The rules of thought

Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by Benjamin W. Jarvis (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ichikawa and Jarvis offer a new rationalist theory of mental content and defend a traditional epistemology of philosophy. They argue that philosophical inquiry is continuous with non-philosophical inquiry, and can be genuinely a priori, and that intuitions do not play an important role in mental content or the a priori.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Rules of Thought.Bradley Rives - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (2):310-314.
Models of Philosophical Thought Experimentation.Jonathan Andy Tapsell - 2014 - Dissertation, Australian National University
Stranded Runners.Christopher T. Buford - 2021 - Logos and Episteme 12 (2):145-152.
If Folk Intuitions Vary, Then What?Edouard Machery, Ron Mallon, Shaun Nichols & Stephen P. Stich - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3):618-635.
Intuition and Inquiry.Anand Vaidya - 2012 - Essays in Philosophy 13 (1):285-296.
Content and Justification: Philosophical Papers.Paul A. Boghossian - 2008 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-18

Downloads
242 (#169,535)

6 months
37 (#234,823)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jonathan Ichikawa
University of British Columbia
Benjamin W. Jarvis
Brown University (PhD)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references