Avatar

Aspiring Mad Scientist

@eccentricecologist / eccentricecologist.tumblr.com

yasmin/ياسمين | marxist-leninist | 20+ year old nerd | she/her exclusively | inshallah we will get to see the imperial core fall in our lifetime

Donations to mutual aid groups have dropped by half since the ceasefire was announced. The bombs may have quieted, but the suffering hasn’t stopped— Palestinians in Gaza still need our help. Please, if you’re able, donate today:

Please consider signing up for monthly contributions!

Anonymous asked:

It never fails to depress me when I see baby leftists asking basic questions that are very directly answered by famous communist theory. We read for a reason, fellow anon, don't be proud of your ignorance and don't skip doing the reading just because you have access to someone can answer your question at the moment.

Disagree. I think that it's our duty as a new generation of Marxists to be able to answer these kinds of questions in our own language and with reference to our own material conditions. The value of the literature passed down to us from Marx & Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, etc. is less that it teaches us what to think, and more that it teaches us how to think. These famous works of Communist literature demonstrate equations based on observations of a world different from the one we now inhabit, and it's up to us to re-apply these equations to our present world.

Further, asking even basic questions is a common and comfortable part of learning, and answering basic questions in our own words is an opportunity to "show the work" and practice dialectical materialism. If all we can do to answer these questions is point at old books, then we don't actually understand the theory ourselves.

Whilst of course I encourage people to read the classics of Marxism, I think that expecting people to have done so on their own is setting yourself up for disappointment. Don't be depressed that people haven't yet read enough of the principles; be excited that people are showing interest in the doctrine of the conditions of the liberation of the proletariat!

Avatar

Reminds me of a famous Sankara quote

Yesss!

I wish I could use this whole poster as my ask button

people act like this college shit is hard but i used AI to generate me a medical license and have bee ndoing surgery on newborns for 6 months

“our age of bronze is collapsing” is this beautiful random burst of monty python dialogue amidst the drudgery of nolan’s vision and i think it should win the first-ever oscar for best solitary line

[wringing my hands as i look out my window directly overlooking wall street, watching the sun rise on october 29, 1929] aw fuck it’s the great depression

Repeat after me:

Transmisandry does not exist.

Trans men are not systematically oppressed for being trans men.

They are systematically oppressed for being trans.

That is literally transphobia.

So that means that transwomen are not oppressed for being trans women, but just for being trans, right?

Trans women are oppressed for being women & for being trans.

Why would a conversation about how trans men aren’t oppressed for being men “mean” anything when it comes to trans women?

This is literally “soo if unicorns don’t exist then neither do horses!!! CHECKMATE SJW” logic.

incense-witch-deactivated201812

Transmisogyny is literally the cross section/overlap of transphobia and misogyny. Therefore, transmisandry is the cross section of transphobia and misandry. And we all know misandry doesn’t exist, soo….

11 years ago

bought an energy drink called "pussy" earlier today because haha funny sex drink but I've been immediately humbled because this shit is delicious. passionfruit and lychee and just the right amount of sweet and tart. i can't do this gang. i can't be the kind of person who goes to my corner store every weekend to buy a six-pack of Pussy Energy Drink.

A quick update for all my fellow r/196 migrants about how things are going back in the motherland. A saga has unfolded:

It began with a basic hornypost, and a comment under said post:

So, the fatal BreadSlice was getting clowned on in the replies, until:

So yeah, the more things change the more they stay the same I guess.

As a game that is fundamentally interested by the concept of the state, even more so than its spiritual predecessor Dark Souls, I find Elden Ring is hit the hardest with the expectation that the player character is a man just by virtue of their role in the story.

Like, the worldbuilding does a very good job of gendering the structure of the Order's leadership: a God, powerful by her nature as the target of the desire of violent men, but lacking in agency, and a Lord*, powerful because of the great violence he is capable of, including towards his God.

This gendering isn't just symbolic. Of the 3 possible Gods in the game, two of them, Ranni and Marika, are directly referred to as women, and the other, Miquella, is constantly feminised and all but stated to be a repressed trans woman, whereas the rest of the Shardbearers (besides Malenia, who has abandoned the Throne to serve Miquella's goals) and the two previous Elden Lords are all men.

Even among the Tarnished, besides you, who has expressed the wish to become Lord ? Gideon, the patriarch of the Roundtable Hold, and Vyke, the gallant knight in love with his maiden.

To be clear: I find this very cool ! This inherently masculine positioning in the game's world makes for a more thoughtful exploration of the game's political thesis, including the emergent narrative exploration of the degendering that a woman must put herself through when seeking power inside of a patriarchal structure, and the fact that this experience is not due to a blatant male gaze makes it more palatable to me.

I do have some criticisms related to this, though, and that's how Ranni's questline plays into it. A questline where an aspiring goddess chooses to rebel and pry back her agency from the system by overturning it and leaving the people to decide their own fate, and where the Tarnished of no Renown becomes her Blade** and kind of lose their masculine role, is a necessary addition to the game's exploration of gender and state IMO, but I wish the game went further with it, either by Ranni being more gender non-conforming besides her assertiveness and ambition, or by stripping the more heterosexual aspects of the questline, overtly feminising the Tarnished of no Renown, and making it into a story that assumes they are a lesbian rather than a straight man (yes, this would alienate a large part of the male userbase, which is why they never would've done it, but I don't think those men should be allowed to play video games, so it's whatever).

Conclusion: The best version of Elden Ring is the one where Ranni is a full-blown lesbian communist

* Notice how "Lady" is never used to refer to whomever holds the Elden Throne. No, that's not a liberty taken for dubbing the game in English: the original Japanese script never uses the term "女王", "Queen", where we would see "Lord" as far as I could find, only "", "King"

** It would have been interesting to explore the parallel between a Tarnished of No Renown who swore themselves to Ranni and Malenia, who also turned herself into the Blade of an aspiring goddess, but y'know ... I can't let every Elden Ring post be a complaint about Malenia's wasted potential or else I'm gonna need some type of prescription