The moral status of the (nuclear) family

Abstract

The family is commonly regarded as being an important social institution. In several policy areas, evidence can be found that the family is treated as an entity towards which others can have moral obligations; it has needs and interests that require protection; it can be ill and receive treatment. The interests attributed to the family are not reducible to those of its members – and may even come into conflict with them. Using Warren's criteria for moral status, we show that, although the status of the family is not explicitly described in terms of moral status, the way in which it is treated implies that it has such status.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Biological Ties and Biological Accounts of Moral Status.Jake Monaghan - 2019 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (3):355-377.
Moral Status.Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves - 2021 - In Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves, Dictionary of Global Bioethics. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 745-745.
Family, choice and distributive justice.Veronique Munoz-Dardé - 2002 - In David Archard & Colin M. [eds] Macleod, The Moral and Political Status of Children: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
The Moral Status of Children.Julie Tannenbaum & Agnieszka Jaworska - 2018 - In Anca Gheaus, Gideon Calder & Jurgen de Wispelaere, The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Childhood and Children. New York: Routledge. pp. 67-78.
Self-serving bias and the structure of moral status.Thomas Douglas - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (3):141-142.
The Mind that Matters.Mattia Cecchinato - forthcoming - The Philosophical Quarterly.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-12

Downloads
158 (#264,332)

6 months
50 (#171,100)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Daniela Cutas
Lund University
Anna Smajdor
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

Parental Labor as Cooperative Labor.K. Lindsey Chambers - 2025 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 42 (4):1270-1284.
Sci-Fi Parenthood and the End of Love.Daniela Cutas - forthcoming - Journal of Social Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1983 - University of California Press.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn, Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 425-434.
Justice, Gender and the Family.Susan Moller Okin - 1989 - Hypatia 8 (1):209-214.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.

View all 14 references / Add more references