National League Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. AdamsPIT 9.3
2. MathewsonNYG 7.2
3. SalleeSTL 6.4
4. AlexanderPHI 6.0
5. CravathPHI 5.7
6. MarquardNYG 5.6
7. TesreauNYG 5.6
8. SeatonPHI 5.3
9. KonetchySTL 5.3
10. RuckerBRO 4.9

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. AdamsPIT 8.4
2. MathewsonNYG 7.1
3. AlexanderPHI 6.6
4. SeatonPHI 6.1
5. SalleeSTL 6.1
6. MarquardNYG 5.4
7. TesreauNYG 5.4
8. RuckerBRO 4.6
9. CheneyCHC 4.3
10. DemareeNYG 4.2

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. MathewsonNYG 2.06
2. AdamsPIT 2.15
3. TesreauNYG 2.17
4. DemareeNYG 2.21
5. PierceCHC 2.30
6. RobinsonPIT 2.38
7. BrennanPHI 2.39
8. MarquardNYG 2.50
9. CheneyCHC 2.57
10. SeatonPHI 2.60

Wins

Wins

1. SeatonPHI 27
2. MathewsonNYG 25
3. MarquardNYG 23
4. AlexanderPHI 22
TesreauNYG 22
6. AdamsPIT 21
CheneyCHC 21
8. SalleeSTL 19
9. HumphriesCHC 16
TylerBSN 16
PerdueBSN 16

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. HumphriesCHC .800
2. DemareeNYG .765
3. AlexanderPHI .733
4. PierceCHC .722
5. MarquardNYG .697
6. MathewsonNYG .694
7. SeatonPHI .692
8. AdamsPIT .677
9. TesreauNYG .629
10. BentonCIN .611

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. MathewsonNYG 1.020
2. AdamsPIT 1.020
3. MarquardNYG 1.031
4. HumphriesCHC 1.066
5. DemareeNYG 1.072
6. PerdueBSN 1.130
7. RobinsonPIT 1.146
8. SalleeSTL 1.149
9. RuckerBRO 1.165
10. AlexanderPHI 1.185

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. TesreauNYG 7.085
2. SeatonPHI 7.315
3. AllenBRO 7.420
4. PierceCHC 7.518
5. TylerBSN 7.595
6. MarquardNYG 7.750
7. AdamsPIT 7.776
8. DemareeNYG 7.933
9. CheneyCHC 7.997
10. HendrixPIT 8.066

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. MathewsonNYG 0.618
2. HumphriesCHC 1.193
3. AdamsPIT 1.406
4. MarquardNYG 1.531
5. SuggsCIN 1.583
6. PerdueBSN 1.653
7. DemareeNYG 1.713
8. RobinsonPIT 1.879
9. SalleeSTL 1.957
10. BrennanPHI 2.000

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. TesreauNYG 5.330
2. HendrixPIT 5.154
3. MarquardNYG 4.719
4. SeatonPHI 4.691
5. AlexanderPHI 4.671
6. TylerBSN 4.433
7. RixeyPHI 4.336
8. Ames2TM 4.323
9. AllenBRO 4.225
10. AdamsPIT 4.132

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. CheneyCHC 54
2. SeatonPHI 52
3. SalleeSTL 50
4. AlexanderPHI 47
5. Camnitz2TM 45
6. JohnsonCIN 44
RaganBRO 44
8. AdamsPIT 43
RobinsonPIT 43
10. HarmonSTL 42
HendrixPIT 42
MarquardNYG 42

Saves

Saves

1. CheneyCHC 11
2. Crandall2TM 6
BrownCIN 6
4. SalleeSTL 5
5. Camnitz2TM 3
Ames2TM 3
WiltseNYG 3
RuckerBRO 3
HendrixPIT 3
MarquardNYG 3

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. SeatonPHI 322.1
2. AdamsPIT 313.2
3. AlexanderPHI 306.1
4. MathewsonNYG 306.0
5. CheneyCHC 305.0
6. TylerBSN 290.1
7. MarquardNYG 288.0
8. TesreauNYG 282.0
9. SalleeSTL 276.0
10. HarmonSTL 273.1

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. SeatonPHI 168
2. TesreauNYG 167
3. AlexanderPHI 159
4. MarquardNYG 151
5. AdamsPIT 144
6. TylerBSN 143
7. HendrixPIT 138
8. CheneyCHC 136
9. RuckerBRO 111
10. Ames2TM 110

