Transcending Mediocrity in IT Operations: Forging a Path to Excellence
Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Transcending Mediocrity in IT Operations: Forging a Path to Excellence

The interesting thing about mediocrity is that not one of us chooses it willingly. Or, even consciously. It just happens.

In most companies, it is not like things are falling apart or spinning out of control. It is not like there is chaos or customers screaming every day. It is more like a horror movie. Stuff builds up over time. Steadily. One tiny failure at a time. Companies unknowingly drift into suboptimal habits, leading to reduced uptime, diminished customer experience, hampered service availability, and stifled innovation. The costs are tangible: financial losses, eroded client retention, and poor morale - maybe not all of it visible at the same time. Mediocrity isn't a deliberate choice but emerges from ingrained human behaviors, systemic flaws, cultural norms rewarding suboptimal outcomes, and mismanaged pressures. It's an insidious creep of micro-decisions and cultural drift, making it the "water we swim in" and profoundly difficult to combat without conscious, sustained effort.

Unmasking Mediocrity: What Second Best Looks Like

Operational mediocrity is a persistent failure to achieve optimal efficiency, reliability, or business value, often stemming from management deficiencies like poor feedback and performance management or leadership deficiencies like tolerating technical debt to satisfy one’s ego, not taking decisive action, or the unwillingness to collaborate with a peer. The mediocrity-gunk that builds up leads to accumulated inefficiencies and a lost competitive advantage, resulting in case studies and citations in books and academia over time.

Identifying mediocrity requires looking beyond catastrophic failures to recognize subtle, damaging patterns - the small shifts in efficiency that we learn to accept under pressure, overload, cost, or attitude. Key symptoms include:

  • The "Automate the Mess" Fallacy: Rushing to deploy new tech (e.g., AI) to optimize outdated processes without fundamental re-engineering or fresh thinking provides an illusion of progress while perpetuating inefficiency and technical debt.
  • Perpetual Firefighting and "Hero Culture": Constantly reacting to crises, lauding quick fixes over long-term solutions, and prevention leads to burnout, neglects root cause analysis, and disincentivizes proactive work, as prevention is often invisible and unrewarded. Rewarding heroes who take pride in swooping in at the right time to save the day is a common theme in many organizations. 
  • Misalignment Across Key Functions: Fragmented efforts in security, automation, and deployment due to a lack of a holistic strategy, even within functions reporting to the same CIO pointing to a lack of overarching governance and collaboration a common theme in many organizations.
  • Valuing Counterproductive Behaviors: This includes jokingly glorified patterns like rewarding information hoarding ("shop knowledge"), "Olympic-level multi-tasking," or relying on individuals to "be more careful" with manual processes instead of robust automation, giving legs to the mediocrity monster that builds up over time.

The costs are severe. Gartner estimates average IT downtime at $5,600 per minute. The number could be true in small and medium businesses. When dealing with large mission-critical operations, this number is likely to be in the millions of dollars. Hidden costs include lost productivity, reputational damage, customer churn, and stifled innovation. Top performers disengage when mediocrity is tolerated. Philip Crosby’s warning, "When you're out of quality, you're out of business," highlights the ultimate risk companies face when they slip into the mediocrity coma. 

The Human Factor: Psychological Traps

Human psychology often paves the road to mediocrity. It is ‘the’ biggest factor in our consistent shift into the mediocrity maze, allowing us to slowly settle for the second-best way to run IT operations.  A few contributing factors include:

Ego, Hubris, and the "Not-Invented-Here" (NIH) Syndrome: Inflated egos can blind teams to the need for improvement and innovation. Leaders suffering from bloated ego find reasons not to adopt a brilliant solution for the fear of appreciating a peer’s idea or not wanting to be seen as towing the line with someone else. NIH syndrome—rejecting external ideas ("we can build it better ourselves")—stems from ownership bias and fear of invalidating past efforts. This leads to reinventing the wheel, wasting resources on "undifferentiated heavy lifting," stifling innovation, and poor performance across the board. It extends to rejecting external processes and methodologies in favor of familiar, homegrown, but inefficient ways of working.

