Archives: 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47


Administrators' newsletter – July 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2025).

Administrator changes

removed NuclearWarfare

Interface administrator changes

added L235

Guideline and policy news

Miscellaneous

  • The 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest will run from 1 July to 30 September. Sign up now!
  • Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative to RFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

edit
  • Traffic report: God only knows
    Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?

Need your attention!

edit

Hi Utcursch,

Kindly check these two discussions -

[1], [2], User:McKhan2 is particularly engaging these discussions as clear harassment and just accused of you being tagged there for Wikipedia:Canvassing. Meanwhile, that person tagged you first in the discussion along with Ekdalian to get support from previous editors who have edited my edits in edit summaries while not even checking discussion tagged as "Kalal POV pushing", where you advised to not push Kalal POV here but with context use where Ahluwalia caste is mentioned itself given two different identities. Now, they first accuse me of not letting Kalal mention there, meanwhile, that discussion suggests the opposite. Then they propose to edit the entire article but it has been well attributed and edited in the same way as they proposed.

After I keep hinting at their true opinion of BIAS and Harassment involving my edits by using analysis to gaslight and divert conversations and keep tagging you and Ekdalian, another editor who removed well sourced edits by just mentioning their pov in edit summaries.

It is a caste of varied origins, and "distinct social groups" as you said and should be kept like that but they think "only Kalal/Kalwar pov" is valid. I remember a few socpup-users who were banned for doing same tone edits like @Newworldruler [1] banned by admin @Discospinster. All the same, they engage in talk discussion doing similar stuff while acting as some core-policies fan. I am certainly not that much fan of such discussions Utcursch and would really love your attention and time on reading the discussions and please read my replies as well. Whatever I answer, the next reply carefully is cherrypicked with the words to again "gaslight." They are just so negatively directed with continuos misinterpretations starting from deviating my "note saying, I checked their edits again on the page after nearly a month" by saying that's a lie citing work prior to their such engagements and including your and others edit summaries and now accusing of CANVASS when I cited "KALAL POV PUSHING" to be read and not edit summaries to support their lame accusations.

Repeated warnings and continuous non-good faith replies by first accusing of stuff and then acting like they care and want to move forward by suggesting another misleading edits. After your guidance and Abecdare's as well on previous edits, my work is based on Wikipedia policies with keeping relevance in mind. All the topics are mentioned with sources, and if you find even a single line or two without sources, just let me know, I have bookmarked enough to add but given AirshipJungle... editors note to not overcite as they removed many references, I have limited them. Those conversations are diverting from one topic to another and to next to keep engaging in such deliberate misinterpretation attacks that appear to be subtle and personal.

I have nothing to add but just the discussion there and one-time checking the article which is well-quoted and sourced is enough as a reply. Thank you Utcursch, I am going offline and if they edit anything given their continuous harassment on contentious topics, I will check and respond to it later and do hope your attention there. HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 08:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@HilssaMansen19: I am quite busy outside of Wikipedia these days. Please drop a note at WT:IND -- someone may be able to take a look. utcursch | talk 21:06, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – August 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2025).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, G15, has been enacted. It applies to pages generated by a large language model (LLM) without human review.
  • Following a request for comment, there is a new policy outlining the granting of permissions to view the IP addresses of temporary accounts. Temporary account deployment on the English Wikipedia is currently scheduled for September 2025, and editors can request access to the permission ahead of time. Admins are encouraged to keep an eye on the request page; there will likely be a flood of editors requesting the permission when they realize they can no longer see IP addresses.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case Indian military history has been closed.
    • South Asia (WP:CT/SA) is designated a contentious topic. The topic area is specifically defined as All pages related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups.
    • The contentious topic designations for Sri Lanka (SL) and India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan (IPA) are folded into this new contentious topic.
    • The community-authorized general sanctions regarding South Asian social groups (GS/CASTE) are rescinded and folded into this new contentious topic.
  • The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 31 July.
  • The arbitration case Transgender healthcare and people has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 11 August.

Miscellaneous

  • Wikimania 2025 is happening in Nairobi, Kenya, and online from August 6 to August 9. This year marks 20 years of Wikimania. Interested users can join the online event. Registration for the virtual event is free and will remain open throughout Wikimania. You can register here now.

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

edit

Nomination of Operation Rajiv for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Rajiv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Rajiv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of GSFC Complex INA for deletion

edit

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GSFC Complex INA, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSFC Complex INA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – September 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2025).

