Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Health and fitness
| Points of interest related to Health and fitness on Wikipedia: Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Health and fitness. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Health and fitness|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Health and fitness. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
| watch |
See also: Medicine-related deletions and Disability-related deletions
Please be sure to follow the three basic steps when nominating an article for deletion. While not required, it is courteous to also notify interested people—such as those who created the article, or those who have contributed significant work to it. Thank you.
Health and fitness
edit- Individualized Quality Control Plan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability not established with substantive independent sources – standalone article not needed for narrow regulatory topic (merge to Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments may be appropriate but I don't see the significance) Reywas92Talk 04:16, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Management, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Michelle F. Henry (Dermatologist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable dermatologist. No reliable, significant, notable coverage. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 16:28, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Health and fitness. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 16:28, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Practicing doctor/educator, I don't this much to distinguish this person from others in the field. Not indexed in Gscholar, doesn't appear to have a significant h-index. Appears PROMO or a CV. Oaktree b (talk) 16:36, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Medicine, and Texas. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 17:23, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, I got my person from the WikiProject Women in Red. She is a distinguished dermatologist who has published over 30 peer-reivewed article and has made a major influence in skin-of-color work. She is also a clinical instructor of dermatology at Weill Cornell Medical College where she teaches her practice to college students. She has also been featured in major media outlets such as Coveteur and self magazine. What do you suggest is missing in order for her to be "notable"? ~2025-37859-60 (talk) 18:51, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Maureen Storey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
To be brief, this article is a resume that relies heavily on self-published or other conflicted sources. I searched for independent, secondary sources that covered Storey or analyzed her work in any kind of detail and could only find the 2011 article in The Guardian (currently reference 3 in the article). One apparently independent newspaper profile (which reads suspiciously like a press release) combined with a bunch of conflicted or trivial mentions is not enough to establish notability. DoItFastDoItUrgent (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Food and drink, Health and fitness, Science, Colorado, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. DoItFastDoItUrgent (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:20, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- Profhilo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable product. Fails WP:GNG. Most of the content is WP:UNDUE - every product for use on humans needs a CE mark; and it's hardly news that products are distributed by different importers in different markets. Article creator has a total of 23 edits, all to either their talk page or this article, including moving it twice from draft space. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 19:58, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- NB: an earlier draft of this article, by the same author, was speedy deleted by DoubleGrazing. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 20:27, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Switzerland. Shellwood (talk) 20:02, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:03, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: While I could speedy this again on the same basis as before, now that it's been brought here, I think we should let the discussion run. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:25, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: as nommed, just promotional, with no evidence of notability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:26, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- Naeem Sadiq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Physician with no clear indication of notability; previous prod declined. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 10:16, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bibliographies, Health and fitness, and Medicine. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 10:16, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sri Lanka and Karnataka. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:54, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - one possibly unreliable citation is not enough for a BLP. Ping me if you find and add three better sources. Bearian (talk) 03:35, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- List of infrastructure in the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This feels like far too broad of a topic, without a clear discussion of inclusion/exclusion criteria. To my knowledge, we do not have similar articles for other countries (though they may exist, named differently). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:14, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:14, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Health and fitness, Military, Education, Schools, Engineering, Medicine, Aviation, Transportation, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:33, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Keep using the same rationale provided by @Katzrockso. I wouldn't be entirely opposed to the convert to categories, but I think this falls under Wikipedia:LoL (note: it should be put in alphabetical order) aesurias (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- delete pointless all-encompassing list. --Altenmann >talk 07:34, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Comment This seems like it could be a perfectly cromulent navigational WP:List of lists, and as such be fine. Is there something I'm missing? TompaDompa (talk) 08:05, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete per WP:SALAT as far too broad. It would have to be a list of lists of lists of lists.Clarityfiend (talk) 09:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- I think it is in retaliation to putting up a world map of political boundaries last night. Wikideas1 (talk) 15:40, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Convert to category Works much better with inclusion pushed from articles rather than pulled by a list article that has to be maintained manually. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Convert to a list of lists per TompaDompa. Thryduulf (talk) 10:52, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Perfectly valid list of lists for navigational purposes - a broad topic has never prevented a Wikipedia article before.Katzrockso (talk) 13:34, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GothicGolem29 (Talk) 12:18, 22 November 2025 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:59, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- Relisting admin note: policy based information on why you support a change in format (or not) will be helpful to the closer. Star Mississippi 00:01, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. This satisfies many of the WP:DOAC; "Categories only show the page name of each page being categorized", "Entries are arranged in alphabetical order only (though you can control the alphabetization). They cannot be organized into sections and subsections on a single page, each with its own descriptive introduction", "Categories are not shown in mobile view.". There is no reason why both the category and list can't exist per WP:NOTDUP and MOS:LIST#List and categories.
- The sectioning provides valuable informational content that would require a multitude of subcategories or otherwise be lost in a conversion to categorization, which is a valid reason to have a list per MOS:LIST#Information and WP:NLIST's "Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept". Katzrockso (talk) 01:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NLIST Agnieszka653 (talk) 21:40, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- Keep and convert to a list of lists page. This seems to be a valid "list of lists" article per WP:LISTOFLISTS. This may entail removal of some sections like "Intermodal terminals", "Ro-Ro ports", "Satellites", and "Weather", which are merely lists of the first order (i.e. the list items are not lists themselves). Epicgenius (talk) 02:01, 3 December 2025 (UTC)