The Paralysis of Fear:

  • Fear of Failure: Leads to choosing the perceived safety of the status quo over innovative risks.
  • Resistance to Change: A natural desire for security and stability makes it difficult to embrace new ideas as often as necessary. 
  • Aversion to Feedback: Constructive criticism, vital for growth, is often avoided by the very people who need it the most. These fears are amplified by a blame culture, where mistakes are punished, reinforcing risk aversion and making mediocrity a rational survival strategy. Ain’t that the truth?

Short-Termism and the Illusion of Perfection: Pressure for quick wins fosters short-term thinking, sacrificing long-term quality. Paradoxically, an overemphasis on perfection can lead to inaction or delivering "locally perfect, globally suboptimal" components. 

Being the largest contributor to mediocrity, the human factor needs a thorough study and should be approached with enough vulnerability and humility for it to bear any results.

Systemic Failures: Organizational Conspiracies Against Excellence

Systemic factors often create conditions where mediocrity becomes almost inevitable. Organizational pressures come in all colors, shapes, and sizes. The ever pressing need to cut costs, increase productivity, manage headcount, and tens of other such compulsions provide the perfect ground to breed mediocrity across IT operations. Some of the contributing factors include:

  • The Squeeze of Constraints (Cost, Time, Scope): Quality is almost always the silent victim of the Iron Triangle. A world-class mindset treats quality as a non-negotiable constraint, influencing decisions about scope, time, and cost, rather than being a derivative. However, the ongoing compromises between the CFO and the CIO leave very little room for IT tools and processes to get their dose of quality and innovation when needed.

  • Technical Debt: Shortcuts for speed today incur costs of complexity and instability in the future. Unmanaged technical debt (from rushed POCs, immature processes, or "environmental debt") degrades performance, reduces productivity, and increases security risks, often long past the change of guard of the team that put the solutions in place.

  • Organizational Inertia: The tendency to resist change ("how we've always done it"), even when necessary. Caused by path dependence, failure to learn externally, bureaucracy, and fear of failure. Kodak and Nokia are cautionary tales, and both abused abundantly as examples of this symptom. Inertia also operates at a micro-level—resistance to better tools, processes, or standards—leading to a "death by a thousand cuts" that stifles continuous improvement in many organizations..
  • Misaligned Incentives: Reward structures that don't align with optimal organizational outcomes. When development teams are rewarded for feature velocity over enterprise-grade quality, crucial tasks like refactoring or testing are often deprioritized, contributing to mediocrity that might not be visible in the short term. This can create a "tragedy of the commons," where teams optimize locally (Dev for speed, Ops for uptime) at the expense of overall system health, code quality, and customer value. True excellence requires incentives aligned around shared, end-to-end outcomes across teams performing different functions.

The Ascent to Excellence: Cultivating a World-Class Mindset

Transcending mediocrity requires a fundamental shift in mindset, culture, and operational philosophy, especially for leaders and others in power. I am not going to argue that avoiding mediocrity is easy or comes naturally. But I will also say that it is not rocket science, nor does it have to be expensive. With the right attitude and organizational culture, it is possible to build IT operations that are on par with the top 1% of companies that run massive operations with very few people while delivering a near-flawless customer experience.

  • Defining World-Class Operations: Achieving "Thriving Excellence" demands consistently exceeding expectations, driving innovation, and acting as a strategic partner both within and outside the organization. This involves a culture of continuous improvement, customer-centricity, employee empowerment, leadership commitment, data-driven decisions, and standardized best practices, all of which have to be painstakingly crafted and nurtured over time. As Kevin Duggan says, "Operational excellence is when each and every employee can see the flow of value to the customer, and fix that flow before it breaks down."
  • Leadership as the Linchpin: Leaders must craft a vision for excellence, align initiatives with metrics, foster accountability, and model desired behaviors - living those values themselves every single day. This includes respecting individuals, seeking perfection through continuous improvement, promoting scientific thinking, focusing on process optimization, ensuring built-in quality, and creating customer value. Critically, leaders must create conditions for excellence by dismantling barriers: combating NIH, fostering psychological safety, redesigning incentives, and consciously funding technical debt reduction across the board.
  • Embracing Continuous Improvement (Kaizen): Many industries and domains have embraced Kaizen wholeheartedly and reaped the benefits that come with it. IT operations will benefit greatly from adopting the theme to achieve excellence across the board.

