American League Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. RuthNYY 8.1
2. FoxxPHA 7.9
3. SimmonsPHA 7.9
4. LazzeriNYY 7.8
5. GehrigNYY 7.5
6. GrovePHA 7.4
7. HudlinCLE 7.3
8. MarberryWSH 7.2
9. FerrellCLE 6.6
10. WalbergPHA 6.4

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. HudlinCLE 7.5
2. GrovePHA 7.3
3. MarberryWSH 6.8
4. WalbergPHA 6.3
5. GraySLB 6.2
6. FerrellCLE 6.0
7. EarnshawPHA 5.7
8. MillerCLE 4.7
9. GastonBOS 4.6
10. CrowderSLB 4.3

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. GrovePHA 2.81
2. MarberryWSH 3.06
3. ThomasCHW 3.19
4. EarnshawPHA 3.29
5. HudlinCLE 3.34
6. MillerCLE 3.58
7. FerrellCLE 3.60
8. WalbergPHA 3.60
9. SheridNYY 3.61
10. MacFaydenBOS 3.62

Wins

Wins

1. EarnshawPHA 24
2. FerrellCLE 21
3. GrovePHA 20
4. MarberryWSH 19
5. GraySLB 18
PipgrasNYY 18
WalbergPHA 18
8. HudlinCLE 17
CrowderSLB 17
10. UhleDET 15

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. GrovePHA .769
2. EarnshawPHA .750
3. FerrellCLE .677
4. CollinsSLB .647
ShoresPHA .647
HeimachNYY .647
7. WalbergPHA .621
8. MarberryWSH .613
9. PipgrasNYY .600
10. WellsNYY .591

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. MarberryWSH 1.206
2. ThomasCHW 1.271
3. FaberCHW 1.291
4. GrovePHA 1.304
5. WalbergPHA 1.326
6. HudlinCLE 1.327
7. RussellBOS 1.333
8. BlaeholderSLB 1.342
9. WellsNYY 1.345
10. LyonsCHW 1.357

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. EarnshawPHA 8.234
2. WellsNYY 8.333
3. MarberryWSH 8.377
4. WalbergPHA 8.608
5. McKainCHW 9.000
6. HadleyWSH 9.031
7. GrovePHA 9.087
8. PipgrasNYY 9.146
9. MacFaydenBOS 9.163
10. CrowderSLB 9.180

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. RussellBOS 1.584
2. PennockNYY 1.602
3. ThomasCHW 2.080
4. UhleDET 2.096
5. QuinnPHA 2.180
6. HudlinCLE 2.344
7. FaberCHW 2.346
8. BlaeholderSLB 2.473
9. MarberryWSH 2.481
10. BraxtonWSH 2.522

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. GrovePHA 5.557
2. EarnshawPHA 5.266
3. PipgrasNYY 4.993
4. HadleyWSH 4.515
5. MarberryWSH 4.350
6. RuffingBOS 4.015
7. WhitehillDET 3.779
8. FerrellCLE 3.709
9. WellsNYY 3.631
10. UhleDET 3.614

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. MarberryWSH 49
2. EarnshawPHA 44
3. GraySLB 43
FerrellCLE 43
5. GrovePHA 42
BlaeholderSLB 42
7. MooreNYY 41
8. HudlinCLE 40
CrowderSLB 40
BrownWSH 40
WalbergPHA 40

Saves

Saves

1. MarberryWSH 9
MooreNYY 9
3. ShoresPHA 7
4. FerrellCLE 5
5. BraxtonWSH 4
HeimachNYY 4
GrovePHA 4
RommelPHA 4
CrowderSLB 4
StonerDET 4
WalbergPHA 4

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. GraySLB 305.0
2. HudlinCLE 280.1
3. GrovePHA 275.1
4. WalbergPHA 267.2
5. CrowderSLB 266.2
6. ThomasCHW 259.2
7. LyonsCHW 259.1
8. EarnshawPHA 254.2
9. MarberryWSH 250.1
10. UhleDET 249.0

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. GrovePHA 170
2. EarnshawPHA 149
3. PipgrasNYY 125
4. MarberryWSH 121
5. GraySLB 109
RuffingBOS 109
7. WhitehillDET 103
8. FerrellCLE 100
UhleDET 100
10. HadleyWSH 98

