GoldRingChip

User Page

Talk Pages

Toolset

To do

sandbox

sb2

sb3

Anniversaries

First edit

Hey, GoldRingChip. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:10, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Administratorship

Congratulations, you are now an administrator! If you haven't already, now is the time to visit the Wikipedia:New admin school and look through the Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide and Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Warofdreams talk 02:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! Pedro |  Chat  07:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations GoldRingChip, and keep up the good work. --CapitalR 17:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations. I expect we'll be working together a lot.--Appraiser 17:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Wishing GoldRingChip a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Mjs1991 (talk) 08:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Wishing GoldRingChip a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for being such great admins for this site! (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:42, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:Barons Strange family tree

Template:Barons Strange family tree has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Titles

GoldRingChip,

peerage titles are part of legal names. It is completely wrong to write Forenames Surname (born-died) Title.

Please, don't do such changes.

GorgonaJS2 (talk) GorgonaJS2 (talk) 12:15, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

• Thank you for sending me this message. —GoldRingChip 12:27, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Edit summary for unusual edit

An edit summary is usually required, but especially for an edit like this. You changed the username in someone's talk post. I can guess why, but an edit summary would make it clear that this sort of edit is not malicious. This edit summary was great. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:42, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

• You are 100% correct! I forgot the edit summary early in this renaming process, but added it as I went on. —GoldRingChip 17:16, 3 July 2026 (UTC)