Games Started

Games Started

1. TesreauNYG 38
2. AdamsPIT 37
3. AlexanderPHI 36
CheneyCHC 36
5. MathewsonNYG 35
SeatonPHI 35
7. TylerBSN 34
GrinerSTL 34
9. MarquardNYG 33
RuckerBRO 33

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. TylerBSN 28
2. MathewsonNYG 25
CheneyCHC 25
4. AdamsPIT 24
5. AlexanderPHI 23
6. SeatonPHI 21
7. MarquardNYG 20
8. HessBSN 19
9. GrinerSTL 18
SalleeSTL 18

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. AlexanderPHI 9
2. SeatonPHI 5
3. MathewsonNYG 4
MarquardNYG 4
RuckerBRO 4
TylerBSN 4
AdamsPIT 4
8. SalleeSTL 3
PerdueBSN 3
PierceCHC 3
JohnsonCIN 3

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. HessBSN 13
2. GrinerSTL 12
3. SalleeSTL 11
4. RaganBRO 10
MarquardNYG 10
HumphriesCHC 10
7. AlexanderPHI 9
PerrittSTL 9
9. MathewsonNYG 8
Camnitz2TM 8
JohnsonCIN 8

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. SeatonPHI 136
2. TesreauNYG 119
3. TylerBSN 108
4. Camnitz2TM 107
5. HarmonSTL 99
6. CheneyCHC 98
LavenderCHC 98
8. HendrixPIT 89
9. JohnsonCIN 86
10. AllenBRO 81

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. HarmonSTL 291
MathewsonNYG 291
3. AlexanderPHI 288
4. RaganBRO 284
5. GrinerSTL 279
6. AdamsPIT 271
CheneyCHC 271
8. SeatonPHI 262
9. RudolphBSN 258
10. SalleeSTL 257

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. MathewsonNYG 4.429
2. MarquardNYG 3.082
3. AdamsPIT 2.939
4. HumphriesCHC 2.542
5. PerdueBSN 2.333
6. AlexanderPHI 2.120
7. SuggsCIN 2.086
8. BrennanPHI 2.043
9. DemareeNYG 2.000
10. RudolphBSN 1.847

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. TylerBSN 0.062
2. RobinsonPIT 0.092
3. PackardCIN 0.094
4. RuckerBRO 0.104
5. HendrixPIT 0.112
6. RudolphBSN 0.144
7. SeatonPHI 0.168
8. DemareeNYG 0.180
9. HarmonSTL 0.198
10. AdamsPIT 0.201

Losses

Losses

1. GrinerSTL 22
2. HarmonSTL 21
3. Camnitz2TM 20
4. RaganBRO 18
AllenBRO 18
6. TylerBSN 17
HessBSN 17
8. JohnsonCIN 16
9. RuckerBRO 15
HendrixPIT 15
SuggsCIN 15
SalleeSTL 15

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. GrinerSTL 127
2. HarmonSTL 119
3. RaganBRO 111
4. PerrittSTL 102
5. Camnitz2TM 100
6. AlexanderPHI 95
7. HessBSN 93
SeatonPHI 93
9. JohnsonCIN 90
TylerBSN 90

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. CheneyCHC 19
2. Ames2TM 12
TylerBSN 12
4. SeatonPHI 9
5. JamesBSN 8
6. ChalmersPHI 7
7. BentonCIN 6
JohnsonCIN 6
LavenderCHC 6
Camnitz2TM 6

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. LavenderCHC 13
2. TylerBSN 11
3. AllenBRO 10
SeatonPHI 10
Camnitz2TM 10
GrinerSTL 10
7. BentonCIN 9
MayerPHI 9
9. PackardCIN 8
PerrittSTL 8
CheneyCHC 8

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. SeatonPHI 1,324
2. CheneyCHC 1,255
3. AlexanderPHI 1,234
4. AdamsPIT 1,227
5. MathewsonNYG 1,195
6. TylerBSN 1,189
7. TesreauNYG 1,158
8. HarmonSTL 1,150
9. MarquardNYG 1,122
10. RaganBRO 1,114