Administrator changes

readded Euryalus
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Ragesoss

CheckUser changes

readded AmandaNP
removed SQL

Oversight changes

readded AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open on whether use of emojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion under G15.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been closed.
  • An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

edit

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

edit

Administrators' newsletter – October 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Vanamonde93

Arbitration

  • After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g. [[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

edit
  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.

Guide to temporary accounts

edit

Hello, Utcursch. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account
  • When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
  • All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
  • A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
  • As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
    • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
    • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Impact for administrators

  • It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
  • It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
  • Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

  • Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
  • Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
  • See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

  • It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences Appearance Advanced options Tick Enable the user info card
    • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
  • Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
  • Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
  • The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

Further information and discussion

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – November 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2025).

Administrator changes

added Toadspike
removed

CheckUser changes

added asilvering

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 10 November 2025

edit

An issue at Ghurid invasion of Bengal

edit

Hey Utcursch. Sorry to bother you, but user:Beylarbey and user:Hejkl have been edit warring on the Ghurid invasion of Bengal since late August 2025. Instead of issuing 3rr warnings I asked both of them to use the article talk page.Beylarbey's talk pageHejkl's talk page In response, Beylarbey reverted Hejkl again.

Upon further investigation, it appears there was a lull in the edit war during the months of September and October which restarted in November.(3rd(H), 7th(B), 8th(H), 12th(B), 12th(H), 15th(B), 16th(H), 16th(B), 16th(H), 16th(B). Would you be interested in addressing this issue?? --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:30, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Kansas Bear: Sorry, I'm a busy outside of Wikipedia these days, but I'll add the page to my watchlist. Meanwhile, consider dropping a note at WT:IND. utcursch | talk 16:38, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
It's all good Utcursch! After I asked both of them to take their concerns to the article talk page, the edit warring stopped. Maybe it's over? Take care! --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:06, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chungam, Kottayam for deletion

edit

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chungam, Kottayam, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chungam, Kottayam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

edit
  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.

Nomination of Ammadam for deletion

edit

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ammadam, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammadam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – December 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Valereee
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Spicy

Technical news

  • Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
  • Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 17 December 2025

edit

Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration


The Signpost: 15 January 2026

edit

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

edit

Administrators' newsletter – February 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Arbitration

  • Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 17 February 2026

edit
  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

edit

Administrators' newsletter – March 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Ks0stm

Oversight changes

removed Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
  • Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
  • The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous


Recent changes

edit

Hi, could you have a look at these recent changes? Seems non-RS sources are used alongwith POV by the user. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:17, 7 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tagged / removed a few sources. utcursch | talk 16:38, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 10 March 2026

edit
  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?

Nomination of Don Bosco Institute of Technology, Mumbai for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Bosco Institute of Technology, Mumbai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Bosco Institute of Technology, Mumbai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:31, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 March 2026

edit

Administrators' newsletter – April 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Checkuser changes

removed Giraffer

Oversight changes

added Kj cheetham
removed Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
  • The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.

Nomination of Panchvalley for deletion

edit

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panchvalley, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panchvalley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shabbir Kumar for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shabbir Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabbir Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Ontor22 (talk) 22:16, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 April 2026

edit

Nomination of Pheni (disambiguation) for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pheni (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pheni (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 04:55, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed L235
added Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
  • The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
  • Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
  • Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous


Nomination of Vedal for deletion

edit

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vedal, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requested correction regarding Samthar ruling dynasty

edit

I would like to request a review of the section discussing the ruling dynasty of Samthar State, as the current wording appears inconsistent with several historical and official published sources.

The article presently states that the ruling family belonged to the Bar Gujar dynasty of Rajputs. However, multiple historical references appear to identify the Samthar ruling house as Gurjar.

The following sources may be relevant:

• Alexander Cunningham, Archaeological Survey of India Reports, Vol. 1–11 (1862–1865; 1871–1878), p. 71.

• Sir Roper Lethbridge, The Golden Book of India (1893), p. 745.

Memoranda on Native States in India (Superintendent Government Printing, Calcutta, 1911), p. 55.

The Hind Rajasthan: Annals of the Native States of India (1896), p. 750.

The Sphere, 28 May 1938 issue, identifying H.H. Maharaja Sir Bir Singh Judev Khatana Bahadur of Samthar.

• Robert Henry Wallace, Service and Adventure with the Khakee Ressalah; or, Meerut Volunteer Horse, during the Mutinies of 1857–58.

• John Murray (London), The Historical Record of the Imperial Visit to India, 1911.

Sahifa-e-Zarrin (1902).

These sources appear to describe or identify the Samthar ruling family as Gurjar by caste, while some records also use the designation “Khatana clan” in reference to members of the ruling house.