These and other similar values form the foundational framework to break the firm grip of mediocrity that can grip any organization. Like most changes, this one has to start from the top. Leaders are singularly responsible for setting the tone for world-class quality, which will then drive enterprise-grade IT operations that will drive businesses forward.

Charting the Course: Actionable Strategies

Moving to excellence demands deliberate strategies encompassing mindset, processes, technology, people, and collaboration. While elementary by definition, not one of these can be taken lightly. Leaders have the burden of modeling the organization around these timeless principles and paving the way for running a world-class IT organization. A handful of strategies that can kickstart this process include:

Foundational Mindset Shifts:

  • IT as Value Driver: Not a cost center. This is the most fundamental shift that has to precede any attempt to move from mediocrity to excellence. The onus is on the CIO to draw the line that connects what IT does with how it can, should, and does contribute to business growth.
  • Embrace Vulnerability & Psychological Safety: Allow experimentation and learning from failures.
  • Cultivate "Growth Mindset": View challenges as learning opportunities. Probably the cheesiest aphorism there is in the school of leadership. Also, the most profound when it comes to articulating the need for root cause analysis and automation.

Practical Implementation Tactics:

  • Proactive Technical Debt Management: Technical debt is a retail commodity. It does not happen as one big lump-sum act by any one engineer. It can. But most often, technical debt is a layered, tiered acceptance of inefficiency that creeps and settles in for the long term. By ruthlessly enforcing standards, automating intelligently, dedicating capacity for refactoring, and making debt visible to business, CIOs can set the tone for moving from mediocrity to excellence in a structured manner.
  • Design Incentives for Quality & Long-Term Stability: This is probably the antithesis of every organization racing to the finish line. In most organizations, speed is rewarded, often at the cost of quality and long-term sustainability. By rewarding outcomes (stability, satisfaction, and toil reduction), not just outputs (features), recognizing proactive work, and aligning incentives across teams for shared goals, CIOs can pave the way for excellence in their organizations.
  • Systematically Dismantle Silos: Silos are a reality in most organizations. Or should I say ‘all’ organizations? Cross-functional teams, collaboration tools, shared understanding of interdependencies are only some of the starting points to battle silos within the org actively. 

The journey is a complex, iterative cultural transformation, not a checklist that can be checked to achieve excellence overnight. Isolated "best practices" without addressing underlying issues lead to superficial change, deepening the mediocrity chasm even further. Strategies must be interconnected: managing technical debt requires a culture that values quality; psychological safety enables feedback for continuous improvement; and more importantly, the leader has to show what it means to collaborate by showing he/she can actively partner with the peer to get things done. 

IT operational mediocrity silently sabotages business goals, stifles innovation, and erodes morale systematically. It is the kind of gift that keeps on giving.  It stems from human psychology, systemic flaws, economic pressures, and mismanaged technology, to mention a few. The path to excellence is an ongoing commitment, a habit cultivated through deliberate effort, strong leadership, and a supportive culture that has to start at the top. Leaders who want to make the change must honestly assess their organizations, champion quality, invest in long-term stability, and relentlessly advocate for best practices. Choosing excellence is a strategic imperative. Not a tactical afterthought.

It's true that operational mediocrity often flies under the radar but can cause real damage over time. It makes me wonder, what would you say is the first step companies should take to turn things around and strive for excellence?

Like
Reply

Love the picture ! Most of what you say - about NIH, fear of failure and nearly most other points - are true not just in IT but in a lot of areas too!

Let’s connect! I’d love to hear your thoughts on some of my recent posts on Edutopia—check them out here: https://www.edutopia.org/profile/rich-schiccatano/

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Joseph Prabhakar

Others also viewed

Explore content categories