TheSecondBrother2

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TheSecondBrother2! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Article development
• Help desk

If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks :)

I will be reading these! TheSecondBrother2 (talk) 20:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Guxhuli per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Guxhuli. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} or use the unblock wizard.  — Newslinger talk 11:45, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheSecondBrother2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Please list all accounts you have used besides this one.

TheSecondBrother

Have you taken the standard offer?

No.

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

I was just blocked based on assumptions, so I am not sure how I can get unblocked, since I am not even the person who I am being accused of.

TheSecondBrother2 (talk) 8:19 am, 22 April 2026, Wednesday (16 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

This doesn't why you were operating TheSecondBrother and this account simultaneously, so I'm declining on that basis. As far as connection to the suspected sockmaster, no comment as the decision was based in part on off-wiki evidence that I do not have access to. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:41, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheSecondBrother2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Please list all accounts you have used besides this one.

TheSecondBrother

Have you taken the standard offer? (six months with no edits)

No.

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

@User:Rosguill I can't reply to your comment so I am making a new request. I don't understand what you meant with the first sentence. But I have already explained in the investigation page before that I lost access to the first account. So, what exactly is the basis on this for declining my first request? As far as off-wiki info is concerned, I can't say either, but the result was only "probable". Which means it was an assumption and prejudice and not a result based beyond any doubt. What kind of procedure is this for your decision making? Editors get blocked here for literally nothing? Where else can I turn to for this?

TheSecondBrother2 (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Irrespective of whether you are actually connected to the master, I can confirm that you have been recently loutsocking, which is in and of itself is a blockable offence. I cannot reconcile your comments below with the technical evidence, so with my CU hat on, the appeal is declined. Giraffer (talk) 21:39, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Hello, What @User:Rosguill meant in the first sentence was that you did not tell why the other account was used, i.e., why did you operate more than one accounts at the same time. Secondly, I think you can regain access to your old account if you have connected your email id to it. I hope this link helps Help:Account recovery.

But, I can't understand that how can you use the other account if you lost access to it, as Rosguill said that you were blocked for using more tha one accounts at the same time Can you explain it. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 07:59, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

From my understanding, TheSecondBrother2 is stating he only has two accounts: TheSecondBrother and TheSecondBrother2. Looking at the contributions, I'm not seeing any overlap between the accounts, which aligns with what he's stated. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:03, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Well, my response waa a bit based on @Rosguill decline comment. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 05:54, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Comment: @TheGreatEditor024 and Significa liberdade: TheSecondBrother/TheSecondBrother2 wasn't blocked for operating two accounts—which as Significa liberdade noticed, didn't overlap in activity, and it was already admitted by TSB2 that they got registered because they lost access to TSB (comment)—but primarily, because they were a probable sockpuppet of Guxhuli. It is rather obvious to anyone who takes some time to review the SPI case properly, even without the off-wiki evidence. I should also note that Guxhuli appears to continue evading their block through the use of TAs, concurrent with TSB2's unblock requests. – Demetrios1993 (talk) 13:25, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

@Demetrios1993 I am not defending this user, but I couldn't find any similarity between This user and @Guxhuli except that both of them are interested in Albanian topics. Well, I used Xtools as I have no other means to compare both accounts. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:54, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Well, after reading this page, User talk:Ktrimi991#Your Attention is needed, I feel like @TheSecondBrother2 is a sock, because It is not that common for new editors come to support blocked editors in their 3rd or 4th edit. Can you explain this.

Source: Special:Contributions/TheSecondBrother TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @TheGreatEditor024, in the investigation page I explained here, how I got to Ktrimi991's page. TheSecondBrother2 (talk) 14:11, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Okay, I get it, but @Demetrios1993's comment also states that your edits are similar to that of @Guxhuli.

Also, Your account was created on 17:41, 3 February 2026, while @Guxhuli's sock account was blocked on 17:25, 3 February 2026. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

But you said above that you couldn't find any similarity except that me and the user being both interested in Albanian topics. And I also agree with that. There is no similarity between my edits and theirs. I am not that familiar with wikipedia yet, meanwhile Guxhuli seems to have had such a wild adventure here. Regarding account creation, I was following what was happening, hence why I decided to join as I didn't find it fair that only the albanian user was reported but the serbian one not, who was clearly vandalising. TheSecondBrother2 (talk) 14:23, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

well, earlier I forgot to use User contributions and only used Xtools. Also, It's a bit hard for me to compare your contributions with the combined contribution of all the other socks. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:30, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Unfortunately I can't help you there either. I have already given my arguments in the investigation page. I see no use in repeating them over and over. Have a good day. TheSecondBrother2 (talk) 14:34, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Well, I guess you're right. Have a nice day. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:42, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

@TheGreatEditor024: Don't forget them appearing in Guxhuli's SPI page – without being notified (I used {{noping}}) – to post a comment (16:04, 6 February 2026) only 30 minutes after the publication of the case (15:34, 6 February 2026), indicating that they were actively monitoring the page. It would only make sense for Guxhuli to be monitoring the page so closely. And of course, there is a lot more evidence, but I am not going to expand on this. – Demetrios1993 (talk) 14:42, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

This dude just wants to get his futile point across at any cost. Fellow editor, of course I was monitoring it, because you blocking the Albanian account, while engaging on canvassing with the blocked serbian one, was how I got here. It is already explained on the investigation page. TheSecondBrother2 (talk) 14:58, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

And btw all that "evidence" that you claim, still didn't achieve a result beyond any doubt. But hey, congrats. You managed to block me after all. TheSecondBrother2 (talk) 15:00, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

I repeat, I am not Guxhuli or whoever that person is. I also disagree with it being obvious to anyone, as even the maximum result of the investigation from the clerk was: Probable mixed without any basis that I am not here to build an encyclopedia. I was indeed blocked on a consesus that didn't go beyond any doubt. I also refuse other accusations that I am using temporary accounts, if that's what is meant by TA. This is getting ridiculous and it is looking like a battleground. TheSecondBrother2 (talk) 13:35, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade You are correct in your assessment. I was indeed blocked erroneously. But, hey, it's not a fair world. TheSecondBrother2 (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2026 (UTC)