i watched a change in you

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
unthinkingclunk

dentoushead asked:

Legalizing copyright infringement would be dismantling one of the few limitations on the white urge to steal from Black Art and Black Artists. The practical application of it would be anti-Black as fuck

janmisali answered:

this argument makes so many assumptions that I disagree with that I don’t know where to start

gnommunist-organizer

damn asker, that's crazy and would suck. good thing we have robust IP law in the United States to prevent theft from Black artists

now to take a big sip of coffee and look up who owns Tupac Shakur's likeness

mlembug

In 2009, Steven Spielberg's DreamWorks company paid the estate for film rights to King's words, along with his life rights, which allow a person or company to make content based on an individual's story. DreamWorks has yet to produce or direct Spielberg's planned King biopic, but the rights have caused complications for numerous filmmakers. (Neither Spielberg's literary agent nor King's estate returned Broadly's request for comment.)

King has received only one major biopic, 2014's Selma, directed by Ava DuVernay […] Instead of using King's speeches, DuVernay wrote original monologues that sounded like soliloquies the civil rights leader could have given. […] When asked about the changes in 2014, DuVernay told the Washington Post, "We knew those rights are already gone. They're with Spielberg."

The thing that bugs me about all those cheery “learn distress tolerance!!!” posts is that, given their target audience is a certain contingent of Tumblr, they’re never going to reach the person who thinks they’re More In Touch With Nature because they find trans peoples’ bodies disgusting, or the person who rejects a friendly neurodivergent person because The Vibes Were Off.

But they absolutely will reach disabled people whose lives are already a permanent exercise in distress tolerance.

They will reach abused neurodivergent people who have let themselves be led into danger because they internalized the lesson that they need to become more tolerant of distress, get outside their comfort zones, stop caring so much about what they like or dislike, and stop treating their discomfort as meaningful information.

And that’s what bothers me about turning distress tolerance into a blanket virtue.

Sometimes you do need to tolerate distress. Sometimes discomfort is just the price of doing something difficult or unfamiliar that you actually want to do.

But sometimes discomfort is telling you that you don’t like something. Sometimes it’s telling you that a boundary is being crossed. Sometimes it’s telling you that you’re in a situation you don’t actually want to be in.

And if you’ve spent your life being taught that you’re too sensitive, too avoidant, too difficult, too afraid, or too concerned with your own comfort, “learn to tolerate distress” can very easily become “learn to override yourself.”

I don’t think the goal should be becoming so good at tolerating distress that you stop asking yourself why you’re distressed in the first place.

Sometimes the thing you need to tolerate is the discomfort of disappointing somebody else by leaving or saying “no”.

And sometimes the answer really is just, “I don’t fucking like this, I don’t have to, nobody dies if I don’t do it.”

dragon-in-a-fez

Anonymous asked:

why is your cat green?

gothicprep answered:

She’s built different 😌

gothicprep

Look i tried to laugh it off, but I haven’t stopped thinking about this message because… my cat literally isn’t green

image

like where is the green

gothicprep

image

Oh Christ

sapropel

image

This is the color your cat is

lazygravez

image

colors i eyedropped directly from op's cat

cheeseanonioncrisps

I drew a tree using only colours eyedropped from OP's cat.

image
karakats

image

every time i see this post all i see is some green alien kitty with antennae so i had to draw it

bogleech

I originally thought those were supposed to be mushrooms, implying that this cat is moldy

tanuki-pyon

image

Moldy forest cat

gothicprep

i'm happy y'all made fan art of my cat. i tried to show her and she just rubbed her face on my phone

seriousmelam
greenmossloveisreal1998iloveyou

image
mistah-oso

HE.  There exists a singular subject in that sentence and squidward is not NB. 

We are shit-posters but we should try to have standards, damnit!

greenmossloveisreal1998iloveyou

first of all youre a shit poster im a good poster second squidward isnt the only one underwater on spongebob dumbass

greenmossloveisreal1998iloveyou

not to mention squidward is nonbinary

dragon-in-a-fez
cafffine

woke up this morning, rolled over, and very confidently tried to blow out my alarm clock like a candle. absolutely no precedent for that.

wizardshark

In the year 1450 a priest rolls over and slams his hand into his candle, burning him and sending wax flying all over the place

dragon-in-a-fez

love the idea that every time someone is an idiot, another person somewhere else in the spacetime continuum is being the exact opposite idiot and there's perfect cosmic balance.

example: for every time a restaurant customer accidentally responded to "enjoy your meal" with "you too", there was also a time that a restaurant employee accidentally ate a customer's food instead of serving it.

junonharbor
junonharbor

Literacy is great. Expanding your horizons is great. But I feel like a lot of people who talk about it get into the territory of moving goalposts really quickly. Here's the thing about that:

  • If fiction became unavailable, people who don't read much non-fiction would not magically become avid non-fiction readers. It's more likely they just wouldn't read.
  • If genre fiction became unavailable, people who mostly read genre fiction would not magically become avid Sophisticated Literary Fiction™️readers. It's more likely they just wouldn't read.
  • If audiobooks became unavailable, people who primarily use audiobooks would not magically start devouring text. It's more likely they simply wouldn't experience books.
  • If graphic novels became unavailable, people who primarily read those would not magically start reading plain prose. It's more likely they'd just have empty bookshelves.
  • If fanfiction became unavailable, people who don't read much original fiction would not magically seek out original fiction. It's more likely they just wouldn't engage much with the written word.

Again. Expanding horizons is a good thing, but it's best when it comes from one's own curiosity rather than some internet scold. The "if you liked x, there's a good chance you'd enjoy y even if it sounds pretty different" approach works a million times better than "YOU MUST EAT YOUR VEGETABLES." Also? At the end of the day, people are autonomous beings, they don't actually owe you the broadest horizons possible, and you cannot control other peoples' media consumption. I learned that the hard way back when I used to be the scold.