Sceptre
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Guild of Copy Editors – September 2025 Newsletter
edit| Guild of Copy Editors – September 2025 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Election news: Project coordinators play an important role in our WikiProject. Following the mid-year Election of Coordinators, we welcomed GoldRomean to the coordinator team. Dhtwiki remains as lead coordinator, and Miniapolis and Mox Eden return as coordinators. If you'd like to help out behind the scenes, please consider taking part in our December election – watchlist our ombox for updates. Information about the role of coordinators can be found here. June 2025 blitz: 10 of the 12 editors who signed up for the June 2025 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited a total of 26,652 words comprising 13 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. July 2025 drive: 30 of the 54 editors who signed up for the July 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited a total of 379,557 words comprising 151 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. August 2025 Blitz: 11 of the 17 editors who signed up for the August 2025 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited a total of 65,601 words comprising 25 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. September 2025 Drive: Sign up here to earn barnstars in our month-long, in-progress September Backlog Elimination Drive. Progress report: As of 06:43, 20 September 2025 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 222 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,010 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we do without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:46, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for adding cards to AEW Title Tuesday! Was just about to do it and you beat me to it in June, good job. Lemonademan22 (talk) 11:19, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Sceptre. Thank you for your work on Continental Classic (2025). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability per WP:NSPORT. I will be moving it to draft space. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Guild of Copy Editors – December 2025 Newsletter
edit| Guild of Copy Editors December 2025 Newsletter
Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist. Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure September Drive: 43 of the 63 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive edited 693,541 words in 265 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. October Blitz: 14 of the 15 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz edited 75,108 words in 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. November Drive: 38 of the 65 editors who signed up for the November Backlog Elimination Drive edited 590,816 words in 240 articles. Barnstars awarded are posted here. December Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 14 December (UTC) and will end on 20 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 01:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 293 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,730 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, GoldRomean, Miniapolis and Mox Eden. To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
WIkiProject Doctor Who: December 2025 Newsletter
editThe Space-Time Telegraph
Volume III, Issue III — December 2025 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who Help! We've been robbed... of a new Doctor Who Christmas special this year :(
2025... I Let You Go
*vworp vworp, vworp vworp*
The Space-Time Telepgraph is back again with our final issue of the year. With 13-episodes of Who-related content broadcast in 2025, it marked the biggest year in the Whoniverse since 2017! Take a quick read below for all the Wikipedia-related (and non-Wikipedia-related) Doctor Who news that you missed, and everything you have to look forward to. Happy New Year! 🥳🎉 Would you like a
Intelligence Bulletin from the Subwave Network
Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹
2019
2020
2021
2022
Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹 (continued) 2023
2024
2025
Notes
Contributors:
If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.
If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Thoughts about my Continental Classic bracket design concept
editHi! I tried creating a new design for the Continental Classic bracket a few months ago. You validly rejected them. I decided to have another go at it. I have made the colors more subtle. I, unfortunately, have not figured out how to incorporate the names of the winners of each match into the design but I think it's an improvement over my old design. Please check it out and give me your thoughts.
User:TheVoicelessWriter/sandbox TheVoicelessWriter (talk) 03:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
"Ide controller" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Ide controller has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 19 § Ide controller until a consensus is reached. 8BitBros (talk • edits) 19:43, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
edit| Happy birthday! Hi Sceptre! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:56, 3 March 2026 (UTC) |
Happy Birthday!
edit| Happy birthday! Hi Sceptre! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors/Membership/News/2025 Annual Report
edit| Guild of Copy Editors Annual Report
Our 2025 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your Guild coordinators
To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:36, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors – April 2026 Newsletter
edit| Guild of Copy Editors – April 2026 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the April 2026 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members. We wish you all happy copy-editing. Election results: In our December 2025 coordinator election, incumbents Dhtwiki, GoldRomean, Miniapolis, and Mox Eden were reelected coordinators, and Wikieditor662 was newly elected coordinator, to serve through 30 June. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators will open on 1 June (UTC). December 2025 Blitz: 16 of the 31 editors who signed up for the December 2025 Copy Editing Blitz edited 116,064 words in 47 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. January Drive: 35 of the 55 editors who signed up for the January Backlog Elimination Drive edited 498,397 words in 183 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. February Blitz: 19 of the 23 editors who signed up for the February Copy Editing Blitz edited 83,969 words in 43 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. March Drive: 28 of the 48 editors who signed up for the March Backlog Elimination Drive edited 210,064 words in 87 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. April Blitz: Sign up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 12 to 18 April. Barnstars will be awarded here. Progress report: As of 09:10, 10 April 2026 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 81 copyediting requests since 1 January 2026. The backlog of articles needing copyediting stands at 1,794 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, GoldRomean, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wikieditor662. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:32, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
About your recent RM close
editYou recently closed Talk:Persecution of transgender people under the second Trump administration#Requested move 1 May 2026 with consensus against moving. While I agree that the close reflected the outcome of the discussion, I request that you amend your close to state that many participants opposed the move on grounds of article scope instead of or in addition to grounds of neutrality. In other words, please edit your close to mention that some participants opposed a move because it would create problems with the scope of the article. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 20:01, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
- I would also like to understand how you came to the conclusion that there was consensus for a 12 month moratorium on move requests when that was not even a question asked in the discussion. I'd ask you to strike that, or else this will definitely need to go to close review. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 20:51, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
- @SuperPianoMan9167: happy to do so; whilst either concern is enough to form the basis for the consensus, it was the false balance one that was a little stronger. @Sirfurboy: I feel as if there's definitely a consensus for both. Moratoria may be added on to a closure if there is enough of an appetite for one, and determining consensus on imposing one is separate to determining consensus on the wider question. Sceptre (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
- In your close, you say,
I'm sad to see the motte-and-bailey tactics outwith Wikipedia show up here too
. Are you aware, however, that the issue of the term "persecution" in this context was tested at RfC and the RfC has just been endorsed ? Core to those RfC findings were that sources do not describe the (very clearly anti-trans rhetoric and actions) as a persecution. That was the RfC finding. In this move request, no new sources were brought to the table, and only one source was discussed that even uses the word. But, as SuperPianoMan9167 points out, there was a good reason for rejecting this move request on grounds of changing the article scope, and many people explicitly stated that this was their reason for rejecting the move request. This is the weaker claim (the move to a specific title is weaker than a view that the word persecution ought not to be in the title), and now it will be used to attack the stronger claim. That is the classic motte-and-bailey, and cementing this in with a 12 month moratorium that was at the longest end, only asked for by a few of the one third of respondents who mentioned a moratorium, is clearly not a consensus on such a draconian measure. Indeed it looks like a supervote. If a moratorium is required (and here, it would be explicitly unhelpful, and disruption has not been demonstrated) then it should be decided by an RfC on that matter, not by suggestions by a minority of the participants. Again, requesting you revise that. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:22, 21 May 2026 (UTC)- I'd value your thoughts on this please. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:51, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing me to the RfC closure, I was genuinely not aware of it. Looking at the RfC and the close review, the closer of the RfC deliberately made no determination on whether it should apply to this article title (about actions taken by the Trump administration), but that there were suitable concerns about the appropriateness of the word in an article about Trump himself. In any case, in a closure, I can only follow roads suitably signposted by the RM. Bringing up the RfC post-close feels like a Hail Mary appeal to me. Sceptre (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Indeed, but in the light of that context - a context you were unaware of - perhaps you can now see that your close comments, and particularly the moratorium, create a motte-and-bailey attack on this high WP:CONLEVEL consensus, and, absent any demonstration of disruption, and absent any sourcing for the wording that is being frozen in, it would not, after all, be appropriate to freeze the discussion at this point, and that the process here clearly has further to travel? Thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 18:17, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- I don't strictly see how the RfC on Trump means that there's a consensus for further discussion on the actions of his administration. The consensuses aren't in conflict -- it is possible to describe an administration/the wider executive as persecutory but not the head of the administration themselves (q.v. the UK on this very issue, in fact). All I saw at the RM was people who wanted a bit of a break from discussing the title again and again. I'm opening to lowering it to six months, but I still believe there's a consensus for a moratorium. Sceptre (talk) 02:24, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- It's possible to describe an administration but not the head of it this way, yes. But sources don't. That's the point. As for consensus to do something that was not even the subject of the move discussion - again, a minority of the respondents requested that. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 06:28, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think it's honestly a winning argument to say the sources don't support the idea of the Trump administration's actions as persecutory, when we've got human rights organisations using much stronger language. Sceptre (talk) 17:31, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- But not that language. That's the point. I have no objection to using the language the sources are using. The assumption I want to soften the language is misplaced. The objection is that we are not doing that, and that sources don't use this language. It is Wikipedian editorialisation. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- It really isn't, unless you can think of a proto-genocide (as the Lemkin Institute are warning about, for example) that isn't persecutory. Sometimes, WP:SPADE just applies. Sceptre (talk) 18:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- The Lemkin institute are an advocacy organisation but if WP:BESTSOURCES use the term genocide then so should we. However, they don't. `Butler calls it "rights-stripping, eliminationist politics and forcible dispossession".. This paper says "administrative and legal frameworks are being weaponized against gender diversity." It is not hard to find BESTSOURCES that call out the politicised anti-trans agenda, and I am sure there are sources that would use "transphobia" instead of anti-trans in desrcibing that, but a lot of them major on the rollback of rights and the damage being done. Indeed there's a whole book on that: Mezey, S. (2026) Transgender Rights in Flux. Bloomsbury. This source talks about a deliberate strategy of anti-trans misinformation. There is a lot to say here, but actually we are not saying it, because instead we (not the sources) want to talk about "persecution". Again, this moratorium that only had minority support prevents the discussion. This is not a battle ground issue - it is a matter about writing articles that follow the sources and not framing the public agenda on Wikipedia. Again, I don't ask that you change the move close - just rescind the moratorium - or else pare it back to a month (because actually, no good will come from a move discussion in less than a month. There is a fuller discussion to be had before someone else jumps in with a new and potentially half-baked RM). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- All you're saying to me is that "persecution" is perhaps too light of a term. But still, going back to the point: the question of an imposing a moratorium is different to the question of the move result. Plenty of people wanted to impose a moratorium, and there was little-to-no pushback on the issue. I also don't anticipate consensus on the page title changing any time soon. Both those points leans towards the imposition of a moratorium of meaningful length being correct, per WP:MORATORIUM. Sceptre (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- Disappointed by this response. I'll take it to Close Review. Could you tell me whether this should be a normal move review (which is unusual in that I would think we would endorse the "not moved" and only discuss the moratorium) or whether this shouled be at WP:AN please? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- I'm happy to cut the moratorium to six months, but given how long contentious RMs take, any shorter wouldn't be meaningful. Sceptre (talk) 20:15, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- Disappointed by this response. I'll take it to Close Review. Could you tell me whether this should be a normal move review (which is unusual in that I would think we would endorse the "not moved" and only discuss the moratorium) or whether this shouled be at WP:AN please? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- All you're saying to me is that "persecution" is perhaps too light of a term. But still, going back to the point: the question of an imposing a moratorium is different to the question of the move result. Plenty of people wanted to impose a moratorium, and there was little-to-no pushback on the issue. I also don't anticipate consensus on the page title changing any time soon. Both those points leans towards the imposition of a moratorium of meaningful length being correct, per WP:MORATORIUM. Sceptre (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- The Lemkin institute are an advocacy organisation but if WP:BESTSOURCES use the term genocide then so should we. However, they don't. `Butler calls it "rights-stripping, eliminationist politics and forcible dispossession".. This paper says "administrative and legal frameworks are being weaponized against gender diversity." It is not hard to find BESTSOURCES that call out the politicised anti-trans agenda, and I am sure there are sources that would use "transphobia" instead of anti-trans in desrcibing that, but a lot of them major on the rollback of rights and the damage being done. Indeed there's a whole book on that: Mezey, S. (2026) Transgender Rights in Flux. Bloomsbury. This source talks about a deliberate strategy of anti-trans misinformation. There is a lot to say here, but actually we are not saying it, because instead we (not the sources) want to talk about "persecution". Again, this moratorium that only had minority support prevents the discussion. This is not a battle ground issue - it is a matter about writing articles that follow the sources and not framing the public agenda on Wikipedia. Again, I don't ask that you change the move close - just rescind the moratorium - or else pare it back to a month (because actually, no good will come from a move discussion in less than a month. There is a fuller discussion to be had before someone else jumps in with a new and potentially half-baked RM). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- It really isn't, unless you can think of a proto-genocide (as the Lemkin Institute are warning about, for example) that isn't persecutory. Sometimes, WP:SPADE just applies. Sceptre (talk) 18:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- But not that language. That's the point. I have no objection to using the language the sources are using. The assumption I want to soften the language is misplaced. The objection is that we are not doing that, and that sources don't use this language. It is Wikipedian editorialisation. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think it's honestly a winning argument to say the sources don't support the idea of the Trump administration's actions as persecutory, when we've got human rights organisations using much stronger language. Sceptre (talk) 17:31, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- It's possible to describe an administration but not the head of it this way, yes. But sources don't. That's the point. As for consensus to do something that was not even the subject of the move discussion - again, a minority of the respondents requested that. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 06:28, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- I don't strictly see how the RfC on Trump means that there's a consensus for further discussion on the actions of his administration. The consensuses aren't in conflict -- it is possible to describe an administration/the wider executive as persecutory but not the head of the administration themselves (q.v. the UK on this very issue, in fact). All I saw at the RM was people who wanted a bit of a break from discussing the title again and again. I'm opening to lowering it to six months, but I still believe there's a consensus for a moratorium. Sceptre (talk) 02:24, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- Indeed, but in the light of that context - a context you were unaware of - perhaps you can now see that your close comments, and particularly the moratorium, create a motte-and-bailey attack on this high WP:CONLEVEL consensus, and, absent any demonstration of disruption, and absent any sourcing for the wording that is being frozen in, it would not, after all, be appropriate to freeze the discussion at this point, and that the process here clearly has further to travel? Thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 18:17, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing me to the RfC closure, I was genuinely not aware of it. Looking at the RfC and the close review, the closer of the RfC deliberately made no determination on whether it should apply to this article title (about actions taken by the Trump administration), but that there were suitable concerns about the appropriateness of the word in an article about Trump himself. In any case, in a closure, I can only follow roads suitably signposted by the RM. Bringing up the RfC post-close feels like a Hail Mary appeal to me. Sceptre (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- I'd value your thoughts on this please. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:51, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Sceptre, thanks for your close. I agree with Sirfurboy here. By my count, there were ~40 users who commented at that RFC; 12 users who supported some form of moratorium; and multiple of those 12 either supported a shorter duration (6 months) or just mentioned "a moratorium". I don't see how that adds up to consensus for 12 months. Astaire (talk) 16:50, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- In your close, you say,
- @SuperPianoMan9167: happy to do so; whilst either concern is enough to form the basis for the consensus, it was the false balance one that was a little stronger. @Sirfurboy: I feel as if there's definitely a consensus for both. Moratoria may be added on to a closure if there is enough of an appetite for one, and determining consensus on imposing one is separate to determining consensus on the wider question. Sceptre (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
edit| Happy First Edit Day, Sceptre, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! ☘︎☘︎☘︎ALEXHammeke (talk | guestbook | sandbox) 03:48, 21 May 2026 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day!
edit| Happy First Edit Day! Hi Sceptre! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 10:29, 21 May 2026 (UTC) |
WIkiProject Doctor Who: April 2026 Newsletter
editThe Space-Time Telegraph
Volume IV, Issue I — April 2026 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who A new newsletter materializing? Quick, help us reverse the polarity of the neutron flow so it can safely land on your talk pages! Don't be lasagna (because there's a new newsletter to read)
Into the Vortex! (Of Good and Featured Content)
A flabbergasting discovery
Intelligence Bulletin from the Subwave Network
Succession
Contributors
Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹
If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.
If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Wikiproject feminism revive
editHello User:Sceptre, I wanted to notify you that there are a few editors, including myself, trying to REVIVE Wikiproject feminism. We recently sorted through the old members' list and found that you were still active! If you want to help Revive Wikiproject feminism we'd love to have you! Also if you have anyone in mind who you think would be willing to join the project please leave them an invitation on their Talk page Goetia [She/They] (talk) 21:05, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Persecution of transgender people under the second Trump administration. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirfurboy (talk • contribs) 07:39, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors – June 2026 Newsletter
edit| Guild of Copy Editors June 2026 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June 2026 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April. Election news: Nominations for the mid-year coordinator election ends at 23:59 on 15 June. Voting will last from 00:00 on 16 June to 23:59 on 30 June. Results will be announced on the election page. April Blitz: 18 of the 21 editors who signed up for the April 2026 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited 122,993 words in 56 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. May Drive: 34 of the 66 editors who signed up for the May 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited 543,972 words in 211 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. June Blitz: Our June 2026 Copy Editing Blitz will start on 14 June and finish on 30 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 22:40, 11 June 2025 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 132 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 1,691 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
File:Opening crawl.jpg listed for discussion
edit
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
Barnstar
edit| The Admin's Barnstar | ||
| Thank you for your always thoughtful closes.Katzrockso (talk) 04:02, 10 July 2026 (UTC) |
Recent article-move decision
editGreetings, Sceptre. In presenting yourself here in Wikipedia, you have written, inter alia: "My editing tends to fall into one of two areas, and I'm particularly interested in expanding Wikipedia's poor coverage of transgender issues and helping to reduce the amount of cisgender, heterosexual and male systemic bias on the encyclopedia." I did not fail to notice the sentence immediately following this ("However, I do understand the importance of not letting my queer politics getting in the way and compromising the neutrality of our queer coverage") but, in all honesty, I cannot see how you took it upon yourself to close down the discussion in this Request to Move the article previously named "Critical-gender feminism" -- in a non-admin closure, moreover. I have two strong objections: One that the self-evident importance and controversial nature of the titling practically demands closure by an administrator (I'd personally prefer three admins, acting in tandem, so as to have a robust precedent), and not a non-admin contributor by any stretch of goodwill. And, two, that the justification objectively reads as a straight-up adoption of the arguments for moving the article. I do not intend to go into details on the latter. I can only ask you to reconsider. And possibly to revert the move. Respectfully, The Gnome (talk) 13:06, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
Champs
editYou wouldlike create this page? I Want translate after after, but not know german. Congrats ~2026-39554-11 (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
