Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.



On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog


Stats for pending changes trial
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases
Category:Wikipedia semi-protected pages
User:Writ_Keeper/Scripts/orangeBar.js in case I need it
User:Risker/Mauricie
{{OversightBlock|sig = ~~~~}} signs the template.

Notes

edit


WP:ARBAP2
{{subst:W-screen}} {{subst:Suppressed}} Wikipedia:SPI/CLERK and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators


Note to self: Consider writing an article about the Forster Family Dollhouse in the Canadian Museum of Civilization. Some day.

Listeria Bot Wikipedia:New_page_patrol_source_guide#Africa

Please post below

edit



A barnstar for you!

edit
The Real Life Barnstar
You did a good job with your wiki rabbit holes presentation. I learned a few things! Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks so much, Clovermoss. It was great to see you and also so many other cool people there! Risker (talk) 05:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

January 2025 NPP backlog drive – Points award

edit
The Invisible Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Risker for accumulating at least 5 points during the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply


BoT election 2025

edit

Hi Risker. Very, very few users have the in-depth, all round experience and institutional memory that you do. Very few have been so engaged on various committees. I once thought I did, but the interest waned somewhat in 2020. I still follow a few things though and write the occasional article, but I've been pretty much put out to pasture by the new generations. I've often wondered how you maintain the enthusiasm I so much admire. The one place you never went was the BoT - I guess you have your reasons although I would have thought you would be a shoe-in for it. Anyways, looking at the lineup for this year's scramble for the two community seats, while the contenders all mean well, it's more like a modern quest for takers for Arbcom (where you are still dearly missed). I'm sure though that you will turn out to vote, so if you do, here's my take on it, and I make no apology for canvassing. Warm regards, Chris. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:47, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello Kudpung, thanks for your very kind words, and for stopping by on my talk page. I think probably my "longevity" can be attributed to the fact that I don't stay in one task too long, and after I've been off in "global Wikimedia" land for a bit, I make sure to reground myself in my home project. The one thing I have always really liked about Wikipedia (and the global roles I've taken on) has been that there's always something different to try or do. At the same time, I still fix typos and grammar errors when I see them, just as I did with my very first contributions. Yes, there have been many who have approached me over the course of several years to put my name forward for the Board of Trustees. Little known fact: I was in fact a candidate for an "expertise" seat back in 2015, but I am the first to admit I wasn't qualified for the proposed seat, and the candidate ultimately selected didn't really work out. It was a very strange time in Wikimedia-land, let's just leave it at that. My decision not to run this year has to do with things outside of the Wikimedia world, and until some of those things stabilize I am not in a position to make that commitment, although I don't rule out something down the road if I'm still around.

My preference is to work on time-limited projects with specific goals (as nebulous as some of those goals may seem), and I think the teams I have worked on have had made some significant contributions to the Wikimedia family. Working on those global committees and task forces and working groups has reinforced to me how critical collaboration is for our success. I've had the opportunity to work with a lot of really fine Wikimedians from many projects (as well as affiliates and the WMF), and have learned a lot about how the Wikimedia world works outside of English Wikipedia. I try to bring those lessons home to this project and share that knowledge. I sometimes fantasize about taking a chainsaw to our extremely overwrought policies, because I believe our overkill in this area has a chilling effect on policy development on other projects.

Thanks for sharing your views on the current WMF Board of Trustees candidates. Myself, I am hoping to see a successful candidate coming out of Africa or Asia in particular; I think the challenge in the past has been getting enough voters to coalesce around one or two of those candidates to result in their success. While I'm pretty sure that, no matter what, there is likely to be a successful candidate from English projects (which I'll note have the most diverse and globalized editorial base of any project), it would sure be nice to see someone from a region that hasn't had their feet under the table before. Risker (talk) 04:04, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for a long and lovely reply! I've not got around all the nooks and crannies of the movement as much as you have, living where I do makes it a bit awkward (and unable to sit in a plane for more than a couple of hours these days and that's why I didn't even fly down to Singapore although I could have driven there - I haven't been out of Asia now since Esino Lario), but I've been around long enough to know what works and what doesn't, and to realise how much I, and I'm sure many others appreciate your work. Your quip with the chainsaw echoes my thoughts entirely, and some of it is exactly at the root of the problems at NPP which has been my hobby horse here for nearly 20 years. Our MoS itself would make any E-in-C of a newspaper of record blanche in horror. There's a PhD thesis out there just waiting to be written on Wikipedia's Policies and Guidelines. Our notability rules alone are over 5 hours of reading for a well educated native English reader! (I know because I did it in a bored moment not so long ago, just to prove a point).
The WMF ignores, perhaps not deliberately, that we volunteers also have the skill sets - and better ones too - than the salaried devs who can can write good code, agreed, but they don't know enough about addressing the various audiences desire for compelling UX and UI design. Instead, they imagine what's needed and spend fortunes on it without it having any measurable impact at all. And that's one of the reasons why a robust BoT is needed and someone who can stimulate some positive action there. Above all, many of us would like to see a board that is more accessible and mostly populated by our peers.
I do share your thoughts about Africa and Asia but IMO the current line up falls short of the really required quals and global knowledge. IMO there are almost certainly other opportunities for them to acquire important roles without needing to be on the Board right now. Do enjoy your trip to Nairobi, (it's been decades since I was last in Africa). Take care. Chris. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:08, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
See now, here's where we differ in candidate assessment. There are at least two candidates, one from Africa and one from Asia, who I personally am aware have solid experience on global Wikimedia task forces and/or committees; it's just that you probably haven't heard their names as often as the candidates you prefer, as both of them make most of their contributions on projects or in areas other than English Wikipedia. I'm still looking at other candidates; I agree that there are several with insufficient experience - but there always are. Risker (talk) 06:54, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
I don't disagree with you at all. I saw those candidates and one from Europe. I am biased however, because the en.Wiki realises most of the money and probably has the most urgent software needs (both editors and other audiences) before processes such as NPP (arguably the most essential of all the backroom operations) get out of control. Therefore we need partners who have not just a bunch of PhDs amongst them but who understand our systems and priorities rather than rubber-stamping the Foundation's high speed expansionism and spending. Also, previous compositions from the non-community contingent have not always been particularly friendly towards the volunteers. Somehow this decades old gaping chasm between the WMF and the volunteer communities has to be bridged, and the BoT is the only organism that could do it officially and effectively if they wanted to. I'll be happy if both of my candidates make the shortlist. People who can "give real thoughtful guidance and oversight" — Jimbo Wales. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:43, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

edit
The Admin Elections barnstar
Thank you very much for being a discussion phase monitor at WP:AELECT2. Considering that we basically had 16 RFAs going at one time, it was quite smooth and drama free. Great job. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:05, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

P.S. You are invited to participate in the debrief phase if you want to talk a bit about being a monitor and how monitoring went from your perspective. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations

edit

I think you're a fantastic choice for Wikimedia Laureate. :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:58, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Congrats, Risker! A solid choice; well deserved. Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:53, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Congrats! Such well-deserved recognition! --Rosiestep (talk) 22:56, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations

edit

It was amazing to meet you and I am glad to see what you’ve achieved. You inspire me and congratulations 🥰

Chris - Uganda 🇺🇬 Owobusingye (talk) 17:26, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • Thank you, Owobusingye. It was very good to meet you. We talked about some guidance for members of the Uganda-based Wikimedia user group to work toward adminship on English Wikipedia, and I have responded at the talk page section on the user group's Meta page, having gathered the thoughts of a few other administrators about good advice for prospective admins. Risker (talk) 21:49, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

IPBE for Mitte27

edit

Hello. This is a continuation of this topic. The user, who requested an IPBE, was special:centralauth/Mitte27, a very experienced user of ru-, ukwiki, WD and Commons. His problem still not solved, as he says today in ruwiki's Discord chat, could you check him and give him IPBE? He already has one in ukwiki. MBH (talk) 06:37, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello MBH, and thanks for your message. Yes, IPBE grants are a little behind, as I do a lot of them and have just returned from Wikimania. I've granted IP block exemption to Mitte for six months, and will be happy to review further once I return from traveling for a family matter. Risker (talk) 06:47, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I also has one more wish. One year ago I gathered some statistics using my bot, in ru- and enwiki. It was planned to save result tables to ruwiki, but due to bot error result table for enwiki was saved in enwiki with a Russian-language title. The page was planned for Wikipedia: namespace in ruwiki, but, because "Википедия:" isn't a namespace title in enwiki, a page appeared in enwiki's main (article) namespace. Page was located by admin, deleted and this admin blocked my bot indefinitely due to one this edit, like I was some sort of vandal. I requested unblock, but request was declined due to reasons I can't understand (I understand text in this reason, but doesn't understand logic). Could you unblock my bot account? This block notification in my bot's metadata is frustrating for me and sufficient reason for unblock, in my opinion, is that I have no intention to edit enwiki from that account, so there are no reasons to forbid this using block. It was one mistaken edit. MBH (talk) 20:44, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply


IP block exemption request

edit

Hi Risker,

Sorry to bug you... I sent in a request to renew my IP block exemption to checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org on September 6 (it expires in about a week and I'll be travelling at that point) and haven't heard back from the checkuser team. You've helped me in the past with similar exemptions, so I thought I'd check if you can help me once again. —Joeyconnick (talk) 18:53, 21 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, extended for 2 years. Sorry for the delay. Risker (talk) 18:58, 21 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much! I really appreciate your (very speedy!) help. 😀 —Joeyconnick (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

A chocolate heart for you!

edit
Chocolate!
This sweet little picture looked like someone should appreciate it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:56, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oh my. That was scrumptious with a nice cup of Kenyan tea. Thank you for the chocolate...and for reassuring me that at least a few people read my comments. Hope you're doing well! Risker (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply


Chocolate for you

edit
For you
What a week. I think we need a big block of 64% single origin Guittard today, suitable for melting into the bottom of a chocolate pecan pie, but also just for eating out of hand. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:59, 23 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

IP block exemption

edit

Hi,

I was thinking of getting back into editing and was wondering if you'd be able to renew my IP block exemption. I use iCloud Private Relay and unfortunately there's no way to whitelist a single site. If that's not a valid reason, I'll just disable it instead.

Thanks, C F A 19:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done, CFA. Risker (talk) 19:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! C F A 20:27, 23 October 2025 (UTC)Reply


Guide to temporary accounts

edit

Hello, Risker. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account
  • When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
  • All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
  • A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
  • As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
    • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
    • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Impact for administrators

  • It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
  • It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
  • Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

  • Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
  • Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
  • See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

  • It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences Appearance Advanced options Tick Enable the user info card
    • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
  • Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
  • Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
  • The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

Further information and discussion

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

User:WereSpielChequers/Smart Blocking

edit

Hi Risker, many, many moons ago you gave me some feedback on a proposal of mine to reduce collateral damage in our blocking process. I have finally got round to reworking and updating the proposal and have a new page at User:WereSpielChequers/Smart Blocking, your feedback would be most welcome. ϢereSpielChequers 17:03, 2 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

ANI ping

edit

Nothing against you, don't worry! I just pinged you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Jimbo Wales; IDHT, inability to DROPTHESTICK, COI, and abusing his position as founder for self-promotion as you are best placed to clarify the powers and authority of the NPOVWG, if you wish to give more specific details in that context! (you don't necessarily have to if you don't wish to/don't have time, I linked your previous post) Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:32, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply


Two policies? One too many.

edit

Hi Risker. A couple years ago at WCNA you said that Wikipedia should just have two policies: a content policy and a conduct policy. That really stuck in my head, and so when I got the chance to write a new wiki's policies from the ground up, I decided to try to do you one better. As of a few minutes ago, the Toki Pona Wikipedia now has precisely one policy: "o toki pona" (roughly, 'engage in good talk'). I doubt we're the only small wiki with only one policy, but we might be the only one where that's a deliberate decision with community backing. That's because, in addition to "good talk", another translation of "toki pona" is 'language of simplicity', so it was important to the community that we keep things simple. The goal is to be able to fit all policy considerations, from civility to style guidance to deletion criteria, into that overarching concept of "good talk", and for that to remain the case even as we add to the policy going forward. Will it work? I'll let you know. But if it does, maybe there'll be some lesson for enwiki to learn there... even if getting down to one or two policies still seems like a steep hill to climb. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 20:36, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tamzin, I wish you and your colleagues the very best in establishing this new Wikipedia. It's my belief that many of our young and small projects have a great deal of potential to be the future of Wikimedia. The secret is always in ensuring that the core of editors is expanding to support the project as it grows, and I hope that Toki Pona finds that success. It is not necessarily a good idea to develop a new project by looking at older, long-established ones: I've been working with a small group to support smaller projects with the concept of "neutral point of view", and I was shocked at how many of them are simply referring to the English Wikipedia version of that policy - with all its complexity and years of one-off concepts plastered onto what we have managed to boil down to about 130 words. (I expect you'll see the results of our work in January, when it goes out for community consultation.) So yes, I suspect that the overarching concept that Toki Pona has chosen is a good way to start. Most important advice I can give you: don't build policies on individual situations. That has been one of the biggest weaknesses in policy development on a lot of our bigger and older projects. I hope you are enjoying the work you are doing on this new project. And I'm very flattered that you found what I said to be so inspiring. Risker (talk) 21:28, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 23

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 04:50, 11 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Io, Saturnalia!

edit
Io, Saturnalia!
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the best wishes, Ealdgyth - Same to you and yours. Risker (talk) 02:26, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays

edit
Hi Risker
Season's Greetings and all the best for 2026
Wherever you are and whatever you believe in (or don't), reach out for peace on this little planet of ours!
HAPPY HOLIDAYS 🥳
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:46, 23 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much for the lovely thoughts, Kudpung. Risker (talk) 02:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas!

edit

Thedarkknightli (talk) 06:08, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for thinking of me, Thedarkknightli. Hope that 2026 is a good year for you. Risker (talk) 02:28, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Anniversary Risker 🎉

edit

Hello @Risker. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 20 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a wonderful, happy 2026 ahead. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ 17:03, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Gnoeee, it's hard to believe that it's been 20 years. I can still remember the feeling of making my first edit before I even registered this account, and it's special that I still have that feeling of excitement and satisfaction when making a good edit all these years later. All the best to you in 2026. Risker (talk) 02:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive

edit
January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol

New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.

  • The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026.
  • The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive.
  • Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants.
  • Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in participating? Sign up here.
You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, Risker!

edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 07:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 1

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:30, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 2

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 02:05, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 3

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:26, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Miracle On Ice II

edit

There will be another Miracle On Ice on Sunday, Feb 22. ~2026-11486-61 (talk) 23:59, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I called it! GO YANKS! ~2026-11664-78 (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
It was a really good game, either team could have taken it. And that's the way it should be. Sad about the outcome, but not sad I got up at a ridiculous hour to watch that game. Shame about Crosby, shame that the refs didn't make the too-many-men call, but that's the game. Risker (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Agree it was a good game, but I'm not sad, wink. The too many men call was a USA goof and missed by the refs but the Canadians also made an obvious slashing penalty that wasn't called. Yes, could have been either way, like in 2010. It's extra sweet because the Yank women took gold in OT against Canada at this Olympics too. I've been waiting for this for 16 years. Best wishes.~2026-11664-78 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Just for the record, this really isn't a repeat of Miracle on Ice, where a clearly inferior US team won over the USSR. *That* was a miracle. Today's game was even-odds between two very, very talented teams. Of course, this is just one more Olympics for a grey-hair like me. I still remember watching the Canada/USSR series back in 1972. Risker (talk) 17:12, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Well, on that particular day we weren't clearly inferior. haha.~2026-11664-78 (talk) 19:03, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Qualitative Research + Documentary for Wikimedia

edit
Hello, Risker. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hey Risker, let me know if my note went through. Thanks! Jonah Ginsburg (talk) 23:25, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 4

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 12:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 5

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:17, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 6

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 8

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 04:21, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

edit
May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 9

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 19:58, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

edit

Hello Risker,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You may be eligible to vote in the U4C election

edit

I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
The Writer's Barnstar
For your lengthy and detailed comments here regarding the changes to the Community Tech team. ↠Pine () 07:01, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 10

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:31, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Checkuser query

edit

Wondering if you're still involved in IP unblocking requests. I worked with you last time over email. Having gone around in circles with the unblock-request system, I sent an email to utrs-admins@googlegroups.com which, amusingly, just bounced back to me.

I am unable to edit on iOS Safari but can on macOS Safari. I’ve just switched back from Firefox, so would like to be able to edit again via Safari on all platforms. Looking for assistance. Seasider53 (talk) 19:14, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. Have taken a look. Given your experience and recurrent periodic difficulties in avoiding blocked IP ranges, I have granted IP block exemption for two years. We recommend the user of checkuser-en-wp-AT-wikipedia.org for these requests. To be fair, I've been tied up with some other stuff so that queue has fallen behind somewhat. Risker (talk) 20:10, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026 Wikimedia Café meetups regarding the English Wikipedia Editor Reflections project

edit
The logo for the Wikimedia Café

Hello! There will be two Wikimedia Café discussion opportunities during the last weekend of June. Both sessions will focus on the English Wikipedia Editor Reflections project. The featured guest in the Café will be User:Clovermoss. Participants may attend either or both sessions.

  1. 27 June 2026 15:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to the Americas, Africa, and Europe
  2. 28 June 2026 03:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to Asia and the Pacific

Please see the Café page for more information, including how to register!

cropped image of colored pencils

Hi Risker, maybe you'd enjoy attending one of these. ↠Pine () 04:14, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 11

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:38, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Request for Independent Reviw

edit

Hi @Risker, I'm reaching out to request if you can independently review an ongoing global ban on my community members. I'm only reaching out neutrally on their behalf because I know that they are all different individual and not Sock puppets.

Here is where the discussion taking place and these three users - Chinemeremprince, Ozims Divine and Anumodu favour Amarachi are all different.

To the best of my knowledged Anumodu favour Amarachi has appealed for unblock but was declined. Also Ozims Divine has written the stewards (I don't know the outcome yet).

What I'm requesting for is that you support in reviewing or directing them on how to go about appealing for unblock as they have no access to request via Wiki for now. Lucy Iwuala (talk) 17:40, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Lucy, nice to see your name here, but unfortunate about the situation. I will take a look, but this will not be quick as the blocks are over a year old and it will take a while to sort things out. From the very first look, it appears that the users may have been working together at a single location for some sort of edit-a-thon related to a 1Lib1Ref campaign? A little background on how the accounts wound up in the same place at about the same time would be very helpful, if you have access to that information. Please let me be clear, I am not a steward and thus cannot lift a global ban or block by myself. At most, I can advocate limiting the block (e.g., reducing it from a global lock to a global block) so that it is possible for the users to provide explanations for the issues that brought their editing to the attention of CheckUsers and stewards. On a very surface level, it appears that they were adding poorly referenced or genuinely problematic content on more than one project, and that's pretty serious. Risker (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for responding @Risker
For context, these users were participating in this in-person and images of the event are here which is why I think their IP were flagged and thought to be one person.
Yes, I quite understand your not being a steward and that it will likely take time to resolve. However, I needed to invite an admin that will understand the circumstances of sharing same IP due to location for users coming from regions like Africa.
As for their contribution, they have been explained better on the importance of contributing meaningfully.
And yes, reducing it to global block will give them access to explain their circumstance to the Admins.
Thank you Risker and nice to connect here with you - even though it's based on a difficult situation like this. Lucy Iwuala (talk) 00:23, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Risker, I understand you mentioned it will take some time.
I'm just reaching out to also let you know that we still look forward to the response you might have for us.
Thank you. Lucy Iwuala (talk) 14:05, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi Lucy. I have done some preliminary review on this, and will be at Wikimania in the near future. Sometimes it works best when one can talk with the people who are most knowledgeable about a situation over a refreshing beverage, face to face. I haven't forgotten this. Risker (talk) 07:00, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello @Risker and thanks for getting back to me.
Sure, I look forward to the outcome of the discussion and wishing a safe flight to Wikimania - hopefully I get to meet you there as well as i will be attending. Lucy Iwuala (talk) 16:12, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 12

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:54, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

July 2026 Wikimedia Café meetups regarding Wikimedia governance and options for reform

edit
The logo for the Wikimedia Café

Hello! There will be two Wikimedia Café discussion opportunities in July. Both sessions will focus on Wikimedia governance, including possible follow-ups to the Movement Charter and options for reform. Participants may attend either or both Café sessions.

This month, to deconflict the Café meetups from Wikimania, the meetups will be held one day later than usual.

  1. 26 July 2026 15:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to the Americas, Africa, and Europe
  2. 27 July 2026 03:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to Asia and the Pacific

Please see the Café page for more information, including how to register!

cropped image of colored pencils

↠Pine () 03:11, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Signpost help request

edit

Hi. I submitted a signpost article here: Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Submissions#Why_Wiki_wouldn't_get_off_the_ground_today_and_why_it's_nosediving. Blueraspberry looked at it and asked I have a wiki friend look it over but I don't have any wiki friends, so I decided to ask you since your article is just above mine on that signpost page. If you don't mind, could you look it over and copyedit it? The actual draft is here: User:BlueRockThrush/Why Wiki wouldn't get off the ground today and why it's nosediving Thank you. BlueRockThrush (talk) 22:34, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi BlueRockThrush. I am literally about to get on a plane, and I am not sure that I will be in a position to help over the next two weeks. If you can find someone else to help you, that would be your best bet. The article topic is very interesting; I gave it a quick skim, and I think it is just the kind of topic that would work well for the Signpost. If you're still struggling to find some assistance in two weeks, ping me again and I will do what I can. Sorry to not be more help. Risker (talk) 14:30, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Articles for Creation backlog drive

edit

Hello Risker:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 5000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply