Talk:Netherlands

Netherlands vs Holland

The first sentence states:

"The Netherlands, informally Holland, is a country ..."

However, referring to the whole country as 'Holland' is discouraged by the Dutch government and often considered a faux pas by inhabitants of the other regions of the country (See also this entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminology_of_the_Low_Countries#Holland). Given that the context of the country page is the country, would it not be more correct to rephrase it to as something along the lines of 'The Netherlands, historically also referred to as Holland, is a country ...'. Or perhaps leave it out entirely here, since there are other pages discussing it? 2A02:A442:777E:2:F984:D5FD:A19F:50C3 (talk) 11:41, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Many, if not most, English speakers primarily call the country "Holland". It's up to Wikipedia to reflect this in the lead without wagging its finger on behalf of people who don't like this. "Historically" isn't even correct, because that usage is current, it isn't something found only in older publications. In the section on the country's name, it's appropriate to point out (in a neutral tone) that it's a semantic shift from the names of the provinces.

I've struck out some of what I wrote originally because on reflection I realized that in previous discussions along the same lines, I've perhaps conflated what people say with what's found in reliable sources. I'm now thinking a priori that perhaps reliable sources consistently use "Netherlands", in which case it would be reasonable to qualify the use of "Holland" in the lead as "often popularly called" or something like that. I still reject the position of some that we should engage in finger-wagging by writing something like "erroneously". And "historically", as I wrote above, is incorrect. Largoplazo (talk) 12:42, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

The usage is informal in English. Anon uses "however" yet says in many words the same. It's an I don't like it argument without merit. No cumbersome passive language will describe informal better. In most other languages the usage is formal. In Dutch and English, Holland is a synonym for the Netherlands, including in leading dictionaries of the Netherlands. As you correctly point out, the qualification of "historical" is false. gidonb (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

I am not convinced that many reliable sources refer to the Netherlands as Holland these days. Very much . Unless a significant number of very reliable and well-known sources can be cited, the phrase "informally Holland" needs to be removed or, at least, significantly reworded. Like "England" vs "UK", this is a mistake that happened a lot twenty years ago, but rarely happens in 2025. Andrew Oakley (talk) 20:09, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

The lead should be changed and the reference to 'Holland' ought to be removed. The article on the United Kingdom doesn't mention that the UK is informally referred to as 'England' either.Vlaemink (talk) 11:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

@Vlaemink I disagree. Many English-speaking persons still refer to the country as Holland, and as such I think it should be recognizable in the lead. Thayts ••• 12:10, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Its wrong and it should be avoided even informally , it needs to be removed from the text ~2026-10460-17 (talk) 20:18, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

We're reporting that it's commonly called that because it is commonly called that. It isn't telling anyone they should call it that, and it isn't proper for the sentence to scold people, so whether it's "right" or "wrong" is irrelevant. Largoplazo (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

I really wish my fellow dutchmen wouldn't be so persistent at lecturing foreigners about this. Hup Holland Hup. niet zo betweterig en door. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:16, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

There are a couple of ironies associated with this. For one thing, no Dutch people ever come here complaining that the word "Dutch" is wrong and asking us to correct it to "Netherlandish". For another, even people from the Netherlands' own former colony Indonesia call it "Belanda" in their national language. The colonial administration appears not to have been as stressed by this as some Wikipedia users are. Largoplazo (talk) 22:50, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Are you a Hollander by any chance? I as a South-Hollander lived in Limburg for about a decade and have learnt the hard way that the rest of the Netherlands definitely isn't pleased with being called "Holland". Limburgers still see us as occupiers (which, technically, historically we are). Then again, this discussion comes up on this talk page more often than a blue moon and repeatedly, the removal of the mention of "Holland" in this article is blocked by some people who refuse to learn how to pronounce "Netherlands". It's one of the reasons why Wikipedia can't be used as a reliable source. ~2026-23219-39 (talk) 20:13, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Who are these mysterious people who purportedly "refuse" to learn how to pronounce "Netherlands"? (As though there's anything challenging about pronouncing that word.) And what part of the lead sentence is unreliable? It doesn't say "Dutch people adore it when English-speakers call their country 'Holland'". (Also, why do I never see complaints from Dutch people about being called "Dutch" by English speakers, given that "Duits" means "German"?) Largoplazo (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Probably because "Dutch" doesn't refer to "Duits" but to "Diets", an old Germanic language from which German, Dutch, English, Luxembourgish and other Germanic languages have derived. ~2026-23426-91 (talk) 09:31, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

The

Is it fine if I add "The" to the title for it to be, "The Netherlands" like, "The Gambia"? Dynamismcool (talk) 13:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

This is specifically prohibited by the guidelines. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite or indefinite article at beginning of name). Largoplazo (talk) 13:50, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Ok, I was just wondering :). Dynamismcool (talk) 20:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Expanding on the "Climate change" section

When seeking to improve this article, I wanted to expand on the “Climate change” section and describe the nitrogen emissions crisis in the Netherlands, causing significant nitrogen pollution due to a high density of livestock in farming regions. I also want to expand on the Dutch response to these adverse climate change effects, mentioning the farm workers’ protests and their resistance to government sanctions. These sanctions include reduced agricultural consumption and decreased livestock in different farming regions, negatively impacting Dutch farmers and landowners. PaisleyPup20 (talk) 01:46, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

It would be helpful to develop Climate change in the Netherlands instead of this already large page. It mentions cows only twice (and one is the lead), and nitrogen not once. CMD (talk) 02:09, 22 April 2026 (UTC)