Reconrabbit

Talia Mae Bettcher Draft

Hi Myles, my name is Daniel (he/him). I'll be working on the Talia Mae Bettcher draft you submitted. Thank you for your contributions, I hope that I can help to establish notability and add reliable secondary sources. Full disclosure, I am working on behalf of Dr. Bettcher as a grad student and Trans Studies Fellow at CSULA. This is my first time working on an article so please feel free to leave me any feedback and I apologize in advance if I make any mistakes! TS Philosopher Daniel (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi Daniel. I moved the article on Talia Mae Bettcher, written by User:OnyekeEjike to a draft because it entirely relied on works that Bettcher was directly connected to. I appreciate you working on this article. If you can find references that establish notability under any of the criteria for Wikipedia:Notability (academics) you should do well. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 01:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Dragonfly reformist643 (15:02, 3 June 2026)

Hello! I recently submitted an edit request to update some outdated information on the University at Buffalo page. Whenever you might have a chance, would you be willing to take a look as an impartial editor? I would appreciate your review. Thank you! --Dragonfly reformist643 (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Turuchan pika has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Turuchan pika has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PeriodicEditor -- PeriodicEditor (talk) 04:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Burmese hare

On 7 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Burmese hare, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that populations of the Burmese hare (example pictured) may be increasing due to deforestation in Laos? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Burmese hare (2nd nomination). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Burmese hare), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:02, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Everhood is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Everhood is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 06:22, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

@A412, have you been able to look at my revisions to the Reception section? -- Reconrabbit (talk) 19:45, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

I've been out of town, so not yet. I'll try to get a look in today. ~ A412 ^talk! 20:05, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Jaryon on 100 Women in Finance (16:51, 7 June 2026)

Hello , how do I create citation? --Jaryon (talk) 16:51, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Jaryon, you can find a guide to doing this at Help:Referencing for beginners -- Reconrabbit (talk) 22:22, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for San Diego California Temple

San Diego California Temple has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:22, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from ChiMbanefo (09:28, 8 June 2026)

Hello Mentor!

Finding it a bit challenging creating an infobox for the biography page of "Oskar Ibru" via my mobile device. It seems i require a laptop to carry out that feature and i currently don't own one.

Please help improve the page! Thanks --ChiMbanefo (talk) 09:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	For your hard work with GA reviews! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:26, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jobo International

Hello, Reconrabbit. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jobo International".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:25, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition of Reconrabbit for accumulating at least 25 points in the May 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 14884 articles during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 15:57, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of White-sided jackrabbit is under review

Your good article nomination of the article White-sided jackrabbit is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wikipedian12512 -- Wikipedian12512 (talk) 22:08, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Speckled spiny tree-rat

On 15 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Speckled spiny tree-rat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that of the three specimens used to describe the speckled spiny tree-rat (pictured), only part of a skull remains? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Speckled spiny tree-rat. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Speckled spiny tree-rat), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:53, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Seyamtop10 on Kotlin (02:13, 17 June 2026)

Bhb --Seyamtop10 (talk) 02:13, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Alchemistal (21:01, 17 June 2026)

Hello! I am very new to editing. How would I insert a '[needs citation]', '[needs verification]' or similar hyperlink to an article? And what are the essential hyperlinks to have on hand before approaching editing an article?

Thank you! --Alchemistal (talk) 21:01, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. What you are referring to are templates. There is much to learn about them at that link. I will provide more information in a bit when I am not trying to get to a train. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 21:07, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

I added a welcome message to your talk page, which should have done useful links. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 22:17, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

{{cn}} is a template for "citation needed". You won't need much knowledge of templates unless/until you start dealing with fancy formats like the "infobox" that appears in the top right of many big articles. —Antonissimo (talk) 20:13, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of White-sided jackrabbit has passed

Your good article nomination of the article White-sided jackrabbit has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wikipedian12512 -- Wikipedian12512 (talk) 19:28, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Assurance Chibuike Okwudili (06:29, 20 June 2026)

Hello, please how do I add wiki Link across articles --Assurance Chibuike Okwudili (talk) 06:29, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Looks like you have done so a hundred times. Do you mean you want to link to a specific section of an article? —Antonissimo (talk) 09:12, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from شما را بشناسد (10:52, 20 June 2026)

اسما --شما را بشناسد (talk) 10:52, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Everhood has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Everhood has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 15:22, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

European rabbit scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that European rabbit has been scheduled as today's featured article for 14 August 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2026, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2026. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be posted there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 14:52, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from U1ajl5xge2 (21:42, 26 June 2026)

