Talk:Super Bowl
| This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Super Bowl was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. Review: March 1, 2006. (Reviewed version). |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 11 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
"2030 Super Bowl" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect 2030 Super Bowl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § 2030 Super Bowl until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
External links
edit- Section review: Removed links that were either book advertising, showing absolutely nothing "unique", or dead links.
- ELpoints #3):
Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
- LINKFARM:
There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
- ELMIN:
Minimize the number of links
. -- - ELCITE:
Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.
- Please note:
- WP:ELBURDEN:
Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them
. -- Otr500 (talk) 13:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Roman Numerals
editCan I add numbers next to roman numerals to help people who do not know Roman numerals understand them? It would be like Super Bowl LIV (54) turtlem :D 02:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Well can I? turtlem :D 12:37, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
"Handegg championship" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Handegg championship has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 31 § Handegg championship until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 00:26, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
"two best teams from each conference"
edit4 teams? Should that be "2 best teams, one from each conference"? ~2025-36388-15 (talk) 22:32, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Viewership Placement
edit"Its viewership is bested by the UEFA Champions League final, FIFA World Cup, Tour de France, Cricket World Cup, FIFA Women's World Cup, Summer Olympic Games, and the Winter Olympic games as the most watched sporting event worldwide..." - The list doesn’t really fit. The Super Bowl takes place on a single day, whereas apart from the Champions League final, the others span several days. In that case, you could also compare the MLB season, with 70 million, to the Super Bowl. However, if you were to compare only the finals of the tournaments, the Cricket World Cup (300 million) and the (Soccer) World Cup (1,400 million) would still rank higher than the Super Bowl. sугсго . PEDIA 08:08, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- So, what exactly are you suggesting? - Adolphus79 (talk) 12:29, 24 June 2026 (UTC)