Abstract

Recently, philosophers' attention has been draw to science done in response to ongoing crises, such as natural disasters, pandemics, or climate change. In this paper, I argue that extant accounts of crisis science, which understand it as merely faster science, are reductive and oversimplified. Instead, I characterize crisis science as a qualitatively distinct phase of science that incorporates a variety of temporal and causal scales and addresses unique communicative challenges. This fuller account of the phenomenon is then detailed with respect to what some contend is the archetypal crisis science, conservation biology.