-rupee note, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 20:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletions

Hi @Johnj1995; a brief read of this talk page shows a large number of declined speedy deletion nominations. I would suggest you re-read the criteria for speedy deletion as I don't feel you currently have an accurate understanding of what the criteria actually are; they are strict and only apply in very specific circumstances. If you're unsure if something is eligible please feel free to leave a message on my talk page, or leave it for someone else to handle. Best, CoconutOctopus talk 20:26, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Wonyoung3108/sandbox

Hi there! I wanted to let you know that I've declined your G7 speedy deletion nomination of User:Wonyoung3108/sandbox. There is no need to deleted a sandbox that has been blanked. This is a waste of time. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy declined: Ajay Seth

I have declined your speedy deletion nomination for Ajay Seth as the author was not banned or blocked at the time of creation. Judging from the other messages on your talk page, I'm going to recommend that you make it a habit to review the speedy deletion criteria prior to nominating pages. In this case, this criterion is clearly stated as the first bullet point under G5. – bradv 19:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

This G5 was also incorrect. The page creator has never been blocked. If you continue to misuse speedy deletion tags, I will block you. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Rescure

@Johnj1995 can I blank several main space articles on notable bayonets created by a blocked user and then replace the text so its not a user's work, I just blanked them, can you send them to the draftspace now Profounder User (talk) 18:51, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Kelley-Roosevelts Asiatic Expedition

Thank you for adding Natalia Holt's book The Beast in the Clouds: The Roosevelt Brothers' Deadly Quest to Find the Mythical Giant Panda to Kelley-Roosevelts Asiatic Expedition. I'm interested in Russell Hendee and it is helpful to have learned of this book and the author's portrayal of him. CRL1 (talk) 03:06, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion: Draft:Salish matter

Hi there! I wanted to reach out and let you know that I've declined your G5 speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Salish matter. From what I can tell, Draft:Salish matter was created by Coded message of truth on October 16, then both Coded message of truth and Joker is cool were blocked on October 27. Thus, Coded message of truth was not editing in violation of a block when they created the article, making it ineligible for G5. If I'm missing something here, please let me know. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for continued incorrect use of CSD after final warning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  voorts (talk/contributions) 03:03, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ross Macdonald.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ross Macdonald.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Jack White (Keen2Go member)

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Jack White (Keen2Go member), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Re: File:Jeremy Cooney press conference February 2026.jpg

Hi, regarding your notice about File:Jeremy Cooney press conference February 2026.jpg — the source, Senator Cooney's official NYS Senate newsroom page, has a Photography Usage section that explicitly licenses press images under CC BY-SA 4.0. I've updated the file description page to reflect the free license. Thanks for the heads up. Dthekay (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Deposit-refund system

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Deposit-refund system, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:58, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Dil Ke Chor - Pakistani Telefilm

Hi @Johnj1995,

Hope you are doing well!

I have created a wikipedia page for the telefilm - Dil ke chor, but somehow I am unable to submit the draft for a review. Can you please guide/help me on what should I do? I already linked the page to Hania Aamir and Momin Saqib's wikipedia pages, as they were the lead actors in the telefilm. Decemberbaby0612 (talk) 19:13, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Advice on correct use of template

Hi John. On the Renfe page you rightly removed my incorrect usage of template. However, given that my text in the usage was self-explanatory, you (as an experienced Wiki user) might have put in the correct template, or at least advised me (as a keen but inexperienced user of the dark arts of Wiki editing) how to do it. Any chance you might still do that? Thanks - Harry. Graham David Audus (talk) 14:15, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

User:Boeing 737-800ng/sandbox

I don't understand why my CSD tag was invalid. This is a user sub page and the user doesn't exist. What am I missing? Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 20:05, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Boeing 737-800ng is the name of the account that created this user sandbox. This is a valid account, which has made more than 600 edits on the Chinese wiki. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:09, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Grayson Hall.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grayson Hall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:The Core Lord/sandbox

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:The Core Lord/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: promnotional, but not TNT level promotional. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:58, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Undo the Redirect/ page move

Hi. Could you please undo the the move/redirect of the page "Republic of Nauru Hospital" to "Nauru Medical Centre". the Republic of Nauru Hospital stays as is and the Nauru Medical Centre will eventually get a separate article. Gmsslala (talk) 22:36, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Centro Sportivo Alagoano

• Centro Sportivo Alagoano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

You reverted without comment my addition of a request for better references on this article. This seems odd as more than 90% of the statements in the article, many of them controversial, are uncited. Perhaps this was done in error? • a frantic turtle 🐢 solidarity 16:15, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Sorry. Assumed that I was restoring the template and didn't notice that it had been removed. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

"Talk:Abigail "Pomni" Brooks" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Talk:Abigail "Pomni" Brooks has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 27 § Talk:Abigail "Pomni" Brooks until a consensus is reached. Red Shogun412 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Don't draftify too soon

Hi, Please keep WP:NPPHOUR in mind while draftifying articles (Draft:SM Northmall KJMO Industry Position Corporation). You can also use the WP:MTD script which will give you a warning in such cases. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on São Paulo/Guarulhos International Airport

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page São Paulo/Guarulhos International Airport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to fix the URL. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • (in Portuguese) date=5 November 2025 https://www.aeroportoguarulhos.net/en/guarulhos-airlines/qatar-airways date=5 November 2025. Retrieved 7 November 2025. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help); Missing or empty |title= (help); Missing pipe in: |url= (help)
• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • (in Portuguese) date=5 November 2025 https://www.aeroportoguarulhos.net/en/guarulhos-airlines/qatar-airways date=5 November 2025. Retrieved 7 November 2025. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help); Missing or empty |title= (help); Missing pipe in: |url= (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:21, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Over 100k edits but no userpage? Woah! Anyway, nice work on Wikipedia! SHSR T • C 20:03, 20 July 2026 (UTC)