- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Tuck on the Rationality of Voting: A Critical Note
Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (3):1-5 (2009)
Abstract
This paper argues that Richard Tuck, in his book Free Riding, fails to show it is rational to vote except in unusual cases.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Voting and Causal Responsibility.Geoffrey Brennan & Geoffrey Sayre-McCord - 2015 - In David Sobel, Peter Vallentyne & Steven Wall, Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy: Volume 1. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 36-59.
Book ReviewsRichard Tuck,. Free Riding.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008. Pp. 223. $35.00. [REVIEW]S. M. Amadae - 2008 - Ethics 119 (1):211-216.
Epistemic Barriers to Rational Voting: The Case of European Parliament Elections.Fabio Wolkenstein - 2020 - Social Epistemology 34 (3):294-308.
Why You Should Vote to Change the Outcome.Zach Barnett - 2020 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 48 (4):422-446.
People Do Not Have a Duty to Avoid Voting Badly: Reply to Brennan.Marcus Arvan - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (1):1-6.
Should Voting Be Compulsory? Democracy and the Ethics of Voting.Annabelle Lever & Annabelle Lever and Alexandru Volacu - 2019 - In Andrei Poama & Annabelle Lever, Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy. Routledge. pp. 242-254.
An Epistemic Case for Positive Voting Duties.Carline Klijnman - 2021 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 33 (1):74-101.
Review of Richard Tuck: Natural rights theories: their origin and development. [REVIEW]Andrew Reeve - 1981 - Ethics 92 (1):159-160.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-09-10
Downloads
393 (#122,814)
6 months
38 (#226,007)
2009-09-10
Downloads
393 (#122,814)
6 months
38 (#226,007)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
In defense of voting method publicity.Aylon Manor - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
Democratic duties. Why we should vote to rectify political injustice.Ludvig Beckman - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
Epistemic Barriers to Rational Voting: The Case of European Parliament Elections.Fabio Wolkenstein - 2020 - Social Epistemology 34 (3):294-308.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation