Welcome!

edit

Hello, Calhetan77, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created, such as Lombada dos Marinheiros, may not meet Wikipedia's content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources. Articles must be written in a neutral manner and may not contain AI generated material.

Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you'd like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  JavaHurricane 14:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lombada dos Marinheiros

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lombada dos Marinheiros requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. JavaHurricane 14:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lombada dos Marinheiros for draftification

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lombada dos Marinheiros is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be draftified.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lombada dos Marinheiros until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

GreenRedFlag (talk) 15:17, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

why? ~2026-30472-46 (talk) 08:20, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
article is correct I dont understand what is problem ~2026-30472-46 (talk) 09:59, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lombada dos Marinheiros for deletion

edit

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lombada dos Marinheiros, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lombada dos Marinheiros until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Listing for discussion of Template:Calheta parishes

edit

icon Template:Calheta parishes has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:35, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Gnomingstuff. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:56, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madalena do Mar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Although I believe you are already notified quite often, your actions have caught the attention of the AI use noticeboard. It would be best to cease editing for a while until this is resolved. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 13:02, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I'm SenshiSun. While reviewing the pages from the AI noticeboard, I found several references that appeared to be incomplete (linking to a homepage), had incorrect page names, or did not contain the claim they cited. Would you mind explaining how these errors happened? I know Wikipedia's automatic citation system can create strange citations. SenshiSun (talk) 19:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Stop icon You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Madalena do Mar. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 07:02, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

AI slop

edit

i have a really good idea. How about you help keep AI slop off wikipedia instead of adding more of it? Masterhatch (talk) 09:22, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your idea is so stupid as you why you delete coat of arms of Madalena do Mar you are really stupid . Calhetan77 (talk) 09:24, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
i suggest you apologise. Masterhatch (talk) 09:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
This user has already been warned about AI use, and that tone is uncivil. I suggest you both apologize for Wikipedia:Civility issues. SenshiSun (talk) 19:21, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I also suggest you self-revert at Madalena do Mar and then rewrite in your own words — aka without LLMs. It reads like ai slop and there's formatting errors only ai makes. There is no place for LLMs on wikipedia. Thank you. Masterhatch (talk) 10:25, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

same person?

edit

june 2026

edit

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is editors using LLM-generated text at Madalena do Mar, possible socking?. ~2026-35622-93 (talk) 21:56, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Calhetan77 reported by User:Speederzzz (Result: ). Thank you. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 11:01, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026

edit
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:48, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply