December 28
edit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- File:Thomas kay 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Life of Riley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This image is duplicated by a higher-quality version on Commons, File:Thomas B. Kay.jpg. (The subject of the image is Thomas Lister Kay, not Thomas B. Kay; I have a move request pending to correct the error in the file name.) The Commons file also provides evidence of publication prior to 1930, while the source of the locally hosted version technically does not provide any evidence of publication. Zeibgeist (talk) 02:38, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per proposal - keep only the higher quality Commons image. ⚙️ WidgetKid 🙈🙉🙊 06:26, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: File has now been renamed on Commons. Sennecaster (Chat) 01:00, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- File:China Media Group.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dabao qian (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Superseded by File:China Media Group.svg Ahri Boy (talk) 03:18, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and use preferred SVG format. ⚙️ WidgetKid 🙈🙉🙊 06:28, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. The keep !votes have not addressed the clear-cut policy-based rationale for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 06:07, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- File:Elgar Heath.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tim riley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Previously at FFD.
File marked as {{Non-free album cover}}, but this template prohibits using such images outside articles about audio recording: This image is of a cover of an audio recording, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the publisher of the work or the artist(s) which produced the recording or cover artwork in question. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of such covers:
solely to illustrate the audio recording in question,
— Ирука13 10:14, 28 December 2025 (UTC)- Keep. Are we rehashing this again? You tried to delete this a year ago and the result was keep (Which was my !vote last time and the same again now, given there have been no changes in the intervening period). If the policies and guidelines have not changed in the intervening period, why is this being attempted again? Pinging the commenters at the previous FfD: Ssilvers, This0k, Whpq, Tim riley and Stefan2 - SchroCat (talk) 10:29, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- That discussion was not closed as keep. Rockfang (talk) 11:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. A no-brainer, I'd say. Tim riley talk 10:49, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: This image, previously used on an album cover, illustrates a particularly appropriate 1971 performance of the subject overture, the focus of which is London, because Edward Heath is a public figure who served as a Member of Parliament from Greater London, shown here conducting the London Symphony Orchestra. I have not seen another photo that would more helpfully illustrate the article, and no one else has found one. The image satisfies all the other criteria, and as to criterion #1, No free content has been found that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:31, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Remove, as image is likely copyrighted and not contextually significant. There is no significant discussion of Heath in the article, just a bullet for one recording amongst many. The image seems like decoration. It's unclear to me how not including it would harm the reader's understanding of the subject. ⚙️ WidgetKid 🙈🙉🙊 21:00, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – This was part of an old 1972 classical album L.S.O. Gala Concert (discogs). André Previn is also top-billed on the album. Such portion as-is still fails to contextually signify a 1909 composition, and the whole album cover still wouldn't signify the composition in any way. The image shows just Heath conducting an orchestra. Pinging ssilvers, tim riley, and SchroCat about this. George Ho (talk) 23:32, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. None of the keep !votes in this discussion or the previous one actually address WP:NFCC, particularly the contextual significance criterion. While album covers used in articles about the albums themselves implicitly satisfy the criterion, use of album covers in articles about other subjects do not. ✗plicit 00:18, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2026 January 5. ✗plicit 00:09, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- File:The post-merger pledge pin of Phi Mu Gamma professional sorority.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- File:Usheryoumakemewannaremixes.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by QuestFour (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Previously deleted when the PRODding was unchallenged (diff). Tagging was attempted twice when this cover art was re-uploaded, which I found out just now when looking at logs. This cover art still fails WP:NFCC#3a and/or WP:NFCC#8; there's already another cover art illustrating the release of the song. George Ho (talk) 23:12, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. - second non-free cover not warranted. Remix version not discussed in any significant way in the article.
- ⚙️ WidgetKid 🙈🙉🙊 23:20, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. The image/logo is not located at the top of the article in the infobox, and is not serves as the primary means of visual identification of the subject (WP:NFCC#8, 10c / WP:NFCI). Image/logo is not the object of sourced commentary, and is used primarily for decorative purposes (WP:NFC#CS); its omission would not be detrimental to understanding of the topic. — Ирука13 05:26, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.