avatar

a family story

Back in the early 1960s, Ma Bell had an informal employee jug band made up of (mostly) ladies from the (all manual) billing department. They didn't have anywhere to go during their lunch breaks, so one of them who happened to have a ukulele asked if the others wanted to play. One had a ukulele from her grandmother that she didn't know how to play, and another couple bought them, and then someone made a washtub bass, and pretty soon there were 10 of them jamming on the patio every day at lunch. They called themselves The Gut-Tub Banjo Ukulele Band.

They got to be pretty good, practicing every day like that. Eventually, when the company would throw parties for them when they did really well at work, they'd get booked to play. Ma Bell built them a small stage, and they'd play parties and coffee breaks. My Aunt Joann played the washboard. Many of them sang.

As the years went by, enough people transferred to different departments that they gave it up for a while. But then, people started to retire, and they had a lot of free time. That first woman with the ukulele called them up and asked it maybe they wanted to get together every couple of months and play. And so they did. And then, a friend asked to join, and then somebody's husband, and someone else's cousin. They got to be more than 20 people, alternating houses every other month to spend one day eating and talking and laughing and singing and playing songs on their strange and improvised instruments.

Most of them are in their 70s now. They have arthritis, and can't hold the frets on the banjo-ukulele so well anymore. My aunt has died, as have several others; still others are too sick to go. Those that do go don't sing so well anymore. But still, they stay connected, see each other and talk and laugh and keep up the energy of The Gut-Tub Banjo Ukulele Band.
santa

SF Cacophony

When I was a teenager, an older friend in SF that I'd met online told me about the Cacophony Society. She told me about the first ever SantaCon, and some of their other events. I was enthralled. I had to meet these people! It was 1995, and I spent ages looking through pages and pages of internet search results until I found them. I cajoled a friend who had a car, and we drove to SF to sneak into a bar to attend a meeting. I was already a member. To the month, it was 18 years ago.

Tonight, I went to the book release party for a book by many of the folks who started some of that fine trouble. I saw people I hadn't seen in 15 years. It was old home night on the freak front. It reminded me of why I love SF.

Friends, I strongly encourage you to purchase a copy of this book. Buy it for your favorite weirdo. Buy it for yourself. Buy it for every teenager you know. Spread the gospel of Cacophony!

http://talesofsfcacophony.com/
roses

women in tech: a happy story, for once

A friend/co-worker and I went out to lunch today. We were talking about some of the cool things about our workplace culture, particularly how it is not sexist. Since we work in an operations department for a software company, that quality isn't necessarily a given.

One thing she pointed out that hadn't even really crossed my mind was that the new dev ops woman we just hired was introduced in an email with her name and picture, and mentioned that her hobbies are decorating and cooking - and that no one asked if she could code. Because, well, duh - that's what she was hired for. If she couldn't code, we wouldn't have hired her for that job.

This reminded me of another new hire email, a recent male hire for the support team who mentioned that his hobbies also include decorating and cooking - not hobbies a man could admit to in every workplace.

This is what diversity and professionalism is supposed to be like, and it's awesome. I hope more companies will join us.
bouncydead

... Hello world?

"My people are going back to LiveJournal."

More people seem to be returning. Perhaps the zeitgeist will return here. One can hope.

At any rate, it's been forever since I've posted here, but having seen several fantastic people comment lately that they are returning... I shall do so, see how it works out.
crack the whip

FUCK CENSORSHIP

If you have been following the debate over the Stop Online Piracy Act SOPA, you'll know that this proposed legislation would break the internet by allowing censorship of anything even vaguely kinda sorta resembling copyrighted material. It's extremely important for anyone who cares about art or technology or culture to oppose this.

I have been unimpressed with GoDaddy as a company for some time now, due to their sexist advertising and general douchebaggery. I didn't think it would happen, but they have reached a new low: they support SOPA.

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archiv…

If you own domains that are registered with GoDaddy, I strongly urge you to move them. I have been meaning to move my domains for a while, and this just provided the kick in the pants necessary to overcome my laziness on the matter.

There are a number of domain registrars who hate SOPA and are excited to take GoDaddy's customers. The following Reddit thread contains information on other registrars who are offering discounts and promotions to GoDaddy customers who wish to move:

http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/c…

Edit: Win! Looks like they dropped their support for SOPA: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy…

Let's make it clear, though - a sudden reversal of opinion when presented with angry customers is not enough. GoDaddy actually participated in writing SOPA. A single press release does not makes this OK.
bouncydead

where are the limits?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/arti…

I am really fascinated with the above article. The story is about an injunction against new business licenses for gold buyers while the city council looks into limits on this industry.

At what point should you restrict licenses for a certain type of business to maintain profitability for existing businesses, if ever? How should a city handle a class of business that could easily be a part of blatant crime? At what point should we restrict licenses based on regulation capability?

In general, I like regulated capitalism. This article poses a lot of questions on what limits are appropriate, and I've been thinking about it all day. In theory, it seems like licensing fees should cover the cost of regulation enforcement.

I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the idea of regulating the numbers of businesses to protect profits for those already existing. It seems like some of the business owners quoted in the article love the idea of limits on their businesses because they think it will protect their profits, which seems sketchy to me. What if existing businesses offer bad deals or poor service? The golden ideal of regulated capitalism is that the best businesses win the most customers, and protecting existing businesses against competition sounds like bad news.

I am comfortable with other reasons for regulation, though. I like consumer protection laws, employee protection laws, environmental protection laws. I support profit, not rapaciousness.

For pawn shops and gold buyers, one of the most important regulations has to do with what records they should keep. Given that these places buy valuable things, it seems reasonable to make sure that these things belong to the sellers. How do you protect against the sale of stolen property without creating an undue burden on either buyer or seller?

I guess the reason I find this so interesting is that there are no right answers to these questions. Even within traditional American economic ideologies, I can imagine a pretty broad spectrum of answers for what is appropriate or acceptable.

Thoughts?
bouncydead

...did that actually work?

I got this in email today, regarding my last post:

On behalf of the SFMTA Board of Directors, thank you for taking the time to write. Please know that this item is not proceeding at this time.

Thanks again,

Roberta Boomer
Secretary, SFMTA Board of Directors

***

Awesome.
bouncydead

proposed tow away zone: how the "war on fun" comes to the SFMTA

Today, I received the following email from San Francisco's Mighty:

MIGHTY NEEDS YOUR HELP

On November 4th, the Sustainable Streets Division of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency passed the following resolution:

ESTABLISH – TOW-AWAY, NO STOPPING, 10PM TO 6AM, DAILY
Utah Street, both sides, between Alameda and 16th streets
San Bruno Avenue, both sides, between Alameda and 16th streets

see the rest of the messageCollapse )

I crafted the following email in response, sent to the MTA and the supervisor's office:

To whom it may concern,

It has come to my attention that there is a proposal to establish a
tow-away zone on Utah street between 16th and Alameda from 10pm to
6am. I urge you to oppose this measure.

This area supplies much-needed safe and well-lit parking for numerous
businesses in the area. Eliminating these spots will increase the
traffic burden on the area as people spend more time driving trying to
find a parking spot. Eliminating these parking spots will increase the
danger to residents, patrons and their vehicles as they have to park
further from their destinations, making both the people and their
vehicles easier prey for thieves. Perhaps most importantly,
eliminating these parking spots will hurt San Francisco, as a number
of people will simply go elsewhere for entertainment.

If you care about safety, traffic, and business revenue in San
Francisco, you should oppose the establishment of a night time
tow-away zone on Utah Street.


Thanks,

Autumn Tyr-Salvia

*****

This really makes me angry. This is how cities are shaped, by making some things convenient and other things inconvenient. This is what the "war on fun" looks like. This is how urban planning shapes acceptable use. It's subtle. It's hard to get people excited about fighting parking zone changes, which is why they do things like this. It seems small, so people don't fight back. But after enough small things, it starts to be such a pain to go out that people don't anymore. Enough people stay home, the clubs close, and we lose out on legal spaces to create experiences outside the pale.

I wish The Mighty and others the best of luck in fighting this.


Edit 11/16: I received the following email today:

On behalf of the SFMTA Board of Directors, thank you for taking the time to write. Please know that this item is not proceeding at this time.

Thanks again,

Roberta Boomer
Secretary, SFMTA Board of Directors

Win!
bouncydead

all hallow's workday

People are dressing up at work tomorrow, and management has specifically asked my team to so they don't feel alone in their costumes. What should I wear?

I could wear the costume I just made, but I really don't want to explain 'self-transforming machine elf' to people at work. I could call it "being from another dimension." I dunno, it feels like it might be a little too weird for work.

Another choice is to go as a calavera, a Mexican Dia de los Muertos skeleton person. If I did that, I guess I'd just wear a big floofy dress and a skull mask, and maybe my pink Burning Man skeleton hat. Is that a cop out?

The real cop out costumes are gypsy or witch. Which is to say, normal clothes, though things I probably wouldn't wear to the office normally. Is "gypsy" an offensive costume now?

Bah. I am going to start making the three of us very good pirate costumes. Everyone needs a pirate costume, and it's simple and good to wear to work. Next year, piracy! This year... I dunno.

Advice welcome.

Edit: Because I know you're all dying to know, I went as a calavera. The machine elf costume is really amazingly awesome, but it just felt like opening too much of myself to work. I'm pretty open about who I am in general, but it felt ... vulnerable. I suppose it's worth considering why.
beholder

overheard at Burning Man

The people camped behind us had some loud sex one afternoon. Not long after, I overheard this exchange.

Girl 1, speaking to boy: "Average."
Girl 2: "What?"
Girl 1: "Oh, he asked how he was, and I said he was average. I mean, what some people would call good sex, I just call average. I think I'm just used to good sex, you know? I mean, some guys are really bad at it. Sometimes, it's not even worth stopping them to tell them how to get better. You just want them to hurry up and finish so you can never fuck them again. But anyways, he wasn't bad, just average."