MiitomoChris

January 2023

Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, RuPaul's Drag Race (season 6), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Drag Race contestant edits

Hello, I noticed that you have been making multiple and repeated disruptive edits the “Contestants” sections on various Drag Race articles. Firstly, all information on Wikipedia must be based on a reliable source (see WP:RS); in these articles, the cited sources are typically articles in major magazines announcing the cast of each season, with cast member hometowns listed. The hometowns on wikipedia articles must match what is listed in these sources (i.e., if the source says New York City, do not change to Manhattan or Brooklyn). Secondly, Wikipedia articles must comply with the Manual of Style. there is a section describing how geographical locations are to be linked. please familiarize yourself with WP:GEOLINK before reformatting the links for geographical locations.

Thanks! Griffindaly (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

NYC and Los Angeles is just boring lol. All of the NYC queens that I had made more specific were from interviews or major magazines when they went into detail where they live. For example, Bob was listed as being from Queens in that vulture article that had the front facing photos. Salina was on another shows around drag race and she was listed as being from Stockton, California. Stockton is in LA and she was from LA during her season.

Even the queens who had spefific cities were sometimes listed as just NYC and LA (Laganja was from Van Nuys but was just listed as LA, same with Shangie being from Studio City and Cracker being in Harlem)

It's really not a big deal being specific. I feel like it brings more character and im not lying about it either, I either use the drag race fan wiki or a interview to make sure that it's a trusted source. MiitomoChris (talk) 22:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

if you are using sources to make these changes, you must provide a citation. again, please review WP:RS for the appropriate guidelines. (the drag race fan wiki is not a reliable source, and interviews before or after someone’s time on drag race are not relevant to an article about their time as a contestant) Griffindaly (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

see also WP:CITE for information on how to provide citations Griffindaly (talk) 18:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Unsourced edits

Please refrain from making edits without citing a reliable source, as has previously been addressed, in Drag Race season article contestant tables. Griffindaly (talk) 06:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello MiitomoChris! Your additions to List of school shootings in the United States (before 2000) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Long Islanders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lawrence, New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Sourcing violations on The Real World articles

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with with your edits to various articles on seasons of The Real World, including Miami, Back to New York, Las Vegas (2002 season), Chicago, Paris, Philadelphia, Austin, San Diego (2011 season), and St. Thomas.

As at least two other editors discussed with you above, this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of victims of the September 11 attacks (A–G), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenville, New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Frank De Martini

Please stop adding uncited material and poorly cited material to articles, as you did with these edits to Frank De Martini, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy, something that and other editors have already warned you about multiple times on this talk page.

Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. An unknown YouTube channel is not a reliable sources, and multiple passages or paragraphs that you added in your edits included no citations at all. In addition to this, you added a mention of the elderly man carried down the stairs, when that was already mentioned in the section. Nightscream (talk) 02:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Laila McQueen

I'm glad to see that you created the page for the queen Laila McQueen. I've added the link to several other pages *and* added it to the RPDR Template and added that template to the article. A few Suggestions for making an even better page.

• References should generally be more than just the URL. See WP:REFB or look at some of the better pages about queens, for example Bianca Del Rio.
• Create a new conversation about having added the queen on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drag Race (aka WT:RPDR). That helps others who write articles about Drag Race that the article has been created so others can do things like link it or add information they might have.
• Join the Wikipedia project at Wikipedia:WikiProject Drag Race.

Once again, glad to see the article.Naraht (talk) 15:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kahanna Montrese, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jp×g 00:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello, I'm Another Believer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not use social media or blogs sites to add details to biographies. Journalistic reliable sources are preferred. --Another Believer _(Talk) 20:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Sources

Hello! I appreciate your attempts to update Wikipedia entries, but Facebook and other social media sites are not considered reliable sources, so please do not use such websites to add claims to biographies of living people. Feel free to add back any claims I've reverted using reliable sources such as newspapers and magazines. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

People in the past used Twitter for reliable sources for queens like Aja. Sadly, there's not many interviews for the Dragula performers. MiitomoChris (talk) 19:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evah Destruction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honduran.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Jade Sotomayor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jade Sotomayor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Sotomayor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheLongTone (talk) 13:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Maddelynn Hatter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maddelynn Hatter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maddelynn Hatter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

4meter4 (talk) 03:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Esther Ku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Korean.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

Hi MiitomoChris! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Divine (performer) and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 03:54, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Support for RPDR Article

Hi @MiitomoChris. I recently posted an article for Akashia (drag queen) and someone immediately nominated it for deletion. I would appreciate it if you would take a moment to visit the deletion discussion and add your voice why she should have an article.

Appreciate it.

BadNewsBear (talk) 04:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

of course! MiitomoChris (talk) 05:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Evah Destruction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evah Destruction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evah Destruction (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--woodensuperman 12:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Dollya Black for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dollya Black is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dollya Black (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--woodensuperman 12:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Cynthia Doll for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cynthia Doll is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cynthia Doll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--woodensuperman 12:43, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Categories

Hi, Chris! Thanks for all your categorizing work on drag queen articles.

I noticed you recently added Category:Drag performers from New York (state) to some articles that are already in Category:Drag performers from New York City. I wanted to note that, per WP:SUBCAT, pages (and subcategories) should not usually be placed in both a given category and any of its subcategories or parent categories.

For categories based on geographical places, that typically translates to placing the page in only the category for the most specific location, as the more specific cat is itself already included inside the more general cat.

Hope that makes sense, and thank you again for all your cat work! Armadillopteryx 00:07, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Good to know lol. Thanks for letting me know! MiitomoChris (talk) 00:39, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:09, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Which edit are you referring to, if you don't mind me asking? MiitomoChris (talk) 17:11, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

This one where you implied Danny Antonucci is skilled at arts with your use of the subjective term "talent", which is another way of saying someone is good at something. We shouldn't treat our opinions on him as facts. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:16, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Mayu Iizuka when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 07:36, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi MiitomoChris! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Otis Redding and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ligaturama (talk) 08:01, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ligaturama. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Otis Redding, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ligaturama (talk) 08:02, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Brown Ladd (May 17)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

There is a source here that I can't easily just delete, and it's using Simry. This is an AI tool, and we just can't source to AI. Current source 6. Notability otherwise seems to be OK.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Joseph Brown Ladd to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 13:31, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, MiitomoChris! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 13:31, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

I changed the 6th source and resubmitted it! MiitomoChris (talk) 20:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on John Amis

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page John Amis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:18, 21 May 2026 (UTC)