Collective harm and the inefficacy problem

Philosophy Compass 14 (4):e12587 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the inefficacy problem that arises in contexts of “collective harm.‘ These are contexts in which by acting in a certain sort of way, people collectively cause harm, or fail to prevent it, but no individual act of the relevant sort seems to itself make a difference. The inefficacy problem is that if acting in the relevant way won’t make a difference, it’s unclear why it would be wrong. Each individual can argue, “things will be just as bad whether or not I act in this way, so there’s no point in doing otherwise.‘ The goal of this paper is to give an overview of some of the main responses available to the problem and to highlight central issues that arise for each type of response. In the final section, I explain what I take to be the most promising strategy and discuss the form that this strategy should take.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The psychological basis of collective action.James Fanciullo - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (2):427-444.
What is the point of helping?James Fanciullo - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (6):1487-1500.
How you can help, without making a difference.Julia Nefsky - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (11):2743-2767.
The Problem of Collective Harm: A Threshold Solution.Frank Hindriks - 2024 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 17 (1).
Making a vague difference: Kagan, Nefsky and the Sorites Paradox.Mattias Gunnemyr - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (9):3501-3526.
Climate Change, Individual Emissions, and Foreseeing Harm.Chad Vance - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 14 (5):562-584.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-26

Downloads
1,087 (#48,456)

6 months
120 (#111,506)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julia Nefsky
University of Toronto at Scarborough

Citations of this work

Ethics of Doxastic Conduct.Jaakko Hirvelä & Säde Hormio - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
Desert and Economic Interdependence.Evan Behrle - 2025 - Journal of Philosophy 122 (6):253-284.
Axiological pessimism, procreation and collective responsibility.Andrea Sauchelli - 2025 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 111 (1):157-172.

View all 93 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents.Christian List & Philip Pettit - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Philip Pettit.
Reasons and Persons.Annette C. Baier - 1984 - Philosophical Books 25 (4):220-224.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford Paperbacks.

View all 98 references / Add more references