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. Crandall2TM 27
2. BrownCIN 21
3. GeyerSTL 20
4. CheneyCHC 18
5. PackardCIN 16
Stack2TM 16
7. HendrixPIT 15
CooperPIT 15
LavenderCHC 15
SalleeSTL 15
RobinsonPIT 15

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. MathewsonNYG 153
2. TesreauNYG 145
3. DemareeNYG 142
4. AdamsPIT 140
5. BrennanPHI 138
6. PierceCHC 136
7. SeatonPHI 127
8. RobinsonPIT 126
9. MarquardNYG 126
10. CheneyCHC 122

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. AdamsPIT 2.40
2. MathewsonNYG 2.49
3. MarquardNYG 2.50
4. RudolphBSN 2.63
5. AlexanderPHI 2.66
6. DemareeNYG 2.70
7. RuckerBRO 2.71
8. BrennanPHI 2.72
9. PerdueBSN 2.74
10. HendrixPIT 2.74

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. MathewsonNYG 36
2. AdamsPIT 33
3. TesreauNYG 27
4. SeatonPHI 26
5. AlexanderPHI 23
6. MarquardNYG 22
7. DemareeNYG 21
8. SalleeSTL 19
9. BrennanPHI 19
10. CheneyCHC 18

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. MathewsonNYG 4.0
2. AdamsPIT 3.6
3. TesreauNYG 3.0
4. SeatonPHI 2.8
5. AlexanderPHI 2.5
6. MarquardNYG 2.4
7. DemareeNYG 2.2
8. SalleeSTL 2.0
9. BrennanPHI 2.0
10. CheneyCHC 1.9

Base-Out Runs Saved (RE24)

<strong>Base-Out Runs Saved</strong><br>Given the bases occupied/out situation, how many runs did the pitcher<br>save in the resulting play. Compared to average, so 0 is average, and<br>above 0 is better than average

1. AdamsPIT 43.39
2. MathewsonNYG 42.28
3. DemareeNYG 35.42
4. MarquardNYG 32.79
5. SalleeSTL 29.68
6. TesreauNYG 26.50
7. CheneyCHC 24.66
8. RuckerBRO 18.91
9. AlexanderPHI 18.13
10. RudolphBSN 16.94

Win Probability Added (WPA)

<strong>Win Probability Added by Pitcher</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability.<br>A change of +/- 1 would indicate one win added or lost.

1. MathewsonNYG 6.8
2. RuckerBRO 5.0
3. DemareeNYG 4.9
4. MarquardNYG 4.8
5. CheneyCHC 4.1
6. AdamsPIT 4.1
7. SalleeSTL 3.9
8. AlexanderPHI 3.3
9. SeatonPHI 2.6
10. BrennanPHI 2.5

Sit. Wins Saved (WPA/LI)

<strong>Situational Wins (WPA/LI)</strong><br>It is the sum of WPA divided by the leverage index for each play.<br>WPA depends greatly on the context of the at bats.<br>This stat does not.

1. MathewsonNYG 5.0
2. AdamsPIT 4.6
3. MarquardNYG 4.3
4. DemareeNYG 3.1
5. RuckerBRO 2.7
6. SalleeSTL 2.6
7. CheneyCHC 2.5
8. SeatonPHI 2.3
9. TesreauNYG 2.3
10. RobinsonPIT 2.3

Championship WPA (cWPA)

<strong>Championship Win Probability Added by Pitcher</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability, displayed in percentage points.<br>A change of +/- 100% would indicate one world series win added or lost.

1. MathewsonNYG 12.1
2. MarquardNYG 8.6
3. DemareeNYG 7.5
4. RuckerBRO 6.9
5. AlexanderPHI 6.7
6. BrennanPHI 4.5
7. CheneyCHC 3.6
8. Fromme2TM 2.9
9. SeatonPHI 2.7
10. HarmonSTL 2.4

Base-Out Wins Saved (REW)

<strong>Base-Out Wins Saved</strong><br>This is the number of wins above average the player was worth by their performance<br>measured by the 24 base-out situations.

1. AdamsPIT 5.0
2. MathewsonNYG 4.8
3. DemareeNYG 4.0
4. MarquardNYG 3.6
5. SalleeSTL 3.2
6. TesreauNYG 2.9
7. CheneyCHC 2.7
8. RuckerBRO 2.0
9. AlexanderPHI 1.9
10. HendrixPIT 1.9