National League Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. MaysNYG 8.3
2. AaronMLN 8.0
3. MathewsMLN 7.4
4. RobinsonCIN 6.8
5. BanksCHC 6.7
6. MusialSTL 6.1
7. DrysdaleBRO 5.8
8. PodresBRO 5.7
Schoendienst2TM 5.7
10. BlasingameSTL 5.4

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. DrysdaleBRO 6.0
2. PodresBRO 5.8
3. SpahnMLN 4.8
4. SanfordPHI 4.6
5. DrabowskyCHC 4.6
6. LawrenceCIN 4.0
7. JacksonSTL 3.8
8. SimmonsPHI 3.7
9. GĂłmezNYG 3.6
10. AntonelliNYG 3.4

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. PodresBRO 2.66
2. DrysdaleBRO 2.69
3. SpahnMLN 2.69
4. BuhlMLN 2.74
5. LawPIT 2.87
6. SanfordPHI 3.08
7. FriendPIT 3.38
8. SimmonsPHI 3.44
9. BarclayNYG 3.44
10. JacksonSTL 3.47

Wins

Wins

1. SpahnMLN 21
2. SanfordPHI 19
3. BuhlMLN 18
4. DrysdaleBRO 17
BurdetteMLN 17
6. LawrenceCIN 16
7. GĂłmezNYG 15
DrottCHC 15
McDanielSTL 15
JacksonSTL 15

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. BuhlMLN .720
2. SanfordPHI .704
3. SpahnMLN .656
4. BurdetteMLN .654
DrysdaleBRO .654
6. McDanielSTL .625
JacksonSTL .625
8. WehmeierSTL .588
9. DrottCHC .577
10. PodresBRO .571
JonesSTL .571

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. PodresBRO 1.082
2. RobertsPHI 1.158
3. DrysdaleBRO 1.167
4. NewcombeBRO 1.168
5. SpahnMLN 1.177
6. LawPIT 1.181
7. JacksonSTL 1.203
8. SanfordPHI 1.217
9. FriendPIT 1.231
10. LawrenceCIN 1.238

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. SanfordPHI 7.377
2. PodresBRO 7.714
3. DrottCHC 7.860
4. BuhlMLN 7.934
5. WorthingtonNYG 7.992
6. SpahnMLN 8.004
7. DrysdaleBRO 8.023
8. DrabowskyCHC 8.036
9. JonesSTL 8.080
10. JacksonSTL 8.387

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. NewcombeBRO 1.495
2. RobertsPHI 1.550
3. LawPIT 1.668
4. PurkeyPIT 1.904
5. JeffcoatCIN 2.000
6. PodresBRO 2.020
7. HaddixPHI 2.057
8. BurdetteMLN 2.069
9. SimmonsPHI 2.123
10. FriendPIT 2.209

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. JonesSTL 7.588
2. HaddixPHI 7.172
3. SanfordPHI 7.149
4. DrottCHC 6.681
5. DrabowskyCHC 6.384
6. DrysdaleBRO 6.027
7. WorthingtonNYG 5.137
8. NuxhallCIN 5.111
9. PodresBRO 5.005
10. WehmeierSTL 4.964

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. LownCHC 67
2. FacePIT 59
3. LabineBRO 58
4. GrissomNYG 55
WorthingtonNYG 55
6. ArroyoPIT 54
7. FarrellPHI 52
FreemanCIN 52
9. AckerCIN 49
LawrenceCIN 49

Saves

Saves

1. LabineBRO 17
2. GrissomNYG 14
3. LownCHC 12
4. WilhelmSTL 11
5. FacePIT 10
FarrellPHI 10
7. Elston2TM 8
MuffettSTL 8
FreemanCIN 8
McMahonMLN 8
RoebuckBRO 8

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. FriendPIT 277.0
2. SpahnMLN 271.0
3. BurdetteMLN 256.2
4. LawrenceCIN 250.1
5. RobertsPHI 249.2
6. DrabowskyCHC 239.2
7. GĂłmezNYG 238.1
8. SanfordPHI 236.2
9. DrottCHC 229.0
10. DrysdaleBRO 221.0

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. SanfordPHI 188
2. DrabowskyCHC 170
DrottCHC 170
4. JonesSTL 154
5. DrysdaleBRO 148
6. FriendPIT 143
7. HaddixPHI 136
8. RobertsPHI 128
9. KoufaxBRO 122
10. LawrenceCIN 121

Games Started

Games Started

1. FriendPIT 38
2. GĂłmezNYG 36
3. SpahnMLN 35
4. SanfordPHI 33
DrabowskyCHC 33
BurdetteMLN 33
7. LawrenceCIN 32
DrottCHC 32
RobertsPHI 32
10. BuhlMLN 31
JeffcoatCIN 31
KlinePIT 31

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. SpahnMLN 18
2. FriendPIT 17
3. GĂłmezNYG 16
4. SanfordPHI 15
5. RobertsPHI 14
BurdetteMLN 14
BuhlMLN 14
8. LawrenceCIN 12
DrabowskyCHC 12
NewcombeBRO 12

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. PodresBRO 6
2. SpahnMLN 4
NewcombeBRO 4
DrysdaleBRO 4
5. AntonelliNYG 3
LawPIT 3
SanfordPHI 3
DrottCHC 3
FriendPIT 3
10. RobertsPHI 2
McDanielSTL 2
McDevittBRO 2
MizellSTL 2
NuxhallCIN 2
KlinePIT 2
JonesSTL 2
JacksonSTL 2
DrabowskyCHC 2
SimmonsPHI 2
BuhlMLN 2
BarclayNYG 2

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. RobertsPHI 40
2. JeffcoatCIN 29
3. FriendPIT 28
GĂłmezNYG 28
NewcombeBRO 28
6. KlinePIT 27
7. LawrenceCIN 26
8. BurdetteMLN 25
WehmeierSTL 25
10. NuxhallCIN 24

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. DrottCHC 129
2. BuhlMLN 121
3. DrabowskyCHC 94
SanfordPHI 94
5. SpahnMLN 78
6. LawrenceCIN 76
7. McDevittBRO 72
8. GĂłmezNYG 71
JonesSTL 71
10. FriendPIT 68
KlippsteinCIN 68

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. FriendPIT 273
2. BurdetteMLN 260
3. RobertsPHI 246
4. SpahnMLN 241
5. JeffcoatCIN 236
6. LawrenceCIN 234
7. GĂłmezNYG 233
8. AntonelliNYG 228
9. DrabowskyCHC 214
KlinePIT 214
SimmonsPHI 214

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. HaddixPHI 3.487
2. RobertsPHI 2.977
3. NewcombeBRO 2.727
4. PodresBRO 2.477
5. DrysdaleBRO 2.426
6. JonesSTL 2.169
7. FriendPIT 2.103
8. SanfordPHI 2.000
9. NuxhallCIN 1.868
10. SimmonsPHI 1.840

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. SimmonsPHI 0.467
2. PurkeyPIT 0.501
3. McDanielSTL 0.613
4. BuhlMLN 0.623
5. PodresBRO 0.689
6. DrysdaleBRO 0.692
7. RushCHC 0.701
8. SpahnMLN 0.764
9. AntonelliNYG 0.805
10. DrabowskyCHC 0.826

Losses

Losses

1. RobertsPHI 22
2. AntonelliNYG 18
FriendPIT 18
4. KlinePIT 16
RushCHC 16
6. DrabowskyCHC 15
7. PurkeyPIT 14
8. GĂłmezNYG 13
HaddixPHI 13
JeffcoatCIN 13
LawrenceCIN 13

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. RobertsPHI 113
2. BurdetteMLN 106
3. FriendPIT 104
JeffcoatCIN 104
5. GĂłmezNYG 100
RushCHC 100
7. LawrenceCIN 98
8. DrabowskyCHC 94
9. KlinePIT 92
NuxhallCIN 92

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. SanfordPHI 12
2. McDanielSTL 9
3. SchmidtSTL 7
DrottCHC 7
McDevittBRO 7
6. HaddixPHI 6
ArroyoPIT 6
ConleyMLN 6
9. WorthingtonNYG 5
KlippsteinCIN 5
KoufaxBRO 5
DrabowskyCHC 5

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. DrabowskyCHC 10
2. AckerCIN 8
LawrenceCIN 8
4. DrysdaleBRO 7
DrottCHC 7
PurkeyPIT 7
JeffcoatCIN 7
NuxhallCIN 7
ArroyoPIT 7
10. JonesSTL 6
McDevittBRO 6

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. FriendPIT 1,148
2. SpahnMLN 1,111
3. BurdetteMLN 1,067
4. LawrenceCIN 1,045
5. RobertsPHI 1,033
6. GĂłmezNYG 1,011
7. DrabowskyCHC 1,010
8. DrottCHC 1,007
9. SanfordPHI 989
10. BuhlMLN 926

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. LownCHC 47
2. GrissomNYG 38
3. LabineBRO 37
4. FacePIT 32
FarrellPHI 32
6. WilhelmSTL 30
7. FreemanCIN 26
8. WorthingtonNYG 23
9. KingPIT 19
McMahonMLN 19
RoebuckBRO 19

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. PodresBRO 155
2. DrysdaleBRO 153
3. LawPIT 133
4. SpahnMLN 130
5. BuhlMLN 128
6. SanfordPHI 124
7. NewcombeBRO 118
8. LawrenceCIN 116
9. JacksonSTL 114
10. BarclayNYG 114

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. HaddixPHI 2.94
2. SimmonsPHI 3.00
3. PodresBRO 3.03
4. DrysdaleBRO 3.04
5. JonesSTL 3.24
6. SanfordPHI 3.31
7. PurkeyPIT 3.36
8. McDanielSTL 3.44
9. RushCHC 3.46
10. FriendPIT 3.48

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. DrysdaleBRO 32
2. PodresBRO 30
3. SpahnMLN 25
4. BuhlMLN 19
5. SanfordPHI 18
6. JacksonSTL 14
7. LawrenceCIN 14
8. LawPIT 14
9. NewcombeBRO 13
10. RoebuckBRO 12

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. DrysdaleBRO 3.5
2. PodresBRO 3.3
3. SpahnMLN 2.7
4. BuhlMLN 2.0
5. SanfordPHI 1.9
6. JacksonSTL 1.5
7. LawrenceCIN 1.5
8. LawPIT 1.4
9. NewcombeBRO 1.4
10. RoebuckBRO 1.3

Base-Out Runs Saved (RE24)

<strong>Base-Out Runs Saved</strong><br>Given the bases occupied/out situation, how many runs did the pitcher<br>save in the resulting play. Compared to average, so 0 is average, and<br>above 0 is better than average

1. PodresBRO 37.08
2. SpahnMLN 34.02
3. DrysdaleBRO 33.24
4. JacksonSTL 23.99
5. BuhlMLN 21.90
6. LawrenceCIN 19.12
7. FarrellPHI 18.11
8. SanfordPHI 17.85
9. RoebuckBRO 16.49
10. DrabowskyCHC 14.05

Win Probability Added (WPA)

<strong>Win Probability Added by Pitcher</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability.<br>A change of +/- 1 would indicate one win added or lost.

1. PodresBRO 4.3
2. SanfordPHI 3.3
3. JacksonSTL 3.3
4. FarrellPHI 3.0
5. DrysdaleBRO 3.0
6. BuhlMLN 2.9
7. SpahnMLN 2.6
8. JonesSTL 2.6
9. BurdetteMLN 2.1
10. PurkeyPIT 1.8

Sit. Wins Saved (WPA/LI)

<strong>Situational Wins (WPA/LI)</strong><br>It is the sum of WPA divided by the leverage index for each play.<br>WPA depends greatly on the context of the at bats.<br>This stat does not.

1. PodresBRO 3.0
2. SpahnMLN 2.6
3. DrysdaleBRO 2.5
4. SanfordPHI 1.7
5. LawrenceCIN 1.6
6. RoebuckBRO 1.5
7. LawPIT 1.4
8. NewcombeBRO 1.4
9. DrabowskyCHC 1.3
10. BurdetteMLN 1.3

Championship WPA (cWPA)

<strong>Championship Win Probability Added by Pitcher</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability, displayed in percentage points.<br>A change of +/- 100% would indicate one world series win added or lost.

1. BuhlMLN 9.1
2. PodresBRO 9.1
3. JonesSTL 7.4
4. ConleyMLN 6.1
5. SpahnMLN 5.5
6. SanfordPHI 5.0
7. McDanielSTL 4.4
8. JohnsonMLN 3.7
9. DrysdaleBRO 3.5
10. SimmonsPHI 3.2

Base-Out Wins Saved (REW)

<strong>Base-Out Wins Saved</strong><br>This is the number of wins above average the player was worth by their performance<br>measured by the 24 base-out situations.

1. PodresBRO 3.9
2. SpahnMLN 3.9
3. DrysdaleBRO 3.5
4. JacksonSTL 2.5
5. BuhlMLN 2.5
6. LawrenceCIN 1.9
7. FarrellPHI 1.9
8. SanfordPHI 1.9
9. RoebuckBRO 1.7
10. DrabowskyCHC 1.5