Games Started

Games Started

1. GrovePHA 37
GraySLB 37
3. CrowderSLB 34
4. HudlinCLE 33
PipgrasNYY 33
WalbergPHA 33
EarnshawPHA 33
8. RuffingBOS 32
RussellBOS 32
10. LyonsCHW 31
FaberCHW 31
SorrellDET 31
ThomasCHW 31

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. ThomasCHW 24
2. GraySLB 23
3. HudlinCLE 22
UhleDET 22
5. LyonsCHW 21
6. WalbergPHA 20
GastonBOS 20
8. GrovePHA 19
CrowderSLB 19
10. RuffingBOS 18
FerrellCLE 18
WhitehillDET 18

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. BlaeholderSLB 4
MacFaydenBOS 4
CrowderSLB 4
GraySLB 4
5. PipgrasNYY 3
HeimachNYY 3
WalbergPHA 3
WellsNYY 3
EarnshawPHA 3
10. GrovePHA 2
MorrisBOS 2
ThomasCHW 2
HollowayCLE 2
HudlinCLE 2
MillerCLE 2
ZacharyNYY 2

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. CrowderSLB 22
WalbergPHA 22
3. WellsNYY 19
4. GraySLB 18
BlaeholderSLB 18
6. ThomasCHW 17
RuffingBOS 17
8. PipgrasNYY 16
WhitehillDET 16
CollinsSLB 16

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. EarnshawPHA 125
2. RuffingBOS 118
3. FerrellCLE 109
4. SorrellDET 106
5. WalbergPHA 99
6. GraySLB 96
WhitehillDET 96
8. MorrisBOS 95
PipgrasNYY 95
10. CrowderSLB 93

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. GraySLB 336
2. HudlinCLE 299
3. UhleDET 283
4. RuffingBOS 280
5. GrovePHA 278
6. LyonsCHW 276
7. CrowderSLB 272
8. ThomasCHW 270
SorrellDET 270
10. WhitehillDET 267

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. GrovePHA 2.099
2. MarberryWSH 1.754
3. PennockNYY 1.750
4. UhleDET 1.724
5. PipgrasNYY 1.316
6. EarnshawPHA 1.192
7. BlaeholderSLB 1.180
8. BraxtonWSH 1.157
9. HadleyWSH 1.153
10. GraySLB 1.135

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. MarberryWSH 0.216
2. HudlinCLE 0.225
3. FerrellCLE 0.260
4. GrovePHA 0.262
5. EarnshawPHA 0.283
6. BraxtonWSH 0.297
7. MorrisBOS 0.302
8. MillerCLE 0.306
9. UhleDET 0.325
10. MacFaydenBOS 0.326

Losses

Losses

1. RuffingBOS 22
2. LyonsCHW 20
3. GastonBOS 19
4. MacFaydenBOS 18
ThomasCHW 18
RussellBOS 18
7. CarrollDET 17
8. HadleyWSH 16
9. GraySLB 15
HudlinCLE 15
CrowderSLB 15
SorrellDET 15
BlaeholderSLB 15
WhitehillDET 15

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. RuffingBOS 132
2. SorrellDET 130
3. WhitehillDET 126
GraySLB 126
5. HadleyWSH 122
6. LyonsCHW 118
7. CrowderSLB 116
8. UhleDET 113
9. WalbergPHA 107
10. PipgrasNYY 106

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. GastonBOS 17
2. BrownWSH 9
3. MorrisBOS 8
GrovePHA 8
EarnshawPHA 8
6. GraySLB 7
7. CarrollDET 6
UhleDET 6
RuffingBOS 6
10. SorrellDET 5
HadleyWSH 5

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. McKainCHW 10
2. FaberCHW 9
3. BayneBOS 8
CarrollDET 8
5. MillerCLE 7
6. CollinsSLB 6
MarberryWSH 6
8. MacFaydenBOS 5
SheridNYY 5
EarnshawPHA 5
PipgrasNYY 5
HadleyWSH 5

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. GraySLB 1,310
2. HudlinCLE 1,201
3. GrovePHA 1,168
4. WalbergPHA 1,139
5. CrowderSLB 1,128
6. EarnshawPHA 1,115
7. RuffingBOS 1,112
8. LyonsCHW 1,102
9. ThomasCHW 1,093
10. UhleDET 1,084