Hey! I would really appreciate some help looking over and critiquing the article Hopton, Derbyshire, if possible. I think I've edited and made it the best it could be, but I'm worried that since I've spent so much time on it, I might be blind to any flaws. I'm specifically worried on if it's too long, or if the detail in it isn't relevant to the village itself. --U1ajl5xge2 (talk) 21:42, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello @U1ajl5xge2, I think you've put together an excellent article here. I don't see any part as being "overly detailed", but geographic regions aren't my specialty - I've only written a brief bit on Lake Oscawana, which has a much shorter history of occupation and little to review historically. Article length is broadly limited by WP:PAGESIZE, which stipulates that an article should be trimmed or split once it reaches about 10,000 words. Hopton, Derbyshire is well below that limit, as it barely reaches 3,000 words. If you are looking for a more detailed review, you are welcome to submit the article to Good Article nominations, though I'm sure the first thing they would note upon seeing it is that a couple sentences that are otherwise obvious could use footnotes (Hopton was a part of the East Midlands constituency, Bus routes that serve Hopton include the 110 and 111 to Ashbourne and Matlock, The school uses the Gell family crest as its logo...). -- Reconrabbit (talk) 22:10, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from AllenBB1007 (12:39, 28 June 2026)

Hi! How do I make a new wiki for something? No one made something about it yet. Thanks. :) --AllenBB1007 (talk) 12:39, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

WP:Your first article —Antonissimo (talk) 03:22, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, while peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• MCE89 (submissions) with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews
• Reconrabbit (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews
• A.Cython (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews
• Generalissima (submissions) with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pearl de Wisdom has been accepted

Pearl de Wisdom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

guninvalid (talk) 14:23, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

You're invited to the Mentorship noticeboard

Hi, Reconrabbit. You are cordially invited to the brand new Wikipedia:Mentorship noticeboard. I get the impression sometimes that we mentors are each toiling in our own cubbyhole or hamster wheel, quietly answering mentee questions with little to no interaction with other mentors. I think we have a lot to share and learn from each other, and I know it will make me feel better just having the opportunity to interact with you and other mentors there, and I hope it will for you, too. Looking forward to hearing your feedback. Please take the § Survey when you get there! Mathglot (talk) 00:49, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Question from Communitycharitychampion (14:43, 5 July 2026)

Good afternoon I am wanting to create a page for myself due to my professional career evolving --Communitycharitychampion (talk) 14:43, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. You can do this on Linkedin or Facebook. Wikipedia does not host articles on people without sources that are independent of them. You might find more information at this page: WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 00:26, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Re: A warning/threat of Wikipedia action

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question, and your feedback is duly noted. I asked for an admin because (the threat of) admin power was being invoked.

I have a follow-up question. My understanding of WP:ARBINFO is that it's a last resort in the dispute process. Without going into too much background, Petextrodon said they would take things to arbitration even though they haven't used my talk page or WP:ANI for any issues with my conduct. I want to clarify: they can skip steps in the process and go straight to arbitration? SinhalaLion (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

You are correct that arbitration is the last resort in dispute resolution.

They have discussed their problems with your editing at the talk page of the article in question. If you are aware that you are in a contentious topic area and make edits that go against consensus, then a case may be made at WP:AE. Here, it is much more structured than WP:ANI, and restrictions are placed on editors if it is necessary based on editing behaviour. A full arbitration case is not needed. At this page in particular, it is not as clear what the restrictions are besides WP:ECR (doesn't apply to you or the person who disputes your edits, since you are both extended-confirmed), so they would have to prove you are making edits that go against consensus to have action taken. Same goes for you, against them.

At this point it seems premature for anyone to go to noticeboards unless they have more proof than I am aware of. See how all the sections at WP:AE have a lot of links to diffs with information on how they violate existing restrictions? -- Reconrabbit (talk) 17:38, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Vieira's spiny tree-rat

On 8 July 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vieira's spiny tree-rat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that only two specimens of Vieira's spiny tree-rat are known to exist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vieira's spiny tree-rat. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Vieira's spiny tree-rat), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

EggRoll97 ^(talk) 00:04, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Question from Hassan Creations.Fx (19:50, 9 July 2026)

How can my article publish instantly? --Hassan Creations.Fx (talk) 19:50, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

You should gain more experience with editing Wikipedia before thinking about publishing an article. Otherwise, you are likely to end up with a deleted article. I will send you some information on your talk page. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 20:13, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

One last question from Draft to Article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:AY_Young -- Just circling back to this am i just waiting for approval to go to article now. Apologize for so many step by step questions I feel so lost on this platform Dougkimeditor (talk) 20:00, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Dougkimeditor, can I please ask whether you've used AI/LLM to produce any parts of the draft? I'm seeing some formatting and phrasing that seems a bit familiar, so I wanted to double check that with you. In solidarity, Blue-Sonnet (I'm listening) 20:23, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

This time i wrote myself! That was a issue before but now NO! this was ALL ME! Dougkimeditor (talk) 20:41, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

I had help from 2 or 3 wiki people not to use spellcheck that is controlled by AI and to abandon AY for formatting etc. you can probably see how many weeks I worked and tweaked all this Dougkimeditor (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

That's totally fine, I just wanted to check with you so you don't run into any trouble going forwards. In solidarity, Blue-Sonnet (I'm listening) 21:02, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Not a problem! Happy to! It’s been months of work on this thing I have to make it happen too much blood sweat! ~2026-29820-29 (talk) 21:05, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

I've also got a couple of suggestions on a brief overview - section headers need to be in sentence case rather than title case, and external links should only be in the references (inline citations only in the article body) or a dedicated External link section.

There are probably further improvements, unfortunately we've got a bit of a heatwave and my phone is getting rather hot so I'll have to leave it at that for now! Feel free to ask for help at the Teahouse too. In solidarity, Blue-Sonnet (I'm listening) 20:31, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Please send suggestions adn tell me how to submit so I can get published... Dougkimeditor (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Peter Orszag

Hi Reconrabbit, thanks again for your help a few months back on Peter R. Orszag's article. My recent request; Talk:Peter R. Orszag#Suggested additions was declined by a different editor. I'd appreciate a second review here — if you think the section is appropriate, it would be great if you could create it. Alternatively, I'm happy to draft a shorter version. I look forward to your thoughts either way. Thanks! Fvfnyc (talk) 01:40, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

I have to agree with Spintendo here. Orszag's membership of any one of these organizations as an advisor or trustee would be undue detail to include in this article, as there is no indication that any of these positions are on their own notable besides 'advisor to the National Academy of Medicine'. If there were articles detailing his involvement with, say, the Carnegie Endowment, then perhaps it would be worth including, but just having his name on a list of committee members is not particularly useful for a reader (what does it mean that he's a trustee or advisor? what did he advise or endow to this organization that got him on this board?). -- Reconrabbit (talk) 13:42, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Question from RaidenVolt (00:02, 16 July 2026)

Hi! Noticed that some articles include references but without specific page numbers. Some of them don't even have a link where you can verify the source. Another thing is that some references don't really confirm the the statements or claims made. What could we do in this case. I don't want to get into an editing war; I just want to point out a poorly sourced or edited article and, if possible, provide accurate references, citations, etc. --RaidenVolt (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello @RaidenVolt! It's good that you are looking out for this. A first step to take, if you want to encourage editors to fix an identified problem, is to add maintenance templates to an article in-line where appropriate. In the first case, you can use {{Page number needed}}. In the second case, try {{Full citation needed}} In the third case, the best to use is {{Failed verification}}. Of course, if the information is particularly problematic, you can remove the text entirely and describe your reasoning for why it should be removed (or replaced with better-referenced material) in the edit summary. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 12:08, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Bold ~2026-40245-38 (talk) 16:41, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Is this link relevant>? -- Reconrabbit (talk) 18:14, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Really helpful advice! I was also considering providing further feedback on the Talk page as well but I don't want to overdo it. RaidenVolt (talk) 23:08, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello Reconrabbit:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 5000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Question from Imaginationvibes3 (19:29, 19 July 2026)

https://w.wiki/rV --Imaginationvibes3 (talk) 19:29, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Do you have a question about how to upload images to Wikipedia? -- Reconrabbit (talk) 20:49, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Neglected (film)

Hi Reconrabbit, I notice that you removed the LLMPROD on this article. 40% of the remaining text is still the problem editor's (checked with mw:Who Wrote That? and I'm wondering how confident you are that all claims have been checked against sources. In my painful experience with this particular case (see WP:AINB § User:Global Donald) there are a lot of subtle sourcing errors--the sources exist but don't say what they're claimed to say.

If you're confident, let me know and I can mark it as resolved. M kuhner (talk) 06:01, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I'm confident that this article does not have text-source integrity issues. The announcement date matches up, and the premise is consistent between the article and Deadline's report. Financing information is accurate per https://www.joblo.com/the-neglected/ and the early script-writing info matches Toronto Film School's blog. Same source confirms it was shot in December 2024 at Clinton, MI. All of the Release information is accurate as well. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 12:01, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll mark it as resolved. Just had to check as we've had a few unfounded deprods. This editor wrote over 600 articles, so you can appreciate it's been hard to give each one the attention it deserves. M kuhner (talk) 14:58, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Understood, thank you for checking. Since the trouble with oxygen generating biomaterial a week or two ago I've been more careful about checking sources. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For coordinating the June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 20 July 2026 (UTC)