Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Environment

(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Energy development)
Latest comment: 6 days ago by Qwerty123M in topic Sam Neill has an RfC

Suggestion: New article on atmospheric methane uptake by trees

edit

I'm Alexander Shenkin, co-author of a 2024 Nature paper showing trees remove methane from the atmosphere. Given the climate significance, this discovery might merit a Wikipedia article.

Key points:

  • Published in Nature (July 2024): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07592-w
  • Shows forests are 10% more beneficial for climate than previously thought
  • Covered by multiple news outlets
  • Has commercial applications in development

Related: SelvaFlux (https://selvaflux.com), a company I founded to commercialize this discovery through methane removal credits, might also be notable enough for an article if it gains more coverage.

I have a conflict of interest so won't create these myself, but happy to provide sources and answer questions on this talk page if anyone's interested in writing about either topic. Ashenkin (talk) 05:36, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Add section to Golf on environmental impact.

edit

The article for golf looks like it was essentially written by the golf industry. There are many articles on the environmental impact of the sport, and I linked several in talk:Golf, but we haven't had much forward movement. Posting the sources here and bringing attention to this in case anyone is interested in getting a section started. It's on my to do list, but may take a while.

GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 01:07, 10 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the recommendations! I think what is likely a more tactful approach would be to incrementally improve sections: adding environmental issues to the golf course section, and talk about gender and racial discrimination in other places (i.e. instead of a section title "women" it could be something more like "Demographics of golf", Sadads (talk) 13:43, 10 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Monsanto + Sign-post article

edit
FYI. This recent Sign-post article

has produced discussion here:

--David Tornheim (talk) 17:44, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Can people please improve the readability of Source–sink dynamics? Thanks.

edit

I think that I'm normally pretty comfortable with technical writing, but IMHO the readability of Source–sink dynamics can be improved. - ~2025-36261-79 (talk) 04:47, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello, I would like to bring attention to a new draft that may be relevant to WikiProject Environment:

Draft:Astronomitaly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Astronomitaly

The draft focuses on dark-sky preservation, light pollution awareness and environmental communication through astronomy-related outreach. The article includes multiple peer-reviewed academic sources.

Any comments or feedback would be welcome. FabriMarra68 (talk) 16:07, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Request for input: possible split discussion at Talk:REDD and REDD+

edit

I've revived a discussion at Talk:REDD and REDD+#Split article into REDD+ and UN-REDD Programme about whether to re-split the UN-REDD Programme material out from REDD and REDD+ into a separate article (and leave a summary + {{main}} link in the parent article).

Input from interested editors is welcome. Please comment on the article talk page section linked above so the discussion stays in one place. Yourecoveredinbees (talk) 23:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Organizing articles at the vital article lists

edit

On the Vital articles project, there are a number of pages listing 50,000 articles to prioritize for level 5. I've noticed that of the environmental issues, some are listed under "Social studies" while others are listed under "Earth science". If you have any better ideas on how to organize, or proposals of things to add, remove, or swap from these lists, you're welcome to comment here: Wikipedia talk:Vital_articles/Level/5/Society#Environmental stuff. Melozone crissalis (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

2026 Potomac River sewage spill

edit

I just created 2026 Potomac River sewage spill. It may be of interest to members of this project. Thriley (talk) 22:09, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Join Wiki Loves Ramadan 2026 – Create New Articles & Win Prizes

edit

Hello WikiProject Environment Members,

You are warmly invited to participate in Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Ramadan 2026 on the English Wikipedia.

This campaign focuses on improving content related to Ramadan, its history, traditions, culture, heritage, notable events, and global observances.

You can participate by creating new articles related to Ramadan and its associated topics. Your contributions will help bridge content gaps and improve coverage of Islamic culture and history on English Wikipedia.

There are also International Prizes for eligible participants.

Please visit the project page for full details, timeline, and guidelines: Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Ramadan 2026

We look forward to your participation. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:56, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

COI edit request relevant to this project: The Ocean Cleanup

edit

Just notifying members of this project that there is a Conflict of Interest edit request relevant to this WikiProject at the The Ocean Cleanup article. DrThneed (talk) 04:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

COI edit request relevant to this project: Hydrogen analyzer

edit

Just notifying members of this project that there is a Conflict of Interest edit request relevant to this WikiProject at the Hydrogen analyzer article. DrThneed (talk) 04:31, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Merced River

edit

Merced River has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:01, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Seeking review of draft

edit

Hi editors, I'm seeking review or feedback on a draft I submitted for Jeffrey Tannenbaum on behalf of Titan Grove Management via my work at Beutler Ink. I thought it might be of interest to some folks here, since he has been active in climate advocacy and environmental business. Thank you. Danilo Two (talk) 17:27, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requested Move at Talk:Environmental impact of artificial intelligence#Requested move 8 May 2026

edit

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Environmental impact of artificial intelligence#Requested move 8 May 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — EarthDude (Talk) 20:21, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft: Peter Michael Bauer - Rewilding Advocate

edit

Hello, I have created a draft article on Peter Bauer, a Portland, Oregon-based environmental and primitive skills educator, rewilding advocate, and performer. Bauer is best known for his Urban Scout persona, through which he helped bring the rewilding movement to broader public attention in the United States during the 2000s. He is also the founder of the nonprofit Rewild Portland.

The draft draws on coverage from the Oregonian, Willamette Week, Portland Tribune, and Southeast Examiner, as well as several books and a 2026 peer-reviewed article in Hunter Gatherer Research (Liverpool University Press).

I am disclosing that I have a conflict of interest in creating this article, as a paid editor with a professional relationship with the subject. I have made every effort to write neutrally and in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines, and welcome feedback of both the content and sourcing.

I would welcome feedback from editors familiar with Oregon subjects, environmental movements, biography articles, and primitive skills or anthropology topics before I submit to AfC.


The draft can be found at: Draft:Peter Michael Bauer

Thank you for your time.LeepKendall (talk) 21:06, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I made some copy edits (feel free to revert). I would add a source for the statement "...through which he helped bring the rewilding movement to broader public attention in the United States during the 2000s" in the intro. Otherwise looks good. Naturedata (talk) 08:13, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Already submitted/accepted! That was fast! Naturedata (talk) 08:16, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

edit
Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Canadian Environmental Law Association

edit

Please add reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 21:06, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requested move at Talk:2026 Zvërnec protests#Requested move 5 June 2026

edit

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2026 Zvërnec protests#Requested move 5 June 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. QalasQalas (talk) 22:10, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

edit


Hello,
Please note that Drinking water, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
Delivered by MusikBot talk 00:05, 8 June 2026 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI teamReply

Move review on Flamingo Revolution

edit

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2026 June § Flamingo Revolution, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. George Ho (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sam Neill has an RfC

edit

Sam Neill, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Qwerty123M (talk) 21:28, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply