The limits of conceptual analysis

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):425-453 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It would be nice if good old a priori conceptual analysis were possible. For many years conceptual analysis was out of fashion, in large part because of the excessive ambitions of verificationist theories of meaning._ _However, those days are over._ _A priori conceptual analysis is once again part of the philosophical mainstream._ _This renewed popularity, moreover, is well-founded. Modern philosophical analysts have exploited developments in philosophical semantics to formulate analyses which avoid the counterintuitive consequences of verificationism, while vindicating our ability to know a priori precisely what it is our words and thoughts represent._ _Despite its apparent promise, however, I

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Limits of Conceptual Analysis in Aesthetics.Karlheinz Lüdeking - 2010 - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 21 (39).
The Epistemology of Thought-Experiment Judgments.Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa & Benjamin W. Jarvis - 2013 - In Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa & Benjamin W. Jarvis, The rules of thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 216-230.
Varieties of conceptual analysis.Max Kölbel - 2021 - Analytic Philosophy 64 (1):20-38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
534 (#102,570)

6 months
52 (#166,296)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura Schroeter
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Which Concept of Concept for Conceptual Engineering?Manuel Gustavo Isaac - 2021 - Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Scientific Philosophy 88 (5):2145-2169.
Metaphilosophy.Paul Thagard & Craig Beam - 2011 - Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy.
Bootstrapping our way to samesaying.Laura Schroeter - 2012 - Synthese 189 (1):177-197.
Semantic Deference versus Semantic Coordination.Laura Schroeter & François Schroeter - 2016 - American Philosophical Quarterly 53 (2):193-210.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press. Edited by John McDowell.
Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul Aaron Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein, Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.

View all 69 references / Add more references