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. MooreNYY 28
2. MarberryWSH 21
3. ShoresPHA 19
4. YdeDET 16
5. McKainCHW 15
RommelPHA 15
7. HeimachNYY 14
MiljusCLE 14
CarrollBOS 14
10. CoffmanSLB 13
KimseySLB 13
DuganCHW 13
OgdenSLB 13
SheridNYY 13
BurkeWSH 13

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. GrovePHA 149
2. MarberryWSH 139
3. ThomasCHW 133
4. HudlinCLE 132
5. EarnshawPHA 128
6. MillerCLE 123
7. FerrellCLE 123
8. GraySLB 119
9. MacFaydenBOS 117
10. WalbergPHA 117

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. GrovePHA 2.85
2. MarberryWSH 3.04
3. UhleDET 3.18
4. BraxtonWSH 3.45
5. HudlinCLE 3.48
6. EarnshawPHA 3.56
7. MillerCLE 3.65
8. FaberCHW 3.67
9. PennockNYY 3.67
10. QuinnPHA 3.68

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. GrovePHA 42
2. MarberryWSH 34
3. HudlinCLE 33
4. EarnshawPHA 27
5. GraySLB 26
6. WalbergPHA 24
7. ThomasCHW 23
8. FerrellCLE 23
9. ZacharyNYY 19
10. MillerCLE 18

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. GrovePHA 4.2
2. MarberryWSH 3.3
3. HudlinCLE 3.3
4. EarnshawPHA 2.6
5. GraySLB 2.5
6. WalbergPHA 2.3
7. ThomasCHW 2.3
8. FerrellCLE 2.2
9. ZacharyNYY 1.8
10. MillerCLE 1.8

Base-Out Runs Saved (RE24)

<strong>Base-Out Runs Saved</strong><br>Given the bases occupied/out situation, how many runs did the pitcher<br>save in the resulting play. Compared to average, so 0 is average, and<br>above 0 is better than average

1. GrovePHA 51.43
2. MarberryWSH 49.43
3. WalbergPHA 37.03
4. EarnshawPHA 35.65
5. HudlinCLE 31.03
6. FerrellCLE 30.48
7. GraySLB 29.78
8. ShoresPHA 22.30
9. ZacharyNYY 20.08
10. StewartSLB 18.59

Win Probability Added (WPA)

<strong>Win Probability Added by Pitcher</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability.<br>A change of +/- 1 would indicate one win added or lost.

1. GrovePHA 5.4
2. MarberryWSH 4.4
3. EarnshawPHA 3.7
4. HudlinCLE 3.7
5. WalbergPHA 3.7
6. ShoresPHA 3.5
7. GraySLB 3.0
8. FerrellCLE 2.8
9. CrowderSLB 2.4
10. ZacharyNYY 2.3

Sit. Wins Saved (WPA/LI)

<strong>Situational Wins (WPA/LI)</strong><br>It is the sum of WPA divided by the leverage index for each play.<br>WPA depends greatly on the context of the at bats.<br>This stat does not.

1. MarberryWSH 4.6
2. GrovePHA 4.2
3. HudlinCLE 3.3
4. WalbergPHA 3.1
5. EarnshawPHA 2.8
6. FaberCHW 2.3
7. MillerCLE 2.0
8. ShoresPHA 1.8
9. FerrellCLE 1.6
10. GraySLB 1.6

Championship WPA (cWPA)

<strong>Championship Win Probability Added by Pitcher</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability, displayed in percentage points.<br>A change of +/- 100% would indicate one world series win added or lost.

1. GrovePHA 12.0
2. WalbergPHA 7.4
3. EarnshawPHA 6.5
4. GraySLB 5.7
5. UhleDET 5.1
6. ShoresPHA 4.2
7. EhmkePHA 3.8
8. CollinsSLB 3.3
9. MooreNYY 1.8
10. HudlinCLE 1.7

Base-Out Wins Saved (REW)

<strong>Base-Out Wins Saved</strong><br>This is the number of wins above average the player was worth by their performance<br>measured by the 24 base-out situations.

1. GrovePHA 5.2
2. MarberryWSH 4.9
3. WalbergPHA 3.7
4. EarnshawPHA 3.5
5. HudlinCLE 3.0
6. FerrellCLE 2.9
7. GraySLB 2.8
8. ShoresPHA 2.2
9. ZacharyNYY 2.1
10. StewartSLB 1.8