Suggested neutral wording:

"Several historical and official publications describe the ruling family of Samthar State as Gurjar, including works by Alexander Cunningham and colonial-era administrative records."

I request that the current wording be reviewed in light of these published sources and updated in accordance with Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, neutrality, and reliable sourcing.

Thank you. XaiverN9tewWike (talk) 11:01, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look when I've some time. Meanwhile, drop a note at WT:IND. utcursch | talk 12:45, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for replying and for your time. As suggested, I will also post a note at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics
If possible, I’d really appreciate if you could also take a look when you get a chance. This issue matters a lot to us because I’m from this region, and my relatives are from the royal family of Samthar. When people from our community see the Samthar State article attributing the family to a different community, it causes a lot of confusion and disappointment. We often have to explain that the Wikipedia article currently has incorrect/misleading info.
That’s why I reached out for help to get the article corrected with reliable sources.
Thanks again for your precious time and consideration.
Here one more source:
Summary of affairs : foreign department, 1818 to 1835 by Wheeler, J. Talboys. p. 150 XaiverN9tewWike (talk) 06:16, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi Utcursch, It’s been a week with no response. Could you please take a look at this request when you have time?
some extra sources:
• The political relations existing between the British government and the N.W Provinces, as they stood in 1840, p. 38.
• Report Of The Political
Administration Of The Territories
Within The Central India Agency
For 1870-71 by H. D. Daly, p. 11.
• Summary of affairs : foreign department, 1818 to 1835 by Wheeler, J. Talboys
Thanks. XaiverN9tewWike (talk) 12:56, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 May 2026

edit
  • Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate
    Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
  • Gallery: Earth Day and Mother's Day
    Earth Day was on 22 April, and Mother's Day was on 10 May (in the US and many other countries).

Administrators' newsletter – June 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2026).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats: Bureaucrats without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119, T423120)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Michael Jackson has opened. Evidence submissions in this case closes on 1 June.

Miscellaneous


Request regarding Nagabhata I page

edit

Sir, as you can see, an unknown editor recently edited the page and added unsourced text to the Early Life section, claiming the Nagabhata I was a Rajput without providing any primary source. Per WP:V and WP:RS, this is unverifiable and controversial.

Furthermore, the same editor added bias and self-made arguments to the Historiography section, which violates WP:OR and WP:NPOV. Based on this pattern, it appears to be casteist propaganda rather than good-faith editing.

Before any action could be taken, the page was locked. I humbly request you to undo the previous edit and restore the version where I had removed their earlier attempts at inserting bias. This will bring the page back to a neutral, sourced state.

Thank you.XaiverN9tewWike (talk) 08:42, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 June 2026

edit

Virji Vora

edit

Hi @Utcursch

Just looking over the "Early life" section. Virji Vora is widely verified as a 16th century Jain merchant, but the bit from John F. Richards (1996) calling him "Baharji Bohra" and describing him as a Muslim Ismaili merchant feels like a conflation. There's a huge gap in time between the records, so it seems like they are totally unrelated individuals.

Could you please verify this whenever you get a second?? TeaToasst (talk) 04:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ancient Indian fringe

edit

Hi utcursch,

Great work removing pseudohistorical and outright nonsense from India/South Asia-related history articles on enwiki. I was wondering whether you can have a look at Shashigupta (Sisikottos), was going to Afd this for the amount of fringe it contains but I see there is 'some' notability from encyclopedic sources (Pauly's). The fringe particularly concerns Shashigupta#Shashigupta vs Chandragupta which it was largely started out for by a now blocked editor . This and the rest of the article rely on dubious colonial-era sources among other non-RS to propagate this fringe view.

Please see if this need be cleaned up or Afd'd altogether.

Thanks Gotitbro (talk) 18:21, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Gotitbro: I'll add it to my watchlist, and go through the sources when I get some time. utcursch | talk 02:21, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Hope to see it soon (was on my radar earlier as well for AfD but came up again after I saw a reification of this misinfo being spread online recently).
Also great work at Kalidasa. I had planned to expand on his supposed origins quite a while back (when I saw Kashmir being promoted there vociferously) but you got there before it :). PS: The same supposed "Kashmir[i]" origins had been added by the same editor for Vishnu Sharma, Charaka etc. among others (though I haven't looked at the validity of those additions). Gotitbro (talk) 03:35, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – July 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Oversight changes

readded
removed L235

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 13 July 2026

edit
  • News and notes: An exclusive club
    Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
  • In the media: Battle for a soul – who won?
    Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!