there is a very specific type of political enlightenment when you allow yourself to acknowledge bad people can be attractive and funny and intelligent and still be bad people because those things don’t quantify morality
“i’ve never met a pretty racist” “republican makeup” etc etc is all just enforcing the idea that being conventionally unattractive is a moral failing. stop doing that. it’s an actively dangerous idea to spread
daily reminder that:
- ai art is not art
- photography is not art
- digital art is not art
- "traditional" art is not art
- music is not art
art is not real and you cant make it
The 67 meme is kinda problematic because 6 is literally afraid of 7. It’s a toxic dynamic. Not to mention what 7 did to 9… how does 7 even still have a platform bro
Daily Affirmations
1. I am not in love with my best friend
2. I do not need mood stabilizers
3. A Patrick Bateman themed sideblog will fix me
Min wage should be 80k salaried
Like this isn't an exaggeration. You should be able to rent alone, buy groceries, have disposable income, and still save for a vacation or whatever tf. I cannot emphasize enough how little people are being paid
Yeah, no, like at first was like, "That seems a little high" and then I stopped and actually compared it to, y'know, the price of living and the cost of things and whatever, and it literally is not? It is actually just "the wages of a decent living" that minimum wage is supposed to be?
It turns out that I -- like the rest of us -- am not immune to propaganda, and sometimes that fact slaps me in the face in the most fascinating ways.
embarrassment is the cost of entry.
if you aren't willing to look like a foolish beginner, you'll never become a graceful master.
Let’s fucking go
This is HUGE.
1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.
2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.
3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."
4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.
TL;DR Google reeeeeally stepped in it this time.
And it couldn't have happened to a more deserving bunch of absolute rat bastards.
Google's motto: Do No Evil.
if you don’t have an emotionally available father as a child you just become one as an adult even if you’re not a man and you have no children
getting an update on my phone that says "you can now upload a photo to gemini and it'll create a full song with lyrics based on your photo!" and i just. why? why would i want that? why would anyone want that? it sounds like the type of thing that'd be funny to do once but. is this really what it's all for?






